Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-68sx7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:56:23.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Optimization of Staged and Discrete Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Suman Dutta
Affiliation:
Indian School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Dynamic Programming

Multi-stage decision process arises during the study of different mathematical problems; the dynamic programming technique was created for taking care of these sorts of problems. Consider a physical system, at any time t, the state of this system is found out by a set of quantities that is called state variables or state parameters. At certain times, we are call upon to make a decision that will have an effect on the state of the system. This time may be prescribed in advanced or the process itself determines the time. The transformations of the state variables are equivalent to these decisions, the selection of a decision being identical with the choice of a transformation. The future state is guided by the outcome of the preceding decision, which maximizes some function of the parameters that describe the final state.

There are many practical problems where sequential decisions are made at various points in time, at various points in space, and at various levels, say, for a system, for a subsystem, or even for a component level. The problems for which the decisions are required to make sequentially are termed as sequential decision problems. They are also called multistage decision problems because for these problems decisions are to be made at a number of stages. Dynamic programming is a mathematical technique, which is most suitable for the optimization of multistage decision problems. Richard Bellman in the early 1950s [Bellman, (1953)] developed this technique. During application of dynamic programming method, a multi-dimensional decision problem was decomposed into a series of single stage decision problems. In this way, an N-variable problem can be expressed as a series of N single-variable problems. These N number of single-variable problems can be solved sequentially. Most of the time, these single-variable subproblems are quite easier to solve compared to the original problem. This decomposition to N single-variable subproblems is accomplished in such a way that the optimal solution of the original N-dimensional problem can be attained from the optimal solutions of the N one-dimensional problems. It is essential to make a note that the methods used to solve these one-dimensional stages do not affect the overall result. Any method can be used for this purpose; these methods may vary from an easy enumeration method to a relatively complicated technique like differential calculus or a nonlinear programming.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beale, E. M. L.Discrete Optimization IIBranch and Bound Methods for Mathematical Programming Systems Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5(1979): 201-19.Google Scholar
Bellman, R. 1953. An Introduction to the Theory of Dynamic Programming, The RAND Corporation, Report R-245.
Bellman, R. 1954. The Theory of Dynamic Programming, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 60: 503-16.
Benders, J. F., Partitioning Procedures for Solving Mixed-variables Programming Problems, Numerische Mathematik, 4(1962): 238-52.
Birewar, D. B. and Grossmann, I. E. 1990. Simultaneous Production Planning and Scheduling in Multiproduct Batch Plants, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 29: 570-80.
Duran, M. A. and Grossmann, I. E.An Outer Approximation Algorithm for a Class of Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programs, Mathematical Programming, 36(1986): 307-39.
Fletcher, R. and Leyffer, S. 1994. Solving Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programs by Outer Approximation. Mathametical Programming, 66: 327-49.
Floudas, C. A. and Ciric, A. R. 1989. Strategies for Overcoming Uncertainties in Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 13(10): 1133-52.Google Scholar
Floudas, C. A. and Grossmann, I. E. 1994. Algorithmic Approaches to Process Synthesis: Logic and Global Optimization. In Proceedings of Foundations of Computer-Aided Design, Colorado: FOCAPD ‘94, Snowmass.
Geoffrion, A. M., Generalized Benders Decomposition, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 10(4): 1972.
Grossmann, I. E. and Sargent, R. W. H. 1979. Optimum Design of Multipurpose Chemical Plants, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 18(2): 343.
Grossmann, I. E. 1990. Mixed-integer Nonlinear Programming Techniques for the Synthesis of Engineering Systems. Res. Eng. Des., 1: 205.
Grossmann, I. E.Quesada, I.Ramon, R. and Voudouris, V. T. 1992. Mixed-integer Optimization Techniques for the Design and Scheduling of Batch Processes. ‘In Proc. of NATO Advanced Study Institute on Batch Process Systems Engineering ’.Google Scholar
Holmberg, K. 1990. On the Convergence of Cross Decomposition, ‘Mathematical Programming’, 47: 269-96.Google Scholar
Kalitventzeff, B. and Maréchal, F. 1988. The Management of a Utility Network, Process System Engineering.Google Scholar
Kalitventzeff, B. 1991. Mixed Integer Non-linear Programming and its Application to the Management of Utility Networks, ‘Engineering Optimization’ vol. 18(1-3): 183-207.Google Scholar
Kocis, G. R. and Grossmann, I. E. 1869. Relaxation Strategy for the Structural Optimization of Process Flow Sheets, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 1987.
Kocis, G. R. and Grossmann, I. E.Global Optimization of Non-convex Mixed-integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) Problems in Process Synthesis. ‘Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research’, 27(1988):1407-21.Google Scholar
Kokossis, C.Floudas, C. A. 1990. Optimization of Complex Reactor Networks-I. ‘ Isothermal operation Antonis Chemical Engineering Science’, 45(3): 595-614.Google Scholar
Qi, R.Henson, M. A.Membrane System Design for Multi-component Gas Mixtures via Mixed-integer Nonlinear Programming, ‘Computers and Chemical Engineering’, 24(2000): 2719-37.Google Scholar
Reklaitis, G. V. 1991. Perspectives on Scheduling and Planning of Process Operations, ‘Presented at the Fourth international symposium on process systems engineering’, Canada: Montebello.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, J. and Grossmann, I. E.A Combined Penalty Function and Outer-Approximation Method for MINLP Optimization, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 14(1990): 769-82.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×