Book contents
- Plotinus on Consciousness
- Plotinus on Consciousness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on the Text
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Self
- Chapter 2 Consciousness Terms
- Chapter 3 First Layer
- Chapter 4 Second Layer
- Chapter 5 Third Layer
- Chapter 6 Self-Determination
- Chapter 7 Conclusion
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 April 2018
Book contents
- Plotinus on Consciousness
- Plotinus on Consciousness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on the Text
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Self
- Chapter 2 Consciousness Terms
- Chapter 3 First Layer
- Chapter 4 Second Layer
- Chapter 5 Third Layer
- Chapter 6 Self-Determination
- Chapter 7 Conclusion
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus on Consciousness , pp. 193 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
Armstrong, A.H. 1966–1988. Plotinus. Loeb Classical Library. 7 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. 1983. Plotinus, Ennead V.1: On the Three Principal Hypostases. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H.J., and Dillon, J. 2015. Plotinus, Ennead IV.3–IV.4.29: Problems Concerning the Soul. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Dillon, J., and Gerson, L. 2004. Neoplatonic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Fleet, B. 1995. Ennead III.6: On the Impassivity of the Bodiless. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2003. Traité 10 (V, 1): Sur les trois hypostases qui ont rang de principes, in Brisson, and Pradeau, (eds.) 2002–2009, 7–21.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. 2013. Plotinus Ennead V.5: That the Intelligibles Are Not External to the Intellect, and on the Good. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Harder, R., Beutler, R., and Theiler, W. 1956–1971. Plotins Schriften. 12 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Henry, P., and Schwyzer, H.R. 1964–1983. Plotini Opera (editio minor). 3 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGroarty, K. 2006. Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead 1.4. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2006. Plotinus’ Cosmology: A Study of Ennead II.1 (40): Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Adamson, P. 2008. “Plotinus on Astrology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 265–291.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1992. Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aquila, R. 1992. “On Plotinus and the Togetherness of Consciousness,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1): 7–32.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H. 1974. “Tradition, Reason, and Experience in the Thought of Plotinus,” in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente: 171–194. Reprinted in Plotinian and Christian Studies. London: Variorum, 1979.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H. 1977. “Form, Individual, and Person in Plotinus,” Dionysius 1: 49–68. Reprinted in Plotinian and Christian Studies. London: Variorum, 1979.Google Scholar
Aubry, G. 2007. “Conscience, pensée, et connaissance de soi selon Plotin: le double héritage de l’Alcibiade et du Charmide,” Etudes Platoniciennes 4: 163–181.Google Scholar
Aubry, G. 2008. “Individuation, particularisation, et détermination selon Plotin,” Phronesis 53: 271–289.Google Scholar
Aubry, G. 2014. “Metaphysics of Soul and Self in Plotinus,” in Remes, and Slaveva-Griffin, (eds.) 2014, 310–322.Google Scholar
Aydede, M., “Pain,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/pain/.Google Scholar
Bene, L. 2013. “Ethics and Metaphysics in Plotinus,” in Karfík, F. and Song, E. (eds.), Plato Revived: Essays on Ancient Platonism in Honour of Dominic J. O’Meara. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 141–161.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H.J. 1966. “Did Plotinus Believe in Ideas of Individuals?,” Phronesis 11: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H.J. 1971. Plotinus’s Psychology: His Doctrine of the Embodied Soul. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, D. 2007. Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1999. “Logos et logoi chez Plotin: leur nature et leur role,” Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg 8: 87–108.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., et al. 2012. Porphyre: Sur la manière dont l’embryon reçoit l’âme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1982. “Idealism in Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed,” Philosophical Review 3: 3–40.Google Scholar
Bussanich, J. 1987. “Plotinus on the Inner Life of the One,” Ancient Philosophy 7: 163–189.Google Scholar
Bussanich, J. 1988. The One and Its Relation to Intellect: A Commentary on Selected Texts. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Caluori, D. 2008. “Plotin. Was fühlt der Leib? Was empfindet die Seele?,” in Landweer, H. and Renz, U. (eds.), Klassische Emotionstheorien: Von Platon bis Wittgenstein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 121–140.Google Scholar
Chaignet, A. 1892. Histoire de la psychologie des Grecs. Vol. 4. Paris: Culture et Civilization (reprint, Brussels, 1966).Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2012. “Plotinus’ Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense-Perception and Discursive Thought,” in Marmadoro, A. (ed.), The Powers of the Mind: Contemporary Questions and Ancient Answers, special issue of Topoi 31: 191–207.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2015. “Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background,” in Marmodoro, and Prince, (eds.) 2015, 31–50.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2018. “Plotinus on Memory, Recollection and Discursive Thought,” in Castagnoli, L. and Ceccarelli, P. (eds.), Greek Memories: Theories and Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 1942. “ΦΑΝΤΑΣΙΑ in Plotinus,” in Clarke, F.P. and Nahm, M.C. (eds.), Philosophical Essays in Honor of Edgar Arthur Singer Jr. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 297–309.Google Scholar
Cobb, H. 1938. “The Concept of Consciousness in Plotinus,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 69: xxxii.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, I. 1998. “Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection,” Phronesis 43 (1): 264–286.Google Scholar
Crystal, I. 2002. Self-Intellection and Its Epistemological Origins in Ancient Thought. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vols. 1 and 2. Trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1986. “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imagination,” in Mackey, J. (ed.), Religious Imagination. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1993. Alcinous: Handbook of Platonism: Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1996. “An Ethic for the Late Antique Sage,” in Gerson, (ed.) 1996, 315–335.Google Scholar
Dodds, E.R. 1957. “Numenius and Ammonius,” in Les sources de Plotin. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 3–32.Google Scholar
Dodds, E.R. 1960. “Tradition and Personal Achievement in the Philosophy of Plotinus,” Journal of Roman Studies 50: 1–7.Google Scholar
Dodds, E.R. 1992. Proclus: Elements of Theology: Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eliasson, E. 2008. The Notion of That Which Depends on Us in Plotinus and Its Background. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 1988. Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 1990. “Reflections on Plotinus’ Ennead IV 2,” in Teodorsson, S.-T. (ed.), Greek and Latin Studies in Memory of Cajus Fabricius. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 206–219.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 1991. “Plotinus and Soul-Body Dualism,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 148–165.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 1994. “Platonic Soul-Body Dualism in the Early Centuries of the Empire to Plotinus,” ANRW 2: 5331–5362.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 1998. “Plotinus on the Emotions,” in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 339–363.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 2005. “Soul and Merismos,” in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 81–93.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E.K. 2012. “Plotinus and Plato on Soul and Action,” in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge University Press, 350–367.Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1991. “The Objective Appearance of Pyhrronism,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 121–147.Google Scholar
Fine, G. 2003. “Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern,” in Inwood, B. and Miller, J. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 192–231.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1992. “Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Plato’s Philebus,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press, 425–463.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1986. “The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of Soul,” in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 93–110.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frith, C., and Rees, G. 2007. “A Brief History of the Scientific Approach to the Study of Consciousness,” in Velmans, M. and Schneider, S. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. (ed.) 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. 1997a. “ἐπιστροφή πρὸς ἑαυτὸν: History and Meaning,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 1–32.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. 1997b. “Introspection, Self-Reflexivity, and the Essence of Thinking According to Plotinus,” in Cleary, J.J. (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism. Belgium: Leuven University Press, 153–173.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1991. “Is There a Concept of Person in Greek Philosophy?” in Everson, S. (ed.), Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 166–193.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graver, M. 1999. “Philo of Alexandria and the Origins of the Stoic Προπάθειαι,” Phronesis 44: 300–325.Google Scholar
Gurtler, G. 2002. “Providence: The Platonic Demiurge and Hellenistic Causality,” in Wagner, M. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus’ Enneads. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 99–124.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1980. “Les niveaux de conscience dans les états mystiques selon Plotin,” Journal de Psychologie 77: 243–266.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1987. “Exercises spirituels,” in Exercise Spirituel et Philosophie Antique. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 13–58.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1993. Plotinus or the Simplicity of Vision. Trans. Chase, M.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, S., Lahteenmaki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.) 2007. Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Heiser, J. 1991. Logos and Language in the Philosophy of Plotinus. New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Helmig, C. 2012. Forms and Concepts: Concept-Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Horn, C. 2012. “Aspects of Biology in Plotinus,” in Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature. Oxford University Press, 214–222.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.M. 2011. “Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5: 262–282.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.M. 2012. “Sympathy, Awareness, and Belonging to Oneself in Plotinus,” Presocratics and Plato: A Festschrift in Honor of Professor Charles H. Kahn. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.M. 2013. “Review of Mark V. Nyvlt, Aristotle and Plotinus on the Intellect: Monism and Dualism Revisited,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51: 480–481.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1984. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 151–183.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. 2005. “In Defense of Inner Sense: Aristotle on Perceiving that One Sees,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 21: 235–285.Google Scholar
Kahn, C.H. 1966. “Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s Psychology,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 48: 43–81.Google Scholar
Kahn, C.H. 1988. “Discovering the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine,” in Dillon, J. and Long, A.A. (eds.), The Question of Eclecticism: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 234–259.Google Scholar
Kahn, C.H. 1992. “Aristotle on Thinking,” in Nussbaum, M.C. and Rorty, A.O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 359–379.Google Scholar
Kahn, C.H. 2005. “Aristotle versus Descartes on the Concept of the Mental,” in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 193–208.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 1997a. “Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Re-Examination,” Phronesis 42: 206–227.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 1997b. “Logos and the Sensible Object in Plotinus,” Ancient Philosophy 17: 397–410.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2000. “Living Body, Soul, and Virtue in the Philosophy of Plotinus,” Dionysius 18: 25–38.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2004. “Plotinus on Evidence and Truth,” in La Vérité. GENOS, Cahiers de Philosophie. Lausanne: Editions Payot, 66–75.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2005. “Plotinus against the Corporealists on the Soul: A Commentary on ENN. IV.7 [2], 8. 1–23,” in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 97–112.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2011. “The Structure of Appearances: Plotinus on the Constitution of Sensible Objects,” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245): 762–782.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2012. “Eiskrisis, or the Presence of Soul in the Body: A Plotinian Conundrum,” Ancient Philosophy 32 (1): 147–166.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2014. The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2009. “Plotinus on Quality and Immanent Form,” in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism. Leiden: Brill, 79–100.Google Scholar
Karfik, F. 2014. “Parts of the Soul in Plotinus,” in Corcilius, K. and Perler, D. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 107–148.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., and Ramelli, I. 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts: Translated with Introduction and Notes. Atlanta, GA: Society for Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 2000. “Metaphysics L 9: Divine Thought,” in Frede, M. and Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lavaud, L. 2014. “The Primary Substance in Plotinus’ Metaphysics: A Little-Known Concept,” Phronesis 59: 369–384.Google Scholar
Leroux, G. 1996. “Human Freedom in the Thought of Plotinus,” in Gerson, (ed.) 1996, 292–314.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A.C. 1964. “Nosce Teipsum and Conscientia,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 46: 188–200.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A.C. 1969–1970. “Non-Discursive Thought: An Enigma of Greek Philosophy,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70: 261–274.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. 1982. “Soul and Body in Stoicism,” Phronesis 27: 34–57. Reprinted in Stoic Studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. 1991. “Representation and the Self in Stoicism,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 102–120.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. 1993. “Hierocles on oikeōsis and Self-Perception,” in Boudouris, K.J. (ed.), Hellenistic Philosophy. Vol. 1. Athens: International Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture, 93–104. Reprinted in Stoic Studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. 2001a. “Ancient Philosophy’s Hardest Question: What to Make of Oneself?,” Representations 74: 19–36.Google Scholar
Long, A.A., and Sedley, D.N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magrin, S. 2010. “Sensation and Scepticism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 249–295.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A., and Prince, B. (eds.) 2015. Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, G.R., and Dillon, J.M. 1987. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides: Translated with Introduction and Notes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2002. Plato’s Rhapsody and Homer’s Music: The Poetics of the Panathenaic Festival in Classical Athens. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1998. The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nikulin, D. 2005. “Unity and Individuation of the Soul in Plotinus,” in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 277–304.Google Scholar
Nikulin, D. 2014. “Memory and Recollection in Plotinus,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96: 183–201.Google Scholar
Noble, C. 2013. “How Plotinus’ Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Ennead 4.4.18.1–9,” Phronesis 58: 249–279.Google Scholar
Noble, C. 2016. “Plotinus’ Unaffectable Soul,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 231–281.Google Scholar
Noble, C., and Powers, N. 2015. “Creation and Divine Providence in Plotinus,” in Marmadoro, and Prince, (eds.) 2015, 51–70.Google Scholar
Norman, R. 1979. “Aristotle’s Philosopher-God,” in Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. Vol. 14. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Nyvlt, M. 2009. “Plotinus on Phantasia: Phantasia as the Home of Self-Consciousness Within the Soul,” Ancient Philosophy 29: 139–155. Reprinted in Nyvlt 2012.Google Scholar
Nyvlt, M. 2012. Aristotle and Plotinus on the Intellect: Monism and Dualism Revisited. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2001. “Intentional Objects of Intellection in Later Neoplatonism,” in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, 115–125.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 1999. “Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Preface to the Question,” in Cleary, J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honor of John Dillon. Aldershot: Ashgate, 263–269.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2003. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perl, E. 2006. “The Togetherness of Thought and Being: A Phenomenological Reading of Plotinus’ Doctrine That the Intelligibles Are Not Outside the Intellect,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 22: 1–26.Google Scholar
Rappe, S. 1996. “Self-Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Enneads,” in Gerson, (ed.) 1996, 250–274.Google Scholar
Remes, P. 2007b. “Ownness of Conscious Experience in Ancient Philosophy,” in Heinamaa, S., Lahteenmaki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 67–94.Google Scholar
Remes, P. 2008b. “Inwardness and Infinity of Selfhood: From Plotinus to Augustine,” in Remes, P. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), Ancient Philosophy of the Self. Dordrecht: Springer, 155–176.Google Scholar
Remes, P. 2016. “Self-Knowledge in Plotinus: Becoming Who You Are,” in Renz, U. (ed.), Self-Knowledge: A History. Oxford University Press, 78–95.Google Scholar
Remes, P. 2017. “Human Action and Divine Power,” in Marmodoro, A. and Viltanioti, I.-F. (eds.), Divine Powers in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press, 39–60.Google Scholar
Remes, P., and Sihvola, J. (eds.) 2008. Ancient Philosophy of the Self. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Remes, P., and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rist, J. 1970. “Ideas of Individuals in Plotinus: A Reply to Dr. Blumenthal,” Revue internationale de philosophie 24: 29–30.Google Scholar
Runia, D. 1999. “A Brief History of the Term Kosmos Noétos from Plato to Plotinus,” in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honor of John Dillon. Aldershot: Ashgate, 151–171.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 2007. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Trans. Macomber, C.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A. 2003. L’ethique du sage chez Plotin: le paradigme du spoudaios. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F.M. 1986. “Conversion and Consciousness in Plotinus, Enneads V.1.7,” Hermes 114: 186–195.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F.M. 1987 “Synousia, Synaisthesis, and Synesis: Presence and Dependence in the Plotinian Philosophy of Consciousness,”ANRW 2: 677–689.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. 1960a. “Bewusst und Unbewusst bei Plotin,” in Les sources de Plotin. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 341–377.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. 1960b. “Plotin und Eusebius Praeparatio Evangelica,” Gnomon 32: 31–48.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. 2003. “The Mirror of Imagination: The Influence of Timaeus 70eff,” in Sharples, R.W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 78. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 203–212.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1996. The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkema, J. 2009. “On the Necessity of Individual Forms in Plotinus,” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3 (2): 138–153.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, S. (forthcoming). “Reconsidering the Body: From a Tomb to a Sign of the Soul.” In S. Slaveva-Griffin and I.L.E. Ramelli (eds.), Lovers of the Soul, Lovers of the Body: Philosophical and Religious Perspectives in Late Antiquity.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1978. “Unconsciousness and Quasiconsciousness in Plotinus,” Phronesis 23: 292–301.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1982. “Myths about Non-Propositional Thought,” in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 295–314.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2001. “Why the Neoplatonists Did Not Have Intentional Objects of Intellection,” in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, 105–114.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD. 3 vols. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. 2006. “Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 22: 146–174.Google Scholar
Tournau, C. 2009. “Qu’est-ce qu’un individu? Unité, individualité, et conscience de soi dans la métaphysique Plotinienne de l’âme,”Les Études philosophiques 3: 333–360.Google Scholar
van den Berg, R. 2014. “The Gift of Hermes: The Neoplatonists on Language and Philosophy,” in Remes, and Slaveva-Griffin, (eds.) 2014, 251–265.Google Scholar
Westra, L. 2002. “Freedom and Providence in Plotinus,” in Wagner, M. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus’ Enneads. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 125–147.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2008a. “Automatic Action in Plotinus,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 443–477.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2011a. “Intelligible Kinds and Natural Kinds in Plotinus,” Études platoniciennes 8: 54–73.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (trans.) 2011b. Porphyry: To Gaurus on How Embryos Are Ensouled and on What Is in Our Power. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2015. “Neoplatonists on the Causes of Vegetative Life,” in Marmodoro, and Prince, (eds.) 2015, 171–185.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. 2006. “A World of Thoughts: Plotinus on Nature and Contemplation (ENN. III.8 [30] 1–6),” in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism. Boston, MA: Brill, 121–143.Google Scholar
Wilkes, K.V. 1988a. “—, Yìshì, Duh, Um, and Consciousness,” in Marcel, A.J. and Bisiach, E. (eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 16–41.Google Scholar
Wilkes, K.V. 1992. “Psuchê versus the Mind,” in Nussbaum, M.C. and Rorty, A.O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 109–127.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2008. Tractatus Logicus-Philosophicus. Trans. Pears, D.F. and McGuiness, B.F.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolfe, K. 2010. “The Status of the Individual in Plotinus,” in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge University Press, 216–223.Google Scholar