Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:15:10.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploratory exploitation and exploitative exploration: The phenomenology of play and the computational dynamics of search

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Mihnea Moldoveanu*
Affiliation:
Desautels Centre for Integrative Thinking, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada mihnea.moldoveanu@rotman.utoronto.ca
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

I argue for a more complicated but nonetheless computationally feasible and algorithmically intelligible interplay between exploration and exploitation and for admitting into our conceptual toolkit regimes of exploitative exploration and exploratory exploitation that can enhance the novelty and usefulness of the results of either problemistic or serendipitous search.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronowitz, S. (2021). Exploring by believing. Philosophical Review, 130(3), 339383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moldoveanu, M. C. (2024). Intelligent artificiality: Machine learning, brain architecture and the foundations of decision theory. DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Moldoveanu, M. C., & Martin, R. L. (2010). Diaminds: Decoding the mental habits of successful thinkers. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Steele, L. M., Hardy, J. H. III, Day, E. A., Watts, L. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2021). Navigating creative paradoxes: Exploration and exploitation effort drive novelty and usefulness. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(1), 149164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar