Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:27:14.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Alliance Theory of Kinship in South Indian Ethnography

from Part I - Opening Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiyyappan, A. 1934. “Cross-Cousin and Uncle–Niece Marriages in South India.” In Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnosociologiques. Compte-rendu de la Première Session. London: Institut Royal d’Anthropologie.Google Scholar
Annoussamy, David. 2003. “Le mariage entre oncle et nièce dans le sud de l’Inde.” In Etudes en hommage à Eugène Schaeffer, ed. Bourdeaux, Gauthier and Berthier, Susy, 6375. Paris: Emile Bruylant.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. “Gastro-Politics in Hindu South Asia.American Ethnologist 8(3): 494511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1985. “Gratitude As a Social Mode in South India.Ethos 13(3): 236245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arumugam, Indira. 2011. Kinship as Citizenship: State Formation, Sovereignty and Political Ethics among the Kallars in Central Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Anthropology of the London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1972. Peasant Society in Koṅku: A Study of Right and Left Subcastes in South India. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1974. “The Kin Nucleus in Tamil Folklore.” In Beck, B., Issue 7 of Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia, 1–27, Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison.Google Scholar
Clark-Decès, . 2014. The Right Spouse: Preferential Marriages in Tamil Nadu. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J.. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J., 1450. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
di Leonardo, Micaela. 1979. “Methodology and Misinterpretation of Women’s Status in Kinship Studies: A Case Study of Goodenough and the Definition of Marriage.American Ethnologist 6(4): 627637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1953. “The Dravidian Kinship Terminology As an Expression of Marriage.Man 53: 3439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1983. Affinity As a Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1986 [1957]. A South Indian Subcaste: Social Organization and Religion of the Pramalai Kallar. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, B. Murray. 1953. Dravidian Kinship Terms. Language 29(3): 339353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, C. J. 1995. “The ‘Holy Family’ of Shiva in a South Indian Temple.Social Anthropology 3(3): 205217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Anthony. 1980. “Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in South Asia.Journal of Anthropological Research 36(4): 474500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Anthony. 1981. “Prescription, Preference and Practice: Marriage Patterns among the Kondaiyankottai Maravar of South India.” Man (n.s.) 16: 108129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Anthony. 1996. “On the Non-existence of ‘Dravidian Kinship.’Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies 6: 112.Google Scholar
Good, Anthony. 2000. “Power and Fertility: Divine Kinship in South India.” In Culture, Creation and Procreation, ed. Bock, Monika and Rao, Aparna, 323356. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Hann, Katherine. 1985. “The Incidence of Relation Marriage in Karnataka, South India.South Asia Research 5(1): 5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, William P. 1989. The Sacred Marriage of a Hindu Goddess. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Dennis. 1977. “Siva, Minaksi, Visnu: Reflections on a Popular Myth in Madurai.The Indian Economic and Social History Review 14(1): 107119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapadia, Karin. 1995. Siva and Her Sisters: Gender, Caste, and Class in Rural South India. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Translated from the French by James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer and Rodney Needham. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. “Reflections on the Atom of Kinship.” In Structural Anthropology 2: 82112. Translated by Monique Layton. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, William. 1958. “Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Mysore Village.Man in India 38(1): 3448.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift (The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies). Translated by W. D. Halls. Foreword by Mary Douglas. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Morgan, Henry Lewis. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Parkin, J. Robert. 1996a. “On Dumont’s ‘Affinal Terms’: Comment on Rudner.Contributions to Indian Sociology 30: 289297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, J. Robert. 1996b. “Genealogy and Category: An Operational View.” L’Homme 139: 87108.Google Scholar
Rao, Kodanda M. 1973. “Rank Difference and Marriage Reciprocity in South India. An Aspect of the Implications of Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Fishing Village in Andhra.” In Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s) 7: 1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Govinda. P. 1993. Marriage Practices in South India: Social and Biological Aspects of Consanguineous Unions. Madras: Department of Anthropology, University of Madras.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1907. “The Marriage of Cousins in India.Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, July, 611640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1968 [1914]. Kinship and Organization. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R., 157210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Rudner, David West. 1990. “Inquest on Dravidian Kinship: Louis Dumont and the Essence of Marriage Alliance.Contributions to Indian Sociology 24(2): 153174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Harold. 1977. “Kinship and Alliance in South India and Australia.American Anthropologist 79: 869882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Harold. 1984. “Markedness and Extensions: The Tamil Case.Man (n.s.) 19: 557574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, David Dean. 1980. Tamil Temple Myths: Sacrifice and Divine Marriage in the South Indian Saiva Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamil Lexicon. 2007. Tamil Lexicon. University of Madras, 1924–1936. At http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/tamil-lex/.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981. Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trawick, Margaret. 1990. Notes on Love in a Tamil Family. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1889. “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18: 245272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uberoi, Patricia. 2006. “Hierarchy and Marriage: Alliance in Indian Kinship.” In Caste, Hierarchy and Individualism: Indian Critiques of Louis Dumont’s Contributions, ed. Khare, R. S., 159163. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yalman, Nur. 1962. “The Structure of the Sinhalese Kindred: A Re-Examination of the Dravidian Terminology.American Anthropologist (n.s.) 64(3): 548575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×