Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:07:26.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 89 - Sacral insufficiency fracture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Nafi Aygun
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Gaurang Shah
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Health System
Dheeraj Gandhi
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Insufficiency fractures occur when bone strength is not sufficient to withstand physiologic stress. The most common bones fractured are the thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies. Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) are less common but they are commonly misdiagnosed [1]. The typical SIF is an H-shaped tri-part fracture with two vertical components through the sacral alae and a third horizontal component connecting them, usually through the upper sacral segments. Any permutation of these can be seen in a given patient, although isolated transverse component is rare.

Plain films are often non-diagnostic. CT is reliable, although in the acute phase findings may be very subtle secondary to decreased background bone density. MRI is very sensitive and shows the marrow edema associated with the fracture as increased signal on fluid-sensitive pulse sequences such as STIR and SE T2 and diminished signal on T1-weighted images in the bone surrounding the fracture (Figs. 89.1, 89.2). Contrast enhancement occurs in areas of edema. Bone scan is very sensitive but less specific than MRI and CT.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Head and Neck and Neuroimaging
Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 401 - 404
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hatzl-Griesenhofer, M, Pichler, R, Huber, H, Maschek, W. [The insufficiency fracture of the sacrum: an often unrecognized cause of low back pain: results of bone scanning in a major hospital]. Nuklearmedizin 2001; 40: 221–7.Google Scholar
Cho, C, Mathis, J, Kortman, K. Sacroplasty. In Mathis, JM, Golovac, S, eds., Image Guided Spine Interventions, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer; 2010; pp. 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, ME, DePalma, MJ, Cifu, DX, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot study. Spine J 2008; 8: 367–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×