Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:18:08.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

By
Theodore Tsaltas
Edited by
Lisa Keder  and
Martin E. Olsen
Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 101 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reich, H, DeCaprio, J, McGlynn, F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, H,Rahmanie, N. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. In Kavic MS, Levinson CJ, Wette PA eds Prevention and Management of Laparoendocscopic Surgical Complications 1st Edition Miami Florida, Socisey of Laparoendoscopic Surgones, 1999.Google Scholar
Lee, PI, Lee, YT, Lee, SH, Chang, YK. Advantages of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996 Aug;3(4, Supplement):S24–5.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Committee Opinion 444, November 2009, reaffirmed 2011.Google Scholar
Johns, DA, Carrera, B, Jones, J, DeLeon, F, Vincent, R, Safely, C. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1709–19.Google Scholar
Stovall, TG, Summitt. Laparoscopic hysterectomy – is there a benefit? N Engl J Med 1996;335:512–13.Google Scholar
Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N, Lethaby, A, Tavender, E, Curr, E, Garry, R et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Coch Dat Sys Rev 2009;3 (CD003677).Google Scholar
Jennings, AJ, Spencer, RJ, Medlin, E, Rice, LW, Uppal, S. Predictors of 30-day readmission and impact of same-day discharge in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 Sep;213(3):344.e1-7.Google Scholar
Lassen, PD, Moeller-Larsen, H, DE Nully, P. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012 Nov;91(11):1339–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsaltas, T, Dassow, JD. Advanced surgical care for a rural outreach population. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, poster presentation at 2015 Annual Clinical Meeting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperin, M, Kivnick, S, Poon, KY. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Nov–Dec;19(6):689–94.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M, Gizzarelli, G, Chanpong, B. Oral sedation: a primer on anxiolysis for the adult patient. Anesth Prog 2007;54(3):118–29.Google Scholar
Slim, K, Vicaut, E, Launay-Savary, MV, Contant, C, Chipponi, J. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2009;249:203–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretagnol, F, Panis, Y, Rullier, E, Rouanet, P, Berdah, S, Dousset, B et al. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: the French GRECCAR III multicenter singleblinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252:863–8.Google Scholar
Reichman, DE, Greenberg, JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2(4):212–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Nygren, J, Thorell, A, Jacobsson, H, Larsson, S, Schnell, PO, Hylén, L, Ljungqvist, O. Preoperative gastric emptying: effects of anxiety and oral carbohydrate administration. Ann Surg 1995 Dec;222(6):728–34.Google Scholar
Hunt, JN. Some properties of an alimentary osmoreceptor mechanism. J Physiol 1956 May;132(2):267–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, AD, Stock, JG, Davies, JM. Effects of preoperative fasting on morbidity and gastric contents in patients undergoing day-stay surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1986 Aug;58(8):876–8.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, P, Dahlback, B, Marsal, K. Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:595–9.Google Scholar
James A. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin no. 123 Thromboembolism in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;118(3):718–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, SM. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy. antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. In: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest, 9th ed. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e691S–736S.Google Scholar
Clarke-Pearson, DL, Elizabeth, J. Geller, EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:654–73.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S. The facts about penicillin allergy: a review. J Adv Pharm Technol Resv 2010 Jan–Mar;1(1):11–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Jacob, M, Chappell, D, Conzen, P, Finsterer, U, Rehm, M. Blood volume is normal after pre-operative overnight fasting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52(4):522.Google Scholar
Lambert, KG, Wakim, JH, Lambert, NE. Preoperative fluid bolus and reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J A Assoc Nur Anesth 2009;77:110–4.Google Scholar
Maharaj, CH, Kallam, SR, Malik, A, Hassett, P, Grady, D, Laffey, JG. Preoperative intravenous fluid therapy decreases postoperative nausea and pain in high risk patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100:675–82.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Ho, K-Y, Wang, Y. Efficacy of pregabalin in acute postoperative pain: a meta-analysis, Br J Anaesth 2011;106 (4):454–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alayed, N, Alghanaim, N, Tan, X, Tulandi, T. Preemptive use of gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1221–9.Google Scholar
Loring, M, Morris, SN, Isaacson, KB. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Soc Laparasc Surg 2015;19(1):e2014.00221. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00221Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, D. Therbligs: the key to simplifying work. The Gilbreth network, http://gilbrethnetwork.tripod.com/therbligs.html.Google Scholar
Allen, K, Blascovich, J. Effects of music on cardiovascular reactivity among surgeons. J Am Med Assoc 1994;272(11):882–4.Google Scholar
Persoon, MC, Broos, HJHP, Witjes, JA, Hendrikx, AJM, Scherpbier, AJJM. The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures. Surg Endosc 2011;25(2):437–43.Google Scholar
Reichman, DE, James, A, Greenberg, JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2(4):212–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CH, Dun, EC, Katz, A, Wieser, FA. Office visceral slide test compared with two perioperative tests for predicting periumbilical adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1049–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hefni, MA, Bhaumik, J, El-Toukhy, T et al. Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial. B J Obstet and Gynaecol 2005 Mar;112(3):329–33.Google Scholar
Buller, JL, Thompson, JR, Cundiff, GW, Krueger Sullivan, L, Schön Ybarra, MA, Bent, AE. Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jun;97(6):873–9.Google Scholar
Chin, K, Smith, BC, Maldonado, PA, Corton, M. Variability in ureteral distance to uterosacral ligament and uterine vessels with and without cervical traction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014 Mar–Apr;21(2):Supplement, S8Google Scholar
Hur, HC, Donnellan, N, Mansuria, S, Barber, RE, Guido, R, Lee, T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Oct;118(4):794–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perron-Burdick, M, Yamamoto, M, Zaritsky, E. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy, Obstet Gynecol 2011 May;117(5):1136–41.Google Scholar
Gilmour, DT, Das, S, Flowerdew, G. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1366–72.Google Scholar
Carley, ME, McIntire, D, Carley, JM, Schaffer, J. Incidence, risk factors and morbidity of unintended bladder or ureter injury during hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:18–21.Google Scholar
Navarro, LHC, Bloomstone, JA, Auler, JOC, Cannesson, M, Della Rocca, G, Gan, TJ et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group Perioper Med. 2015; 4: 3.Published online, Apr 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaye, AD, Riopelle, JM. Miller’s Anesthesia. Missouri: Churchill Livingstone, 2009. Ch. Intravascular fluid and electrolyte physiology, pp. 1705–37.Google Scholar
Holte, K, Klarskov, B, Christensen, DS, Lund, C, Nielsen, KG, Bie, P et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 2004;240:892–9.Google Scholar
Yee, JP, Koshiver, JE, Allbon, C, Brown, CR. Comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulfate for analgesia of pain after major surgery. Pharma 1986 Sep–Oct;6(5):253–61.Google Scholar
Balestrieri, P, Simmons, G, Hill, D, Brown, J, Jackson, A, Brull, SJ, Maneatis, TJ, Shefrin, A, Bynum, L, O’Hara, DA. The effect of intravenous ketorolac given intraoperatively versus postoperatively on outcome from gynecologic abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 1997 Aug;9(5):358–64.Google Scholar
Nakayama, M, Ichinose, H, Yamamoto, S et al. Perioperative intravenous flurbiprofen reduces postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1999;43:13–18.Google Scholar
Rittenhouse, BE, Choiniere, M. An economic evaluation of pain therapy after hysterectomy: patient-controlled analgesia versus regular intramuscular opioid therapy. Int J Tech Assess 1999 15(3):548–62.Google Scholar
Everett, B, Salamonson, Y. Differences in postoperative opioid consumption in patients prescribed patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular injection. Pain Manag Nurs 2005 Dec;6(4):137–44.Google Scholar
Bayar, U. Basaran, M. Atasoy, N. Ayoglu, H. Sade, H. Altunkaya, H. Comparison of satisfaction and pain relief between patients-controlled analgesia and interval analgesia after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008 Jun;29(2):139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, K, Metcalfe, MA, Herbert, A, Maresh, M, Casbard, A, Hargreaves, J et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. B J Obstet Gynecol 2004 111(7):688–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Makinen, J, Johansson, J, Tomas, C et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16: 1473–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, KN, Jonsdottir, GM, Jorgensen, S, Shah, N, Einarsson, JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. J S Laparosc Surg 2012 Oct–Dec;16(4):519–24.Google Scholar
Walsh, CA, Walsh, SR, Tang, TY, Slack, M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009 May;144(1):3–7.Google Scholar
Bulent Berker, MD, Salih Taskin, MD, Elif Aylin Taskin, MD. Complications of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery chapter 60 in prevention and management of laparoendoscopic surgical complications. In: S Laparoendosc Surg, 3rd ed, 2012.Google Scholar
Vilos, GA, Ternamian, A, Dempster, J et al. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007 29:433–65.Google Scholar
Leron, E, Piura, B, Ohana, E, Mazor, M. Delayed recognition of major vascular injury during laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998 Jul;79(1):91–93.Google Scholar
Hur, HC, Donnellan, N, Mansuria, S, Barber, R, Guido, R, Lee, T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:794–801.Google Scholar
Uccella, SU, Ceccaroni, M, Cromi, A, Malzoni, M, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:516–523.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×