We define and develop two-level type theory (2LTT), a version of Martin-Löf type theory which combines two different type theories. We refer to them as the ‘inner’ and the ‘outer’ type theory. In our case of interest, the inner theory is homotopy type theory (HoTT) which may include univalent universes and higher inductive types. The outer theory is a traditional form of type theory validating uniqueness of identity proofs (UIP). One point of view on it is as internalised meta-theory of the inner type theory. There are two motivations for 2LTT. Firstly, there are certain results about HoTT which are of meta-theoretic nature, such as the statement that semisimplicial types up to level n can be constructed in HoTT for any externally fixed natural number n. Such results cannot be expressed in HoTT itself, but they can be formalised and proved in 2LTT, where n will be a variable in the outer theory. This point of view is inspired by observations about conservativity of presheaf models. Models of Type Theory with Strict Equality. Phd thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham.). Secondly, 2LTT is a framework which is suitable for formulating additional axioms that one might want to add to HoTT. This idea is heavily inspired by Voevodsky’s Homotopy Type System (HTS). A simple type system with two identity types. Unpublished note.), which constitutes one specific instance of a 2LTT. HTS has an axiom ensuring that the type of natural numbers behaves like the external natural numbers, which allows the construction of a universe of semisimplicial types. In 2LTT, this axiom can be assumed by postulating that the inner and outer natural numbers types are isomorphic. After defining 2LTT, we set up a collection of tools with the goal of making 2LTT a convenient language for future developments. As a first such application, we develop the theory of Reedy fibrant diagrams in the style of Shulman ((2015). Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 1–75.). Continuing this line of thought, we suggest a definition of $(\infty,1)$ -category and give some examples.

The categorical models of differential linear logic (LL) are additive categories and those of the differential lambda-calculus are left-additive categories because of the Leibniz rule which requires the summation of two expressions. This means that, as far as the differential lambda-calculus and differential LL are concerned, these models feature finite nondeterminism and indeed these languages are essentially non-deterministic. We introduce a categorical framework for differentiation which does not require additivity and is compatible with deterministic models such as coherence spaces and probabilistic models such as probabilistic coherence spaces.

Jacobs has proposed definitions for (weak, strong, split) generic objects for a fibered category; building on his definition of (split) generic objects, Jacobs develops a menagerie of important fibrational structures with applications to categorical logic and computer science, including higher order fibrations, polymorphic fibrations, $\lambda2$ -fibrations, triposes, and others. We observe that a split generic object need not in particular be a generic object under the given definitions, and that the definitions of polymorphic fibrations, triposes, etc. are strict enough to rule out some fundamental examples: for instance, the fibered preorder induced by a partial combinatory algebra in realizability is not a tripos in this sense. We propose a new alignment of terminology that emphasizes the forms of generic object appearing most commonly in nature, i.e. in the study of internal categories, triposes, and the denotational semantics of polymorphism. In addition, we propose a new class of acyclic generic objects inspired by recent developments in higher category theory and the semantics of homotopy type theory, generalizing the realignment property of universes to the setting of an arbitrary fibration.

Bisimulation is a concept that captures behavioural equivalence of states in a variety of types of transition systems. It has been widely studied in a discrete-time setting. The core of this work is to generalise the discrete-time picture to continuous time by providing a notion of behavioural equivalence for continuous-time Markov processes. In Chen et al. [(2019). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 347 45–63.], we proposed two equivalent definitions of bisimulation for continuous-time stochastic processes where the evolution is a flow through time: the first one as an equivalence relation and the second one as a cospan of morphisms. In Chen et al. [(2020). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.], we developed the theory further: we introduced different concepts that correspond to different behavioural equivalences and compared them to bisimulation. In particular, we studied the relation between bisimulation and symmetry groups of the dynamics. We also provided a game interpretation for two of the behavioural equivalences. The present work unifies the cited conference presentations and gives detailed proofs.

Cartesian reverse differential categories (CRDCs) are a recently defined structure which categorically model the reverse differentiation operations used in supervised learning. Here, we define a related structure called a monoidal reverse differential category, prove important results about its relationship to CRDCs, and provide examples of both structures, including examples coming from models of quantum computation.

We prove a correspondence between $\kappa$ -small fibrations in simplicial presheaf categories equipped with the injective or projective model structure (and left Bousfield localizations thereof) and relatively $\kappa$ -compact maps in their underlying quasi-categories for suitably large regular cardinals $\kappa$ . We thus obtain a transition result between weakly universal small fibrations in the (type-theoretic) injective Dugger–Rezk-style standard presentations of model toposes and object classifiers in Grothendieck $\infty$ -toposes in the sense of Lurie.

Higher-dimensional rewriting systems are tools to analyse the structure of formally reducing terms to normal forms, as well as comparing the different reduction paths that lead to those normal forms. This higher structure can be captured by finding a homotopy basis for the rewriting system. We show that the basic notions of confluence and wellfoundedness are sufficient to recursively build such a homotopy basis, with a construction reminiscent of an argument by Craig C. Squier. We then go on to translate this construction to the setting of homotopy type theory, where managing equalities between paths is important in order to construct functions which are coherent with respect to higher dimensions. Eventually, we apply the result to approximate a series of open questions in homotopy type theory, such as the characterisation of the homotopy groups of the free group on a set and the pushout of 1-types. This paper expands on our previous conference contribution Coherence via Wellfoundedness by laying out the construction in the language of higher-dimensional rewriting.

We study the reduction in a $\lambda$ -calculus derived from Moggi’s computational one, which we call the computational core. The reduction relation consists of rules obtained by orienting three monadic laws. Such laws, in particular associativity and identity, introduce intricacies in the operational analysis. We investigate the central notions of returning a value versus having a normal form and address the question of normalizing strategies. Our analysis relies on factorization results.

In this paper, in connection with the program of extending the Curry–Howard isomorphism to classical logic, we study the $\lambda \mu$ -calculus of Parigot emphasizing the difference between the original version of Parigot and the version of de Groote in terms of normalization properties. In order to talk about a satisfactory representation of the integers, besides the usual $\beta$ -, $\mu$ -, and $\mu '$ -reductions, we consider the $\lambda \mu$ -calculus augmented with the reduction rules $\rho$ , $\theta$ and $\varepsilon$ . We show that we need all of these rules for this purpose. Then we prove that, with the syntax of Parigot, the calculus enjoys the strong normalization property even when we add the rules $\rho$ , $\theta$ , and $\epsilon$ , while the $\lambda \mu$ -calculus presented with the more flexible de Groote-style syntax, in contrast, has only the weak normalization property. In particular, we present a normalization algorithm for the $\beta \mu \mu '\rho \theta \varepsilon$ -reduction in the de Groote-style calculus.

The proof theory of the constructive modal logic S4 (hereafter $\mathsf{CS4}$ ) has been settled since the beginning of this century by means of either standard natural deduction and sequent calculi or by the reconstruction of modal logic through hypothetical and categorical judgments à la Martin-Löf, an approach carried out by using a special kind of sequents, which keeps two separated contexts representing ordinary and enhanced hypotheses, intuitively interpreted as true and valid assumptions. These so-called dual-context sequents, originated in linear logic, are used to define a natural deduction system handling judgments of validity, truth, and possibility, resulting in a formalism equivalent to an axiomatic system for $\mathsf{CS4}$ . However, this proof-theoretical study of $\mathsf{CS4}$ lacks, to the best of our knowledge, its third fundamental constituent, namely a sequent calculus. In this paper, we define such a dual-context formalism, called ${\bf DG_{CS4}}$ , and provide detailed proofs of the admissibility for the ordinary cut rule as well as the elimination of a second cut rule, which manipulates enhanced hypotheses. Furthermore, we make available a formal verification of the equivalence of this proposal with the previously defined axiomatic and dual-context natural deduction systems for $\mathsf{CS4}$ , using the Coq proof-assistant.

This paper studies normalisation by evaluation for typed lambda calculus from a categorical and algebraic viewpoint. The first part of the paper analyses the lambda definability result of Jung and Tiuryn via Kripke logical relations and shows how it can be adapted to unify definability and normalisation, yielding an extensional normalisation result. In the second part of the paper, the analysis is refined further by considering intensional Kripke relations (in the form of Artin–Wraith glueing) and shown to provide a function for normalising terms, casting normalisation by evaluation in the context of categorical glueing. The technical development includes an algebraic treatment of the syntax and semantics of the typed lambda calculus that allows the definition of the normalisation function to be given within a simply typed metatheory. A normalisation-by-evaluation program in a dependently typed functional programming language is synthesised.

One of the most fundamental properties of a proof system is analyticity, expressing the fact that a proof of a given formula F only uses subformulas of F. In sequent calculus, this property is usually proved by showing that the $\mathsf{cut}$ rule is admissible, i.e., the introduction of the auxiliary lemma H in the reasoning “if H follows from G and F follows from H, then F follows from G” can be eliminated. The proof of cut admissibility is usually a tedious, error-prone process through several proof transformations, thus requiring the assistance of (semi-)automatic procedures. In a previous work by Miller and Pimentel, linear logic ( $\mathsf{LL}$ ) was used as a logical framework for establishing sufficient conditions for cut admissibility of object logical systems (OL). The OL’s inference rules are specified as an $\mathsf{LL}$ theory and an easy-to-verify criterion sufficed to establish the cut-admissibility theorem for the OL at hand. However, there are many logical systems that cannot be adequately encoded in $\mathsf{LL}$ , the most symptomatic cases being sequent systems for modal logics. In this paper, we use a linear-nested sequent ( $\mathsf{LNS}$ ) presentation of $\mathsf{MMLL}$ (a variant of LL with subexponentials), and show that it is possible to establish a cut-admissibility criterion for $\mathsf{LNS}$ systems for (classical or substructural) multimodal logics. We show that the same approach is suitable for handling the $\mathsf{LNS}$ system for intuitionistic logic.

The family ${\mathcal{R}} X^*$ of regular subsets of the free monoid $X^*$ generated by a finite set X is the standard example of a ${}^*$ -continuous Kleene algebra. Likewise, the family ${\mathcal{C}} X^*$ of context-free subsets of $X^*$ is the standard example of a $\mu$ -continuous Chomsky algebra, i.e. an idempotent semiring that is closed under a well-behaved least fixed-point operator $\mu$ . For arbitrary monoids M, ${\mathcal{C}} M$ is the closure of ${\mathcal{R}}M$ as a $\mu$ -continuous Chomsky algebra, more briefly, the fixed-point closure of ${\mathcal{R}} M$ . We provide an algebraic representation of ${\mathcal{C}} M$ in a suitable product of ${\mathcal{R}} M$ with $C_2'$ , a quotient of the regular sets over an alphabet $\Delta_2$ of two pairs of bracket symbols. Namely, ${\mathcal{C}}M$ is isomorphic to the centralizer of $C_2'$ in the product of ${\mathcal{R}} M$ with $C_2'$ , i.e. the set of those elements that commute with all elements of $C_2'$ . This generalizes a well-known result of Chomsky and Schützenberger (1963, Computer Programming and Formal Systems, 118–161) and admits us to denote all context-free languages over finite sets $X\subseteq M$ by regular expressions over $X\cup\Delta_2$ interpreted in the product of ${\mathcal{R}} M$ and $C_2'$ . More generally, for any ${}^*$ -continuous Kleene algebra K the fixed-point closure of K can be represented algebraically as the centralizer of $C_2'$ in the product of K with $C_2'$ .

Symmetric monoidal theories (SMTs) generalise algebraic theories in a way that make them suitable to express resource-sensitive systems, in which variables cannot be copied or discarded at will. In SMTs, traditional tree-like terms are replaced by string diagrams, topological entities that can be intuitively thought of as diagrams of wires and boxes. Recently, string diagrams have become increasingly popular as a graphical syntax to reason about computational models across diverse fields, including programming language semantics, circuit theory, quantum mechanics, linguistics, and control theory. In applications, it is often convenient to implement the equations appearing in SMTs as rewriting rules. This poses the challenge of extending the traditional theory of term rewriting, which has been developed for algebraic theories, to string diagrams. In this paper, we develop a mathematical theory of string diagram rewriting for SMTs. Our approach exploits the correspondence between string diagram rewriting and double pushout (DPO) rewriting of certain graphs, introduced in the first paper of this series. Such a correspondence is only sound when the SMT includes a Frobenius algebra structure. In the present work, we show how an analogous correspondence may be established for arbitrary SMTs, once an appropriate notion of DPO rewriting (which we call convex) is identified. As proof of concept, we use our approach to show termination of two SMTs of interest: Frobenius semi-algebras and bialgebras.

The concept of a synchronizing word is a very important notion in the theory of finite automata. We consider the associated decision problem to decide if a given DFA possesses a synchronizing word of length at most k, where k is the standard parameter. We show that this problem DFA-SW is equivalent to the problem Monoid Factorization introduced by Cai, Chen, Downey, and Fellows. Apart from the known $\textsf{W}[2]$ -hardness results, we show that these problems belong to $\textsf{A}[2]$ , $\textsf{W}[\textsf{P}],$ and $\textsf{WNL}$ . This indicates that DFA-SW is not complete for any of these classes, and hence, we suggest a new parameterized complexity class $\textsf{W}[\textsf{Sync}]$ as a proper home for these (and more) problems. We present quite a number of problems that belong to $\textsf{W}[\textsf{Sync}]$ or are hard or complete for this new class.

Hoare Logic has a long tradition in formal verification and has been continuously developed and used to verify a broad class of programs, including sequential, object-oriented, and concurrent programs. Here we focus on partial and total correctness assertions within the framework of Hoare logic and show that a comprehensive categorical analysis of its axiomatic semantics needs the languages of indexed and fibered category theory. We consider Hoare formulas with local, finite contexts, of program and logical variables. The structural features of Hoare assertions are presented in an indexed setting, while the logical features of deduction are modeled in the fibered one.

Given a plane graph $G=(V,E)$ , a Petrie tour of G is a tour P of G that alternately turns left and right at each step. A Petrie tour partition of G is a collection ${\mathscr P}=\{P_1,\ldots,P_q\}$ of Petrie tours so that each edge of G is in exactly one tour $P_i \in {\mathscr P}$ . A Petrie tour P is called a Petrie cycle if all its vertices are distinct. A Petrie cycle partition of G is a collection ${\mathscr C}=\{C_1,\ldots,C_p\}$ of Petrie cycles so that each vertex of G is in exactly one cycle $C_i \in {\mathscr C}$ . In this paper, we study the properties of 3-regular plane graphs that have Petrie cycle partitions and 4-regular plane multi-graphs that have Petrie tour partitions. Given a 4-regular plane multi-graph $G=(V,E)$ , a 3-regularization of G is a 3-regular plane graph $G_3$ obtained from G by splitting every vertex $v\in V$ into two degree-3 vertices. G is called Petrie partitionable if it has a 3-regularization that has a Petrie cycle partition. The general version of this problem is motivated by a data compression method, tristrip, used in computer graphics. In this paper, we present a simple characterization of Petrie partitionable graphs and show that the problem of determining if G is Petrie partitionable is NP-complete.

Sharing analysis is used to statically discover data structures which may overlap in object-oriented programs. Using the abstract interpretation framework, we show that sharing analysis greatly benefits from linearity information. A variable is linear in a program state when different field paths starting from it always reach different objects. We propose a graph-based abstract domain which can represent aliasing, linearity, and sharing information and define all the necessary abstract operators for the analysis of a Java-like language.

In this paper, we address the problem of proving confluence for string diagram rewriting, which was previously shown to be characterised combinatorially as double-pushout rewriting with interfaces (DPOI) on (labelled) hypergraphs. For standard DPO rewriting without interfaces, confluence for terminating rewriting systems is, in general, undecidable. Nevertheless, we show here that confluence for DPOI, and hence string diagram rewriting, is decidable. We apply this result to give effective procedures for deciding local confluence of symmetric monoidal theories with and without Frobenius structure by critical pair analysis. For the latter, we introduce the new notion of path joinability for critical pairs, which enables finitely many joins of a critical pair to be lifted to an arbitrary context in spite of the strong non-local constraints placed on rewriting in a generic symmetric monoidal theory.

Bishop’s presentation of his informal system of constructive mathematics BISH was on purpose closer to the proof-irrelevance of classical mathematics, although a form of proof-relevance was evident in the use of several notions of moduli (of convergence, of uniform continuity, of uniform differentiability, etc.). Focusing on membership and equality conditions for sets given by appropriate existential formulas, we define certain families of proof sets that provide a BHK-interpretation of formulas that correspond to the standard atomic formulas of a first-order theory, within Bishop set theory $(\mathrm{BST})$ , our minimal extension of Bishop’s theory of sets. With the machinery of the general theory of families of sets, this BHK-interpretation within BST is extended to complex formulas. Consequently, we can associate to many formulas $\phi$ of BISH a set ${\texttt{Prf}}(\phi)$ of “proofs” or witnesses of $\phi$ . Abstracting from several examples of totalities in BISH, we define the notion of a set with a proof-relevant equality, and of a Martin-Löf set, a special case of the former, the equality of which corresponds to the identity type of a type in intensional Martin-Löf type theory $(\mathrm{MLTT})$ . Through the concepts and results of BST notions and facts of MLTT and its extensions (either with the axiom of function extensionality or with Vooevodsky’s axiom of univalence) can be translated into BISH. While Bishop’s theory of sets is standardly understood through its translation to MLTT, our development of BST offers a partial translation in the converse direction.