Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Part III - Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 277 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Amado, A. 2009. La imagen justa: Cine Argentino y política (1980–2007). Buenos Aires: Colihue.Google Scholar
Arditti, R. 1999. Searching for Life: The Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo and the Disappeared Children of Argentina. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Argento, A. 2009. De vuelta a casa {Historias de hijos y nietos restituidos}. Buenos Aires: Marea.Google Scholar
Calveiro, P. 2004. Poder y desaparición: Los campos de concentración en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Colihue.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. 2007. “Constitutive Knowledge: Tracing Trajectories of Information in New Contexts of Relatedness.” Anthropological Quarterly 80(2): 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). 2014. Informe anual 2014. www.oas.org/es/cidh/docs/anual/2014/docs-es/Anual2014-D-seguimiento.pdf, accessed October 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M. 2011. “Proof of Identity in Criminal Prosecutions for Abduction of Children and Identity Substitution.” In Making Justice: Further Discussions on the Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity in Argentina, ed. Center for Legal and Social Studies and International Center for Transitional Justice. (English version published online.)Google Scholar
Fonseca, C. 2011. “The De-Kinning of Birthmothers: Reflections on Maternity and Being Human.” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 8(2): 307–339.Google Scholar
Gandsman, A. 2009. “‘Do You Know Who You Are?’ Radical Existential Doubt and Scientific Certainty in the Search for the Kidnapped Children of the Disappeared in Argentina.” Ethos 37(4): 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, G. 2011. Identidades desaparecidas: Peleas por el sentido en los mundos de la desaparición forzada. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2003. “Kinning: The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9(3): 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legrand, C. 2009. “Routes to the Roots: Toward an Anthropology of Genealogical Practices.” In International Adoption: Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children, ed. Marre, D. and Briggs, L., 244–255. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mookherjee, N. 2007. “Available Motherhood: Legal Technologies, ‘State of Exception’ and the Dekinning of ‘War-Babies’ in Bangladesh.” Childhood 14: 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaro, M. and Palermo, V.. 2003. La dictadura militar 1976/1983: Del golpe de estado a la restauración democrática. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Penchaszadeh, V. 2015. “Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Restoring Genetic Identity after Forced Disappearance and Suppression of Identity in Argentina.” Journal of Community Genetics 6: 207–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regueiro, S. 2010. Inscripciones como hijos propios en la administración publica: la consumación burocrática de la desaparición de ninos. In Infancia, justicia y derechos humanos, ed. Villalta, C., 245–284. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.Google Scholar
Regueiro, S. 2013. Apropiación de niños, familias y justicia, Argentina (1976–2012). Rosario: Prohistoria ediciones.Google Scholar
Regueiro, S. 2015. “‘Subversivas’: ‘Malas madres’ y familias ‘desnaturalizadas’.” Cadernos Pagu 44: 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ros, A. 2012. The Post-Dictatorship Generation in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay: Collective Memory and Cultural Production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2011. “What Kinship Is (Part One)” and “What Kinship Is (Part Two).” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17: 2–19, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1999. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London/New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Vaisman, N. 2012. “Identity, DNA and the State in Post-Dictatorship Argentina.” In Identity Politics and the New Genetics: Re/Creating Categories of Difference and Belonging, ed. Schramm, K., Skinner, D. and Rottenburg, R., 97–115. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaisman, N. 2014. “Relational Human Rights: Shed-DNA and the Identification of the ‘Living Disappeared’ in Argentina.” Journal of Law and Society 41(3): 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalta, C. 2005. “La apropiación de ‘menores’: Entre hechos excepcionales y normalidades admitidas.” Revista Estudios 16: 129–147.Google Scholar
Villalta, C. 2006. “Cuando la apropiación fue adopción. Sentidos, prácticas y reclamos en torno al robo de niños.” Cuadernos de Antropología Social 24: 147–173.Google Scholar
Villalta, C. 2009. “De secuestros y adopciones el circuito institucional de la apropiación criminal de niños en Argentina (1976–1983).” Historia Critica 38: 146–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalta, C. 2010a. “Uno de los escenarios de la tragedia: el campo de la minoridad y la apropiación criminal de niños.” In Infancia, justicia y derechos humanos, ed. Villalta, C., 199–244. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.Google Scholar
Villalta, C. 2010b. “De los derechos de los adoptantes al derecho a la identidad: los procedimientos de adopción y la apropiación criminal de niños en la Argentina.” Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 15(2): 338–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Bellamy, Carla. 2011. The Powerful Ephemeral: Everyday Healing in an Ambiguously Islamic Place. South Asia Across the Disciplines. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2002. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clark-Decès, Isabelle. 2014. The Right Spouse: Preferential Marriage in Tamil Nadu. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjarlais, Robert. 1997. Shelter Blues: Sanity and Selfhood among the Homeless. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filliozat, Jean. 1964. The Classical Doctrine of Indian Medicine, Its Origins and Its Greek Parallels,1st English ed. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1965. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Liebeskind, Claudia. 1998. Piety on Its Knees: Three Sufi Traditions in South Asia in Modern Times. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, Andrew James. 2014. Troubling Breath: Tuberculosis, Care and Subjectivity at the Margins of Rajasthan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, Sarah. 2014. Daughters of Parvati: Women and Madness in Contemporary India. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2006. The Empire of Love: Toward a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Carolyn Moxley. 2009. Uncertain Suffering: Racial Health Care Disparities and Sickle Cell Disease. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 2009 [1987]. The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830–1980. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Lisa. 2014. Life beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1981 “Self-Interest and the Social Good: Some Implications of Hagen Gender Imagery.” In Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, ed. Ortner, S. and Whitehead, H., 166–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2005. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, Anand Vivek. 2018. Jinnealogy: Time, Islam, and Ecological Thought in the Medieval Ruins of Delhi. South Asia in Motion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1987. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
References
A.G.R. v. D.R.H. & S.H. (Robinson v. Hollingsworth). 2009. Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County Vicinage (# FD-09-001838-07).Google Scholar
Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Men and Women Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. “Liberalism’s Family Values.” In States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity, 135–165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Melissa. 1991. “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke’s Attack on Patriarchy.” In Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory, ed. Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Pateman, Carole, 74–94. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Center for Genetics and Society. 2015. “3-Person IVF.” www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=6527, accessed June 18, 2015.Google Scholar
Cohen, Adam. 26 Jan. 2010. “A Legal Puzzle: Can a Baby Have Three Biological Parents?” The New York Times.Google Scholar
Darnovsky, Marcey. 9 July 2013. “A Slippery Slope to Human Germline Modification.” Nature 499: 7457. www.nature.com/news/a-slippery-slope-to-human-germline-modification-1.13358, accessed August 10, 2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Tocqueville, Alexis. 2004. Democracy in America. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartouni, Valerie. 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
In re Baby M. 1987. 217 N.J. Super. 313 (Ch. Div). www.leagle.com/decision/1987530217NJSuper313_1495, accessed August 5, 2015.Google Scholar
Johnson v. Calvert. 1993. 5 Cal.4th 84, 851 P.2d 776.Google Scholar
Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1995. “Reproduction in the Eighteenth Century.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 269–386. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1960. Two Treatises of Government, Lassett edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges. 2015. 576 U. S. __ (2015), No. 14–556. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf, accessed June 26, 2015.Google Scholar
OHSU. 26 Aug. 2009. “OHSU Primate Center Scientists Develop Gene Therapy Method to Prevent Some Inherited Diseases.” https://news.ohsu.edu/2009/08/26/ohsu-primate-center-scientists-develop-gene-therapy-method-to-prevent-some-inherited-diseases, accessed March 3, 2015.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1995. “The Body As Property: A Feminist Re-vision.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 387–406. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragoné, Helena. 1997. “Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers, and Fathers.” In Situated Lives: Gender and Culture in Everyday Life, ed. Lamphere, Louise, Ragoné, Helena and Zavella, Patricia, 110–127. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. “Displacing Knowledge: Technology and the Consequences for Kinship.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 346–364. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charis, Benjamin, Ruha, Cussins, Jessica and Darnovsky, Marcy. 19 May 2015. “Innovation and Equity in an Age of Gene Editing.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/may/19/innovation-and-equity-in-an-age-of-gene-editing, accessed July 8, 2015.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1984. “Constituting a Culture of Argument: The Possibilities of American Law.” In When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community, 231–74. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1990. Justice As Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
References
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Bélanger, Danièle. 2006. “Indispensable Sons: Negotiating Reproductive Desires in Rural Vietnam.” Gender, Place and Culture 13(3): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bùi Minh Huệ. 13 Aug. 2014. “Gìn Giữ Gia Đình Việt Trước Sự Xâm Lăng Văn Hóa” [Preserving the Vietnamese family in the face of cultural aggression]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet (ed.) 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chu Thị Bích Huệ. 11 Jan. 2011. “Chuẩn Mực Văn Hóa Gia Đình Là Nền Tảng Của Hạnh Phúc” [The family’s cultural standards are the foundation for happiness]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Colen, Shellee. 1995. “‘Like a Mother to Them’: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 78–102. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Deborah. 2000. “Mythical Mothers and Dichotomies of Good and Evil: Homeless Mothers in the United States.” In Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood: Race, Class, Sexuality, Nationalism, ed. Ragoné, Helena and Twine, France Winddance, 263–294. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1959. Oedipus and Job in West African Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1964 [1911]. “Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XII, 213–226. Translated by James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1985 [1913] “Totem and Taboo.” In The Origins of Religion: Totem and Taboo, Moses and Monotheism and Other Works, 43–224. Translated by James Strachey. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2016 [1999]. Women’s Bodies, Women’s Worries: Health and Family Planning in a Vietnamese Rural Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2016. “Silence As a Response to Everyday Violence: Understanding Domination and Distress through the Lens of Fantasy.” Ethos 44(4): 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2018. “Domestic Moods: Maternal Mental Health in Northern Vietnam.” Medical Anthropology 37(7): 582–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Buch Segal, Lotte. 2016. “Introduction: Anthropology and Psychoanalysis: Explorations at the Edges of Culture and Consciousness.” Ethos 44(4): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Wahlberg, Ayo. 2014. “Selective Reproductive Technologies.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. 2014. “‘Bare Sticks’ and Other Dangers to the Social Body: Assembling Fatherhood in China.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C., Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 359–381. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Guilmoto, Christophe. 2009. “The Sex Ratio Transition in Asia.” Population and Development Review 35(3): 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmoto, Christophe. 2012. “Son Preference, Sex Selection, and Kinship in Vietnam.” Population and Development Review 38(1): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thư, Hà. 5 Nov. 2012a. “Giảm Thiểu Mất Cân Bằng Giới Tính Khi Sinh: ‘Việt Nam Sẽ Làm Được!’” [Reducing the imbalanced sex ratio at birth: ‘Vietnam will be able to do it’]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Thư, Hà. 12 Nov. 2012b. “Hệ Lụy của Mất Cân Bằng Giới Tính Khi Sinh: Tai Họa cho Sự Phát Triển Bền Vững” [Implications of the imbalanced sex ratio at birth: a disaster for stable development]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Van Luong, Hy. 1989. “Vietnamese Kinship: Structural Principles and the Socialist Transformation in Northern Vietnam.” The Journal of Asian Studies 48(4): 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Susan. 2002 [1952]. “The Nature and Function of Phantasy.” In Developments in Psychoanalysis, ed. Riviere, Joan, 67–121. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Jellema, Kate. 2007. “Everywhere Incense Burning: Remembering Ancestors in Đổi Mới Vietnam.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 38(3): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1988a. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book I: Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954, ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain, translated by Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1988b The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–1955, ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain, translated by Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2002 [1966–1967]. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XIV: The Logic of Phantasy. Translated by Cormac Gallagher. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2006 [1966]. Écrits. Translated by Bruce Fink in collaboration with Héloïse Fink and Russell Grigg. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand. 2006 [1973]. The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 2007[1927]. Sex and Repression in Savage Society. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, Barbara. 2001. “Female-Selective Abortion in Asia: Patterns, Policies, and Debates.” American Anthropologist 103(4): 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PAVE. 2016b. Intimate Partner Violence and Depression during Pregnancy and after Birth. Research Update. Hanoi.Google Scholar
Peletz, Michael. 2001. “Ambivalence in Kinship since the 1940s.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 413–444. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R., 157–210. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Sangren, P. Steven. 2009. “‘Masculine Domination’: Desire and Chinese Patriliny.” Critique of Anthropology 29(3): 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangren, P. Steven. 2013. “The Chinese Family As Instituted Fantasy: Or, Rescuing Kinship Imaginaries from the ‘Symbolic.’” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 19: 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Melford E. 1997. Gender Ideology and Psychological Reality: An Essay on Cultural Reproduction. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2009. Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFPA. 2011. Son Preference in Vietnam: Ancient Desires, Advancing Technologies. Hanoi: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).Google Scholar
UNFPA. 2014. Policy Brief: The Imbalanced Sex Ratio at Birth in Vietnam – Connecting Research and Policy for Change. Hanoi: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).Google Scholar
United Nations. 2017. World Population Prospects 2017. United Nations: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/, accessed July 13, 2017.Google Scholar
Van Bich, Pham. 1999. The Vietnamese Family in Change: The Case of the Red River Delta. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Ayo and Gammeltoft, Tine M.. 2017. Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meira. 1994. Conditional Love: Parents’ Attitudes towards Handicapped Children. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Werner, Jayne. 2009. Gender, Household and State in Post-Revolutionary Vietnam. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegersma, Nancy. 1988. Vietnam: Peasant Land, Peasant Revolution: Patriarchy and Collectivity in the Rural Economy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Margery. 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar