Krimmel, H. Surrogate motherhood arrangements from the perspective of the child. In Alpern, K., ed., The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Brazier, M., Campbell, A., & Golombok, S. Surrogacy: review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulations (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office [HMSO], 1998); available online at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/±/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsLegislation/DH_4009697 (accessed March 16, 2015).Google Scholar

Tieu, M. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers. Journal of Medical Ethics 2009; 35: 171–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilkson, S. Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar

Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Lycett, E., Murry, C., & Jadva, V. Surrogacy: the experience of the commissioning couple. Human Reproduction 2003; 18: 6.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Murry, C., Jadva, V., MacCallum, F., & Lycett, E. Families created through surrogacy arrangements: parent-child relationship on the 1st year of life. Developmental Psychology 2004; 40: 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, A. Artificial Reproduction and Reproductive Rights (London: Dartmouth Publishing, 1991).Google Scholar

Freeman, T. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review 2015; 33(1):45–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine 2012; 19(4): 769–89.Google ScholarPubMed

Golombok, S. Parenting (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

McCandless, J., & Sheldon, S. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008) and the tenacity of the sexual family form. Modern Law Review 2010; 72(2):175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. The (im)possible parents in law. In Lind, C., Keating, H., and Bridgeman, J., eds., Taking Responsibility, Law and the Changing Family (Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar

B v. C & D (Surrogacy: Adoption) [2015] EWFC 17; Re Z (A Child) (Surrogate Father: Parental Order) [2015] EWFC 73, [2015] 1 Weekly Law Reports 4993.Google Scholar

Section 33, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008 (London: HMSO, 2009). Available online at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents; accessed May 1, 2015.Google Scholar

Section 35, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; read in conjunction with section 38(2) of the same act.Google Scholar

Section 42, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; read in conjunction with section 45(2) of the same act.Google Scholar

Sections 36 and 43, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Legal issues around surrogacy. Available online at: www.hfea.gov.uk/1424.html; accessed April 30, 2014.Google Scholar

Section 54, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.Google Scholar

Section 54(6), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008, but see also section 54(7), as applied in D and L (Surrogacy) [2012] EWHC 2631 (Fam.).Google Scholar

www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/most_customers_want_to_know.asp#Adoptions; accessed May 30, 2015.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, What you can find out about your donor or donor-conceived genetic siblings. Available online at: www.hfea.gov.uk/112.html; accessed May 30, 2015.Google Scholar

www.donorconceivedregister.org.uk/about-us.html; accessed May 30, 2015.Google Scholar

Blyth, E. Parental orders and identity registration: one country three systems. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2010; 32(4):345–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, H., & Jones, C. Tourism: a matter of life and death in the United Kingdom. In Cohen, I. G., ed., The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 164–81.Google Scholar

Kandel, R. F. Which came first: the mother or the egg? A kinship solution to gestational surrogacy. Rutgers Law Review 1994; 47:165–239.Google ScholarPubMed

Jonas, M. Choosing between claims: allocating parental responsibility in surrogacy disputes. In Häyry, M., Takala, T., & Herissone-Kelly, P., eds., Bioethics and Social Reality (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005).Google Scholar

Rae, S. The Ethics of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood: Brave New Families (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 1994).Google Scholar

Kolers, A., & Bayne, T. Are you my mommy? On the genetic basis of parenthood. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2001; 18(3):273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trusted, J. Gifts of gametes: reflections about surrogacy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1986; 3(1):123–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wallbank, J. Too many mothers? Surrogacy, kinship, and the welfare of the child. Medical Law Review 2002; 10:271–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oultram, S. One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements. Journal of Medical Ethics 2015; 41:470–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sections 35(2) and 42(2), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.Google Scholar

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [16] per Hedley J (at that time, ss. 28(2) and (8) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 1990 were the relevant legislative provisions); available online at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37/section/28; accessed May 25, 2015.Google Scholar

Sections 56 and 58, Family Law Act of 1986.Google Scholar

Section 54(6) and (7), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; applied in R and S v. T [2015] EWFC 22; Re D and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2012] EWHC 2631 (Fam.).Google Scholar

For a historical account of the legal consequences of marriage, see Cretney, S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Herring, J. Relational autonomy and family law. In Wallbank, J., Choudhry, S., & Herring, J., eds., Rights, Gender and Family Law (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2010).Google Scholar

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [15], per Hedley J.Google Scholar

Re D (A Child) (Surrogacy) [2014] UKHC 2121 (Fam.), [15]–[18], per Moylan J.Google Scholar

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [13], emphasis added.Google Scholar

Re G (Parental Orders) [2014] EWHC 1561 (Fam.).Google Scholar

AB and CD v. CT [2015] EWFC 12.Google Scholar

See, for example, A v. C [1985] FLR 445; Re P [1987] 2 FLR 421; Re MW [1995] 2 FLR 759; C and C v. GS [1996] SCLR 837; Re N (A Child) [2007] EWCA Civ. 1053, [2008] 1 FLR 198; Re TT (Surrogacy) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam.); Re M (A Child), also known as H v. S [2015] EWFC 36; see also ref. 2 at 3.6.Google Scholar

Biggs, H., & Jones, C. Legally vulnerable: what is vulnerability and who is vulnerable? In Freeman, M., Hawkes, S., & Bennett, B., eds., Law and Global Health (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 133–48.Google Scholar

Section 54(3), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.Google Scholar

J v. G [2013] EWHC 1432 (Fam.), [29], per Theis J.Google Scholar

JP v. LP [2014] EWHC 595 (Fam.).Google Scholar

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.).Google Scholar

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [54].Google Scholar

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [55].Google Scholar

Section 1(2), Adoption and Children Act of 2002.Google Scholar

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [65].Google Scholar