Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:11:36.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 23 - Diffusion MR imaging in adult neoplasia

from Section 3 - Adult neoplasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is increasingly being incorporated into standard clinical evaluation of brain tumors. Driven by compelling results from experimental animal models, an increasing number of clinical research groups have begun to evaluate the potential of DWI to improve clinical management of brain tumors. The principles of DWI are covered in Ch. 4. This chapter contains an overview of the current developments in DWI as applied to adult neuro-oncology. Specific examples have been drawn from the literature to demonstrate how DWI can provide unique and valuable information with regard to diagnosis, treatment planning, and therapeutic monitoring of brain neoplasia (Table 23.1).

The current clinical value of conventional MRI resides in its ability to demonstrate gross tumor morphology and temporal changes non-invasively. Conventional MRI exploits a variety of tissue properties that allow the neuro-oncologist/neuroradiologist to assess gross tumor extent on the resultant contrasts, such as T2-weighted (Fig. 23.1), gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted (Fig. 23.1) images. The typical radiological assessment is somewhat interpretive and based on the spatial extent and location of abnormal tissue contrast. The actual image contrast values are rarely quantified, as these are usually scaled arbitrarily and do not have a simple relationship to microscopic tissue properties. There is significant clinical potential for MR techniques that provide additional quantitative or semiquantitative functional, structural, or molecular information related to tumor biology and physiology. Such information may be derived from MR signals that reflect perfusion dynamics, oxygenation levels, biochemistry/metabolism, cellularity, and levels of gene expression.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
, pp. 321 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stejskal, EO, Tanner, JE.Spin diffusion measurements spin echoes in presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965; 42: 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basser, PJ, Pierpaoli, C.Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996; 111: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenevert, TL, Brunberg, JA, Pipe, JG. Anisotropic diffusion in human white matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. Radiology 1990; 177: 401–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunberg, JA, Chenevert, TL, McKeever, PE, et al. In vivo MR determination of water diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy: correlation with structural alteration in gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 361–371.Google ScholarPubMed
Conturo, TE, McKinstry, RC, Aronovitz, JA, Neil, JJ. Diffusion MRI: precision, accuracy and flow effects. NMR Biomed 1995; 8: 307–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moseley, ME, Kucharczyk, J, Mintorovitch, J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 1990; 176: 439–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warach, S, Gaa, J, Siewert, B, Wielopolski, P, Edelman, RR. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 231–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorensen, AG, Buonanno, FS, Gonzalez, RG, et al. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 199: 391–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, DG, Niendorf, T, Leibfritz, D. Health and infarcted brain tissues studied at short diffusion times: the origins of apparent restriction and the reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR Biomed 1994; 7: 304–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykova, E, Svoboda, J, Polak, J, Chvatal, A, et al. Extracellular volume fraction and diffusion characteristics during progressive ischemia and terminal anoxia in the spinal cord of the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994; 14: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szafer, A, Zhong, J, Gore, JC. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 697–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, RK, Sinha, U, Cloughesy, TF, Alger, JR. Inverse correlation between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41: 2–7.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyng, H, Haraldseth, O, Rofstad, EK. Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 828–836.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kono, K, Inoue, Y, Nakayama, K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1081–1088.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, D, Korogi, Y, Sugahara, T, et al. Cerebral gliomas: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 656–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenevert, TL, Stegman, LD, Taylor, JM, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 2029–2036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eis, M, Els, T, Hoehn-Berlage, M, Hossmann, KA. Quantitative diffusion MR imaging of cerebral tumor and edema. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1994; 60: 344–346.Google ScholarPubMed
Bastin, ME, Sinha, S, Whittle, IR, Wardlaw, JM. Measurements of water diffusion and T1 values in peritumoural oedematous brain. Neuroreport 2002; 13: 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bitzer, M, Klose, U, Geist-Barth, B, et al. Alterations in diffusion and perfusion in the pathogenesis of peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2062–2076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, SC, Lai, PH, Chen, WL, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI features of brain abscess and cystic or necrotic brain tumors: comparison with conventional MRI. Clin Imaging 2002; 26: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biousse, V, Newman, NJ, Hunter, SB, Hudgins, PA. Diffusion weighted imaging in radiation necrosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2003; 74: 382–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozer, DJ, Jäger, HR, Danchaivijitr, N, et al.Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low-grade glioma subtype. NMR Biomed 2007; 20: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkinson, MD, Smith, TS, Brodbelt, AR, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients in oligodendroglial tumors characterized by genotype. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1405–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, WW, Poon, WS, Metreweli, C. Diffusion MR imaging in glioma: does it have any role in the pre-operation determination of grading of glioma?Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenzale, JM, Mukundan, S, Barboriak, DP. Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response. Radiology 2006; 239: 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuruda, JS, Chew, WM, Moseley, ME, Norman, D. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: value of differentiating between extraaxial cysts and epidermoid tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 925–931; discussion 932–934.Google ScholarPubMed
Steen, RG.Edema and tumor perfusion: characterization by quantitative 1H MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 259–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krabbe, K, Gideon, P, Wagn, P, et al. MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours. Neuroradiology 1997; 39: 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronin, IN, Kornienko, VN, Fadeeva, LM, Rodionov, PV, Golanov, AV. Diffusion-weighted image in the study of brain tumors and peritumoral edema. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 2000; 3: 14–16; discussion 17.Google Scholar
Witwer, BP, Moftakhar, R, Hasan, KM, et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 568–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wieshmann, UC, Symms, MR, Parker, GJ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging demonstrates deviation of fibres in normal appearing white matter adjacent to a brain tumour. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2000; 68: 501–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, S, Crain, BJ, Chacko, VP, van Zijl, PC. Three dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999; 45: 265–269.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, M, Hajnal, JV, van Bruggen, N, et al. Normal and abnormal white matter tracts shown by MR imaging using directional diffusion weighted sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14: 865–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajnal, JV, Doran, M, Hall, AS, et al. MR imaging of anisotropically restricted diffusion of water in the nervous system: technical, anatomic, and pathologic considerations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D, Douek, P, Argyropoulou, M, et al. Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumors. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 5: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, S, Frederiksen, K, van Zijl, PC, et al. Brain white matter anatomy of tumor patients evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 377–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gossl, C, Fahrmeir, L, Putz, B, Auer, LM, Auer, DP. Fiber tracking from DTI using linear state space models: detectability of the pyramidal tract. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 378–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bammer, R, Acar, B, Moseley, ME. In vivo MR tractography using diffusion imaging. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45: 223–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, S, van Zijl, PC.Van Zijl, PC.Fiber tracking: principles and strategies: a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 468–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coenen, VA, Krings, T, Mayfrank, L, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of the pyramidal tract in a neuronavigation system during brain tumor surgery: first experiences and technical note. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 86–92; discussion 92–93.Google Scholar
Sorensen, AG, Patel, S, Harmath, C, et al. Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 551–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Therasse, P, Arbuck, SG, Eisenhauer, EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardor, Y, Roth, Y, Lidar, Z, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1094–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, BD, Chenevert, TL, Kim, B, Ben-Yoseph, O. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: application to experimental neuro-oncology. Quart Magn Reson Biol Med 1994; 1: 89–106.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhao, M, Pipe, JG, Bonnett, J, Evelhoch, JL. Early detection of treatment response by diffusion-weighted 1H-NMR spectroscopy in a murine tumour in vivo. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galons, JP, Altbach, MI, Paine-Murrieta, GD, Taylor, CW, Gillies, RJ. Early increases in breast tumor xenograft water mobility in response to paclitaxel therapy detected by non-invasive diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Neoplasia 1999; 1: 113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinnaiyan, AM, Prasad, U, Shankar, S, et al. Combined effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and ionizing radiation in breast cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 1754–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stegman, LD, Rehemtulla, A, Hamstra, DA, et al. Diffusion MRI detects early events in the response of a glioma model to the yeast cytosine deaminase gene therapy strategy. Gene Ther 2000; 7: 1005–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, MI, Wilke, M, Muller-Weihrich, S, Auer, DP. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of treatment-associated changes in recurrent and residual medulloblastoma: preliminary observations in three children. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 1100–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardor, Y, Pfeffer, R, Spiegelmann, R, et al. Monitoring response to convection-enhanced Taxol delivery in brain tumor patients using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 4971–4973.Google ScholarPubMed
Tomura, N, Narita, K, Izumi, J, et al. Diffusion changes in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after sterotactic irradiation for brain tumors: possible prediction of treatment response. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, BA, Chenevert, TL, Lawrence, TS, et al. Functional diffusion map: a non-invasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 16759–16764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamstra, DA, Chenevert, TL, Moffat, BA, et al. Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high grade glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 16759–16764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamstra, DA, Rehemtulla, A, Ross, BD. The functional diffusion map (fDM) as an early imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma: correlation with conventional radiologic response and overall survival. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3387–3394.Google ScholarPubMed
Chenevert, TL, Sundgren, PC, Ross, BD.Diffusion imaging: insight to cell status and cytoarchitecture. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 619–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamstra, DA, Galban, CJ, Meyer, CR, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4104–4109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×