Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:55:53.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 31 - Diffusion and perfusion MRI in inflammation and demyelination

from Section 4 - Infection, inflammation and demyelination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In inflammatory and demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), conventional MR imaging (MRI) findings are unable to differentiate the heterogeneous pathological substrates of individual lesions, since different tissue changes (i.e., inflammation, demyelination, remyelination, gliosis, and axonal loss) lead to a similar appearance of increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Moreover, conventional MRI does not delineate tissue damage occurring beyond T2-visible lesions (i.e., in the normal-appearing white matter [NAWM] and gray matter [GM]).[1,2] Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) have the potential to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory and demyelinating disorders of the CNS, by overcoming some of these limitations.

Diffusion is the microscopic random translational motion of molecules in a fluid system. In the CNS, diffusion is influenced by the microstructural components of tissue, including cell membranes and organelles. The diffusion coefficient in biological tissues (which can be measured in vivo by DWI) is, therefore, lower than the diffusion coefficient in free water, and for this reason is named the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).[3] Pathological processes such as inflammatory-demyelination can modify tissue integrity, resulting in a loss (or increased permeability of) “restricting” barriers, and can, thus, result in an increase of the ADC. The measurement of diffusion is also dependent on the direction in which diffusion is measured, since within the time scale of the diffusion experiment water may diffuse unevenly in different directions, depending on the size and shape of the cellular structures. As a consequence, diffusion measurements can give information about the shape, integrity, and orientation of tissues,[4] which can also be altered by pathology. A full characterization of diffusion can be obtained in terms of a tensor,[5] a 3 × 3 matrix that accounts for the correlation existing between molecular displacement along orthogonal directions. From the tensor, it is possible to derive mean diffusivity (MD), a measure of diffusion that is independent of the orientation of structures (since it results from an average of the ADCs measured in three orthogonal directions, and it is equal to the one-third of its trace), and some other dimensionless indexes of anisotropy. One of the most used of these indices is the fractional anisotropy (FA).[6,7] Full details can be found in Chs. 4 and 5.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
, pp. 488 - 500
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, IV, McKeown, SR.A histological, histochemical and biochemical study of the macroscopically normal white matter in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1979; 41: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, D, Barkhof, F, McConnel, R, et al. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999; 122: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D, Breton, E, Lallemand, D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986; 161: 401–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D, Turner, R, Pekar, J, Moonen, CTW.Diffusion and perfusion imaging by gradient sensitization: design, strategy and significance. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 7–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basser, PJ, Mattiello, J, Le Bihan, D.Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin-echo. J Magn Reson B 1994; 103: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basser, PJ, Pierpaoli, C.Microstructural features measured using diffusion tensor imaging. J Magn Reson B 1996; 111: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierpaoli, C, Jezzard, P, Basser, PJ, Blarnett, A, Di Chiro, G.Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996; 201: 637–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, BR, Belliveau, JW, Buchbinder, BR, et al. Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 1991; 19: 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, TJ, Rowley, HA, Haughton, VM.Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 227: 593–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mottershead, JP, Schmierer, K, Clemence, M, et al. High field MRI correlates of myelin content and axonal density in multiple sclerosis: a post-mortem study of the spinal cord. J Neurol 2003; 250: 1293–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmierer, K, Wheeler-Kingshott, CAM, Boulby, PA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saindane, AM, Law, M, Ge, Y, et al. Correlation of diffusion tensor and dynamic perfusion MR imaging metrics in normal-appearing corpus callosum: support for primary hypoperfusion in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 767–772.Google ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Gass, A, Bammer, R, et al. Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005; 65: 1526–1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, M, Iannucci, G, Cercignani, M, et al. A quantitative study of water diffusion in multiple sclerosis lesions and normal-appearing white matter using echo-planar imaging. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, M, Cercignani, M, Inglese, M, Horsfield, MA, Comi, G.Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2001; 56: 304–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bammer, R, Augustin, M, Strasser-Fuchs, S, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing diffuse and focal white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 583–589.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castriota Scanderbeg, A, Sabatini, U, Fasano, F, et al. Diffusion of water in large demyelinating lesions: a follow-up study. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 764–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poonawalla, AH, Hasan, KM, Gupta, RK, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: initial findings. Radiology 2008; 246: 880–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolind, SH, Laule, C, Vavasour, IM, et al. Complementary information from multi-exponential T2 relaxation and diffusion tensor imaging reveals differences between multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage 2008; 40: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselhorst, R, Kappos, L, Bilecen, D, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging of plaque development in multiple sclerosis: application of an extended blood–brain barrier leakage correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 495–505.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ge, Y, Law, M, Johnson, G, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions: characterizing hemodynamic impairment and inflammatory activity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1539–1547.Google ScholarPubMed
Putnam, T. Evidences of vascular occlusion in multiple sclerosis and encephalomyelitis. Arch Neurol Neuropsychol 1935; 32: 1298–1321.Google Scholar
Wakefield, AJ, More, LJ, Difford, J, McLaughlin, JE. Immunohistochemical study of vascular injury in acute multiple sclerosis. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wuerfel, J, Bellmann-Strobl, J, Brunecker, P, et al. Changes in cerebral perfusion precede plaque formation in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal perfusion MRI study. Brain 2004; 127: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sims, DE. Recent advances in pericyte biology: implications for health and disease. Can J Cardiol 1991; 7: 431–443.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnett, MH, Prineas, JW. Relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis: pathology of the newly forming lesion. Ann Neurol 2004; 55: 458–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernarding, J, Braun, J, Koennecke, HC.Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging in a patient with acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM). J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, M, Hisaoka, S, Mori, K, et al. Differences in water diffusion and lactate production in two different types of postinfectious encephalopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 559–563.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglese, M, Salvi, F, Iannucci, G, et al. Magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MR imaging of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 267–272.Google ScholarPubMed
Cramer, SC, Stegbauer, KC, Schneider, A, Mukai, J, Maravilla, KR.Decreased diffusion in central pontine myelinolisis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1476–1479.Google Scholar
Ohta, K, Obara, K, Sakauchi, M, et al. Lesion extension detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Neurol 2001; 248: 809–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocca, MA, Cercignani, M, Iannucci, G, Comi, G, Filippi, M. Weekly diffusion-weighted imaging of normal-appearing white matter in MS. Neurology 2000; 55: 882–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Bozzali, M, Iannucci, G, et al. Assessment of normal-appearing white and grey matter in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 1406–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzali, M, Cercignani, M, Sormani, MP, Comi, G, Filippi, M. Quantification of brain gray matter damage in different MS phenotypes by use of diffusion tensor MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 985–988.Google ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Gallo, A, Valsasina, P, et al. Short-term accrual of gray matter pathology in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: an in vivo study using diffusion tensor MRI. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 1139–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulizzi, A, Rovaris, M, Judica, E, et al. Determinants of disability in multiple sclerosis at various disease stages: a multiparametric magnetic resonance study. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 1163–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cader, S, Johansen-Berg, H, Wylezinska, M, et al. Discordant white matter N-acetylaspartate and diffusion MRI measures suggest that chronic metabolic dysfunction contributes to axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otaduy, MCG, Callegaro, D, Bacheschi, LA, Leite, CC. Correlation of magnetization transfer and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 754–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceccarelli, A, Rocca, MA, Falini, A, et al. Normal-appearing white and grey matter damage in MS. A volumetric and diffusion tensor MRI study at 3.0 Tesla. J Neurol 2007; 254: 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreja-Guevara, C, Rovaris, M, Iannucci, G, et al. Progressive grey matter damage in patients with relapsing-remitting MS: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 578–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agosta, F, Absinta, M, Sormani, MP, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain 2007; 130: 2111–2119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Judica, E, Ceccarelli, A, et al. A 3-year diffusion tensor MRI study of grey matter damage progression during the earliest clinical stage of MS. J Neurol 2008 255: 1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccarelli, O, Werring, DJ, Wheeler-Kingshott, CA, et al. Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations. Neurology 2001; 56: 926–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, M, Bozzali, M, Comi, G. Magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MR imaging of basal ganglia from patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2001; 183: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelcke, U, Kappos, L, Lechner-Scott, J, et al. Reduced glucose metabolism in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue: a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. Neurology 1997; 48: 1566–1571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, M, Rocca, MA, Colombo, B, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 559–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, M, Saindane, AM, Ge, Y, et al. Microvascular abnormality in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: perfusion MR imaging findings in normal-appearing white matter. Radiology 2004; 231: 645–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adhya, S, Johnson, G, Herbert, J, et al. Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T. Neuroimage 2006; 33: 1029–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karonen, JO, Vanninen, RL, Liu, Y, et al. Combined diffusion and perfusion MRI with correlation to single-photon emission CT in acute ischemic stroke. Ischemic penumbra predicts infarct growth. Stroke 1999; 30: 1583–1590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, CB, Duprez, TP, Smith, AM, et al. Which MR-derived perfusion parameters are the best predictors of infarct growth in hyperacute stroke? Comparative study between relative and quantitative measurements. Radiology 2002; 223: 361–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashid, W, Parkes, LM, Ingle, GT, et al. Abnormalities of cerebral perfusion in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglese, M, Park, SJ, Johnson, G, et al. Deep gray matter perfusion in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 196–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lycke, J, Wikkelso, C, Bergh, AC, Jacobsson, L, Andersen, O. Regional cerebral blood flow in multiple sclerosis measured by single photon emission tomography with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime. Eur Neurol 1993; 33: 163–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtmannspotter, M, Inglese, M, Rovaris, M, et al. A diffusion tensor MRI study of basal ganglia from patients with ADEM. J Neurol Sci 2003; 206: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, F, Rocca, MA, Benedetti, B, et al. MR imaging assessment of brain and cervical cord damage in patients with neuroborreliosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 892–894.Google ScholarPubMed
Rocca, MA, Agosta, F, Mezzapesa, DM, et al. A functional MRI study of movement-associated cortical changes in patients with Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Neuroimage 2004; 21: 1061–1068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittock, SJ, Lennon, VA, Krecke, K, et al. Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica. Arch Neurol 2006; 63: 390–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Iannucci, G, Falautano, M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with mildly disabling relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an exploratory study with diffusion tensor MR imaging. J Neurol Sci 2002; 195: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrenken, H, Pouwels, PJ, Geurts, JJ, et al. Altered diffusion tensor in multiple sclerosis normal-appearing brain tissue: cortical diffusion changes seem related to clinical deterioration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 628–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Riccitelli, G, Judica, E, et al. Cognitive impairment and structural brain damage in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2008 71: 1521–1526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tortorella, C, Rocca, MA, Mezzapesa, D, et al. MRI quantification of gray and white matter damage in patients with early-onset multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2006; 253: 903–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, A, Rovaris, M, Riva, R, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI detects normal-appearing white matter damage unrelated to short-term disease activity in patients at the earlier stage of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 803–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codella, M, Rocca, MA, Colombo, B, et al. Cerebral grey matter pathology and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. J Neurol Sci 2002; 194: 71–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Codella, M, Rocca, MA, Colombo, B, et al. A preliminary study of magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MRI of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue. J Neurol 2002; 249: 535–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, J, Henry, RG, Genain, C, Nelson, SJ, Pelletier, D. Mechanisms of normal appearing corpus callosum injury related to pericallosal T1 lesions in multiple sclerosis using directional diffusion tensor and 1H MRS imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1281–1286.Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, X, Tench, CR, Morgan, PS, Costantinescu, CS. Use of combined conventional and quantitative MRI to quantify pathology related to cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 437–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovaris, M, Judica, E, Gallo, A, et al. Grey matter damage predicts the evolution of primary progressive multiple sclerosis at 5 years. Brain 2006; 129: 2628–2634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhuri, A, Behan, PO.Fatigue and basal ganglia. J Neurol Sci 2000; 179: 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglese, M, Adhya, S, Johnson, G, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008; 28: 164–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blinkenberg, M, Rune, K, Jensen, CV, et al. Cortical cerebral metabolism correlates with MRI lesion load and cognitive dysfunction in MS. Neurology 2000; 54: 558–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulesu, E, Perani, D, Fazio, F, et al. Functional basis of memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: a [18F]FDG PET study. Neuroimage 1996; 4: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M, Tench, CR, Morgan, PS, Blumhardt, LD. Pyramidal tract mapping by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: improving correlations with disability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaithianathar, L, Tench, CR, Morgan, PS, Wilson, M, Blumhardt, LD. T1 relaxation time mapping of white matter tracts in multiple sclerosis defined by diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol 2002; 249: 1272–1278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagani, E, Filippi, M, Rocca, MA, Horsfield, MA. A method for obtaining tract-specific diffusion tensor MRI measurements in the presence of disease: application to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 258–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, X, Tench, CR, Morgan, PS, Niepel, G, Constantinescu, CS. “Importance sampling” in MS: use of diffusion tensor tractography to quantify pathology related to specific impairment. J Neurol Sci 2005; 237: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, MJ, Horenstein, C, Hirsch, JG, et al. Functional pathway-defined MRI diffusion measures reveal increased transverse diffusivity of water in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 1127–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, DS, Smith, SA, Zackowski, KM, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the corticospinal tract in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2007; 38: 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagani, E, Horsfield, MA, Rocca, MA, Filippi, M. Assessing atrophy of the major white matter fiber bundles of the brain from diffusion tensor MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 527–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, JH, Zhang, S, Laidlaw, DH, et al. Identification of fibers at risk for degeneration by diffusion tractography in patients at high risk for MS after a clinically isolated syndrome. J Mag Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 983–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, F, Yu, C, Jiang, T, Li, K, Chan, P. Diffusion tensor tractography-based group mapping of the pyramidal tract in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 278–282.Google ScholarPubMed
Ciccarelli, O, Toosy, AT, Hickman, SJ, et al. Optic radiation changes after optic neuritis detected by tractography-based group mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25: 308–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocca, MA, Valsasina, P, Ceccarelli, A, et al. Structural and functional MRI correlates of Stroop control in benign MS. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 279–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickman, SJ, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, M, Jones, SJ, et al. Optic nerve diffusion measurement from diffusion weighted imaging in optic neuritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 951–956.Google ScholarPubMed
Valsasina, P, Rocca, MA, Agosta, F, et al. Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy histogram analysis of the cervical cord in MS patients. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 822–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, F, Benedetti, B, Rocca, MA, et al. Quantification of cervical cord pathology in primary progressive MS using diffusion tensor MRI. Neurology 2005; 64: 631–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesseltine, SM, Law, M, Babb, J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1189–1193.Google ScholarPubMed
Anand Trip, S, Wheeler-Kingshott, C, Jones, SJ, et al. Optic nerve diffusion tensor imaging in optic neuritis. Neuroimage 2006; 30: 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, B, Rovaris, M, Pulizzi, A, et al. A diffusion-tensor MRI study of the cervical cord damage in benign and secondary progressive MS patients. Neurology 2008; 70(Suppl 1): A471.Google Scholar
Ciccarelli, O, Wheeler-Kingshott, C, McLean, MA, et al. Spinal cord spectroscopy and diffusion-based tractography to assess acute disability in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007; 130: 2220–2231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti, B, Valsasina, P, Judica, E, et al. Grading cervical cord damage in neuromyelitis optica and MS by diffusion tensor MRI. Neurology 2006; 67: 161–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti, B, Rovaris, M, Judica, E, et al. Assessing “occult” cervical cord damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus using diffusion tensor MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 893–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosso, C, Remy, P, Creange, A, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging characteristics of an acute strokelike form of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1006–1008.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×