Book contents
- Encounters at the Counter
- Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics
- Encounters at the Counter
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Encounters at the Counter
- 2 Approaching the Counter at the Supermarket
- 3 Customers’ Inquiries about Products
- 4 Offering a Taste in Gourmet Food Shops
- 5 Embodied Trajectories of Actions in Shop Encounters
- 6 Unpacking Packing
- 7 The Request-Return Sequence
- 8 Moving Money
- Appendix Transcription Conventions
- Index
- References
2 - Approaching the Counter at the Supermarket
Decision-Making and the Accomplishment of Couplehood
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2023
Book contents
- Encounters at the Counter
- Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics
- Encounters at the Counter
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Encounters at the Counter
- 2 Approaching the Counter at the Supermarket
- 3 Customers’ Inquiries about Products
- 4 Offering a Taste in Gourmet Food Shops
- 5 Embodied Trajectories of Actions in Shop Encounters
- 6 Unpacking Packing
- 7 The Request-Return Sequence
- 8 Moving Money
- Appendix Transcription Conventions
- Index
- References
Summary
Focusing on supermarkets in a Swiss Italian city, this chapter explores the interactional work that couples shopping together do before finally arriving at the counter to make a request. While some requests arise from a need that was stated at the very beginning of the shopping expedition (e.g., ‘I need cheese’) and which then guide the pair to a specific counter at the store, other requests arise from something said or seen in the course of traversing the store. It is shown that even needs or wishes that were expressed at the beginning of the interaction can undergo transformation. Potential purchasable items proffered by one member of the pair may be modified or rejected by the other, and in this process the pair enacts a particular kind of relationship, being a committed couple, in which both parties have a say in food that is to be purchased and prepared for specific meals. The study shows that requests emerge incrementally over the course of interactions, and are situated in particular interactional, material, and economy-oriented environments
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Encounters at the CounterThe Organization of Shop Interactions, pp. 37 - 72Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014Google Scholar
Aston, G. (1995). In reference to the role of openings to service encounters. Cahiers de linguistique française, 16(1), 89–111.Google Scholar
Best, K. (2012). Making museum tours better: Understanding what a guided tour really is and what a tour guide really does. Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.644695Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884166Google Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2006). Le chiusure conversazionali nell’interazione al banco di un supermercato [Conversational closings in the interaction at a supermarket counter]. In Bürki, Y. & De Stefani, E., eds., Trascrivere la lingua: Dalla filologia all’analisi conversazionale. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 369–403.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2010). Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice: Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours. In Pettorino, M., Giannini, A., Chiari, I., & Dovetto, F., eds., Spoken Communication. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 137–170.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2011). “Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono.” Agire come coppia al supermercato. Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali [“Oh wait here, I’m getting these, cos I like them.” Acting as a couple at the supermarket. A conversational and multimodal approach to the analysis of decision-making]. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2013). The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple. In Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M., eds., Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2014). Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store: How practices of categorisation matter. In Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M., eds., Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.12steGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, E. (2019). Ordering and serving coffee in an Italian café: How customers obtain ‘their’ coffee. In Day, D. & Wagner, J., eds., Objects, Bodies and Work Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 113–139. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924535-008Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Mondada, L. (2010). Die Eröffnung von sozialen Begegnungen im öffentlichen Raum. Die emergente Koordination der räumlichen, visuellen und verbalen Handlungen [Opening social encounters in open space. The emerging coordination of spatial, visual and verbal actions]. In Mondada, L. & Schmitt, R., eds., Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 103–170.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Mondada, L. (2014). Reorganizing mobile formations: When ‘guided’ participants initiate reorientations in guided tours. Space and Culture, 17(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508504Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Mondada, L. (2018). Encounters in public space: How acquainted versus unacquainted persons establish social and spatial arrangements. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485230Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., Sambre, P., & Van De Mieroop, D. (2016). The interactional history of examples and parentheses: Note-taking practices in multiparty interaction among attendees of a mutual-help group for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) sufferers. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 110–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.04desGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2015). The alignment of manual and verbal displays in requests for the repair of an object. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058608Google Scholar
Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2016). Rethinking format: An examination of requests. Language in Society, 45(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Spaces: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as a situated practice. In Kita, S., ed., Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 217–241. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607744Google Scholar
Harjunpää, K., Mondada, L., & Svinhufvud, K. (2018). The coordinated entry into service encounters in food shops: Managing interactional space, availability, and service during openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485231Google Scholar
Heinemann, T., & Koivisto, A. (2016). Indicating a change-of-state in interaction: Cross-linguistic explorations. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.002Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds., Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, J., ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1Google Scholar
Keisanen, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2012). The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724985Google Scholar
Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Suspending action: From simultaneous to consecutive ordering of multiple courses of action. In Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M., eds., Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.04keiGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making, Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In Selting, M. & Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.08mazGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. W. (1976). Resources for Saying in Service Encounters. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1957). The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hesperis, 44, 31–71.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2012). Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences. In Nasu, H. & Chaput Waksler, F., eds., Interaction and Everyday Life. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 293–311.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M., eds., Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–75. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.02monGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2016). Making multiple requests in French and Finnish convenience stores. Language in Society, 45(5), 733–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000646Google Scholar
Pitsch, K. (2012). Exponat – Alltagsgegenstand – Turngerät: Zur interaktiven Konstitution von Objekten in einer Museumsausstellung [Exhibit – everyday object – gym equipment: On the interactive constitution of objects in a museum exhibition]. In Schmitt, R., Mondada, L., & Hausendorf, H., eds., Raum als interaktionale Ressource. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 233–273.Google Scholar
Poggi, I. (1981). Le interiezioni. Studio del linguaggio e analisi della mente [Interjections. The analysis of language and the analysis of the mind]. Turin: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Rossano, F. (2010). Questioning and responding in Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2756–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, G. (2015). The Request System in Italian Interaction, Nijmegen: Ipskamp Drukkers.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In Sudnow, D., ed., Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 31–74.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vols 1 & 2. Ed. by Jefferson, G.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2010). Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes, 47(2), 130–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380Google Scholar
Sorjonen, M.-L., & Raevaara, L. (2014). On the grammatical form of requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In Drew, P. & Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds., Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.10sorGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A. & Birkner, K. (2010). Multimodale Ressourcen für Stadtführungen [Multimodal resources for city tours]. In Costa, M. & Müller-Jacquier, B., eds., Deutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Touristenführungen. Munich: Judicium Verlag, pp. 214–243.Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, K. (2018). Waiting for the customer: Multimodal analysis of waiting in service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.002Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, E., & Szymanski, M. (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In Richards, K. & Seedhouse, P., eds., Applying Conversation Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_6Google Scholar