Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: February 2018

10 - Vaginal Hysterectomy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Summary

Introduction

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. The literature supports vaginal hysterectomy as the safest and most cost-effective route of hysterectomy for benign disease whenever technically feasible. However, vaginal hysterectomy remains an underutilized route of hysterectomy. Proposed reasons why vaginal hysterectomy is not performed more frequently include: (1) the development of technology to perform laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies; (2) decreased surgeon experience with vaginal hysterectomy; and (3) lower reimbursement for vaginal procedures.

This chapter will review indications and contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy. It will also discuss the benefits of performing a hysterectomy via the vaginal route whenever possible. Relevant anatomy and the steps of the procedure will be reviewed. Finally, the chapter will review the prevention of complications such as cuff cellulitis, dehiscence, and bleeding pedicle. Management of these complications will also be discussed.

Scope of the Problem

Approximately 30 percent of women in the United States will undergo a hysterectomy prior to the age of 60. Ninety percent of hysterectomies are performed for benign indications including abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids, and uterine prolapse. When technically feasible, vaginal hysterectomy appears to be superior to both laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. A recent Cochrane review concluded that vaginal hysterectomy is associated with a faster return to normal activities and less febrile morbidity than abdominal hysterectomy. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a greater number of urinary tract injuries and a significantly longer operating time than vaginal hysterectomy. The cost of vaginal hysterectomy is significantly less than robotic, laparoscopic, or abdominal hysterectomy, making this the preferred route of surgery.

The approach to hysterectomy varies widely across countries, regionally within countries, and even among surgeons working at the same hospital. The physician determines the plan for surgery, and ultimately the choice depends on the surgeon's experience, preferences, and individual patient characteristics. Despite the benefits of vaginal hysterectomy that have been repeatedly demonstrated by numerous trials, vaginal hysterectomy remains an underutilized procedure in the United States. The proportion of hysterectomies performed vaginally in the United States decreased from 24.8 percent in 1998 to 16.7 percent in 2010. As of 2013 the proportion of inpatient vaginal hysterectomies was stable at 16.9% despite a decrease in abdominal and an increase in laparoscopic procedures since 2010.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;114:1156–8.
2. Johanna, A., Nieboer, J., Emma, T., Garry, R., Mol, B. W., and Kluivers, K., “Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease (review),” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 (8), doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
3. Wright, J. D., Herzog, T. J., Jennifer, T., Ananth, C. V., Lewin, S. N., Lu, Y.-S., Neugut, A. I., and Hershman, D. L., “Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013;122:233–41.
4. Vrunda B, Desai MD, Xiao X. An update on inpatient hysterectomy routes in the United States. American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;213(5):742–43
5. Kovak, R. S., “Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;57:58–71.
6. Figueiredo, O., Figueiredo, P., Figueiredo, P., Pelosi, M., and Pelosi, M., “Vaginal removal of the benign nonprolapsed uterus: experience with 300 consecutive operations,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;94:348–51.
7. Agostini, A., Bretelle, F., Cravello, L., Maisonneuve, A. S., Roger, V., and Blanc, B., “Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse: a prospective comparative study,” British Joural of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;5:515–18 .
8. Muffly, T. M. and Kow, N. S., “Effect of obesity on patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014;21:168–75 .
9. Agostini, A., Vejux, N., Colette, E., Bretelle, F., Cravello, L., and Blanc, B., “Risk of bladder injury during vaginal hysterectomy in women with a previous cesarean section,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2005;50:940–2.
10. Jones, H. and Rock, J. A., Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Walters Kluver, 2015.
11. Kulkarni, M. M. and Rogers, R. G., “Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;53:5–16.
12. Kroft, J. and Amanda, S., “Energy based vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;118 : 1127–36 .
13. Hodges, K. R., Davis, B. R., and Swaim, L. S., “Prevention and management of hysterectomy complications,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;57:43–57.
14. Matthews, C. A. and Kenton, K., “Treatment of vaginal cuff evisceration,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;124: 705–8.
15. Toy, E., “Management of a lost pedicle at the time of vaginal hysterectomy,” February 15, 2016. Available: www.exxcellence.org/pearls-of-exxcellence/list-of-pearls/management-of-a-lost-pedicle-at-the-time-of-a-vaginal-hysterectomy/.
16. Muffly, T. M. and Kow, N. S., “Effect of obesity on patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014;21:168–75.