Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:49:33.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Representation of Self versus Others’ Actions

from Part IV - Understanding Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

By
John A. Dewey  and
Günther Knoblich
Edited by
Sukhvinder S. Obhi  and
Emily S. Cross
Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Emily S. Cross
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Get access

Summary

Abstract

In many social settings, people are expected to respond to and anticipate the actions of others. Everyday examples include team sports, card games and normal conversations. Clearly, an important aspect of social cognition is thinking about and planning for other agents’ actions. But what processes are involved in thinking about others’ actions, as opposed to one’s own actions? This chapter introduces some broad ideas about the possible sensorimotor foundations of action representation in both self and other, drawing on recent findings from the fields of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The chapter is organized around three themes: (1) how action experience shapes the representation of others’ actions; (2) action affordances and the representation of space in relation to self and other; and (3) distinguishing self and other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shared Representations
Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life
 , pp. 351 - 373
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assal, F., Schwartz, S., & Vuilleumier, P. (2007). Moving with or without will: Functional neural correlates of alien hand syndrome. Annals of Neurology, 62(3), 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banissy, M. J., Cohen Kadosh, R., Maus, G. W., Walsh, V., & Ward, J. (2009). Prevalence, characteristics and a neurocognitive model of mirror-touch synaesthesia. Experimental Brain Research, 198(2–3), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behmer, L. P. J., & Jantzen, K. J. (2011). Reading sheet music facilitates sensorimotor mu-desynchronization in musicians. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(7), 1342–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisiach, E., Rusconi, M. L., & Vallar, G. (1991). Remission of somatoparaphrenic delusion through vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 29(10), 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaesi, S., & Wilson, M. (2010). The mirror reflects both ways: Action influences perception of others. Brain and Cognition, 72(2), 306–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 237–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1(7), 635–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, C. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(1), 114–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1490–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardellicchio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2012). Grasping affordances with the other’s hand: A TMS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16(1), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaminade, T., & Decety, J. (2002). Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1975–1978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claxton, G. (1975). Why can’t we tickle ourselves? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 335–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Sinigaglia, C., & Gallese, V. (2011a). Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2658–2663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costantini, M., Committeri, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011b). Ready both to your and to my hands: Mapping the action space of others. PLoS One, 6(4), e17923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravo, A., Claessens, P. E., & Baldo, M. C. (2009). Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding. Experimental Brain Research, 199(1), 95–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Alonzo, M., & Cipriani, C. (2012). Vibrotactile sensory substitution elicits feeling of ownership of an alien hand. PLoS One, 7(11), e50756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daprati, E., Wriessnegger, S., & Lacquaniti, F. (2007). Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions. Experimental Brain Research, 177(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, T. J., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39(12), 1624–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Della Sala, S., Marchetti, C., & Spinnler, H. (1991). Right-sided anarchic (alien) hand: A longitudinal study. Neuropsychologia, 29(11), 1113–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desantis, A., Weiss, C., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2012a). Believing and perceiving: Authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS One, 7(5), e37959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desantis, A., Weiss, C., & Waszak, F. (2012b). Believing and perceiving: Authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS One, 7(5), e37959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. A., & Carr, T. H. (2013a). Predictable and self-initiated visual motion is judged to be slower than computer generated motion. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 987–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. A., (2013b). When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. A., Seiffert, A. E., & Carr, T. H. (2010). Taking credit for success: The phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diersch, N., Cross, E., Stadler, W., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Rieger, M. (2012). Representing others’ actions: The role of expertise in the aging mind. Psychological Research, 76(4), 525–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, J. P., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317(5841), 1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305(5685), 875–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85(5), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engbert, K., Wohlschläger, A., & Haggard, P. (2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107(2), 693–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, A., & Keller, P. E. (2011). The perception of musical spontaneity in improvised and imitated jazz performances. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrer, C., Bouchereau, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N. (2008a). Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behavioural Neurology, 19(1–2), 53–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrer, C., Frey, S., Van Horn, J., Tunik, E., Turk, D., et al. (2008b). The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cerebral Cortex, 18(2), 254–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, I. (1978). Efference copy and corollary discharge: Implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4(4), 636–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festinger, L., & Canon, L. K. (1965). Information about spatial location based on knowledge about efference. Psychological Review, 72(5), 378–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Halligan, P. W., Frith, C. D., Driver, J., et al. (1999). The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain, 122(3), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. (2005). The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4), 752–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C., & Done, J. (1989). Experiences of alien control in schizophrenia reflect a disorder in the central monitoring of action. Psychological Medicine, 19, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2003). Sense of agency and higher-order cognition: Levels of explanation for schizophrenia. Cognitive Semiotics. http://kfil.upol.cz/hpo2003/gall03.html.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R. E. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Graziano, M., Yap, G., & Gross, C. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266(5187), 1054–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holst, E. von. (1954). Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behavior, 2, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(05), 849–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7(14), 2325–2330.Google ScholarPubMed
Isenhower, R. W., Richardson, M. J., Carello, C., Baron, R. M., & Marsh, K. L. (2010). Affording cooperation: Embodied constraints, dynamics, and action-scaled invariance in joint lifting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 342–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishibashi, H., Hihara, S., & Iriki, A. (2000). Acquisition and development of monkey tool-use: Behavioral and kinematic analyses. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 78(11), 958–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research, 142(1–2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, simulation, and self-identification. Mind and Language, 19(2), 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. S. (2009). The development of imitation in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2325–2335. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khemlani, S. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2011). When one model casts doubt on another: A levels-of-analysis approach to causal discounting. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Kircher, T. (2004). Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 657–666.Google ScholarPubMed
Kumar, D., & Srinivasan, N. (2013). Hierarchical control and sense of agency: Differential effects on control on implicit and explicit measure of agency. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kumar, D., (2014). Naturalizing sense of agency with a hierarchical event-control approach. PLoS One, 9(3), e92431.Google ScholarPubMed
Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(2), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leube, D., Knoblich, G., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M., & Kircher, T. (2003). The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. NeuroImage, 20(4), 2084–2090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maister, L., Banissy, M. J., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Mirror-touch synaesthesia changes representations of self-identity. Neuropsychologia, 51(5), 802–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54(3), 702–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 184–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J.,Metcalfe, J., Van Snellenberg, J. X., DeRosse, P., Balsam, P., & Malhotra, A. K. (2012). Judgements of agency in schizophrenia: An impairment in autonoetic metacognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1391–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., Currie, G., & Ziegler, F. (2009). Two routes to perspective: Simulation and rule-use as approaches to mentalizing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 513–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to ‘e’motion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. W., & Haggard, P. (2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 136–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 1056–1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Münsterberg, H. (1888). Die Willenshandlung [The Voluntary Action]. Freiburg: Mohr.Google Scholar
Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 655–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., Barca, L., Bocconi, A. L., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers. Brain and Cognition, 73(1), 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Iodice, P., Ferraina, S., & Kessler, K. (2013). Shared action spaces: A basis function framework for social re-calibration of sensorimotor representations supporting joint action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poonian, S. K., & Cunningham, R. (2013). Intentional binding in self-made and observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramenzoni, V. C., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Davis, T. (2008). An information-based approach to action understanding. Cognition, 106(2), 1059–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 264–274. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, A. (2008). Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequences of others’ actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition, 94(3), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnell, K., Heekeren, K., Schnitker, R., Daumann, J., Weber, J., et al. (2007). An fMRI approach to particularize the frontoparietal network for visuomotor action monitoring: Detection of incongruence between test subjects’ actions and resulting perceptions. NeuroImage, 34(1), 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sforza, A., Bufalari, I., Haggard, P., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Social Neuroscience, 5(2), 148–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shergill, S. S., Bays, P. M., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003). Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation. Science, 301(5630), 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skerry, A. E., Carey, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). First-person action experience reveals sensitivity to action efficiency in prereaching infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46), 18728–18733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B. F. (1948). ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2005). Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancy. Cognition, 95(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants’ perception of others’ actions. Cognition, 96(1), B1–B11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009). Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage, 46(1), 290–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43(6), 482–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strother, L, House, K. A., & Obhi, S. S. (2010). Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Voss, M. (2013). The experience of agency: An interplay between prediction and postdiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsakiris, M. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PLoS One, 3(12), e4040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsakiris, M., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Gallagher, S. (2007). On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(3), 645–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakiris, M., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Costantini, M. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one’s body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717), 2470–2476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallar, G., & Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 533–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48(3), 564–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, M., Ingram, J. N., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2005). Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nature Neuroscience, 9(1), 26–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D., Sparrow, B., & Winerman, L. (2004). Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 838–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, C., Herwig, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2011). The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds. Cognition, 121(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, C., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2012). Vicarious action preparation does not result in sensory attenuation of auditory action effects. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1654–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Epstein, W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 880–888.Google ScholarPubMed
Wohlschläger, A., Haggard, P., Gesierich, B., & Prinz, W. (2003). The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychological Science, 14(6), 586–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×