Introduction

Jinjun Wang; Lihao Feng

doi:10.1017/9781316676448.002

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2018

Jinjun Wang and

Lihao Feng

Show author details

Jinjun Wang: Affiliation:
Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Lihao Feng: Affiliation:
Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A general introduction to flow control is presented, including the background, classification, and features of various passive and active techniques. The passive methods include Gurney flap, vortex generator, bump, cavity, roughness, small disturbance, bleed, splitter plate, polymer, and biomimetic techniques. The active methods include oscillation and flow perturbation, acoustic excitation, jet, synthetic jet, plasma actuator, and Lorentz force.

Type: Chapter
Information: Flow Control Techniques and Applications , pp. 1 - 22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676448.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aftab, S. M. A., Razak, N. A., Rafie, A. S. M., and Ahmad, K. A. Mimicking the humpback whale: an aerodynamic perspective. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016, 84: 48–69Google Scholar

Akilli, H., Sahin, B., and Tumen, N. F. Suppression of vortex shedding of circular cylinder in shallow water by a splitter plate. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2005, 16(4): 211–219Google Scholar

Allen, L. andBridges, T. J. Flow past a swept wing with a compliant surface: stabilizing the attachment-line boundary layer. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 2003, 110(4): 333–349Google Scholar

Report of the Group of Personalities formed by Busquin, P. European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020. Published by the European Commission, 2001Google Scholar

Aydin, B. T., Cetiner, O., and Unal, M. F. Effect of self-issuing jets along the span on the near-wake of a square cylinder. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 48(6): 1081–1094Google Scholar

Bachmann, T. and Wagner, H. The three-dimensional shape of serrations at barn owl wings: towards a typical natural serration as a role model for biomimetic applications. Journal of Anatomy, 2011, 219(2): 192–202Google Scholar

Baek, H. and Karniadakis, G. E. Suppressing vortex-induced vibrations via passive means. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2009, 25(5): 848–866Google Scholar

Barnes, C. J. and Visbal, M. R. Numerical exploration of the origin of aerodynamic enhancements in low-Reynolds number corrugated airfoils. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(11): 115106Google Scholar

Berger, T. W., Kim, J., Lee, C., and Lim, J. Turbulent boundary layer control utilizing the Lorentz force. Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(3): 631–649Google Scholar

Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y. C. Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for super hydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Progress in Materials Science, 2011, 56(1): 1–108Google Scholar

Brücker, C. and Weidner, C. Influence of self-adaptive hairy flaps on the stall delay of an airfoil in ramp-up motion. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 47: 31–40Google Scholar

Busse, A., Sandham, N. D., McHale, G., and Newton, M. I. Change in drag, apparent slip and optimum air layer thickness for laminar flow over an idealised superhydrophobic surface. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 727: 488–508Google Scholar

Celik, B., Akdag, U., Gunes, S., and Beskok, A. Flow past an oscillating circular cylinder in a channel with an upstream splitter plate. Physics of Fluids, 2008, 20(10): 103603Google Scholar

Chen, Y. C., Liu, H., Zhang, B. Q., and Zhu, Z. Q. A review on drag reduction study and application for large aircraft. The Application and Development of CFD in Large Civil Aircraft, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2009, 32–47 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Choi, K. S. Near-wall structure of turbulent boundary layer with spanwise-wall oscillation. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(7): 2530–2542Google Scholar

Choi, H., Park, H., Sagong, W., and Lee, S. Biomimetic flow control based on morphological features of living creaturesa. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24(12): 121302Google Scholar

Corke, T. C., Enloe, C. L., and Wilkinson, S. P. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 42: 505–529Google Scholar

Daniello, R. J., Waterhouse, N. E., and Rothstein, J. P. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Physics of Fluids, 2009, 21(8): 085103Google Scholar

Ekmekci, A. and Rockwell, D. Effects of a geometrical surface disturbance on flow past a circular cylinder: a large-scale spanwise wire. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 665: 120–157Google Scholar

Elbing, B. R., Winkel, E. S., Lay, K. A., Ceccio, S. L., Dowling, D. R., and Perlin, M. Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 612: 201–236Google Scholar

Feng, L. H. and Wang, J. J. Circular cylinder vortex-synchronization control with a synthetic jet positioned at the rear stagnation point. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 662: 232–259Google Scholar

Feng, L. H. and Wang, J. J. Modification of a circular cylinder wake with synthetic jet: Vortex shedding modes and mechanism. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2014, 43: 14–32Google Scholar

Fransson, J. H. M., Talamelli, A., Brandt, L., and Cossu, C. Delaying transition to turbulence by a passive mechanism. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(6): 064501Google Scholar

Fu, H. and Rockwell, D. Shallow flow past a cylinder: control of the near wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 539: 1–24Google Scholar

Gad-el-Hak, M. Compliant coatings for drag reduction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(1): 77–99Google Scholar

Garner, P. L., Meredith, P. T., and Stoner, R. C. Areas for future CFD development as illustrated by transport aircraft applications. AIAA Paper 1991–1527Google Scholar

Glezer, A. and Amitay, M. Synthetic jets. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 34: 503–529Google Scholar

Hu, H. and Tamai, M. Bioinspired corrugated airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(6): 2068–2077Google Scholar

Huang, R. F., Jufar, S. R., and Hsu, C. M. Flow and mixing characteristics of swirling double-concentric jets subject to acoustic excitation. Experiments in Fluids, 2013, 54(1): 1421Google Scholar

Hwang, J. Y., Yang, K. S., and Sun, S. H. Reduction of flow-induced forces on circular cylinder using a detached splitter plate. Physics of Fluids, 2003, 15(8): 2433–2436Google Scholar

Hwang, J. Y. and Yang, K. S. Drag reduction on a circular cylinder using dual detached splitter plates. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007, 95(7): 551–564Google Scholar

Iollo, A. and Zannetti, L. Trapped vortex optimal control by suction and blowing at the wall. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2001, 20(1): 7–24Google Scholar

Ito, S. Aerodynamic influence of leading-edge serrations on an airfoil in a low Reynolds number – a study of an owl wing with leading edge serrations. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 2009, 4(1): 117–123Google Scholar

Jacob, B., Olivieri, A., Miozzi, M., Campana, E. F., and Piva, R. Drag reduction by microbubbles in a turbulent boundary layer. Physics of Fluids, 2010, 22(11): 115104.Google Scholar

Jimenez, J. Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 36: 173–196Google Scholar

Joslin, R. D. and Miller, D. N. Fundamentals and applications of modern flow control. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009Google Scholar

Jovanović, J., Pashtrapanska, M., Frohnapfel, B., Durst, F. K. J., and Koskinen, K. On the mechanism responsible for turbulent drag reduction by dilute addition of high polymers: theory, experiments, simulations, and predictions. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2006, 128(1): 118–130Google Scholar

Kesel, A. B. Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203(20): 3125–3135Google Scholar

Lasagna, D., Donelli, R., De Gregorio, F., and Luso, G. Effects of a trapped vortex cell on a thick wing airfoil. Experiments in Fluids, 2011, 51(5): 1369–1384Google Scholar

Leblanc, S. Acoustic excitation of vortex instabilities. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13(11): 3496–3499Google Scholar

Li, P.F., Zhang, B. Q., Chen, Y. C., and Chen, Z. L. Wave drag reduction of airfoil with shock control bump. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(6): 971–977 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Lin, J. C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(4): 389–420Google Scholar

Liu, Y. and Li, G. A new method for producing “Lotus Effect” on a biomimetic shark skin. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 388(1): 235–242Google Scholar

Lu, F. K., Li, Q., and Liu, C. Microvortex generators in high-speed flow. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2012, 53: 30–45Google Scholar

Luo, Z. B. and Xia, Z. X. Advances in synthetic jet technology and applications in flow control. Advances in Mechanics, 2005, 35(2): 221–234Google Scholar

Ma, H. D. and Cui, E. J. Drag prediction and reduction for civil transportation. Mechanics in Engineering. 2007, 29(2): 1–8Google Scholar

Meng., X. G. and Sun, M. Aerodynamic effects of wing corrugation at gliding flight at low Reynolds numbers. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(7): 071905Google Scholar

Milholen, W. E. and Owens, L. R. On the application of contour bumps for transonic drag reduction. AIAA Paper 2005–462Google Scholar

Mohany, A. andZiada, S. Effect of acoustic resonance on the dynamic lift forces acting on two tandem cylinders in cross-flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2009, 25(3): 461–478Google Scholar

Moreau, E. Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2007, 40(3): 605–636Google Scholar

Steering Committee for the Decadal Survey of Civil Aeronautics, National Research Council. Decadal Survey of Civil Aeronautics: Foundation for the Future. Published by the National Academies Press, 2006Google Scholar

Narayanan, S., Chaitanya, P., Haeri, S., Joseph, P., Kim, J. W., and Polacsek, C. Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(2): 025109Google Scholar

Navrose, , Meena, J. and Mittal, S. Three-dimensional flow past a rotating cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 766: 28–53Google Scholar

Olsman, W. F. and Colonius, T. Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil with a cavity. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(1): 143–149Google Scholar

Olsman, W. F., Willems, J. F., Hirschberg, A., Colonius, T., and Trieling, R. R. Flow around a NACA0018 airfoil with a cavity and its dynamical response to acoustic forcing. Experiments in Fluids, 2011, 51(2): 493–509Google Scholar

Procaccia, I., L’vov, V. S., and Benzi, R. Colloquium: Theory of drag reduction by polymers in wall-bounded turbulence. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2008, 80(1): 225–247Google Scholar

Riley, J. J., Gad-El-Hak, M., and Metcalfe, R. W. Compliant coatings. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 20: 393–420Google Scholar

Rothstein, J. P. Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 42: 89–109Google Scholar

Serson, D., Meneghini, J. R., Carmo, B. S., Volpe, E. V., and Gioria, R. S. Wake transition in the flow around a circular cylinder with a splitter plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 755: 582–602Google Scholar

Shen, L., Zhang, X., Yue, D. K., and Triantafyllou, M. S. Turbulent flow over a flexible wall undergoing a streamwise travelling wave motion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 484: 197–221Google Scholar

Shi, X. D. and Feng, L. H. Control of flow around a circular cylinder by bleed near the separation points. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56(12): 214Google Scholar

Son, K., Choi, J., Jeon, W.P., and Choi, H. Mechanism of drag reduction by a surface trip wire on a sphere. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 672: 411–427Google Scholar

Talley, S., Iaccarino, G., Mungal, G., and Mansour, N. An experimental and computational investigation of flow past cacti. Annual Research Briefs. Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames/Stanford University, 2001: 51–63Google Scholar

Tian, Y., Liu, P., and Peng, J. Using shock control bump to improve transonic buffet boundary of airfoil. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(8): 1421–1428 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Todde, V., Spazzini, P. G., and Sandberg, M. Experimental analysis of low-Reynolds number free jets. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 47(2): 279–294Google Scholar

Wang, J. J., Li, Y. C., and Choi, K. S. Gurney flap – Lift enhancement, mechanisms and applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2008, 44(1): 22–47Google Scholar

Wang, J. J., Zhang, P. F., Lu, S. F., and Wu, K. Drag reduction of a circular cylinder using an upstream rod. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2006, 76(1): 83–101Google Scholar

Wang, J. J., Choi, K. S., Feng, L. H., Jukes, T.N., and Whalley, R. D. Recent developments in DBD plasma flow control. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013a, 62: 52–78Google Scholar

Wang, J. J., Pan, C., Choi, K. S., Gao, L., and Lian, Q. X. Formation, growth and instability of vortex pairs in an axisymmetric stagnation flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013b, 725: 681–708Google Scholar

Washburn, A. E., Gorton, S. A., and Anders, S. G. Snapshot of active flow control research at NASA Langley. AIAA Paper 2002–3155Google Scholar

Wu, Y. and Li, Y. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control. ACTA Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36: 381–405 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Xu, J., Maxey, M. R., and Karniadakis, G. E. Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 468: 271–281Google Scholar

Yang, S. L. and Spedding, G. R. Separation control by external acoustic excitation at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(6): 1506–1515Google Scholar

Yarusevych, S., Sullivan, P. E., and Kawall, J. G. Effect of acoustic excitation amplitude on airfoil boundary layer and wake development. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(4): 760–771Google Scholar

Zhang, P. F., Wang, J. J., and Feng, L. H. Review of zero-net-mass-flux jet and its application in separation flow control. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2008, 51(9): 1315–1344Google Scholar

Zhang, P. F., Wang, J. J., and Huang, L. X. Numerical simulation of flow around cylinder with an upstream rod in tandem at low Reynolds numbers. Applied Ocean Research, 2006a, 28(3): 183–192Google Scholar

Zhang, P. F., Wang, J. J., Lu, S. F., and Mi, J. Aerodynamic characteristics of a square cylinder with a rod in a staggered arrangement. Experiments in Fluids, 2005, 38(4): 494–502Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Gao, L., and Wang, J. J. Drag reduction of a disk with an upstream rod. Wind and Structures, 2006b, 9(3): 245–254Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive