Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:27:24.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mindfulness, curiosity, and creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Francesco Pagnini Open the ORCID record for Francesco Pagnini [Opens in a new window] ,
Philip Maymin Open the ORCID record for Philip Maymin [Opens in a new window]  and
Ellen Langer Open the ORCID record for Ellen Langer [Opens in a new window]
Francesco Pagnini
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy francesco.pagnini@unicatt.it
Philip Maymin
Affiliation:
Department of Analytics, Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT, USA philip@maymin.com
Ellen Langer*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA langer@wjh.harvard.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Curiosity and creativity are manifestations of novelty-seeking mechanisms, closely intertwined and interdependent. This principle aligns seamlessly with the foundational tenets of Langerian mindfulness, which places novelty seeking as a cornerstone. Creativity, curiosity, openness, and flexibility all harmoniously converge in this framework. Spanning over four decades, research in the realm of mindfulness has diligently delved into the intricate interplay among these constructs.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e110
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014). Specific mindfulness skills differentially predict creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1092–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, C. J., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2020). The plasticity of well-being: A training-based framework for the cultivation of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(51), 32197–32206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haigh, E. A., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B., & Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer mindfulness/mindlessness scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J. (2023). The mindful body: Thinking our way to chronic health. Random House.Google Scholar
Maymin, P. Z., & Langer, E. J. (2021). Cognitive biases and mindfulness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagnini, F., Barbiani, D., Cavalera, C., Volpato, E., Grosso, F., Minazzi, G. A., … Phillips, D. (2023). Placebo and nocebo effects as Bayesian-brain phenomena: The overlooked role of likelihood and attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(5), 1217–1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirson, M. A., Langer, E., & Zilcha, S. (2018). Enabling a socio-cognitive perspective of mindfulness: The development and validation of the Langer mindfulness scale. Journal of Adult Development, 25, 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattner, A. (2015). Curiosity. Are you curious enough to read on?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 108(5), 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar