Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:29:14.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 40 - Gestational Surrogacy in the District of Columbia and Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2016

E. Scott Sills
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Genetics, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy
International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues
, pp. 304 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DC Code § 16-402 (2014). Available online at: www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/dccode/.Google Scholar
In re Roberto d.B., 923 A.2d 115, 118–142 (Md. 2007).Google Scholar
Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational Surrogacy Law across the United States: State-By-State Interactive Map for Commercial Surrogacy, 2014. Available online at: http://surrogacymap.com; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Hinson, D. S.. Parentage rights for same-sex couples: state-by-state gestational surrogacy laws, Family Advocate (Spring 2016): 4243, 45.Google Scholar
Hinson, D. S.. State-by-state surrogacy law across America. Family Advocate (Winter 2015): 6.Google Scholar
Hinson, D. S., McBrien, M.. Surrogacy across America: both the law and the practice. Family Advocate (Fall 2011): 32–6.Google Scholar
Note that because legislation is pending in both DC and Maryland, by the time of publication, this chapter could already be out of date.Google Scholar
In re Baby M, 109 N.J. 396, 411 (1988).Google Scholar
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART releases new annual report on in vitro fertilization procedures, 2014. Available online at: http://sart.org/SART_Technology_Releases_New_Annual_Report_on_In_Vitro_Fertilization_Procedures; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
ESHRE. The world’s number of IVF and ICSI babies has now reached a calculated total of 5 million, 2012. Available online at: www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Press-releases/Press-releases-ESHRE-2012/5-million-babies.aspx; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational surrogacy in the District of Columbia, 2014. Available online at: http://creativefamilyconnections.com/surrogacy-law-by-state/DC; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Hinson, D. S., ReVeal, L.. Surrogacy in the metropolitan Washington, DC, area, International Council on Infertility Information Dissemination, Spring 2013. Available online at: www.inciid.org/surrogacy-in-DC-and-Maryland; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
29 DCMR § 550.1 (2013) (prohibiting a district-certified emergency vehicle from crossing into Maryland).Google Scholar
Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination Parentage Act of 2009, amended in March 2013 and codified in DC Code, § 16-909, allows same-sex female couples who are married, registered domestic partners, or who sign a consent to parent and whose babies are born in DC (regardless of whether they are DC residents) to have their partner automatically recognized as the second parent and entered on a birth certificate when using artificial insemination as long as the second parent consented to the insemination with the intent to be a parent.Google Scholar
2013 DC Bill 20-0032 (20th Council Period) (January 8, 2013).Google Scholar
Chibbaro, L., Jr. Catania introduces surrogacy bill. Washington Blade, January 16, 2013. Available online at: www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/16/catania-introduces-surrogacy-bill.Google Scholar
The committee hearing can be viewed in its entirety at http://dccarchive.oct.dc.gov/services/on_demand_video/channel13/June2013/06_20_13_JUDICI.asx. Even those in favor of legalizing surrogacy were not in agreement as to how to do so.Google Scholar
Chibbaro, L., Jr. DC marriage officiant, surrogacy bills advance. Washington Blade, Summer 2013. Available online at: www.washingtonblade.com/2013/06/24/dc-gay-marriage-officiant-surrogacy-bills-advance-gay-news.Google Scholar
Riley, J.. Tackling surrogacy laws a tricky business. Metro Weekly, February 12, 2015. Available online at: www.metroweekly.com/2015/02/tackling-surrogacy-laws-a-tricky-business.Google Scholar
Council of the District of Columbia, B 21-0016: Collaborative Reproduction Amendment Act of 2015 (21st Council Period), 2015. Available online at: http://lims.dccouncil.us/Legislation/B21-0016?FromSearchResults=true.Google Scholar
Council of the District of Columbia, B 21-0016. Available online at: http://lims.dccouncil.us/_layouts/15/uploader/AdminProxy.aspx?LegislationId=B21-0016.Google Scholar
Brandel, A.. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism. Md. L. Rev. 1995; 54:488, 511–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicolette, C. L., Reamer, L. C.. Comment: Regulatory options for surrogate arrangements in Maryland. U. Balt. L. Rev. 1988; 18:110, 136–7.Google Scholar
Md. Sen. 795 Reg. Sess. (1988).Google Scholar
H.B. 1479, 1988 Md. Leg. Sess.Google Scholar
Letter from W. Donald Schaefer, Governor of Md., to Thomas V. “Mike” Miller, Jr., President of the Maryland State Senate (May 26, 1992) (outlining his rationale for vetoing Senate Bill 251).Google Scholar
Rosen, Barry F., Lawson, Lynn S.. Surrogacy contracts in transition. Md. Bar J. July–Aug. 1993; at 32, 35 (citing S.B. 369, 1993 Md. Laws).Google Scholar
85 Op. Att’y Gen. 348, 367–8 (Md. 2000).Google Scholar
“Opinions of the Attorney General, while not binding, are entitled to great weight. [citations omitted]. In the absence of controlling authority, these opinions are persuasive ‘since the legislature is presumed to be cognizant of that construction of the statute’ [citation omitted].” (Napa Valley Educators’ Association v. Napa Valley Unified School District. (1987) 194 Cal. App.3rd 243, 251).Google Scholar
Md. Sen. 71, 2011 Reg. Sess. (January 19, 2011).Google Scholar
Md. Sen. B 792 (2013).Google Scholar
H.B. 1099 (2013).Google Scholar
Dresser, M.. Proposed law would govern surrogacy births. Baltimore Sun, March 28, 2013. Available online at: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-03-28/news/bs-md-collaborative-reproduction-20130325_1_surrogacy-law-vitro-fertilization-maryland-law.Google Scholar
Archived: 2013 Testimony before Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee (February 28, 2013). Available online at: http://mgahouse.maryland.gov/house/play/5d62d957-be25-47d1-bec4-b950307ce02d/?catalog/03e481c7-8a42-4438-a7da-93ff74bdaa4c).Google Scholar
Boyle, M.. D.C. Catholic Conference opposes bill to legalize surrogacy in District. Catholic Standard, July 31, 2013. Available online at: www.cathstan.org/Content/News/News/Article/D-C-Catholic-Conference-opposes-bill-to-legalize-surrogacy-in-District/2/2/5762.Google Scholar
Southern Maryland Online. Annapolis Roundup, February 14, 2015. Available online at: http://somd.com/news/headlines/2015/19080.shtml.Google Scholar
H.B. 1477 (2016); H.B. 968 (2016), subsequent history available online at http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2016RS/votes_comm/hb1477_jud.pdf.Google Scholar
Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational surrogacy in Maryland, 2014. Available online at: http://creativefamilyconnections.com/surrogacy-law-by-state/Maryland; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 540 (1942) (right to have children is a “basic liberty”).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×