Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:56:49.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Expertise, Structured Professional Judgement and Risk Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

By
Mary Davoren  and
Harry Kennedy
Edited by
Mary Davoren  and
Harry G. Kennedy
Mary Davoren
Affiliation:
Broadmoor Hospital and West London NHS Trust
Harry G. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

No-one can predict the future with accuracy. Yet doctors in all disciplines are required to make projections about the future and doctors are held to a level of expertise when exercising professional judgement within their scope of practice. The acquisition of expertise requires a knowledge of what expertise is in itself. Diagnosis is such a skill, demonstrating that unstructured professional judgement seldom exists in the absence of semi-structured or structured approaches to expert judgement. Risk has been taken as a paradigm for structured professional judgement. A thorough understanding of the nature of expertise in psychiatry and in the courts is necessary for the practice of forensic psychiatry. The process of both teaching and acquiring clinical expertise is considered both from first principles and in relation to topics such as the use of structured professional judgement instruments and judgement support frameworks. These extend to all aspects of practice including triage and needs assessment, leave, conditional discharge, treatment programme completion, forensic recovery, a range of functional mental capacities, legal defences and reliability.

Keywords

ExpertiseStructured professional judgementRiskTriageLeaveTreatment completionDischarge
Type
Chapter
Information
Seminars in Forensic Psychiatry , pp. 141 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hacking, I. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, REL, Dunham, HW. Mental Disorders in Urban Areas: An Ecological Study of Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses. Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Williams, HK, Senanayke, M, Ross, CC, Bates, R, Davoren, M. Security needs among patients referred for high secure care in Broadmoor Hospital England. BJPsych Open 2020; 6 (4): e55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhrskov Sørensen, L, Bengtson, S, Lund, J, Ibsen, M, Långström, N. Mortality among male forensic and non-forensic psychiatric patients: matched cohort study of rates, predictors and causes-of-death. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2020: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maden, T. Treating Violence: A Guide to Risk Management in Mental Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H, Evans, R. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kennedy, HG, Simpson, A, Haque, Q. Perspective on excellence in forensic mental health services: what we can learn from oncology and other medical services. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2019; 10: 733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, A. The psychiatric expert in court. Psychological Medicine 1984; 14 (2): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grounds, A. The psychiatrist in court. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1985; 34 (1): 55–8.Google Scholar
Rix, K, Mynors-Wallis, L, Craven, C. Rix’s Expert Psychiatric Evidence. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1965; 58 (5): 295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe. Dangerous Offenders – Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)3 and Explanatory Report. Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2014.Google Scholar
Mossman, D. Critique of pure risk assessment or, Kant meets Tarasoff. University of Cincinnati Law Review 2006; 75: 523.Google Scholar
Szmukler, G, Everitt, B, Leese, M. Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychological Medicine 2012; 42 (5): 895–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mossman, D. Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994; 62 (4): 783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, H. Risk assessment is inseparable from risk management: comment on Szmuckler (Psychiatric Bulletin, 2000, 24, 6–10). Psychiatric Bulletin 2001; 25 (6): 208–11.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P, Cooper, S, Herbert, E et al. The Quantification of Violence Scale: a simple method of recording significant violence. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2007; 53 (6): 485–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, J. The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration. Bethesda, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, PE. Hypothetical criteria for the prediction of individual criminality. In Webster, C. D. and Hucker, S. J. (eds) Dangerousness: Probability and Prediction, Psychiatry and Public Policy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Flynn, G, O’Neill, C, McInerney, C, Kennedy, HG. The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freestone, M, Bull, D, Brown, R et al. Triage, decision-making and follow-up of patients referred to a UK forensic service: validation of the DUNDRUM toolkit. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzies, R, Webster, C, Sepejak, D. Hitting the forensic sound barrier: predictions of dangerousness in a pre-trial psychiatric clinic. In Webster, C. D and Hucker, S. J. (eds) Dangerousness: Probability and Prediction, Psychiatry and Public Policy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 115–43.Google Scholar
Menzies, R, Webster, CD, McMain, S, Staley, S, Scaglione, R. The dimensions of dangerousness revisited. Law and Human Behavior 1994; 18 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groen, GJ, Patel, VL. Medical problem solving: some questionable assumptions. 1985; 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, VL, Kaufman, DR, Magder, SA. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic environments. In Ericsson, A (ed.) The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 1996, pp. 127–65.Google Scholar
Groen, GJ, Patel, VL. Medical problem solving: some questionable assumptions. Medical Education 1985; 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, VL, Cohen, TA, Murarka, T et al. Recovery at the edge of error: debunking the myth of the infallible expert. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2011; 44 (3): 413–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slaughter, LA, Keselman, A, Kushniruk, A, Patel, VL. A framework for capturing the interactions between layperson’ understanding of disease, information gathering behaviors, and actions taken during an epidemic. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005; 38: 298–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraepelin, E. Clinical Psychiatry: A Text-Book for Students and Physicians, Abstracted and Adapted from the Seventh German ed. of Kraepelin’s ‘Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie’. Bristol, Thoemmes Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Griesinger, W. Mental Pathology and Therapeutics: W. Wood & Company, 1882.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. Lectures on Clinical Psychiatry. New York, Hafner Pub. Co., 1968.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. Morbid jealousy: some clinical and social aspects of a psychiatric symptom. Journal of Mental Science 1961; 107 (449): 687–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGorry, PD, Hartmann, JA, Spooner, R, Nelson, B. Beyond the ‘at risk mental state’ concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 2018; 17 (2): 133–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brittain, RP. The sadistic murderer. Medicine, Science and the Law 1970; 10 (4): 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCulloch, MJ, Snowden, PR, Wood, PJ, Mills, HE. Sadistic fantasy, sadistic behaviour and offending. British Journal of Psychiatry 1983; 143: 20–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, PE. Jealousy: the pathology of passion. British Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 158 (5): 593–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, PE, Lester, G. Vexatious litigants and unusually persistent complainants and petitioners: from querulous paranoia to querulous behaviour. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2006; 24 (3): 333–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, A. Psychopathic personality: a most elusive category. Psychological Medicine 1974; 4 (2): 133–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, PE, Hazelwood, RR, Warren, J. The sexually sadistic criminal and his offenses. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 1990; 18 (2): 163–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Hazelwood, RR, Dietz, PE, Warren, J. The criminal sexual sadist. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 1992; 61: 12.Google Scholar
Robins, E, Guze, SB. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 1970; 126 (7): 983–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, JK, Birley, J, Cooper, J, Graham, P, Isaacs, A. Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying ‘present psychiatric state’. The British Journal of Psychiatry 1967; 113 (498): 499–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL, Endicott, J, Robins, E. Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry 1978; 35 (6): 773–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. Epidemiologically-Based Mental Health Needs Assessments: Review of Research on Psychiatric Disorders (ICD-10, F2-F6). London, Royal College of Psychiatrists, Research Unit, 1992.Google Scholar
Wing, J. SCAN and the PSE tradition. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1996; 31 (2): 50–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R, Endicott, J. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) 3. New York, Biometric Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1977.Google Scholar
Endicott, J, Spitzer, RL. A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 1978; 35 (7): 837–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, Gibbon, M, First, MB. User’s Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: SCID. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1990.Google Scholar
First, M, Spitzer, R, Gibbon, M, Williams, J. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) s, Clinician Version, Administration Booklet. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing Inc., 2012.Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, Gibbon, M, First, MB. The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: history, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry 1992; 49 (8): 624–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB. Psychotic disorders in DSM-III–R. The American Journal of Psychiatry 1989; 146 (8): 953–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Hacking, I. Lost in the forest. London Review of Books 2013; 35 (15): 7–8.Google Scholar
Hacking, I (ed.). Kinds of people: moving targets. Proceedings: British Academy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. Degeneracy, criminal behavior, and looping. Genetics and Criminal Behavior 2001: 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, LJ, Spivak, BL, Shepherd, SM. Racial fairness in violence risk instruments: a review of the literature. Psychology, Crime & Law 2021: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venner, S, Sivasubramaniam, D, Luebbers, S, Shepherd, SM. Cross-cultural reliability and rater bias in forensic risk assessment: a review of the literature. Psychology, Crime & Law 2021; 27 (2): 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venner, S, Sivasubramaniam, D, Luebbers, S, Shepherd, SM. Exploring rater cultural bias in forensic risk assessment. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2021; 20 (3): 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coid, J, Kahtan, N, Gault, S, Jarman, B. Ethnic differences in admissions to secure forensic psychiatry services. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2000; 177 (3): 241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coid, JW, Kirkbride, JB, Barker, D et al. Raised incidence rates of all psychoses among migrant groups: findings from the East London first episode psychosis study. Archives of General Psychiatry 2008; 65 (11): 1250–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, SM, Anthony, T. Popping the cultural bubble of violence risk assessment tools. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2018; 29 (2): 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, S. Criminal engagement and Australian culturally and linguistically diverse populations: challenges and implications for forensic risk assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2016; 23 (2): 256–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, VL, Arocha, JF, Kaufman, DR. Expertise and tacit knowledge in medicine. In Horvath, RJSJA (ed.) Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999, pp. 75–99.Google Scholar
Posner, RA. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 2004; 24 (3): 177–81.Google Scholar
Coughlin, LD, Patel, VL. Processing of critical information by physicians and medical students. Journal of Medical Education 1987; 62 (10): 818–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Arocha, JF, Patel, VL. Novice diagnostic reasoning in medicine: accounting for evidence. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1995; 4: 355–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, VL, Kaufman, DR, Magder, SA. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic environments. In Ericsson, A (ed.) The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 1996, pp. 127–65.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 2003; 58 (9): 697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donner-Banzhoff, N, Seidel, J, Sikeler, AM et al. The phenomenology of the diagnostic process: a primary care-based survey. Medical Decision Making 2017; 37 (1): 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, A. Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2012; 18 (6): 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D, Klein, G. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. American Psychologist 2009; 64 (6): 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, H. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanoch, Y, Wood, S. The scams among us: who falls prey and why. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2021; 30 (3): 260–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbach, B, Huang, L. Con men and their enablers: the anatomy of confidence games. Social Research: An International Quarterly 2018; 85 (4): 795–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, TA, Burleyson, GP, Tielsch, JM, Cameron, JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Annals of Surgery 1995; 221 (1): 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, JF, Pisters, PW, Lee, JE et al. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery 2007; 141 (4): 456–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, CM, Turrini, O, Parikh, P et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Archives of Surgery 2010; 145 (7): 634–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amato, L, Colais, P, Davoli, M et al. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Epidemiologia e prevenzione 2013; 37 (2–3 Suppl. 2): 1–100.Google ScholarPubMed
Amato, L, Fusco, D, Acampora, A et al. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Epidemiologia e prevenzione 2017; 41 (5–6 Suppl. 2): 1–128.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, B, Kim, K, Park, Y, Lim, MC, Bristow, RE. Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2018; 97 (49).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, C, Lavery, J, Friedman, A, Wapner, R, Wright, J. Serious maternal complications in relation to severe pre‐eclampsia: a retrospective cohort study of the impact of hospital volume. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2017; 124 (8): 1246–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hata, T, Motoi, F, Ishida, M et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery 2016; 263 (4): 664–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hehir, MP, Ananth, CV, Wright, JD et al. Severe maternal morbidity and comorbid risk in hospitals performing< 1000 deliveries per year. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2017; 216 (2): 179. e1–e12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, AM, Ananth, CV, Huang, Y, D’Alton, ME, Wright, JD. Hospital delivery volume, severe obstetrical morbidity, and failure to rescue. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016; 215 (6): 795. e1–e14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habets, P, Jeandarme, I, Kennedy, HG. Determining security level in forensic psychiatry: a tug of war between the DUNDRUM toolkit and the HoNOS-Secure. Psychology Crime & Law 2020: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousmaniere, T, Goodyear, RK, Miller, SD, Wampold, BE. The Cycle of Excellence: Using Deliberate Practice to Improve Supervision and Training. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howner, K, Andiné, P, Bertilsson, G et al. Mapping systematic reviews on forensic psychiatric care: a systematic review identifying knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2018; 9: 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howner, K, Hofvander, B, Tapp, J. Editorial: what works for forensic psychiatric patients: from treatment evaluations to short and long-term outcomes. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020; 11 (1254).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinkfield, G, Ogloff, J. A review and analysis of routine outcome measures for forensic mental health services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2014; 13 (3): 252–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, PE. Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Coid, JW, Yang, M, Ullrich, S et al. Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2011; 22 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coid, JW, Kallis, C, Doyle, M, Shaw, J, Ullrich, S. Identifying causal risk factors for violence among discharged patients. PLoS One 2015; 10 (11): e0142493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M, Wong, SC, Coid, JW. Violence, mental health and violence risk factors among community women: an epidemiological study based on two national household surveys in the UK. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M, Coid, JW, Pan, H. Multilevel generalized linear models for modelling age-related gender difference in violent behaviour and associated factors in the general household population. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2005; 14 (3): 130–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Y-y, Liu, Yang, M, Ramsay, MS, Li, XS, Coid, JW. A comparison of logistic regression, classification and regression tree, and neural networks models in predicting violent re-offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2011; 27: 547–73.Google Scholar
Risk Management Authority. Risk Assessment Tools Evaluation Directory (RATED). Paisley, Scotland, Risk Management Authority (RMA), 2019.Google Scholar
Feinstein, AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983; 99 (6): 843–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Fava, GA, Tomba, E, Sonino, N. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2012; 66 (1): 11–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vet, HC, Terwee, CB, Mokkink, LB, Knol, DL. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glancy, G, Choptiany, M, Jones, R, Chatterjee, S. Measurement-based care in forensic psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2021; 74: 101650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, C, Margison, F, Barkham, M. The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence Based Mental Health 1998; 1 (3): 70–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, NS, Truax, P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991; 59 (1): 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, NS, Follette, WC, Revenstorf, D. Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy 1984; 15 (4): 336–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Reliable and clinically significant change, 1998. www.psyctc.org/stats/rcsc.htm.Google Scholar
Eastman, N, Bellamy, S. Admission Criteria to Secure Psychiatric Care: ACeSS Schedule (unpublished paper for South Thames Regional Office of NHS Executive and High Security Psychiatric Services Commissioning Board). London, St George’s Hospital Medical School, 1998.Google Scholar
Shaw, J, Davies, J, Morey, H. An assessment of the security, dependency and treatment needs of all patients in secure services in a UK health region. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 2001; 12 (3): 610–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, G, Sugarman, P, Picchioni, M, Long, C. HoNOS‐Secure: tracking risk and recovery for men in secure care. The British Journal of Forensic Practice 2010; 12 (4): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M, Davies, S. The Security Needs Assessment Profile: a multidimensional approach to measuring security needs. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2005; 4 (1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habets, P, Jeandarme, I, Kennedy, HG. Applicability of the DUNDRUM-1 in a forensic Belgium setting. Journal of Forensic Practice 2019; 21 (1): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dwyer, S, Davoren, M, Abidin, Z et al. The DUNDRUM Quartet: validation of structured professional judgement instruments DUNDRUM-3 assessment of programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 assessment of recovery in forensic mental health services. BMC Research Notes 2011; 4: 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davoren, M, O’Dwyer, S, Abidin, Z et al. Prospective in-patient cohort study of moves between levels of therapeutic security: the DUNDRUM-1 triage security, DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery scales and the HCR-20. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12: 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davoren, M, Abidin, Z, Naughton, L et al. Prospective study of factors influencing conditional discharge from a forensic hospital: the DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery structured professional judgement instruments and risk. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, J, Thomas, SD, Mackinnon, T, Eggleton, D. The risks, needs and stages of recovery of a complete forensic patient cohort in an Australian state. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18 (1): 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, M, Schel, SH, Kennedy, HG, Bulten, BH. Patient characteristics related to length of stay in Dutch forensic psychiatric care. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2017; 28 (6): 863–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoren, M, Hennessy, S, Conway, C, Marrinan, S, Gill, P, Kennedy, HG. Recovery and concordance in a secure forensic psychiatry hospital – the self rated DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery scales. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, HG, Davoren, M, O’Flynn, P, O’Sullivan, OP. How to measure progress in forensic care. In Birgit Vollm, PB (ed.) Long-Term Forensic Psychiatric Care: Clinical, Ethical and Legal Challenges. Cham, Springer, 2019, pp. 103–21.Google Scholar
McCullough, S, Stanley, C, Smith, H et al. Outcome measures of risk and recovery in Broadmoor High Secure Forensic Hospital: stratification of care pathways and moves to medium secure hospitals. BJPsych Open 2020; 6 (4): e74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, WM, Meehl, PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1996; 2 (2): 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C, Douglas, K, Eaves, D, Hart, S. HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, 1997.Google Scholar
Douglas, KS, Hart, SD, Webster, CD, Belfrage, H. HCR-20V3: Assessing Risk for Violence: User Guide. Burnaby, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, 2013.Google Scholar
Douglas, K, Webster, C, Hart, S, Eaves, D, Ogloff, J. HCR-20-Violence Risk Management Companion Guide. Burnaby, Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, 2001.Google Scholar
Troquete, NA, van den Brink, RH, Beintema, H et al. Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 2013; 202 (5): 365–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Brink, RH, Troquete, NA, Beintema, H et al. Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Shea, LE, Dickens, GL. The HCR-20 as a measure of reliable and clinically significant change in violence risk among secure psychiatric inpatients. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2015; 62: 132–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Strand, SJM, Selenius, H. Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample: comparing HCR-20v2 with the Female Additional Manual to the HCR-20v2. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2019; 73 (4–5): 248–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. Resilience in the face of adversity: protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry 1985; 147 (6): 598–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In Rolf, J, Masten, AS, Cicchetti, D, Nuechterlein, KH and Weintraub, S (eds) Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lockertsen, Ø, Varvin, S, Færden, A, Vatnar, SKB. Short-term risk assessments in an acute psychiatric inpatient setting: a re-examination of the Brøset Violence Checklist using repeated measurements – differentiating violence characteristics and gender. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2021; 35 (1): 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almvik, R, Woods, P, Rasmussen, K. The Brøset Violence Checklist: sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2000; 15 (12): 1284–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, T, Daffern, M, Bowe, SJ, McKenna, B. Evaluating the impact of an electronic application of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression with an embedded Aggression Prevention Protocol on aggression and restrictive interventions on a forensic mental health unit. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 2019; 28 (5): 1186–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogloff, JR, Daffern, M. The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: an instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2006; 24 (6): 799–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, T, Daffern, M, Bowe, SJ, McKenna, B. Predicting aggressive behaviour in acute forensic mental health units: a re-examination of the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression’s predictive validity. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 2017; 26 (5): 472–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, HG, Mullaney, R, McKenna, P et al. A tool to evaluate proportionality and necessity in the use of restrictive practices in forensic mental health settings: the DRILL tool (Dundrum restriction, intrusion and liberty ladders). BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20 (1): 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, JJ, Meyer, D, Maguire, T, Ogloff, JRP, Daffern, M. A clinical decision support system to prevent aggression and reduce restrictive practices in a forensic mental health service. Psychiatric Services 2021; 72 (8): 885–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijaz, A, Papaconstantinou, A, O’Neill, H, Kennedy, HG. The Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Manual (S-RAMM) validation study 1. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 2009; 26 (2): 54–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagan, J, Ijaz, A, Papaconstantinou, A et al. The Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Manual (S-RAMM) validation study II. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 2009; 26 (3): 107–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SanSegundo, MS, Ferrer-Cascales, R, Bellido, JH et al. Prediction of violence, suicide behaviors and suicide ideation in a sample of institutionalized offenders with schizophrenia and other psychosis. Frontiers in Psychology 2018; 9: 1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abidin, Z, Davoren, M, Naughton, L et al. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Shea, LE, Picchioni, MM, Mason, FL, Sugarman, PA, Dickens, GL. Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient self-harm. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2014; 55 (8): 1937–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicholls, TL, Brink, J, Desmarais, SL, Webster, CD, Martin, M-L. The Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): a prospective validation study in a forensic psychiatric sample. Assessment 2006; 13 (3): 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, H. Therapeutic uses of security: mapping forensic mental health services by stratifying risk. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2002; 8 (6): 433–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, HG. Models of care in forensic psychiatry. BJPsych Advances 2021: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, JK, Brown, GW. Social treatment of chronic schizophrenia: a comparative survey of three mental hospitals. Journal of Mental Science 1961; 107 (450): 847–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M, Painter, J, Buckingham, B, Stewart, MW. A review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). BJPsych Bulletin 2018; 42 (2): 63–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Phelan, M, Slade, M, Thornicroft, G et al. The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 167 (5): 589–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierzchniak, P, Farnham, F, Taranto, Nd et al. Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: a multi-disciplinary approach. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1999; 10 (2): 343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harty, M-A, Shaw, J, Thomas, S et al. The security, clinical and social needs of patients in high security psychiatric hospitals in England. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2004; 15 (2): 208–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J, McKenna, J, Snowden, P et al. The North-West Region. I: Clinical features and placement needs of patients detained in Special Hospitals. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1994; 5 (1): 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J, McKenna, J, Snowden, P et al. Clinical features and placement needs of all North West Region patients currently in Special Hospital. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1994; 5: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, C, Franey, A. Managing High Security Psychiatric Care. New York, Jessica Kingsley, 1998.Google Scholar
Cohen, A, Eastman, N. Assessing Forensic Mental Health Need: Policy, Theory and Research. London, RCPsych Publications, 2000.Google Scholar
Flynn, G, O’Neill, C, Kennedy, HG. DUNDRUM-2: prospective validation of a structured professional judgment instrument assessing priority for admission from the waiting list for a forensic mental health hospital. BMC Research Notes 2011; 4: 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeandarme, I, Habets, P, O’Reilly, K, Kennedy, HG. Is non-completion of treatment related to security need? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2021; 31 (5): 321–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, M, Khawaja, A. The HCR-20 and post‐discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression 2004; 30 (6): 469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, M, Power, LA, Coid, J et al. Predicting post-discharge community violence in England and Wales using the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2014; 13 (2): 140–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, A, Dean, K, Fahy, T, Cullen, AE. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17 (1): 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitacco, MJ, Tabernik, HE, Zavodny, D, Bailey, K, Waggoner, C. Projecting risk: the importance of the HCR‐20 risk management scale in predicting outcomes with forensic patients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2016; 34 (2–3): 308–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, J. A review of effective interventions for reducing aggression and violence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 2008; 363 (1503): 2577–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Wampold, BE. How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 2015; 14 (3): 270–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davoren, M, Byrne, O, O’Connell, P et al. Factors affecting length of stay in forensic hospital setting: need for therapeutic security and course of admission. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Reilly, K, Donohoe, G, Coyle, C et al. Prospective cohort study of the relationship between neuro-cognition, social cognition and violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15 (1): 155–.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campagnolo, D, Furimsky, I, Chaimowitz, G. Absconsion from forensic psychiatric institutions: a review of the literature. International Journal of Risk and Recovery 2019; 2 (2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, E, Hearn, D, Ndegwa, D, Norman, P, Hammond, N. Developing the leave/abscond risk assessment (LARA) from the absconding literature: an aide to risk management in secure services. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2012; 6 (6): 280–90.Google Scholar
Cullen, AE, Jewell, A, Tully, J et al. A prospective cohort study of absconsion incidents in forensic psychiatric settings: can we identify those at high-risk? PLoS One 2015; 10 (9): e0138819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilterman, EL, Philipse, MW, de Graaf, ND. Assessment of offending during leave: development of the Leave Risk Assessment in a sample of Dutch forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2011; 10 (3): 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyall, M, Bartlett, A. Decision making in medium security: can he have leave? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2010; 21 (6): 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezey, G, Durkin, C, Dodge, L, White, S. Never ever? Characteristics, outcomes and motivations of patients who abscond or escape: a 5-year review of escapes and absconds from two medium and low secure forensic units. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2015; 25 (5): 440–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohan, D, Jamieson, E, Taylor, PJ. The use of trial leave for restricted special hospital patients. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2001; 11 (1): 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, R, Goel, V, Neillie, D, Stedman, T, Meehan, T. Unauthorised absences from leave from an Australian security hospital. Australasian Psychiatry 2014; 22 (2): 170–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sklenarova, H, Neutze, J, Kretschmer, T, Nitschke, J. Granting leave to patients in bavarian forensic-psychiatric hospitals: a survey to describe the current process and develop guidelines. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020; 11: 287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, TM, Choo, L. Understanding and reducing unauthorized leaves of absence from forensic mental health settings: a literature review. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2020: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, G, Crocker, AG, Nicholls, TL, Seto, MC. Risk assessment instruments in clinical practice. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2012; 57 (4): 238–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crocker, AG, Nicholls, TL, Charette, Y, Seto, MC. Dynamic and static factors associated with discharge dispositions: the national trajectory project of individuals found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) in Canada. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2014; 32 (5): 577–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharewera-Mika, J, Cooper, E, Wiki, N et al. The appropriateness of DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 for Māori in forensic mental health services in New Zealand: participatory action research. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, H. Limits of psychiatric evidence in criminal courts: morals and madness. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland 2005; 11: 1–17.Google Scholar
Kennedy, H. Limits of psychiatric evidence in civil courts and tribunals: science and sensibility. Irish Medical Journal 2004; 10.Google Scholar
Rutledge, E, Kennedy, M, O’Neill, H, Kennedy, HG. Functional mental capacity is not independent of the severity of psychosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2008; 31 (1): 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzini, L, Volicer, L, Nelson, WA, Fox, E, Derse, AR. Ten myths about decision-making capacity. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2004; 5 (4): 263–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, DC, Hawkins, L, McInturff, B, Harrell, LE. Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1997; 45 (4): 458–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Marson, DC, McInturff, B, Hawkins, L, Bartolucci, A, Harrell, LE. Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1997; 45 (4): 453–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, G, O’Reilly, K, O’Connor, J, Kennedy, HG. An evaluation of functional mental capacity in forensic mental health practice: the Dundrum capacity ladders validation study. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18 (1): 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelbaum, PS, Grisso, T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 319 (25): 1635–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisso, T. Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.Google Scholar
Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS, Hill-Fotouhi, C. The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48 (11): 1415–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Akinkunmi, AA. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool – fitness to plead: a preliminary evaluation of a research instrument for assessing fitness to plead in England and Wales. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2002; 30 (4): 476–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS. Comparison of standards for assessing patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 152 (7): 1033–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, N, Starling, B. Mental disorder ethics: theory and empirical investigation. Journal of medical ethics 2006; 32 (2): 94–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, A. Freewill and Responsibility (Routledge Revivals). London, Taylor & Francis, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A. The Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J, Hope, T, Stewart, A. Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2003; 26 (6): 697–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amador, XF, David, AS. Insight and Psychosis: Awareness of Illness in Schizophrenia and Related Disorders. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, A, Buchanan, A, Reed, A, Almeida, O. The assessment of insight in psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 161 (5): 599–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, A. The psychopathology of insight. British Journal of Medical Psychology 1934; 14 (4): 332–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysaker, PH, Vohs, J, Hasson-Ohayon, I et al. Depression and insight in schizophrenia: comparisons of levels of deficits in social cognition and metacognition and internalized stigma across three profiles. Schizophrenia Research 2013; 148 (1–3): 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, GS, David, AS, Richardson, G et al. Mental capacity, diagnosis and insight in psychiatric in-patients: a cross-sectional study. Psychological Medicine 2009; 39 (8): 1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, DC, Savage, R, Phillips, J. Financial capacity in persons with schizophrenia and serious mental illness: clinical and research ethics aspects. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2006; 32 (1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazel, S, Hope, T, Jacoby, R. Assessment of competence to complete advance directives: validation of a patient centred approach. BMJ 1999; 318 (7182): 493–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, M, Dornan, J, Rutledge, E, O’Neill, H, Kennedy, HG. Extra information about treatment is too much for the patient with psychosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2009; 32 (6): 369–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dornan, J, Kennedy, M, Garland, J, Rutledge, E, Kennedy, HG. Functional mental capacity, treatment as usual and time: magnitude of change in secure hospital patients with major mental illness. BMC Research Notes 2015; 8: 566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). Weekly Law Reports 1993; 25 February: 290–6.Google Scholar
Cairns, R, Maddock, C, Buchanan, A et al. Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 187 (4): 372–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prat, CS, Keller, TA, Just, MA. Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007; 19 (12): 1950–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calman, KC, Royston, G. Personal paper: risk language and dialects. BMJ 1997; 315 (7113): 939–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, P, Berry, DC, Raynor, D. Testing two methods of presenting side effect risk information about common medicines. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2001, 9(S1) 6–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, A, Elwyn, G, Mulley, A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 2002; 324 (7341): 827–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mossman, D, Noffsinger, SG, Ash, P et al. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2007; 35 (4 Suppl.): S3-72.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoge, SK, Bonnie, RJ, Poythress, N et al. The MacArthur adjudicative competence study: development and validation of a research instrument. Law and Human Behavior 1997; 21 (2): 141–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roesch, R, Webster, CD, Eaves, D, Menzies, RJ. The Fitness Interview Test: A Method for Examining Fitness to Stand Trial. Toronto, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto, 1984.Google Scholar
Rogers, R, Jordan, MJ, Harrison, KS. A critical review of published competency-to-confess measures. Law and Human Behavior 2004; 28 (6): 707–18; discussion 19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, R, Otal, T, Drogin, EY, Dean, BM. Effectiveness of the Miranda acquiescence questionnaire for investigating impaired Miranda reasoning. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2020; 48 (2): 226–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, R, Wasyliw, OE, Cavanaugh, JL. Evaluating insanity. Law and Human Behavior 1984; 8 (3–4): 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, PE. Why the experts disagree: variations in the psychiatric evaluation of criminal insanity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1985; 477 (1): 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, JI, Murrie, DC, Chauhan, P, Dietz, PE, Morris, J. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre‐trial evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2004; 22 (2): 171–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, DJ, Walk, A (eds) Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and the Aftermath. London, Gaskell Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, G, Mandarelli, G, Meynen, G, Carabellese, F, Ferracuti, S. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS). Translational Psychiatry 2019; 9 (1): 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandarelli, G, Carabellese, F, Felthous, AR et al. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists’ decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2019; 66: 101503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarpazza, C, Miolla, A, Zampieri, I et al. Translational application of a neuro-scientific multi-modal approach into forensic psychiatric evaluation: why and how? Frontiers in Psychiatry 2021; 12: 597918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi-Guarnieri, D, Janofsky, J, Keram, E et al. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2002; 30 (2 Suppl.): S3-40.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, R, Bender, SD. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception, 4th ed. New York, Guilford Publications, 2018.Google Scholar
Fenwick, P. Automatism, medicine and the law. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement 1990; 17: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×