Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T03:11:51.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Accountability, the Common Core, and Creativity

from PART II - VOICES FROM THE RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

By
John Baer  and
Tracey Garrett
Edited by
Ronald A. Beghetto  and
James C. Kaufman
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University
Tracey Garrett
Affiliation:
Rider University
Ronald A. Beghetto
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Must Content Standards and Accountability Be in Conflict with Creativity?

The past two decades have seen a major and unrelenting call for more testing of students and more explicit and more detailed content standards that form the framework for such assessment. Although No Child Left Behind legislation has played a prominent role in recent educational policy formulations, federal mandates have not been the only force pushing for greater accountability (Fuhrman, 2001; Ladd, 1996). This movement includes both state initiatives and nongovernmental, nationwide efforts such as the Core Knowledge Foundation's Core Knowledge Sequence (Core Knowledge Foundation, 1998; Hirsch, 1987, 1991, 1996) and, most recently, the Common Core State Standards. Although this latter initiative, which has been adopted by almost all the states, was started and promoted heavily by the National Governors Association for Best Practices and the Council of Chief School Officers (2014a, 2014b, 2014c), it has become a very divisive political issue, even within the ranks of its supporters (American Federation of Teachers, 2013; Beghetto, Kaufman, & Baer, 2015; Porter, McMaken, Hwang, & Yang, 2011; Strauss, 2013). We will not argue the merit (or lack thereof) of either an increasing reliance on standardized testing or the wisdom of fine-grained, grade-by-grade content standards. That debate is ongoing, and for the moment we will take the current situation, and a near-term future that seems to be heading toward ever more explicit content standards, as a given that any educational goals or activities must acknowledge and (to some extent at least) accommodate. We will argue that these initiatives (both the focus on explicit and detailed content standards and the standardized test-based accountability to which these standards are often closely linked) need not doom the teaching and promotion of creativity in the classroom. Teaching for creativity and detailed required content standards can coexist quite comfortably, and although they may seem at times to be working at cross purposes (and indeed, this is sometimes the case), they just as often work synergistically, such that teaching for creativity helps meet content standards goals, and teaching detailed content knowledge can reinforce and enhance student creativity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom , pp. 45 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
American Federation of Teachers. (2013, May 2013). AFT poll of 800 teachers finds strong support for Common Core Standards and a moratorium on stakes for new assessments until everything is aligned (Press Release). Retrieved June 3, 2016 from www.aft.org/newspubs/press/2013/050313.cfm
American Federation of Teachers. (2014, April 30). AFT's Weingarten calls for moratorium on high-stakes consequences of Common Core tests: Tests should be decoupled from decisions that hurt students, teachers and schools until standards are properly implemented and field-tested. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from www.aft.org/newspubs/press/2013/043013.cfm
Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. New York: Harper Collins.
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1997a). Creative teachers, creative students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Baer, J. (1997b). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25–31.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1998a). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1998b). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 18–37.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1999). Creativity in a climate of standards. Focus on Education, 43, 16–21.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2002). Are creativity and content standards allies or enemies? Research in the Schools, 9 ( 2), 35–42.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2003). Impact of the Core Knowledge Curriculum on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 297–300.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Being creative inside and outside the classroom. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bank Street College. (1997). America reads: Bank Street College's approach to early literacy acquisition. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from www.paec.org/david/reading/amreads.pdf
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Beghetto, R., Kaufman, J., & Baer, J. (2015). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Reason and creativity in development (pp. 316–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berliner, D. C. (2011). Narrowing curriculum, assessments, and conceptions of what it means to be smart in the U.S. schools: Creaticide by design. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 79–93). New York: Routledge.
Burns, M. S, Griffin, P., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), (2000). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children's reading success. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 809–830.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Core Knowledge Foundation. (1998). Core knowledge sequence: Content guidelines for grades K–8. Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.Google Scholar
Eberle, B., & Stanish, B. (1980). CPS for kids: A resource book for teaching creative problem-solving to children. Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.
Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D., & Cameron, J. (1999). Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation: Negative, neutral, and positive. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 677–691.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728–741.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.Google Scholar
Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–327.Google Scholar
Feldhusen, J. F. (2006). The role of the knowledge base in creative thinking. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Reason and creativity in development (pp. 137–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finn, C., Levesque, P., Phillips, V., & Skandera, H. (2014, June 18). A Common Core accountability moratorium. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from http://edexcellence.net/articles/a-common-core-accountability-moratorium
Fuhrman, S. H. (Ed.). (2001). From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2012). Educational psychology (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics. New York: Harper & Row.
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mt. Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 243–270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.
Hennessey, B. A. (2010a). The creativity-motivation connection. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 342–365). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hennessey, B. A. (2010b). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 329–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). Conditions of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hennessey, B. A., & Zbikowski, S. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation techniques. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 297–308.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. (Ed.). (1991–1997). The core knowledge series: Resource books for kindergarten through six. New York: Doubleday.
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don't have them. New York: Doubleday.
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jones, G., Jones, B., & Hargrove, T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees? Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 12, 5–14.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2006). Reason and creativity in development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, M. M. (2006). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests: A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.Google Scholar
Ladd, H. F. (1996). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87–122.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Mayer, R. E. (2006). The role of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Reason and creativity in development (pp. 145–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Micklus, C. S. (1986). OM-AHA! Problems to develop creative thinking skills. Glassboro, NJ: Creative Competitions.
Micklus, C. S., & Micklus, C. (1986). OM program handbook. Glassboro, NJ: Creative Competitions.
National Education Association. (2014, June 12). NEA welcomes Gates Foundation moratorium on Common Core high-stakes tests. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from www.nea.org/home/59364.htm.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers (2014a). Common Core state standards initiative. Retrieved June 3, 2016 from www.corestandards.org/
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers (2014b). English language arts standards: Common Core state standards initiative. Retrieved June 3, 2016 from www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers (2014c). Mathematics standards: Common Core state standards initiative. Retrieved June 3, 2016 from www.corestandards.org/Math/
New Jersey Department of Education. (2004). New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards. Retrieved May 10, 2007 from: www.state.nj.us/njded/cccs/index.html
Olson, L. (2000). Worries of a standards “backlash” grow. Education Week, 19(30), 1, 12–13.Google Scholar
Olson, L. (2001). Education alliance calls for corrections to standards-based systems. Education Week, 20(19), 6.Google Scholar
Orwin, C., & Forbes, H. D. (1994). Cultural literacy: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Social Education, 9(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
Paul, R. W. (1990). Critical thinking and cultural literacy: Where E. D. Hirsch goes wrong. In Paul, R. W. (Ed.), Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (pp. 429–435). Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
Pletka, B. (2005, March 26). Review of The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Review. Retrieved May 12, 2007 from http://edrev.asu.edu/reviews/rev369.htm
Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common Core Standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103–116.Google Scholar
Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2007) Creative leadership: Skills that drive change. San Diego, CA: Sage.
Ravitch, D. (2014, June 10). New York Times: Gates Foundation calls for a moratorium on high stakes attached to Common Core tests. Diane Ravitch's blog. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from http://dianeravitch.net/2014/06/10/new-york-times-gates-foundation-calls-for-a-moratorium-on-high-stakes-attached-to-common-core-tests/
Rich, M. (2014, June 10). Delay urged on actions tied to tests by schools. The New York Time, June 10, 2014. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/education/gates-foundation-urges-moratorium-on-decisions-tied-to-common-core.html
Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2003). Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.Google Scholar
Schear, E. L. (1992). Cultural literacy and the developmental student: Whose culture and what kind of literacy? Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 8(2), 5–14.Google Scholar
Schuh, K. L. (2003). Knowledge construction in the learner-centered classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 426–442.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2006). Creative genius, knowledge, and reason. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Reason and creativity in development (pp. 43–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, V. (2013, July 24). New Common Core tests: Worth the price? The Washington Post. Retrieved November 8, 2013 from www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/07/24/new-common-core-tests-worth-the-price/
Talents Unlimited, Inc. (2007). Talents Unlimited. Retrieved May 9, 2007 from http;//www.mcpss.com/websites/MCPSS/MCPSS/Default.asp?PN=PagesLevel1&L=0&DivisionID=‘23’&DepartmentID=‘95’&SubDepartmentID=‘’&PageID=‘510’
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition – Verbal Tests, Forms A and B – Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition – Verbal Tests, Forms A and B – Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
Torrance, E. P., & Presbury, J. (1984). The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 9, 238–243.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2006) Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th Ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Tucker, M. S. (2002). The roots of backlash. Education Week, 21(16), 76, 42–43.Google Scholar
Vail, K. (1997). Core comes to Crooksville. American School Board Journal, 184(3), 14–18.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 148–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Expertise and reason in creative thinking. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Reason and creativity in development (pp. 7–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willingham, D. B. (2001). Cognition: The thinking animal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1999). Psychology and life (15th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×