Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:18:53.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The paradoxical self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Vilayanur Ramachandran
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
William Hirstein
Affiliation:
Elmhurst College
Narinder Kapur
Affiliation:
University College London
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Vilayanur Ramachandran
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Jonathan Cole
Affiliation:
University of Bournemouth
Sergio Della Sala
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Tom Manly
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Andrew Mayes
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Oliver Sacks
Affiliation:
Columbia University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Summary

We consider a number of syndromes incorporating paradoxical phenomena that lie at the boundary between neurology and psychiatry. Amongst the phenomena we examine are Cotard's Syndrome (belief that one is dead/dying), Capgras Syndrome (belief that a personally familiar person has been replaced by an imposter), and Apotemnophilia (desire to have a limb amputated). We use these phenomena to speculate on the manner in which the brain constructs a sense of self. We propose that, despite the extraordinary variety of paradoxical symptoms encountered in neuropsychiatry, certain key assumptions can help explain most of these self-related phenomena. (1) Discrepancies and conflict between the information dominating different brain systems. (2) Disturbance of Me/Other distinctions caused by dysfunctional interactions between the mirror neuron system, frontal lobe structures and sensory input. (3) Misattribution of symptoms to spurious causes, so as to minimize internal discrepancies. (4) The existence of three functionally distinct visual systems, as opposed to the two conventionally accepted ones, with selective damage or uncoupling between them. (5) Recruiting one neural map for another unrelated function, or one neural structure serving as a template for transcribing on to another neural structure. We suggest that, paradoxically, the mechanisms that give rise to psychiatric delusions and illusions may themselves sometimes have adaptive value in evolutionary terms.

Introduction

An approach we have pursued in our laboratory involves exploring precisely those phenomena that have long been regarded as paradoxical or anomalous, that do not fit the overall framework of science as currently practised, or that appear to violate established conventional assumptions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altschuler, E. L., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). A simple method to stand outside oneself. Perception, 36: 632–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altschuler, E. L., Vankov, A., Wang, V., Ramachandran, V. S. & Pineda, J. A. (1997). Person see, person do: human cortical electrophysiological correlates of monkey see monkey do cells (poster session presented at the 27th annual meeting of the society for neuroscience, New Orleans, LA).Google Scholar
Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., et al. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353: 2035–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaral, D. G., & Price, J. L. (1984). Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis). The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 230: 465–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Koski, L., Zaidel, E., Mazziotta, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. Journal of Neuroscience, 26: 2964–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, R. (1984). Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: a neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia, 22: 457–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayne, T., & Levy, N. (2005). Amputees by choice: body integrity disorder and the ethics of amputation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, D. (1991). The Geschwind Syndrome. Advances in Neurology, 55: 411–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. (1997). The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neuroscience, 20: 560–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisiach, E., & Geminiani, G. (1991). Anosognosia related to hemiplegia and hemianopia. In: Priganto, G. P. and Schacter, D. L. (Eds.). Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury: Clinical and Theoretical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., & Seeck, M. (2004). Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain, 127: 243–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanke, O., Morgenthaler, F. D., Brugger, P., & Overney, L. S. (2009). Preliminary evidence for a fronto-parietal dysfunction in able-bodied participants with a desire for a limb amputation. Journal of Neuropsychology, 3: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brang, D., McGeoch, P., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2008). Apotemnophilia: a neurological disorder. Neuroreport, 19: 1305–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S. (2009). Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364: 2359–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacchio, A., Blasis, E., Necozione, S., di Orio, F., & Santilli, V. (2009). Mirror therapy for chronic complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 361: 634–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capgras, J., & Reboul-Lachaux, J. (1923). L'illusion des ‘sosies’ dans un délire systématisé chronique. Bulletin de la Société Clinique de Medicine Mentael, 11: 6–16. Reprinted in H. D. Ellis, J. Whitley and J. P. Luauté (Eds.). (1994) Delusional misidentification: the three original papers on the Capgras, Fregoli and intermetamorphosis delusions. History of Psychiatry, 5: 117–46.Google Scholar
Case, L., & Ramachandran, V. S (2010). Immediate interpersonal and intermanual referral of tactile sensation following anesthetic block of the brachial plexus. Archives of Neurology, 57: 1521–3.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Menzies, P., & Sutton, J. (2009). Abductive inference and delusional belief. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 15: 1–27.Google Scholar
Critchley, M. (1953). The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Devinsky, O. (2009). Delusional misidentifications and duplications: right brain lesions, left brain delusions. Neurology, 72: 80–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devinsky, O., & Lai, G. (2008). Spirituality and religion in epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 12: 636–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91: 176–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easton, S., Blanke, O., & Mohr, C. (2009). A putative implication for fronto-parietal connectivity in out-of-body experiences. Cortex, 45: 216–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experience. Science, 317: 1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, H., Young, A., Quayle, A., & Pauw, K. (1997). Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras Delusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 264: 1085–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M. B. (2005). Desire for an amputation of a limb: paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 35: 919–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freese, J. L., & Amaral, D. G. (2006). Synaptic organization of projections from the amygdala to visual cortical areas TE and V1 in the Macaque monkey. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 496: 655–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzaniga, M., & LeDoux, J. (1978). The Integrated Mind. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. (2008). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21: 1229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirstein, W., & Ramachandran, V. (2009). He is not my father, and that is not my arm: accounting for misidentification of people and limbs. In: Hirstein, W. (Ed.). Confabulation. Views from Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Psychology and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–38.Google Scholar
Hirstein, W., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1997). Capgras syndrome: a novel probe for understanding the neural representation and familiarity of persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 264: 437–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, N. (1978). Nature's psychologists. In Ramachandran, V. S. and Josephson, B. (Eds.). Consciousness and the Physical World. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hung, Y., Smith, M. L., Bayle, D. J., et al. (2010). Unattended emotional faces elicit early lateralized amygdala–frontal and fusiform activations. Neuroimage, 50: 727–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 653–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M., & Jacob, P. (2005). Visual cognition: a new look at the two-visual systems model. Neuropsychologia, 43: 301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J. L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42: 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lingnau, A., Gesierich, B., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 9925–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotto, A., Hickok, G. S., & Holt, L. L. (2009). Reflections of mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13: 110–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeoch, P. D., Brang, D., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). Apraxia, metaphor and mirror neurons. Medical Hypotheses, 69:1165–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, R., & Dennett, D. (2009). The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32: 493–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Money, J., Jobaris, R., & Furth, G. (1977). Apotemnophilia: two cases of self-demand amputation as a paraphilia. Journal of Sex Research, 13: 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muetzelfeldt, L., Kamboj, S. K., Rees, H., et al. (2008). Journey through the K-hole: phenomenological aspects of ketamine use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95: 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noordzij, M. L., Newman-Norlund, S. E., Ruiter, J. P., et al. (2009). Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberman, L. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). The stimulating social mind: the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133: 310–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Altschuler, E. L., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research, 24: 190–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearn, J., & Gardner-Thorpe, C. (2002). Jules Cotard (1840–1899): his life and the unique syndrome that bears his name. Neurology, 58: 1400–03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, J. D., & Miller, S. M. (1998). A ‘sticky’ interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder?Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 265: 2141–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S. (1996). What neurological syndromes can tell us about human nature: some lessons from phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome, and anosognosia. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 61: 115–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S. (1998). Consciousness and body image. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353: 1851–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., & Altschuler, E. L. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132: 1693–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Brang, D. (2009). Sensations evoked in patients with amputation from watching an individual whose corresponding intact limb is being touched. Archives of Neurology, 66: 1281–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121: 1603–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & McGeoch, P. D. (2007). Occurrence of phantom limb genitalia after gender reassignment surgery. Medical Hypotheses, 69: 1001–03.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (2008). Sensations referred to a patient's phantom arm from another subject's intact arm: perceptual correlates of mirror neurons. Medical Hypotheses, 70: 1233–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Brang, D., McGeoch, P. D., & Rosar, W. (2009). Sexual and food preference in apotemnophilia and anorexia: interactions between ‘beliefs’ and ‘needs’ regulated by two-way connections between body image and limbic structures. Perception, 38: 775–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., McGeoch, P. D., & Brang, D. (2008). Apotemnophilia: a neurological disorder with somatotopic alterations in SCR and MEG activation. Society for Neuroscience Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377: 489–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S., Vilayanur, S., Hirstein, W. S., Armel, K. C., Tecoma, E., & Iragul, V. (1997). The neural basis of religious experience (paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, LA).Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 27: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, E. T. (1999). Spatial view cells and the representation of place in the primate hippocampus. Hippocampus, 9: 467–80.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierra, M., & Berrios, G. E. (2001). The phenomenological stability of depersonalisation: comparing the old with the new. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 189: 629–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinkman, A. (2008). The syndrome of Capgras. Psychiatry, 71: 371–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. D., Lori, N. F., Akbudak, E., et al. (2009). MRI diffusion tensor tracking of a new amygdalo-fusiform and hippocampo-fusiform pathway system in humans. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29: 1248–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallar, G., & Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: a body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192: 533–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. W., Leafhead, K. M., & Szulecka, T. K. (1994). The Capgras and Cotard delusions. Psychopathology, 27: 226–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. W., Reid, I., Wright, S., & Hellawell, D. J. (1993). Face-processing impairments and the Capgras delusion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 695–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×