Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:08:30.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Midfoot and Forefoot Arthritis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2018

Andrew Robinson
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
James W. Brodsky
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
John P. Negrine
Affiliation:
Orthosports, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Roddy, E, Thomas, MJ, Marshall, M, Rathod, T, Myers, H, Menz, HB, Thomas, E, Peat, G. The population prevalence of symptomatic radiographic foot osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74(1):156–63.Google Scholar
Mann, RA, Prieskorn, D, Sobel, M. Mid-tarsal and tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for primary degenerative osteoarthrosis or osteoarthrosis after trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1376–85.Google Scholar
Singh, VK, Javed, S, Parthipun, A, Sott, AH. A radionuclide bone scan with single photon-emission computed tomography and CT (SPECT-CT). Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Jun;19(2):80–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, HG, Myerson, MS, Schon, LC. Spectrum of operative treatments and clinical outcomes for atraumatic osteoarthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Apr;28(4):482–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klos, K, Simons, P, Hajduk, AS, Hoffmeier, KL, Gras, F, Fröber, R, Hofmann, GO, Mückley, T. Plantar versus dorsomedial locked plating for Lapidus arthrodesis: a biomechanical comparison. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Nov;32(11):1081–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, MJ, Sayres, SC, Saleem, O, Levine, D, Roberts, M, Deland, JT, Ellis, S. Morbidity and complications following percutaneous calcaneal autograft bone harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Jan;35(1):30–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumhauer, J, Pinzur, MS, Donahue, R, Beasley, W, DiGiovanni, C. Site selection and pain outcome after autologous bone graft harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Feb;35(2):104–7.Google Scholar
Nemec, SA, Habbu, RA, Anderson, JG & Bohay, DR. Outcomes following midfoot arthrodesis for primary arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32(4): 355–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, J, Myerson, MS, Scioli, MW, Den Hartog, BD, Kay, DB, Bennett, GL, Stephenson, KA. Midfoot arthrodesis following multi-joint stabilization with a novel hybrid plating system. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Mar;33(3):220–5.Google Scholar
Komenda, GA, Myerson, MS, Biddinger, KR. Results of arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joints after traumatic injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1665–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinzur, MS. Neutral ring fixation for high-risk nonplantigrade Charcot midfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:961-966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sammarco, VJ, Sammarco, GJ, Walker, EW Jr, Guiao, RP. Midtarsal arthrodesis in the treatment of Charcot midfoot arthropathy. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92 Suppl 1 Pt 1:1-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butt, DA, Hester, T, Bilal, A, Edmonds, M, Kavarthapu, V. The medial column Synthes Midfoot Fusion Bolt is associated with unacceptable rates of failure in corrective fusion for Charcot deformity. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):809–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Pope, EJ, Takemoto, RC, Kummer, FJ, Mroczek, KJ. Midfoot fusion: a biomechanical comparison of plantar planting vs intramedullary screws. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Mar;34(3):409–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raikin, SM, Schon, LC. Arthrodesis of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints of the midfoot. Foot and Ankle Int. 2003 Aug;24(8):584–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlet, HC, Hodges, Davis W, Anderson, RB. Tendon arthroplasty for basal fourth and fifth metatarsal arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002 May;23(5):440–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shawen, SB, Anderson, RB, Cohen, BE, Hammit, MD, Davis, WH. Spherical ceramic interpositional arthroplasty for basal fourth and fifth metatarsal arthritis. Foot ankle Int. 2007 Aug; 28(8):896-901.Google Scholar
Viens, NA, Adams, SB Jr, Nunley, JA 2nd. Ceramic interpositional arthroplasty for fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joint arthritis. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2012 Fall; 21(3):126–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, S, Jin, D. Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016, EPub ahead of PublicationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajis, A, Geary, N. Surgical technique, fusion rates, and planovalgus foot deformity correction with naviculocuneiform fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Mar;35(3):232–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coughlin, & Shurnas, . Hallux rigidus: Demographics, etiology and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(10):731–43.Google Scholar
Lambrinudi, C. Metatarsus primus elevatus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1938; 31(11):1273.Google Scholar
Meyer, JO, Nishon, LR, Weiss, I, Docks, G. Metatarsus primus elevatus and the etiology of hallux rigidus. J Foot Surg. 1987; 26(3):237–41.Google Scholar
Hattrup, SJ, Johnson, KA. Subjective results of hallux rigidus following treatment with cheilectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:182–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, MJ, Shurnas, PS. Hallux rigidus. Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov;85-A(11):2072–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solan, MC, Calder, JD, Bendall, SP. Manipulation and injection for hallux rigidus. Is it worthwhile? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Jul;83(5):706–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rongstad, K, Miller, G, Vander, Griend R, and Cowin, D. A biomechanical comparison of four fixation methods of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle. 1994; 15:415–9.Google Scholar
Hyer, CF, Glover, JP, Berlet, GC, Lee, TH. Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;47(1):13–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeever, DC. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux valgus, hallux rigidus and metatarsus primus varus. JBJS Am. 1952;34(1):129–34.Google Scholar
Roukis, TS. Non-union after arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;50(6):710–3.Google Scholar
Moberg, E. A simple operation for hallux rigidus. Clin Orthop 1979;142:5556.Google Scholar
Thomas, PJ, Smith, RW. Proximal phalanx osteotomy for the surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Jan;20(1):312.Google Scholar
Cook, E, Cook, J, Rosenblum, B, Landsman, A, Giurni, J, Basile, P. Meta-analysis of first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;48(2):180–90.Google Scholar
Dawson-Bowling, S, Adimonye, A, Cohen, A, Cottam, H, Ritchie, J, Fordyce, M. MOJE ceramic metatarsophalangeal arthroplasty: disappointing clinical results at two to eight years. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jul;33(7):560–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, MT, Walker, CR, Sirikonda, SP. Long term outcome of first MTPJ replacement using ceramic prosthesis with press fit design. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:21.Google Scholar
McGraw, IWW, Jameson, SS, Kumar, CS. Mid-term results of the Moje hallux MP joint replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 July;31(7):592–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Maiyah, M, Rice, P & Schneider, T. Outcome of first metatarsophalangeal total joint replacement (Toefit): A clinical outcome and survival analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B no. SUPP 21:32Google Scholar
Raikin, SM, Ahmad, J, Pour, AE, Abidi, N. Comparison of arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9): 1979–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, JN, Thomson, CE. Arthrodesis or total replacement arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: A randomised control trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Sep;26(9): 680–90.Google Scholar
Baumhauer, JF, Singh, D, Glazebrook, M, et al. Prospective, randomized, multi-centered clinical trial assessing safety and efficacy of a synthetic cartilage implant versus first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in advanced hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(5):457–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, W. The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. N Y Med J. 1904;80:741–2.Google Scholar
Myerson, MS, Schon, LC, McGuigan, FX, Oznur, A. Result of arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint using bone graft for restoration of length. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Apr;21(4):297306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodsky, JW, Ptaszek, AJ, Morris, SG. Salvage first MTP arthrodesis utilizing ICBG: clinical evaluation and outcome. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Apr;21(4):290–6.Google Scholar
Majkowski, RS, Galloway, S. Excision arthroplasty for hallux valgus in the elderly: a comparison between the Keller and modified Mayo. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:317–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcahy, D, Daniels, T, Lau, J, Boyle, E, Bogoch, E. Rheumatoid forefoot deformity: a comparison study of 2 functional methods of reconstruction. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1440–50.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. An operation for severe grades of contracted or clawed toes. Am J Orthop Surg. 1911;9:441–9.Google Scholar
Barouk, LS, Barouk, P. Joint preserving surgery in rheumatoid forefeet: Preliminary study with more than two year follow up. Foot Ankle Clinics. 2007;12(3): 435–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, PJ, Stainsby, GD. Metatarsal head preservation in forefoot arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;7:93101.Google Scholar
Hossain, S. Stainsby procedure for non-rheumatoid claw toes. Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;9:113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×