Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:23:28.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contributions of K. Gödel to Relativity and Cosmology

from Part I - Invited Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

G.F.R. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Petr Hájek
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access

Summary

Summary. K Gödel published two seminal papers on general relativity theory and its application to the study of cosmology. The first examined a non-expanding but rotating solution of the Einstein field equations, in which causality is violated; this lead to an in-depth examination of the concepts of causality and time in curved space-times. The second examined properties of a family of rotating and expanding spatially homogeneous solutions of the Einstein equations, which was a forerunner of many studies of such cosmologies. Together they stimulated examination of themes that were fundamental in the development of the Hawking-Penrose singularity theorems and in studies of cosmological dynamics. I review these two papers, and the developments that resulted from them.

Introduction

Gödel became interested in general relativity theory while he and Einstein were both on staff of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton. Apparently they discussed the subject together often. His resultant two papers had a major impact:

Curiously, the beginning of the modern studies of singularities in general relativity in many ways had its seeds in the presentation by Kurt Gödel (1949) of an exact solution of Einstein's equations for pressure-free matter, which could be thought of as a singularity-free, rotating but non-expanding cosmological model … [this paper] was one of the papers presented in a special issue of Reviews of Modem Physics dedicated to Einstein on his 70th birthday. Gödel used this space-time as an example helping to clarify the nature of time in general relativity, for it is an exact solution of the Einstein equations in which there are closed timelike lines: an observer can travel into his own past, and (as an old man) stand alongside himself (as a young man). He shortly thereafter published a further paper (1952) discussing a family of exact solutions of Einstein's equations representing rotating and expanding spatially homogeneous universe models (and relying on the geometric results derived many decades earlier by Sophus Lie and Luigi Bianchi). As these permit non-zero redshifts, they could include realistic models of the observed universe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gödel '96
Logical Foundations of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics - Kurt Gödel's Legacy
, pp. 34 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R., Bazin, M., Schiffer, M. (1975). Introduction to General Relativity. (McGraw Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo), 437–448.
Chandrasekhar, S. and Wright, J. P. (1961). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 47, 341.
Coleman, S., Hartle, J. B., Piran, T. and Weinberg, S. (Eds.) (1991). Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes. (World Scientific, Singapore).
Collins, C. B. (1986). Shearfree fluids in general relativity. Can.J.Phys. 64, 191–199.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1979). Singularities in Bianchi Cosmologies. Physics Reports 56, 63–105.Google Scholar
Ehlers, J. (1960): Beitrage zur mechanik kontinuerlichen medien. Abh. Mainz. Akad. Wiss. u. Lit., Mat/Nat Kl Nr 11. English Translation: Contributions to the relativistic mechanics of continuous media. Gen. Rel. Grav. 25, 1225–1266 (1993).Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949). In Schilpp. (1949), 687–688.
Einstein, A. (1949a). In Schilpp. (1949), 27–29, 65–67.
Ellis, G. F. R. (1967). The dynamics of pressure-free matter in general relativity. Journ. Math. Phys. 8, 1171–1194.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. F. R. (1971). Relativistic Cosmology. In General Relativity and Cosmology, Proc. Int. School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course XLVII. Ed. Sachs, R. K. (Academic Press, New York), 104–179.
Ellis, G. F. R. and MacCallum, M. A. H. (1969). A class of homogeneous cosmological models. Comm. Math. Phys. 12, 108–141.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1949). An example of a new type of cosmological solution of Einstein's field equations of gravitation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 447–450. [See Maths. Review 11, 216].Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1949a). A Remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy. In Schilpp. (1949), 557–462.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1952). Rotating universes. In Proc. Int. Cong. Math. (Camb., Mass.). Ed. Graves, L. M. et al. Volume 1, 175–181. [see Maths. Review 13, 500].
Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Hawking, S. W. and Penrose, R. (1970). The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 314, 529–548.Google Scholar
Heckmann, O. and Schücking, E. (1955). Remarks on Newtonian cosmology. I. Zs.f.Ap. 38, 95–109.Google Scholar
Heckmann, O. and Schücking, E. (1955). Remarks on Newtonian cosmology. II. Zs.f.Ap. 40, 75–92.Google Scholar
Heckmann, O. and Schücking, E. (1962). Relativistic cosmology. In Gravitation, Ed. Witten, L.. (Wiley, New York), 438–469.
Hobill, D., Burd, A. and Coley, A. (Eds.) (1994). Deterministic Chaos in General Relativity. (Plenum Press, New York. Nato-ASI Series B: Physics).
Kasner, E. (1921). Geometrical Theorems on Einstein's cosmological equations. Am.J.Math. 3, 217.Google Scholar
King, A. R. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). Tilted homogeneous cosmologies. Comm. Math. Phys. 31, 209–242.Google Scholar
Kundt, W. (1956). Tragheitsbahnen in einem vom Gödel angegeben kosmologischen model. Zs.f.Ap. 145, 611–620.Google Scholar
Lemaître, G. (1933). L'Univers en expansion. Ann. Soc. Sci Brux. 53, 51–85.Google Scholar
Lichnwerowicz, A. (1955). Theories relativistes de la Gravitation et d'lelectromagnetisme. (Masson, Paris).
MacCallum, M. A. H. (1980). In General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. Ed. Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
MacCallum, M. A. H. (1993). Anisotropic and inhomogeneous cosmologies. In The Renaissance of General Relativity and Cosmology. Ed. Ellis, G. F. R., Lanza, A. and Miller, J. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), 213–233.
Misner, C. W. (1969). The Mixmaster Universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1071–1074.Google Scholar
Oszvath, I. and Schücking, E. (1962). Finite Rotating Universe. Nature 193, 1168–1169.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1965). Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57–59.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, A. K. (1955). Relativistic cosmology. Phys. Rev. 98, 1123–1126.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, A. K. (1957). Relativistic and Newtonian cosmology. Zs.f.Ap. 43, 161–164.Google Scholar
Rindler, W. (1977). Essential Relativity. (Springer, Berlin), 243–244.
Ryan, M. (1972). Hamiltonian Cosmology. (Springer, Berlin; Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 13).
Schücking, E. (1957). Naturwiss 19, 57.
Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.) (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist. (2 Vols). (Open Court, La Salle).
Stewart, J. M. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1968). Solutions of Einstein's equations for a fluid which exhibits local rotational symmetry. Journ. Math. Phys. 9, 1072–1082.Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. (1937). Relativistic hydrodynamics. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 43, 37.Google Scholar
Taub, A. H. (1951). Empty Space-Times admitting a 3-parameter group of motions. Ann. Math. 53, 472.Google Scholar
Thome, K. S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. (Norton, New York).
Tipler, F. J., Clarke, C. J. S., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1980). Singularities and Horizons: a review article. In General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred years after the birth of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2, Ed. Held, A. (Plenum Press, New York), 97–206.
Wainwright, J. and Ellis, G. F. R. (Ed.) (1996). The dynamical systems approach to cosmology. In publication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Zeeman, E. C. (1964). Causality implies the Lorentz group. J. Math. Phys. 5, 490–493.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×