Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 1 - 34Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Andrews, Lori. 1999. The Clone Age: Adventures in the New World of Reproductive Technology. New York: Henry Hold.Google Scholar
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James. 2009. “Introduction: Pedigrees of Knowledge, Anthropology and the Genealogical Method.” In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, 1–23. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Barnes, John. 1967. “Genealogies.” In The Craft of Social Anthropology, ed. Epstein, Arnold Leonard, 101–127. London: Social Sciences Paperbacks in Association with Tavistock.Google Scholar
Becker, Anne. 1995. Body, Self, and Society: The View from Fiji. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Shaoni. 19 June 2017. “Controversial Doctor to Use MRT Technique for Over 40s Fertility.” BioNews 905.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Mary. 1993. Reclaiming English Kinship: Portuguese Refractions of British Kinship Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Mary. 1996. “Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Method.” Man (n.s.) 2(1): 43–66.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 1995. “The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth: Feeding, Personhood, and Relatedness among Malays in Pulau-Langkawi.” American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. ed. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Morgan. 2009. Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Colen, Shellee. 1995. “‘Like a Mother to Them’: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye and Rapp, Rayna, 78–102. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane and Yanagisako, Sylvia, eds. 1987. Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Allya and Whalen, Julia. 2014. “Online Adoption ‘Rehoming’: Legal Loopholes Allow Children to Be Given Away.” CBC News.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, Robbie and Dumit, Joseph, eds. 1998. Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deomampo, Daisy. 2016. Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette, Franklin, Sarah, Hirsch, Eric, Price, Francis and Strathern, Marilyn. 1993. Technologies of Procreations: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hoschild, Arlie. 2002. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fadel, Leila. 26 Jan. 2018. “Same-Sex Couples Sue U.S. Government for Kids’ Citizenship.” Transcript of All Things Considered, NPR.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyers. 1945. The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyers. 1949. The Web of Kinship among the Tallensi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Robin. 1967. Kinship and Marriage: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1998. Making Miracles: Scientific Progress and the Facts of Life.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation, ed. Franklin, Sarah and Ragoné, Helena, 102–117. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, eds. 2001. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and Ragoné, Helena. 1998a. “Introduction.” In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation, ed. Franklin, Sarah and Ragoné, Helena, 1–14. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and Ragoné, Helena, eds. 1998b. Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gailey, Christine. 2010. Blue Ribbon Babies and Labors of Love: Race, Class and Gender in U.S. Adoption. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1957. “Ideal Language and Kinship Structure.” Philosophy of Science 24: 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye and Rapp, Rayna, eds. 1995a. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye and Rapp, Rayna, eds. 1995b. “Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye and Rapp, Rayna, 1–18. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartouni, Valeria. 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, Cori. 1995. “Gender, Genetics, and Generation: Reformulating Biology in Lesbian Kinship.” Cultural Anthropology 10(1): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, Marcia. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2010. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Susan. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Bartha, Leader, Arthur, Hume, Stacey, Shoubridge, Eric, Isasi, Rosario, Noohl, Forough, Ogbogu, Ubaka, Ravitsky, Vardit and Kleiderman, Erika. 2017. “Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: The Road to the Clinic in Canada.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 39(10): 916–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, Monica. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, Jessaca. 2008. The Circulation of Children. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Sam. 24 Jan. 2018. “One Ruled a U.S. Citizen, the Other Not: Gay Couple’s Twins Face Unusual Battle.” The Guardian.Google Scholar
Lewin, Ellen. 1993. Lesbian Mothers: Accounts of Gender in American Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Ellen. 1998. Recognizing Ourselves: Ceremonies of Lesbian and Gay Commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Loike, John and Reame, Nancy. 22 Dec. 2016. “Opinion: Ethical Considerations of ‘Three-Parent’ Babies.” The Scientist.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Carol and Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, eds. 2013. Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: G. Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1929. The Sexual Life of Savages. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Melley, Brian. 23 Jan. 2018. “Gay Couple Married in Canada Sues U.S. Government for Denying Citizenship to Child.” The Associated Press.Google Scholar
Modell, Judith. 1994. Kinship with Strangers: Adoption and Interpretations of Kinship in American Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis. 1877. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Mullin, Emily. 13 June 2017. “The Fertility Doctor Trying to Commercialize Three-Parent Babies.” MIT Technology Review.Google Scholar
Nahman, Michal. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1960. “Discussion: Descent Systems and Ideal Language [Response to Gellner].” Philosophy and Science 27: 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, Ainsley, Wilkinson, Stephen and Wrigley, Anthony. 2016. “Ethical and Legal Issues in Mitochondrial Transfer.” EMBO Molecular Medicine 8(6): 589–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, Fitz. 1982. “Review of Nature, Culture and Gender.” American Ethnologist 9(3): 593–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred. 1922. The Andaman Islanders: A Study in Social Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred. 1931. “Social Organization of Australian Tribes.” Oceania 1(3): 322–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred. 1940. “On Joking Relationships.” Africa 13(3): 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, Sarah. 28 Sept. 2016. “‘Three-Parent Baby’ Claim Raises Hopes – and Ethical Concerns.” Nature.Google Scholar
Rivers, William. 1910. “The Genealogical Method of Anthropological Inquiry.” In Kinship and Social Organization, ed. Rivers, W. H. R., 97–112. New York: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schneider, David. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoot, Brittany, 28 Feb. 2015. “3-Parent IVF: Why Isn’t It Available in the United States?” The Guardian.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teman, Elly. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charis. 2005. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Twohey, Megan. 09 Sept. 2013a. “The Child Exchange Part 1: Americans Use Internet to Abandon Children Adopted from Overseas.” Reuters Investigates.Google Scholar
Twohey, Megan. 09 Sept. 2013b. “The Child Exchange Part 2: In a Shadowy Online Network, a Pedophile Takes Home a ‘Fun Boy.’” Reuters Investigates.Google Scholar
Twohey, Megan. 10 Sept. 2013c. “The Child Exchange Part 3: With Blind Trust and Good Intentions, Amateurs Broker Children Online.” Reuters Investigates.Google Scholar
Twohey, Megan. 11 Sept. 2013d. “The Child Exchange Part 5: Orphaned in Russia, Brought to America and Then Abandoned Time and Again.” Reuters Investigates.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2009. “The Gift and the Given: Three Nano-Essays on Kinship and Magic.” In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, 237–268. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Weismantel, Mary. 1995. “Making Kin: Kinship Theory and Zumbagua Adoptions.” American Ethnologist 22(4): 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1995. “Forever Is a Long Time: Romancing the Real in Gay Kinship Ideologies.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 87–110. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wrigley, Anthony, Wilkinson, Stephen and Appleby, John. 2015. “Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics and Identity.” Bioethics 29(9): 631–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Collier, Jane. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 14–50. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol. 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by