Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: February 2018

7 - Operative Laparoscopy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Summary

Introduction

Operative laparoscopy has become widely used for a variety of gynecologic procedures. It is beneficial to patients due to shorter hospital stay and recovery time and lower risk of surgical and postoperative complications. This chapter will cover patient selection including contraindications to operative laparoscopy, preoperative testing, and surgical preparations. It will also cover intraoperative considerations including surgical instruments, abdominal entry and closure as well as an overview of the following procedures: ovarian cystectomy, laparoscopic salpingectomy, oophorectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy. Complications specific to operative laparoscopy will be discussed in this chapter.

Scope of the Problem

Laparoscopic surgery has important advantages over laparotomy for the treatment of gynecologic conditions. There is a lower risk of surgical injury and postoperative complications, less postoperative pain, and a shorter hospital stay. Although operative time can be longer, laparoscopy is, overall, cost-effective. A study in 1995 comparing open to laparoscopic oophorectomies found a reduction in average cost from $7,053 to $6,139, and operating time of 175 and 137 minutes for laparoscopic and open surgeries respectively. In addition, laparoscopic surgeries have been found to be associated with less adhesion formation. This also has an economic impact. Postoperative adhesions can cause complications which require hospitalizations and repeated surgeries which are costly. A study in Sweden in 1997 estimated 2,330 hospital admissions and a cost of about $13 million annually as a result of postoperative adhesions. Although operative laparoscopy has many benefits, a unique risk related to this type of surgery is the potential of cancer dissemination from a malignant adnexal mass. Rupture of a malignant mass has a negative impact on disease-free survival in ovarian cancer. Appropriate patient selection, preoperative evaluation, and physician experience are necessary for safe and effective operative laparoscopy.

Preoperative Care

Patient Selection, Special Populations

Many surgical procedures can be performed successfully with laparoscopy, but it is important to consider the patient's preference and the surgeon's experience when planning for laparoscopy. In addition, equipment must be available and affordable in the hospital setting, with an experienced surgical team. Common indications for gynecologic operative laparoscopy include pelvic mass or ovarian cyst, fibroids, sterilization, ectopic pregnancy, and endometriosis. Contraindications to laparoscopy include extensive peritoneal adhesions which preclude adequate pneumoperitoneum, acute peritonitis, ileus or intestinal obstruction, extensive hernias, and medical contraindications to pneumoperitoneum or Trendelenberg positioning.

1. Medeiros, L. R., Rosa, D. D., Bozzetti, M. C. et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor. Coch Database of Sys Rev 2009:CD004751.
2. Papasakelariou, C., Saunders, D., De La Rosa. Comparative study of laparoscopic oophorectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2(4): 407–10.
3. Lundorff, P., Hahlin, M., Thorburn, B. et al. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(5): 911–15.
4. Ivarsson, M. L., Holmdahl, L., Franzen, G., Risberg, B.. Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. Eur J Surg 1997; 163(9): 679–84.
5. Vergote, I., Brabanter, J. De, Fyles, A. et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001; 357: 176–2.
6. Gomel, V.. Laparoscopy. Can Med Assoc J 1974; 111(2): 167–9.
7. Sisodia, R.M., Carmen, M.G. Del, Boruta, D.M.. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of adnexal masses. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(1): 66–75.
8. Broach, A. N., Mansuria, S. M., Sanfilippo, J.. Pediatric and adolescent gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52(3): 380–9.
9. Rieger, M. M., Santos, X. M., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H. et al. Laparoscopic outcomes for pelvic pathology in children and adolescents among patients presenting to the pediatric and adolescent gynecology service. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28(3): 157–62.
10. Snyder, T., Selanders, J.. Incidental appendectomy – yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998; 6: 30–7.
11. Gustofson, R., Kim, N., Liu, S. et al. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 298–303.
12. Turrentine, F. E., Wang, H., Simpson, V. B., Jones, R. S.. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 865–77.
13. Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Fitterman, N. et al. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(8): 575–80.
14. Parker, D. Y., Burke, J. J. II, Gallup, D. G.. Gynecological surgery in octogenarians and nonagenarians. A J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(5): 1401–3.
15. Scheib, S. A., Tanner, E. III, Green, I. C. et al. Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese patient: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009; 21(2): 182–95.
16. Bensley, R. P., Schermerhorn, M. L., Hurks, R. et al. Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernias after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(6): 1159–67.
17. Agarwala, N., Liu, C. Y.. Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy: Left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space: a review of 918 procedures. J Min Invas Gynecol 2005; 12(1): 55–61.
18. Bohmer, A. B., Wappler, F., Zwissler, B.. Preoperative risk assessment: from routine tests to individualized investigation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111(25): 437–46.
19. Manley, S., Kelaita, G. de, Joseph, N. J. et al. Preoperative pregnancy testing in ambulatory surgery: incidence and impact of positive results. Anes 1995; 83(4): 690–3.
20. Philips, P. A., Amaral, J. A.. Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(4): 525–36.
21. Nordestgaard, A. G., Bodily, K. C., Obsorne, R. W.. Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 543–5.
22. Coskun, F., Salman, M. A.. Anesthesia for operative endoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 13(4): 371–6.
23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Practice Bulletin No. 104, May 2009a.
24. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Practice Bulletin No. 84, August 2007.
25. Geerts, W. H., Pineo, G. F., Heit, J. A. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 124(Suppl): 338–400S.
26. Abbott, C. Sutton. History of power sources in endoscopic surgery. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20 : 271–8.
27. Law, K., Lyons, S.. Comparative studies of energy sources in gynecologic laparoscopy. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20 : 308–18.
28. Ahmad, G., Gent, D., Henderson, D, O'Flynn, H, Phillips, K, Watson, A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2015(8 ): CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
29. Phillips, J. M Complications in laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1977; 15: 157–62.
30. Levinson, C.. Laparoscopy is easy – except for the complications: a review with suggestions. J Rep Med 1974; 5: 187–94.
31. Chapron, C Pierre, F Harchaoui, Y et al. Gastrointestinal injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 1999 Feb; 14(2): 333–7.
32. Findley, A. D., Solnik, M. J. Prevention and management of urologic injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28: 323–8.