Book contents
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Cambridge Aerospace Series
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gurney Flap
- 3 Vortex Generator
- 4 Roughness
- 5 Polymer
- 6 Biological Techniques
- 7 Jet
- 8 Synthetic Jet
- 9 Plasma Actuator
- 10 Lorentz Force
- 11 Closed-Loop Control
- Index
- References
11 - Closed-Loop Control
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2018
Book contents
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Cambridge Aerospace Series
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gurney Flap
- 3 Vortex Generator
- 4 Roughness
- 5 Polymer
- 6 Biological Techniques
- 7 Jet
- 8 Synthetic Jet
- 9 Plasma Actuator
- 10 Lorentz Force
- 11 Closed-Loop Control
- Index
- References
Summary
A closed-loop control system includes fluid system, actuator, sensor, and control algorithm. The control parameters depend on information from the control system which in turn depend on the control. Thus, it could adapt to the flow condition and contribute an intelligent and robust system. The control algorithm could be based on the reduced-order model or the measured signal from the flow field. The reduced-order model is usually achieved by advanced data processing methods, such as POD. On the other hand, measured variables, such as pressure and force coefficients, could also be used for the design of the control algorithm. Some examples of closed-loop control are introduced in detail to show its effect. It is suggested that the realization of closed-loop control is important for engineering applications of active flow control techniques.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications , pp. 266 - 277Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Benard, N., Cattafesta III, L. N., Moreau, E., Griffin, J., and Bonnet, J. P. On the benefits of hysteresis effects for closed-loop separation control using plasma actuation. Physics of Fluids, 2011, 23(8): 894–894Google Scholar
Bergmann, M., Cordier, L., and Brancher, J. P. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(9): 336–346Google Scholar
Brunton, S. L., Dawson, S. T. M., and Rowley, C. W. State-space model identification and feedback control of unsteady aerodynamic forces. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 50: 253–270Google Scholar
Corke, T. C. Bowles, P. O., He, C., and Matlis, E. H. Sensing and control of flow separation using plasma actuators. Philosophical Transactions, 2011, 369(1940): 1459–1475Google Scholar
Joslin, R. D. and Miller, D. N. Fundamentals and applications of modern flow control. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009Google Scholar
Pastoor, M., Henning, L., Noack, B. R., King, R., and Tadmor, G. Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 608: 161–196Google Scholar
Patel, M. P., Sowle, Z. H., Corke, T. C., and He, C. Autonomous sensing and control of wing stall using a smart plasma slat. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(2): 516–527Google Scholar
Patel, M. P., Tilmann, C. P., and Ng, T. T. Active transparent stall control system for air vehicles. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(5): 993–997Google Scholar
Pinier, J. T., Ausseur, J., Glauser, M. N., and Higuchi, H. Proportional closed-loop feedback control of flow separation. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(1): 181–190Google Scholar
Siegel, S. G., Cohen, K., and McLaughlin, T. Numerical simulations of a feedback-controlled circular cylinder wake. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(6): 1266–1276Google Scholar
Tewes, P., Wygnanski, I., and Washburn, A. E. Feedback controlled forcefully attached flow on a stalled airfoil. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(3): 940–951Google Scholar
Weller, J., Camarri, S., and Iollo, A. Feedback control by low-order modelling of the laminar flow past a bluff body. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 634: 405–418Google Scholar