Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-n6p7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-02T21:14:36.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Spatiotemporal methodologies in environmental anthropology: geographic information systems, remote sensing, landscape changes, and local knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ismael Vaccaro
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Eric Alden Smith
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Shankar Aswani
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Spatial tools such as remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS) are increasingly used in a variety of research and public applications. The popularization of geospatial data and tools in the media and society has significantly changed the way we perceive, understand and manage our landscapes. A variety of social actors have become familiar with these technologies, whether they be an extractivist cooperative disputing borders in the Brazilian Amazon, a US resident checking his property on a cadastral map, or a school teacher in India, using a satellite image to teach regional geography. Today, geospatial technologies are recognized as valuable assets of civil society and essential tools to address social and environmental problems (NAS 2002). The proliferation of satellite and public-domain spatial data, Global Positioning Systems (GPS), affordable computer hardware and software, and data processing and analytical techniques continue to expand the use of these technologies in anthropology generally, and environmental anthropology in particular. Such spatial information is frequently used in visualization (e.g., displays of aerial photography or satellite imagery for a study region) using Google Earth or other public domain software that allow quick online data access/display without requiring specialized training. More in-depth research and analyses entail the use of designated RS/GIS software programs (e.g., ERDAS Imagine, ArcGIS, Idrisi, Multispec, among many others), and the actual acquisition of the relevant GIS datasets (as opposed to merely accessing them for online displays and/or simple queries).

This chapter reviews uses and issues in the application of RS and GIS in anthropological research. We briefly present fundamental geospatial concepts and provide a concise history of RS and GIS applications in anthropology. Next, we review the range of geospatial concerns in anthropological research design, highlighting research questions, units of analysis, data search and temporal sampling, and assessments of data processing needs and analysis. In order to illustrate these geospatial concerns, we focus in particular on land use/cover change research, and provide guidelines for data planning and research design. Finally, we present critical ethical and pragmatic issues in the (re)presentation of spatiotemporal data and maps, reflecting on the positive potential as well as perils of using these tools in anthropological research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Social Sciences
Methods and Research Design
, pp. 266 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, M.Maschner, H. 1992
Anderson, J.Hardy, E. E.Roach, J. T.Witmer, R. E. 1976 A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor dataWashingtonGeological Survey ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
Behrens, C. 1992
Behrens, C. A 1994 Recent advances in the regional analysis of indigenous land use and tropical deforestation, special issue ofHuman Ecology 22 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucek, B.Moran, E. F. 2004 Goodchild, M. F.Janelle, D. GSpatially Integrated Social ScienceOxford, UKOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brondízio, E. S. 2004 Agriculture intensification, economic identity, and shared invisibility in Amazonian peasantry: Caboclos and colonists in comparative perspectiveCulture and Agriculture 26 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondízio, E. S. 2005 Moran, Ostrom, E.Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human–Environment Interactions in Forest EcosystemsCambridge, MAMIT Press223Google Scholar
Brondízio, E. S. 2006 Balée, W.Erikson, C.Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical LowlandsColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Brondízio, E. S. 2008 The Amazonian Caboclo and the Açaí palm: Forest Farmers in the Global MarketNew YorkNew York Botanical Garden PressGoogle Scholar
Brondízio, E. S.Fiorini, S.Adams, R.Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, Cultural AnthropologyParis, FranceUNESCOhttp://www.eolss.net/eolss_sitemap.aspx
Brondízio, E. S.E. F. Moran, P. MauselWu, Y. 1994 Land use change in the Amazon estuary: patterns of Cabloco settlement and landscape managementHuman Ecology 22 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondízio, E. S.Ostrom, E.Young, O. 2009 Connectivity and the governance of multilevel socio-ecological systems: the role of social capitalAnnual Review of Environment and Resources 34 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, F. P. 1978 The use of Landsat data in studies of human ecologyCurrent Anthropology 19 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, F. P. 1984 Moran, E. F.The Ecosystem Concept in AnthropologyBoulder, COWestview PressGoogle Scholar
Conant, F. P. 1994 Human ecology and space age technology: some predictionsHuman Ecology 22 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, H. C. 1980 Ethnographic Atlas of Ifugao: A Study of Environment, Culture and Society in Northern LuzonNew Haven, CNYale University PressGoogle Scholar
Cultural Survivor 1995
D’Antona, A. O.Cak, A. D.VanWey, L. 2008 Collecting sketch maps to understand property land use and land cover in large surveysField Methods 20 66Google ScholarPubMed
DeCastro, F.Silva-Fosberg, M. C.Wilson, W.Brondízio, E.Moran, E. 2002 The use of remotely sensed data in rapid rural assessmentField Methods 14 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Gregorio, A.Jansen, L. J. M. 2000 Land Cover Classification System [LCCS]: Classification Concepts and User ManualRomeFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
Eastman, J. R.Fulk, M. A. 1993 Long sequence time series evaluation using standardized principal componentsPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59 1307Google Scholar
Evans, T. P.Moran, E. F. 2002 Lutz, W.Frskawetz, A.Sanderson, W. C.
Fairhead, J.Leach, M. 1995 Reading forest history backwards: the interaction of policy and local land use in Guinea’s forest-savanna mosaicEnvironment & History 1 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C.Feinman, G. 2005 Introduction to “landscapes over timeAmerican Anthropologist 107 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J.Mishra, V.Rindfuss, R.Walsh, S. 2003 People and the Environment: Approaches to Linking Household and Community Surveys to Remote Sensing and GISAmsterdamKluwer Academic Press
Galvin, K. A.R. B. Boone, N. M. SmithLynn, S. J. 2001 Impacts of climate variability on east African pastoralists: linking social science and remote sensingClimate Research 19 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 1963 Agricultural Involution : The Process of Ecological Change in IndonesiaBerkeley, CAUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A. 1991 A “new look” for archeologyScience 252 918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodchild, M. F.Janelle, D. G. 2004 Spatially Integrated Social ScienceOxford, UKOxford University Press
Green, G. M.Schweik, C. M.Randolph, J. C. 2005 Moran, Ostrom, E.Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human–Environment Interactions in Forest EcosystemsCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Guyer, J. I.Lambin, E. F.Cliggett, L. 2007 Temporal heterogeneity in the study of African land use interdisciplinary collaboration between anthropology, human geography and remote sensingHuman Ecology 35 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckenberger, M. J.Kuikuruo, A.Kuikuro, U. T. 2003 Amazônia 1492: Pristine forest or cultural parkland?Science 301 1710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herlihy, P. H.Knapp, G. 2003 Maps of, by, and for the Peoples of Latin AmericaHuman Organization 62CrossRef
Hirsch, E.O’Hanlon, M. 1995 The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and SpaceOxford, UKOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. C. 1995 Moran, E. F.The Comparative Analysis of Human Societies: Toward Common Standards for Data Collection and ReportingBoulder, COLynne Rienner PublishersGoogle Scholar
Janssen, L. L. F.van der Wel, F. J. M. 1994 Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: a reviewPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60 419Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 1996 Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing PerspectiveUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice Hallhttp://www.r-s-c-c.org/Google Scholar
John, C. 1990 Applications of Space-Age Technology in AnthropologyJohn C. Stennis Space CenterNASA
Jordan, C. F. 1969 Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floorEcology 50 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1939 Cultural and Natural Areas of Native North AmericaBerkeley, CAUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
Lambin, E. F. 2003 J. Fox, V. MishraRindfuss, R.Walsh, S.People and the Environment: Approaches to Linking Household and Community Surveys to Remote Sensing and GISKluwer Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Lambin, E. F.Strahler, A. 1994 Indicators of land-cover change for change-vector analysis in multitemporal space at coarse spatial scalesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing 15 2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. L.Ripple, W. J. 1998 Comparisons among vegetation indices and bandwise regression in a highly disturbed, heterogeneous landscape: Mount St. Helens, WashingtonRemote Sensing of Environment 64 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillesand, T.Keifer, R. 1987 Remote Sensing and Image InterpretationNew YorkJohn Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Liverman, D.Moran, E.Rindfuss, R.Stern, P. 1998 People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social ScienceWashington DCNational Academy Press
Lu, D.Mausel, P.Brondízio, E.Moran, E. F. 2004 Change detection techniquesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing 25 2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, D.Mausel, P.Brondízio, E.Moran, E. F. 2004 Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon BasinForest Ecology and Management 198 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, T. R.Avery, T. E. 1977 Remote Sensing: A Handbook for Archeologists and Cultural Resource ManagersWashingtonCultural Resources Management Division, National Park ServiceGoogle Scholar
McCracken, S.Brondízio, E.Nelson, D. 1999 Remote sensing and GIS at farm property level: demography and deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65 1311Google Scholar
McIver, D. K.Friedl, M. A. 2002 Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed dataRemote Sensing of Environment 81 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maselli, F.Conese, C.Rodolfi, A.De Filippis, T.Petkov, L. 1994 Definition of multi-source prior probabilities for maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed dataProceedings of the SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering 2315 711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.Vogt, N.Nijnik, M.Brondízio, E.Fiorini, S. 2009 Geertman, S.Stillwell, J.Participatory Social SciencesDordrecht, NetherlandsSpringer PublishersGoogle Scholar
Morain, S. 1998 D. Liverman, E. MoranRindfuss, R.Stern, P.People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social ScienceWashington DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Moran, E.Brondízio, E. 2001 Lambek, M.Messer, E.Ecology and the Sacred: Engaging the Anthropology of Roy RappaportAnn ArborUniversity of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Moran, E. F. 1990 Moran, E. F.The Ecosystem Concept in AnthropologyAnn Arbor, MIMichigan University PressGoogle Scholar
Moran, E. 1998
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 2002 Earth Observations from Space: History, Promise, and RealityWashington, DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 2007
Nyerges, E. A.Green, G. M. 2000 http://www.cipec.org/publications/nyerges_and_green2000.html
Ostrom, E.Nagendra, H. 2006 Inaugural Article: Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 19224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroni, L. 2003 Improved classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data using modified prior probabilities in large and complex landscapesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing 24 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, J. 1995 Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information SystemsNew York:Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
Pinedo-Vasquez, M.Pasqualle, J. BDel Castillo Torres, D.Coffey, K. 2002 A tradition of change: The dynamic relationship between biodiversity and society in sector Muyuy, PeruEnvironmental Science and Policy 221 1Google Scholar
Porro, R. 2000
Reining, P. 1979 Challenging Desertification in West Africa: Insights from Landsat into Carrying Capacity, Cultivation, and Settlement Sites in Upper Volta and NigerAthens, GACenter for International Studies, Ohio UniversityGoogle Scholar
Rindfuss, R.Stern, P. 1998 D. Liverman, E. MoranRindfuss, R.Stern, P.People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social ScienceWashington DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Robbins, P.Maddock, T. 2004 Interrogating land cover categories: metaphor and method in remote sensingCartography and Geographic Information Science 27 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondeaux, G.Steven, M.Baret, F. 1996 Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indicesRemote Sensing of Environment 55 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, J. W.R. H. Haas, J. A.Schell, D. W. DeeringHarlan, J. C. 1973
Roy Chowdhury, R. 2006 Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcelsApplied Geography 26 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy Chowdhury, R.Schneider, L. C. 2004 Turner, B. L.Geoghegan, J.Foster, D.Integrated Land-Change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final FrontiersOxford, UKClarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Sader, S. A.Server, T.Smoot, J. C.Richards, M. 1994 Forest change estimates for the Northern Peten region of Guatemala: 1986–1990Human Ecology 22 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuurman, N. 2000 Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990sProgress in Human Geography 24 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Server, T.Wiseman, J. 1984 Remote sensing and archeology: potential for the futureMississipiEarth Resources LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. 1989 Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed dataInternational Journal of Remote Sensing 10 989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirén, A. H.Brondízio, E. S. 2009 Detecting subtle change in small-scale tropical forest shifting cultivation systems: methodological contributions integrating field and remotely-sensed dataApplied Geography 29 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirén, A. 2007 Population growth and land use intensification in a subsistence-based indigenous community in the AmazonHuman Ecology 5 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, J. H. 1955 Theory of Culture Change; The Methodology of Multilinear EvolutionUrbana, ILUniversity of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Stone, G. 1993 Settlement EcologyTucson, AZUniversity of Arizona PressGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C. 2005 Moran, Ostrom, E.Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human–Environment Interactions in Forest EcosystemsCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. D.Taylor, P. J. 2003 Critical reflections on the use of remote sensing and GIS Technologies in human ecological researchHuman Ecology 31 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P.McCay, B. J. 1975 New directions in ecology and ecological anthropologyAnnual Review of Anthropology 4 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P.Rappaport, R. 1968 Clifton, J. A.Introduction to Cultural Anthropology: Essays in the Scope and Methods of the Science of ManBoston, MAHoughton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Walker, P. APeters, P. E. 2007 Making sense in time: remote sensing and the challenges of temporal heterogeneity in social analysis of environmental change – cases from MalawiHuman Ecology 35 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, D. 1987 Cultural and ecological survival in the Ituri Forest: the role of accurately monitoring natural resources and agricultural land useCultural Survival Quarterly 11 72Google Scholar
Wilkie, D. 1990 John, C.Applications of Space-Age Technology in AnthropologyJohn C. Stennis Space CenterGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, D. 1996 Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring: A Guide for First-time UsersNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×