Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:34:11.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Ankle and Hindfoot Arthritis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2018

Andrew Robinson
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
James W. Brodsky
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
John P. Negrine
Affiliation:
Orthosports, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Saltzman, CL, Zimmerman, MB, O’Rourke, M, Brown, TD, Buckwalter, JA, Johnston, R. Impact of comorbidities on the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:11, 2366–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valderrabano, V, Horisberger, M, Russell, I, Dougall, H, Hintermann, B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:7, 1800–6.Google Scholar
Ateshian, GA, Soslowsky, LJ, Mow, VC. Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. J Biomech. 1991; 24:8, 761–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Athanasiou, KA, Niederauer, GG, Schenck, RC Jr. Biomechanical topography of human ankle cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995; 23:5, 697704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushnaghan, J, Dieppe, P. Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991; 50, 813.Google Scholar
Jung, HG, Parks, BG, Nguyen, A, Schon, LC. Effect of tibiotalar joint arthrodesis on adjacent tarsal joint pressure in a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28:1, 103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takakura, Y, Tanaka, Y, Sugimoto, K, Akiyama, K, Tamai, S. Long-term results of arthrodesis for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 361, 178–85.Google Scholar
Sheridan, BD, Robinson, DE, Hubble, MJ, Winson, IG. Ankle arthrodesis and its relationship to ipsilateral arthritis of the hind- and mid-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:2, 206–7.Google Scholar
Flavin, R, Coleman, SC, Tenenbaum, S, Brodsky, JW. Comparison of gait after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34:10, 1340–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, ME, Wright, ES, Segal, AD, Orendurff, MS, Ledoux, WR, Sangeorzan, BJ. Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33:4, 282–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, Y, Takakura, Y, Hayashi, K, Taniguchi, A, Kumai, T, Sugimoto, K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:7, 909–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Saltzman, CL, el-Khoury, GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16:9, 572–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangeorzan, BJ, Mosca, V, Hansen, ST Jr. Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Foot Ankle. 1993; 14:3, 136–41.Google Scholar
Saltzman, CL, Brandser, EA, Berbaum, KS, et al. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15:12, 661–5.Google Scholar
Pugely, AJ, Lu, X, Amendola, A, Callaghan, JJ, Martin, CT, Cram, P. Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35:3, 207–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sealey, RJ, Myerson, MS, Molloy, A, Gamba, C, Jeng, C, Kalesan, B. Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30:3, 187–9.Google Scholar
Townshend, D, Di Silvestro, M, Krause, F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:2, 98102.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, RP, Stufkens, SA, de Bruijn, EE, Sierevelt, IN, van Dijk, CN, Kerkhoffs, GM. Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:10, 940–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dannawi, Z, Nawabi, DH, Patel, A, Leong, JJ, Moore, DJ. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: are results reproducible irrespective of pre-operative deformity? Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 17:4, 294–9.Google Scholar
Guo, C, Yan, Z, Barfield, WR, Hartsock, LA. Ankle arthrodesis using anatomically contoured anterior plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31:6, 492–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaass, C, Knupp, M, Barg, A, Hintermann, B. Anterior double plating for rigid fixation of isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30:7, 631–9.Google Scholar
Gougoulias, NE, Agathangelidis, FG, Parsons, SW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28:6, 695706.Google Scholar
Rippstein, P, Kumar, B, Müller, M. Ankle arthrodesis using the arthroscopic technique. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005; 17:4–5, 442–56.Google Scholar
Ferkel, RD, Hewitt, M. Long-term results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26:4, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winson, IG, Robinson, DE, Allen, PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:3, 343–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Cameron, SE, Ullrich, P. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16:1, 21–6.Google Scholar
Paremain, GD, Miller, SD, Myerson, MS. Ankle arthrodesis: results after the miniarthrotomy technique. Foot Ankle Int. 1996; 17:5, 247–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myerson, MS, Quill, G. Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; 268, 8495.Google Scholar
Buck, P, Morrey, BF, Chao, EY. The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69:7, 1052–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pell, RF 4th, Myerson, MS, Schon, LC. Clinical outcome after primary triple arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:1, 4757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haritidis, JH, Kirkos, JM, Provellegios, SM, Zachos, AD. Long-term results of triple arthrodesis: 42 cases followed for 25 years. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15:10, 548–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenuta, J, Shelton, YA, Miller, F. Long-term follow-up of triple arthrodesis in patients with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993; 13:6, 713–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figgie, MP, O’Malley, MJ, Ranawat, C, Inglis, AE, Sculco, TP. Triple arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 292, 250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, SC, Mann, RA, Graves, KO. Triple arthrodesis in older adults. Results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75:3, 355–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, GL, Graham, CE, Mauldin, DM. Triple arthrodesis in adults. Foot Ankle. 1991; 12:3, 138–43.Google Scholar
Sammarco, VJ, Magur, EG, Sammarco, GJ, Bagwe, MR. Arthrodesis of the subtalar and talonavicular joints for correction of symptomatic hindfoot malalignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27:9, 661–6.Google Scholar
Anand, P, Nunley, JA, DeOrio, JK. Single-incision medial approach for double arthrodesis of hindfoot in posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34:3, 338–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rammelt, S, Pyrc, J, Agren, PH, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using the hindfoot arthrodesis nail: a multicenter study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34:9, 1245–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budnar, VM, Hepple, S, Harries, WG, Livingstone, JA, Winson, I. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a curved, interlocking, intramedullary nail. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31:12, 1085–92.Google Scholar
Pelton, K, Hofer, JK, Thordarson, DB. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a dynamically locked retrograde intramedullary nail. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27:10, 759–63.Google Scholar
Hammett, R, Hepple, S, Forster, B, Winson, I. Tibiotalocalcaneal (hindfoot) arthrodesis by retrograde intramedullary nailing using a curved locking nail. The results of 52 procedures. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26:10, 810–15.Google Scholar
Anderson, T, Linder, L, Rydholm, U, Montgomery, F, Besjakov, J, Carlsson, A. Tibio-talocalcaneal arthrodesis as a primary procedure using a retrograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study of 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76:4, 580–7.Google Scholar
Mendicino, RW, Catanzariti, AR, Saltrick, KR, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde intramedullary nailing. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004; 43:2, 82–6.Google Scholar
Chou, LB, Mann, RA, Yaszay, B, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21:10, 804–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papa, JA, Myerson, MS. Pantalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis of the ankle and hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74:7, 1042–9.Google Scholar
Brodsky, JW, Verschae, G, Tenenbaum, S. Surgical correction of severe deformity of the ankle and hindfoot by arthrodesis using a compressing retrograde intramedullary nail. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35:4, 360–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinley, JC, Shortt, N, Arthur, C, Gunner, C, MacDonald, D, Breusch, SJ. Outcomes following pantalar arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:7, 681–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herscovici, D, Sammarco, GJ, Sammarco, VJ, Scaduto, JM. Pantalar arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis and diabetic neuroarthropathy of the ankle and hindfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:6, 581–8.Google Scholar
Gordon, D, Zicker, R, Cullen, N, Singh, D. Open ankle arthrodeses via an anterior approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34:3, 386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strasser, NL, Turner, NS. Functional outcomes after ankle arthrodesis in elderly patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33:9, 699703.Google Scholar
Kennedy, JG, Hodgkins, CW, Brodsky, A, Bohne, WH. Outcomes after standardized screw fixation technique of ankle arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 447, 112–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R, Daniels, TR, Parker, K. Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:3, 526–35.Google Scholar
Kofoed, H. Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 424, 73–9.Google Scholar
Nunley, JA, Caputo, AM, Easley, ME, Cook, C. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR total ankle replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94:1, 43–8.Google Scholar
Saltzman, CL, Mann, RA, Ahrens, JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30:7, 579–96.Google Scholar
Daniels, TR, Younger, AS, Penner, M, et al. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96:2, 135–42.Google Scholar
SooHoo, NF, Zingmond, DS, Ko, CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:10, 2143–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, JA, Mann, RA, Horton, E. STAR™ ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:5, S473–84.Google Scholar
Karantana, A, Hobson, S, Dhar, S. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:4, 951–7.Google Scholar
Daniels, TR, Mayich, DJ, Penner, MJ. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle replacement with the Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97, 895903.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, KM, Adams, SB, Viens, NA, et al. Early prospective clinical results of a modern fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:11, 1002–11.Google Scholar
Raikin, SM, Kane, J, Ciminiello, ME. Risk factors for incision-healing complications following total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:12, 2150–5.Google Scholar
Schuberth, JM, Babu, NS, Richey, JM, Christensen, JC. Gutter impingement after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34:3, 329–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agel, J, Coetzee, JC, Sangeorzan, BJ, Roberts, MM, Hansen, ST Jr. Functional limitations of patients with end-stage ankle arthrosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26:7, 537–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, AD, Shofer, J, Hahn, ME, Orendurff, MS, Ledoux, WR, Sangeorzan, BJ. Functional limitations associated with end-stage ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94:9, 777–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, S, Klejman, S, Pinsker, E, Houck, J, Daniels, T. Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:24, e191(1–10).Google Scholar
Smith, RW, Shen, W, Dewitt, S, Reischl, SF. Triple arthrodesis in adults with non-paralytic disease. A minimum ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:12, 2707–13.Google Scholar
Wapner, KL. Triple arthrodesis in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998; 6:3, 188–96.Google Scholar
Knupp, M, Skoog, A, Törnkvist, H, Ponzer, S. Triple arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29:3, 293–7.Google Scholar
Wukich, DK, Bowen, JR. A long-term study of triple arthrodesis for correction of pes cavovarus in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989; 9:4, 433–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetmore, RS, Drennan, JC. Long-term results of triple arthrodesis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:3, 417–22.Google Scholar
Zide, JR, Myerson, MS. Arthrodesis for the cavus foot: when, where, and how? Foot Ankle Clin. 2013; 18:4, 755–67.Google Scholar
Fortin, PT, Walling, AK. Triple arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 365, 9199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, SC, Mann, RA, Graves, KO. Triple arthrodesis in older adults: results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75, 355–62.Google Scholar
Pell, RF, Myerson, MS, Schon, LC. Clinical outcomes after primary triple arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82, 4757.Google Scholar
Saltzman, CL, Fehrle, MJ, Cooper, RR, Spence, EC, Ponseti, IV. Triple arthrodesis: twenty-five and forty-four-year average follow-up of the same patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81, 1391–402.Google Scholar
Beischer, AD, Brodsky, JW, Pollo, FE, Peereboom, J. Functional outcome and gait analysis after triple or double arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20:9, 545–53.Google Scholar
Ljung, P, Kaij, J, Knutson, K, Pettersson, H, Rydholm, U. Talonavicular arthrodesis in the rheumatoid foot. Foot Ankle. 1992; 13:6, 313–16.Google Scholar
Chen, CH, Huang, PJ, Chen, TB, et al. Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for talonavicular arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2001; 22:8, 633–6.Google Scholar
Chiodo, CP, Martin, T, Wilson, MG. A technique for isolated arthrodesis for inflammatory arthritis of the talonavicular joint. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21:4, 307–10.Google Scholar
Haskell, A, Pfeiff, C, Mann, R. Subtalar joint arthrodesis using a single lag screw. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25:11, 774–7.Google Scholar
Easley, ME, Trnka, HJ, Schon, LC, Myerson, MS. Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:5, 613–24.Google Scholar
Myerson, MS, Alvarez, RG, Lam, PW. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for the management of severe ankle and hindfoot deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21:8, 643–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, RA, Chou, LB. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16:7, 401–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenenbaum, S, Coleman, SC, Brodsky, JW. Improvement in gait following combined ankle and subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96:22, 1863–9.Google Scholar
Saville, P, Longman, CF, Srinivasan, SC, Kothari, P. Medial approach for hindfoot arthrodesis with a valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:8, 818–21.Google Scholar
Frey, C, Halikus, NM, Vu-Rose, T, Ebramzadeh, E. A review of ankle arthrodesis: predisposing factors to nonunion. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15:11, 581–4.Google Scholar
de Heus, JA, Marti, RK, Besselaar, PP, Albers, GH. The influence of subtalar and triple arthrodesis on the tibiotalar joint. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79:4, 644–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×