Four Faces of Creativity at School

Maciej Karwowski; Dorota M. Jankowska

doi:10.1017/9781316212899.019

18 - Four Faces of Creativity at School

from PART II - VOICES FROM THE RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2016

Maciej Karwowski and

Dorota M. Jankowska

Edited by

Ronald A. Beghetto and

James C. Kaufman

Show author details

Maciej Karwowski: Affiliation:
The Maria Grzegorzewska University
Dorota M. Jankowska: Affiliation:
The Maria Grzegorzewska University
Ronald A. Beghetto: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Over the decades of the development of creative education, scholars have devoted a great amount of attention to understanding children's and young people's creative potential. This potential was usually defined through cognitive characteristics – mainly divergent thinking (Runco, 2015), creative imagination (Dziedziewicz & Karwowski, 2015; Jankowska & Karwowski, 2015), or problem solving skills (Voss & Means, 1989). However, creativity requires more than just abilities. Certain personality traits – especially openness and independence (Feist, 1998) – as well as intrinsic motivation (Amabile, 1993) or creative self-efficacy (Beghetto, 2006) may be perceived as elements of the complex mosaic of creative potential (Karwowski, 2015; Karwowski & Lebuda, 2016; Lubart, Zenasni, & Barbot, 2013).

In this chapter we briefly sketch a new model of creativity, understood as a dynamic interplay between creative abilities and those personality traits that, we believe, are crucial to creative activity, namely openness and independence. This leads us to the typological approach and four distinct types of creativity, briefly described later in the chapter. We explore these characteristics and focus especially on the usefulness of this approach for teaching creativity.

Teachers’ perceptions of creativity are complex, but too often they are not complex enough. When asked what child creativity is, a great majority of teachers would probably define it with reference to at least one aspect of creative thinking. Most frequently, it would probably be originality (“non-schematic thinking,” “creates new solutions”) or fluency (“has lots of ideas”). Sometimes they would probably also refer to creative imagination (“fertile imagination,” “fancy”), as well as openness to experience (“curious about the unknown,” “eager to take up new challenges”). Indeed, decades of research into teachers’ implicit theories of creativity show that the characteristics of creative students they list most frequently mainly refer to students’ cognitive functioning, followed by personality and motivation (Andiliou & Murphy, 2010). Unique or original, imaginative, curious, and open to experience are those characteristics of students that occur in most of these analyses (Andiliou & Murphy, 2010; Chan & Chan, 1999).

Type: Chapter
Information: Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom , pp. 337 - 354

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212899.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185–201.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18–26.Google Scholar

Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5, 201–219.Google Scholar

Baer, J. (2014). The crisis in creativity research stems from too little fragmentation, not too much. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 200–205.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.Google Scholar

Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of students characteristics in Hog-Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195.Google Scholar

Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–291.Google Scholar

Chen, B. B. (forthcoming). The creative self-concept as a mediator between openness to experience and creative behaviour. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications.

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Dziedziewicz, D., Gajda, A., & Karwowski, M. (2014). Developing intercultural competence and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 32–42.Google Scholar

Dziedziewicz, D., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Development of children's creative visual imagination: A theoretical model and enhancement programmes. Education 3–13. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.1020646Google Scholar

Dziedziewicz, D., Olędzka, D., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Developing 4- to 6-year-old children's figural creativity using a doodle-book program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 85–95.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 77–89.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1959). The creative attitude. In Anderson, H. H. (Eds.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 44–54). New York: Harper & Brothers.

Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, (forthcoming). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133.

Galenson, D. W. (2011). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). The status of the social in creativity studies and the pitfalls of dichotomic thinking.Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 94–111.Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290–304.Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, doi: 10.1002/jocb.140.Google Scholar

Helson, R., & Pals, J. L. (2000). Creativity potential, creative achievement, and personal growth. Journal of Personality, 68, 1–27.Google Scholar

Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., & Karwowski, M. (2015). How to develop children's creativity and intercultural sensitivity: Around Creativity Compass program. In Tan, A. G. & Perleth, C. (Eds.), Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 133–147). Singapore: Springer.

Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1591, http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591.Google Scholar

Jaussi, K. S, Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 247–258.Google Scholar

Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1989). Assessing creative potential worldwide: The first cross-cultural application of the test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). Gifted Education International, 6, 78–86.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2007). Teachers’ nominations of students’ creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? Social Sciences, 2, 264–269.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2010a). Kreatywność – feeria rozumień, uwikłań, powodów. Teoretyczno-empiryczna prolegomena. [Creativity: a feeria of understandings, entanglements, conditions]. In. Karwowski, M. & Gajda, A. (Eds.), Kreatywność (nie tylko) w klasie szkolnej [Creativity not only in the classroom] (pp. 12–45). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.

Karwowski, M. (2010b). Are creative students really welcome in the classroom? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” student’ personality among Polish teachers. Social and Behavioural Sciences Journal, 2, 1233–1237.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8, 547–558.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62–70.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2015a). Notes on creative potential and its measurement. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 4–17.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2015b). Types of creativity questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

Karwowski, M. (forthcoming). Subordinated and rebellious creativity at school. In Beghetto, R. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Karwowski, M. & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Cambridge companion to reason and development (pp. 302–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., & Benedek, M. (2016). Intelligence as the necessary condition for creativity? Beyond the threshold hypothesis. Intelligence, 57, 105–117.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Gralewski, J. (2011). Zmotywowana kreatywność. Synergia motywacyjna postawy twórczej młodzieży. [Motivated creativity. Motivational synergy of youths’ creative attitude]. Chowanna, 2, 45–58.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25–33.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–232.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (forthcoming). Creative self-concept: A surface characteristic of creative personality. In G. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215–232.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Soszyński, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 163–171.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar

Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.Google Scholar

Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41–51.Google Scholar

Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 847–861.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. (1959). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In. Anderson, H. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 83–95). New York: Harper & Brothers.

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265.Google Scholar

Nicholls, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717–727.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.Google Scholar

Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 53–66.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1999). A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 161–164.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2015). A commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 21–32.Google Scholar

Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers' biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–328.Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O'Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.Google Scholar

Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking – drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6, 272–280.Google Scholar

Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1989). Toward a model of creativity based upon problem solving in the social sciences. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Ronning, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 399–410). New York: Plenum Press.

Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar

Book contents

18 - Four Faces of Creativity at School

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive