Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:18:18.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 95 - Postoperative disc herniation versus postsurgical scarring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Nafi Aygun
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Gaurang Shah
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Health System
Dheeraj Gandhi
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

MRI is the modality of choice for evaluation of the post-discectomy spine if there is a suspicion for recurrent disc herniation. Intravenous gadolinium should be routinely administered, as it helps in the differentiation of recurrent disc herniation from postoperative scarring. Moreover, it may assist with diagnosis of postoperative arachnoiditis and spinal infection. Sagittal as well as axial images should be routinely obtained in postoperative spine without and with intravenous gadolinium (Figs. 95.1, 95.2, 95.3)

Differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and scar is crucial in the management, but it is not an easy task. This is because of accompanying postsurgical alterations and edema, as well as frequent co-incidence of scar and herniated disc. Herniated disc is generally low in T1 signal and T2 signal. One may be able to identify a thin band of very low signal surrounding the disc, suggestive of fibers of annulus. However, the disc material may occasionally be bright on T2-weighted sequences. Recurrent disc herniation generally does not enhance with intravenous contrast other than at its periphery [1]. However, it is imperative that the imaging should begin promptly after contrast administration. The disc may enhance homogeneously on delayed enhanced images and may therefore be inseparable from scar.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Head and Neck and Neuroimaging
Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 427 - 429
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bundschuh, CV, Modic, MT, Ross, JS, Masaryk, TJ, Bohlman, H. Epidural fibrosis and recurrent disk herniation in the lumbar spine: MR imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 923–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×