Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:01:04.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Optimization of Unconstrained Multivariable Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Suman Dutta
Affiliation:
Indian School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When the optimization of an objective function is required without any additional correlation, then this optimization is called unconstrained optimization. Unconstrained optimization problem appears in some cases in chemical engineering. It is the simplest multivariable optimization problem. Parameter estimation is a significant application in engineering and science, where, multivariable unconstrained optimization methods are required. Some optimization problems are inherently unconstrained; there is no additional function (section 2.7, 2.8). When there are some usual constraints on the variables, it is better to ignore these constraints and to consider that they do not have any impact on the optimal solution. Unconstrained problems also formed due to reconstructions of constrained optimization problems, in which the penalization terms are used to replace the constraints in the objective function that have the effect of discouraging constraint violations.

Rarely do we get any unconstrained problem as a practical design problem, the knowledge on this type of optimization problems is essential for the following purposes:

  1. The constraints hold very less influence in some design problems.

  2. To get basic idea about constrained optimization, the study of unconstrained optimization techniques is necessary.

  3. Solving the unconstrained optimization problem is quite easy compared to constrained optimization.

Some robust and efficient methods are required for the numerical optimization of any nonlinear multivariable objective functions. The efficiency of the algorithm is very significant because these optimization problems require an iterative solution process, and this trial and error becomes unfeasible when number of variables is more than three. Generally, it is very difficult to predict the behavior of nonlinear function; there may exist local minima or maxima, saddle points, regions of convexity, and concavity. Therefore, robustness (the capability to get a desired solution) is desirable for these methods. In some regions, the optimization algorithm may proceed quite slowly toward the optimum, demanding excessive computational time. In this chapter, we will discuss various nonlinear programming algorithms for unconstrained optimization.

Formulation of Unconstrained Optimization

For an unconstrained optimization problem, we minimize the objective function that is constructed with real variables, without any limitations on the values of these variables.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. L.Recent Advances in Finding Best Operating Conditions, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 48(1953): 789-98.Google Scholar
Anupam, K. et al. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 89(2011): 1274-80.CrossRef
Broyden, C. G. 1967. Quasi-Newton Methods and their Application to Function Minimization, Mathematics of Computation, vol. 21, pp. 368.Google Scholar
Broyden, C. G., Dennis, J. E. and More, J. J.On the Local and Superlinear Convergence of Quasi-Newton Methods, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, 12(1975): 223.Google Scholar
Cauchy, A. L. 1847. Méthode Générale Pour La Résolution Des Systèmes D’équations Simultanées, Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, vol. 25, pp. 536-38.
Davidon, W. C. 1959. Variable Metric Method of Minimization, Report ANL-5990, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
Deb, K. 2009. Optimization for Engineering Design: Algorithms and Examples, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Dennis, J. E. Jr. and More, J. J. 1977. Quasi-Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory, SIAM Review, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 46-89.Google Scholar
Dutta, S. et al. Adsorptive Removal of Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solution Over Powdered Activated Carbon: Optimisation through Response Surface Methodology, Chemical Engineering Journal, 173(2011): 135-43.
Edgar, T. F., Himmelblau, D. M., Lasdon, L. S. 2001. Optimization of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. and Powell, M. J. D. 1963. A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization, Computer Journal, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 163-68.Google Scholar
Fox, R. L. 1971. Optimization Methods for Engineering Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Hooke, R., Jeeves, T. A.Direct Search Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems, Assoc. Computing Mechinery J., 8(1960): 212-29.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. and Jeeves, T. A. 1961. “Direct Search” Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems, J. Ass. Comput. Mach., 8: 212-29.Google Scholar
Karnopp, D. C., Random Search Techniques for Optimization Problems, Automatica, 1(1963): 111-21.Google Scholar
Levenberg, K.A Method for the Solution of Certain Nonlinear Problems in Least Squares”, Qart. Appl. Math., 2(1944): 164-66.
Lewis, R. M., Torczon, V., Trosset, M. W.Direct Search Methods: Then and Now; Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 124(2000): 191-207.
Marquardt, D. W.An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Inequalities, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 11(1963): 431-41.
Montgomery, D. C. 2008. Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley and Sons, INC.Google Scholar
Powell, M. J. D.An Efficient Method for Finding the Minimum of a Function of Several Variables without Calculating Derivatives, The Computer Journal, 7(1964): pp. 155-62.Google Scholar
Rao, S. S. 2009.Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice (4e), John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastrigin, L. A.The Convergence of the Random Search Method in the External Control of a Many-Parameter System, Automat. Remote Control, 24(1963): 1337-42.Google Scholar
Swann, W. H. 1972. Direct Search Methods, in: W., Murray (Ed.), Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization, New York: Academic Press, pp. 13-28.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×