Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T05:55:41.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Andrea Nightingale
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
David Sedley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Ancient Models of Mind
Studies in Human and Divine Rationality
, pp. 237 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackeren, M. (2003) Das Wissen vom Guten: Bedeutung und Kontinuität des Tugendwissens in den Dialogen Platons. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.) (2006) A Companion to Socrates. Oxford.
Alesse, F. (2000) La Stoa e la tradizione socratica. Naples.
Allen, J. (2005) “The Stoics on the origin of language and the foundations of etymology,” in Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, ed. Frede, D and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, J.-M. (2002) “Sénèque et la topographie de Rome,” in Neronia VI. Rome à l'époque néronienne, ed. Croisille, J.-M. and Perrin, Y.. Brussels: 170–77.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1985) “Self-knowledge in early Plato,” in Platonic Investigations. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy vol. 13, ed. O'Meara, D. J.. Washington, D.C.: 111–38.
Annas, J. (2002) “What are Plato's ‘middle’ dialogues in the middle of?” in Annas and Rowe: 2002: 1–23.
Annas, J. (2002) “My station and its duties,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society102: 109–23.
Annas, J. (2004) “Marcus Aurelius: ethics and its background,” RhizaiI.2: 103–19.
Annas, J. (2007) “Ethics in Stoic philosophy,” Phronesis52: 58–87.
Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.) (2002) New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient. Cambridge, MA.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1986) “Imagination et méditation chez Sénèque: l'exemple de la praemeditatio,” Revue des Études Latines 64: 185–95.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1977) “Form, individual and person in Plotinus,” Dionysius 1: 49–68.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1989) “The Stoicism of Marcus Aurelius,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 36.3: 2228–52.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (2005) “Sur les polémiques des anciens stoïciens,” Philosophie antique 5: 65–91.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984) Introduzione alla logica stoica. Como.
Barnes, J. (1993) “A big, big D?,” Classical Review 43: 304–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996) “The catalogue of Chrysippus' logical works,” in Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, ed. Algra, K. A., Horst, P. W. and Runia. Leiden, D. T., New York and Cologne: 169–84.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden, New York and Cologne.
Barnes, J. (1999a) “Aristotle and Stoic logic,” in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: 23–53.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1999b) “Logic. Introduction,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 65–76.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) “Argument in ancient philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge:20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) Truth, etc. Oxford.
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton.
Barney, R. (2003) “A puzzle in Stoic ethics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 303–40.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. (2006) “Dancing with the gods: The myth of the chariot in Plato's Phaedrus,” American Journal of Philology 127: 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellissima, F. and Pagli, P. (1996) Consequentia Mirabilis. Una regola logica tra matematica e filosofia. Florence.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1997) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Ethicists, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2005) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge.
Bett, R. (2006) “Stoic ethics,” in A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P.. Oxford and Marsden, MA: 530–48.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2008) Review of Brennan 2005, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research76, no. 2: 504–06.
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1966) “Did Plotinus believe in Ideas of individuals?,” Phronesis 11: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1971) Plotinus' Psychology: His Doctrine of the Embodied Soul. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobonich, C. (2002) Plato's Utopia Recast. Oxford.CrossRef
Bobzien, S. (1993) “Chrysippus' modal logic and its relation to Philo and Diodorus,” in Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, ed. Döring, K. and Ebert, T.. Stuttgart: 63–84.Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, A. (1890) Epictet und die Stoa. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1998) “The Old Stoic theory of emotions,” in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T.. Dordrecht: 21–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2000) “Reservation in Stoic ethics,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie82: 149–77.
Brennan, T. (2003) “Moral psychology,” in Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 257–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2005) The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford.
Brunschwig, J. (1980) “Proof defined,” in Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, ed. Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 125–60.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988) “La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême,” in Matter and Metaphysics, Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, ed. Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M.. Naples: 19–127.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1991) “On a book-title by Chrysippus: ‘On the fact that the ancients admitted dialectic along with demonstrations,’” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl. vol.: 81–95.
Burnyeat, M. (1976) “Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy,” Philosophical Review 85: 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1981) “Aristotle on understanding knowledge,” in Aristotle on Science: The “Posterior Analytics,” ed. Enrico, Berti. Padua: 97–140.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis and Cambridge.
Burnyeat, M. (1997) “Antipater and self-refutation: elusive arguments in Cicero's Academica,” in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books, Proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21–25, 1995), ed. Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (2005) “Eikōs muthos,” RhizaiII.2: 143–65; reprinted in Plato's Myths, ed. C. Partenie. Cambridge, 2009: 167–86.
Bury, R. G. (1935) Sextus Empiricus, vol II: Against the Logicians. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Camp, J. and Canart, P. (1956) Le Sens du mot theios chez Platon. Louvain.Google Scholar
Carter, R. E. (1967) “Plato and inspiration,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 5: 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2000) “Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 263–328.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2004) “Il condizionale crisippeo e le sue interpretazioni moderne,” Elenchos25: 353–95.
Castagnoli, L. (2007) “‘Everything is true’, ‘everything is false’: self-refutation arguments from Democritus to Augustine,” Antiquorum Philosophia1: 11–74.
Castagnoli, L. (2009) “Συνάρτησις crisippea e tesi di Aristotele,” in La logica nel pensiero antico (Atti del I Colloquio, Roma 28–29 Novembre 2000), ed. Alessandrelli, M. and Vincentis, M. Nasti De. Naples: 105–63.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge.
Caston, V. (1999) “Something and nothing: the Stoics on concepts and universals,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy17: 146–213.
Cavini, W. (1985) “La negazione di frase nella logica greca,” in Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, ed. Cavini, W., Macciò, M. C. Donnini, Funghi, M. S. and Manetti, D.. Florence: 47–126.Google Scholar
Chiesa, C. (1991) “Le problème du langage intérieur chez les stoïciens,” Revue internationale de philosophie 45: 301–21.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. (1993) “The relation of philosophy to sophrosune: Zalmoxian medicine in Plato's Charmides,” Ancient Philosophy 13: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1989) “Greek philosophers on euthanasia and suicide,” in Suicide and Euthanasia, ed. Brody, B.. Dordrecht: 9–38; reprinted in Cooper 1999: 515–41.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1998) “Eudaimonism, the appeal to nature, and ‘moral duty’ in Stoicism,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, ed. Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J.. Cambridge: 261–84; reprinted in Cooper 1999: 427–48.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1999) Reason and Emotion. Princeton.
Crivelli, P. (2007) “Epictetus and logic,” in The Philosophy of Epictetus, ed. Scaltsas, D. and Mason, A. S.. Oxford: 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, G. J. (1969) A Commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Diès, A. (1927) “La transposition platonicienne,” in Autour de Platon. Essais de Critique et d' Histoire, vol. 2. Paris: 267–308.Google Scholar
Dobbin, R. (1998) Epictetus: Discourses, Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1979) “L'eclettismo impossibile. Seneca e il platonismo medio,” in Modelli filosofici e letterari. Lucrezio, Orazio, Seneca, ed. Donini, P. L. and Gianotti, G. F.. Bologna: 149–300.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1979) Exemplum Socratis. Studien zur Sokratesnachwirkung in der kynisch-stoischen Popularphilosophie der frühen Kaiserzeit und im frühen Christentum. Wiesbaden.
Döring, K. (1989) “Gab es eine Dialektische Schule?,” Phronesis34: 293–310.
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1987–) Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen, System, Entwicklung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dyson, M. (1974) “Some problems concerning knowledge in Plato's Charmides,” Phronesis 19: 102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas. A Study of Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2007) “The three-part soul,” in The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F.. Cambridge: 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le De Ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions. Paris.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1979) “Knowledge and logos in the Theaetetus,” Philosophical Review 88: 366–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1999a) “Knowledge and belief in Republic 5–7,” in Fine 1999b vol 1: 215–46.
Fine, G. (ed.) (1999b) Plato, 2 vols. Oxford.
Fine, G. (2008) “Does Socrates claim to know that he knows nothing?,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy35: 49–88.
Flashar, H. (1958) Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis platonischer Philosophie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. (1966) “Plato Phaedrus 235c3,” Classical Philology 61: 108–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1974) Die stoische Logik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2002) “Introduction,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D.. Oxford: 1–52.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2007) “A notion of a person in Epictetus,” in The Philosophy of Epictetus, ed. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S.. Oxford: 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. (1995) The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauly, B. M. (2004) Senecas Naturales Quaestiones. Naturphilosophie für die römische Kaiserzeit. Zetemata 122. Munich.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, the Latin Tradition, 2 vols. Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae, 4 vols. Naples.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1993) “Panaetius on the virtue of being yourself,” in Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World, ed. Bulloch, A. et al. Berkeley: 330–53.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.
Glucker, J. (1989) “Πρòς τòν εἰπόντα. Sources and credibility of De Stoicorum Repugnantiis 8,” Illinois Classical Studies 13: 473–89.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2000) La Dialectique des stoïciens. Paris.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (forthcoming) “Zénon d'Élée et l'invention de la dialectique.”
Graf, F. (2009) “Apollo, possession, and prophecy,” in Apolline Politics and Poetics, ed. Athanassaki, L., Martin, R., and Miller, J. F.. Athens: 587–605.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago.
Griswold, C. L. (1986) Self-Knowledge in Plato's Phaedrus. New Haven.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1952) Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1996) Simplicius, Commentaire sur le “Manuel” d'Épictète. Introduction et édition critique du texte grec. Philosophia Antiqua 66. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1991) “Philosophie, discours philosophique et divisions de la philosophie chez les stoïciens,”Revue internationale de philosophie 45: 205–19.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1994) “Liste commentée de oeuvres de Chrysippe (D. L. VII 189–202),” in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. II, ed. Goulet, R.. Paris: 336–56.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. (2002) “Plato's division of goods in the Republic,” Phronesis XLVII/4: 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horky, P. S. (2007) Plato's Magnesia and Philosophical Polities in Magna Graecia. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Southern California. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hoven, R. (1971) Stoïcisme et stoïciens face au problème de l'au-delà. Paris.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2005) Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher, and Mathematician King. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–88) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, 4 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993) “The Stoic division of philosophy,” Phronesis 38: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Action in Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1997) “‘Why do fools fall in love?’,” in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R., Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 68: 55–69.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1999) “Stoic ethics (i–vii),” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, K. et al. Cambridge: 675–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (2005) Reading Seneca. Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford.
Inwood, B. (2007a) Seneca. Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford.
Inwood, B. (2007b) “Seneca, Plato, and Platonism: the case of Letter 65,” in Platonic Stoicism–Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C.. Leuven: 149–67.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1980) Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico. Naples.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1977) Plato's Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (1995) Plato's Ethics. New York.
Isnardi Parenti, M. (2000) “Socrate e Catone in Seneca: Il filosofo e il politico,” in Seneca e il suo tempo, ed. Parroni, P.. Rome: 215–25.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1962) Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of his Development, trans. Robinson, R., 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janaway, C. (1995) Images of Excellence. Plato's Critique of the Arts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. (1997) “Forms of individuals in Plotinus: a re-examination,” Phronesis 42: 206–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (1998) “Aidôs in Epictetus,” Classical Philology 93: 136–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneale, W. (1957) “Aristotle and the Consequentia Mirabilis,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1999) “Self-constitution in the ethics of Plato and Kant,” The Journal of Ethics 3: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. (1983) “Comments on Gregory Vlastos, ‘The Socratic elenchus,’”Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 59–70.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. (1989) Aristotle on the Human Good. Cambridge.
Kraut, R. (2001) “Aristotle's ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kraut, R. (ed.) (2006) The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford.
Lawrence, G. (2006) “Human good and human function,” in Kraut 2006: 37–75.CrossRef
Lear, J. (2006) “Allegory and myth in Plato's Republic,” in The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic, ed. Santas, G.. Oxford: 25–43.Google Scholar
Leinieks, V. (1996) The City of Dionysos: A Study of Euripides' Bakchai. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linforth, I. (1946) “Telestic madness in Plato, Phaedrus 244d–e,” University of California Publications in Classical Philology 13: 163–72.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1978) “Emotion and decision in Stoic psychology,” in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J. M.. Berkeley: 233–46.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971) “Language and thought in Stoicism,” in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: 75–113.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1974) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. London.
Long, A. A. (1975–76) “Heraclitus and Stoicism,” Φιλοσοϕία 5–6: 132–56.
Long, A. A. (1976) “The Early Stoic concept of moral choice,” in Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought, ed. Bossier, F. et al. Leuven: 77–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978/96) “Dialectic and the Stoic sage,” in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J. M. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 101–24 (reprinted in Long 1996: 85–106). Page citations refer to the reprint.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1981) “Aristotle and the history of Greek skepticism,” in Studies in Aristotle, ed. O'Meara, D. J.. Washington D.C.: 79–106.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1982) “Soul and body in Stoicism,” Phronesis27: 34–57.
Long, A. A. (1983) “Greek ethics after MacIntyre and the Stoic community of reason,” Ancient Philosophy3: 184–97, reprinted in Long 1996: 156–78.CrossRef
Long, A. A. (1986) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, 2nd edn. London.
Long, A. A. (1988) “Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy,” Classical Quarterly38: 150–71.
Long, A. A. (1992) “Finding oneself in Greek philosophy,” UIT Tijdschrift voor Filosofie2: 255–79.
Long, A. A. (1996) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.
Long, A. A. (2001) “Ancient philosophy's hardest question: what to make of oneself?” Representations74: 19–36.
Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2002) “Indifference readings: Plato and the Stoa on Socratic ethics,” in Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Wiseman, T. P.. Oxford: 363–98.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1964) “Self-refutation – a formal analysis,” Philosophical Quarterly 14: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKim, R. (1985) “Socratic self-knowledge and ‘knowledge of knowledge’ in Plato's Charmides,” Ancient Philosophy 13: 23–36.Google Scholar
Mamo, P. S. (1969) “Forms of individuals in the Enneads,” Phronesis 14: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1986) “Diogenes Laertius on Stoic philosophy,” Elenchos 7: 295–382.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1961) Stoic Logic, 2nd edn. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. B. (1999) Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maurizio, L. (1995) “Anthropology and spirit possession: a reconsideration of the Pythia's role at Delphi,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 115: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzoli, G. (2000) “Le ‘voci’ dei dialoghi di Seneca,” in Seneca e il suo tempo, ed. Parroni, P.. Rome: 249–60.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1965) Il significato della logica stoica. Bologna.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (2000) Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (1988) Introduction à la pensée des Mégariques. Paris and Brussels.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1981) “Poetic inspiration in early Greece,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A (1992) “Inspiration and mimesis in Plato,” in The Language of the Cave, ed. Barker, A. and Warner, M.. Apeiron 25, no. 4: 27–46.Google Scholar
Long, A. A (2002) “Plato's Muses: The goddesses that endure,” in Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D.. Oxford: 29–46.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (2000) “Mouthpiece, schmouthpiece,” in Who Speaks for Plato?, ed. Press, G.. Lanham: 15–26.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (2002) The People of Plato. Indianapolis.
Nails, D. (2006) “The trial and death of Socrates,” in Ahbel-Rappe, and Kamtekar, 2006: 5–20.
Nasti De Vincentis, M. (2002) Logiche della connessività. Bern, Stuttgart and Vienna.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1984) “Episteme and logos in Plato's later thought,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 66: 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1999a) The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley.
Nehamas, A. (1999b) Virtues of Authenticity. Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton.
Nehamas, A. (1999c) “Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic X,” in Nehamas 1999b: 251–78. Originally published in Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. J. M. E. Moravcsik and Philip Temko. Totowa, NJ. 1982: 79–124.
Nehamas, A. and Woodruff, P. (1995) Plato, Phaedrus. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Newman, R. (1989) “Cotidie meditari: theory and practice of the meditatio in imperial Stoicism,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii.36.3: 1473–1517.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G. (1999) Plato's Phaedrus: The Philosophy of Love. West Lafayette, Ind.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (1995) Genres in Dialogue. Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (2002) “Distant views: realistic and fantastic mimesis in Plato,” in Annas, and Rowe, 2002: 227–47.
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.
North, H. (1966) Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca.
Nuchelmans, G. (1991) Dilemmatic Arguments: Towards a History of Their Logic and Rhetoric. Amsterdam and Oxford.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1995) “Eros and the wise: the Stoic response to a cultural dilemma,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13: 231–67.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) “Erôs and ethical norms: philosophers respond to a cultural dilemma,” in The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J.. Chicago: 55–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, E. (1964) The Essential Plotinus. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
O'Daly, G. (1973) Plotinus' Philosophy of the Self. Shannon, Ireland.Google Scholar
O'Meara, D. (2003) Platonopolis. Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pendrick, G. (2002) Antiphon the Sophist: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Penner, T. and Rowe, C. (2005) Plato's Lysis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2005) “Stoic epistemology and the limits of externalism,”Ancient Philosophy 25: 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1948) Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung, 2 vols. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Prantl, C. (1855–70) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. (1989) Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. (2002) “Plato, Zeno, and the object of love,” in The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J.. Chicago: 170–99.Google Scholar
Rademaker, A. (2005) Sophrosyne and the Rhetoric of Self-Restraint: Polysemy and Persuasive Use of an Ancient Greek Value Term. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rappe, S. (1996) “Self-knowledge and subjectivity in the Enneads,” in The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L.. Cambridge: 250–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Remes, P. (2007) Plotinus on Self. The Philosophy of the “We.”Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repici, L (1993) “The Stoics and the elenchos,” in Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, ed. Döring, K and Ebert, T.. Stuttgart: 253–69.Google Scholar
Reshotko, N. (2006) Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-nor-Bad. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato's Timaeus. Monothéismes et Philosophie. Turnhout, Belgium.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005a) “Le Sage face à Zeus: logique, éthique et physique dans le stoïcisme impérial, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, ns4: 579–96.
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005b) The Roman Stoics. Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.
Reydams-Schils, G. (2006) “The Roman Stoics on divine thinking and human knowledge,” in Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition, ed. Gersh, S and Moran, D.. Notre Dame, Indiana: 81–94.Google Scholar
Richardson Lear, G. (2004) Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1963) “Forms of individuals in Plotinus,” Classical Quarterly 23: 223–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1970) “Ideas of individuals in Plotinus: a reply to Dr. Blumenthal,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie24: 298–303.
Roller, M. (2004) “Exemplarity in Roman culture: The cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” Classical Philology 99: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1996) Of Art and Wisdom: Plato's Understanding of Techne. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. (2000) “Seneca and nature,” Arethusa 33: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1986) Plato: Phaedrus. Warminster.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G. (1999) Socrates, Pleasure, and Value. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. (2001) Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London.Google Scholar
Santas, G. (1973) “Socrates at work on virtue and knowledge in Plato's Charmides,” in Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. NMourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M. New York: 105–32.Google Scholar
Santas, G. (1999) “The form of the good in Plato's Republic” in Fine 1999b, vol. 1: 247–74.
Schiesaro, A. (1996) “Felicità, libertà e potere nel De vita beata,” in Seneca, Sulla felicità, ed. Agonigi, D.. Milan: 5–26.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) “The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium,”Phronesis 28: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991/99) The Stoic Idea of the City, reprinted with a new foreword by M. Nussbaum and an epilogue by the author. Chicago. Original publication Cambridge 1991.
Scully, S. (2003) Plato's Phaedrus. Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1977) “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23: 74–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1985) “The Stoic theory of universals,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy23, suppl.: 87–92.
Sedley, D. (1993) “Chrysippus on psychophysical causality,” in Passions and Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, ed. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M.. Cambridge: 313–31.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) “The ideal of godlikeness,” in Fine 1999b, vol. 2: 309–28.
Sedley, D. (2003) Plato's Cratylus. Cambridge.
Sedley, D. (2004) The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato's Theaetetus. Oxford.
Sedley, D. (2005) “Stoic metaphysics at Rome,” in Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, ed. Salles, R.. Oxford: 117–42.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007) Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley.
Setaioli, A. (1988) Seneca e i greci. Citazione e traduzione nelle opere filosofiche. Bologna.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A (1997) “Seneca e l'oltretomba,” Paideia52: 321–67. Republished in (2000) Facundus Seneca. Aspetti della lingua e dell'ideologia senecana. Bologna: 247–323.
Setaioli, A (2006) “Seneca and the divine: Stoic tradition and personal development,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition13.3: 333–68.
Sheffield, F. (2006) Plato's Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, A. (2007) “Ascent and descent: the philosopher's regret,” Social Policy and Philosophy 24: 40–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2006) Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life and Death. Chicago.
Staley, G. (2002) “Seneca and Socrates,” in Noctes Atticae: 34 Articles on Graeco-Roman Antiquity and Its Nachleben, ed. Amden, B. Copenhagen: 281–85.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996) “Following nature: A study in Stoic ethics,” in Striker, G., Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: 221–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2007) “Onomastic reference in Seneca. The case of Plato and the Platonists,” in Platonic Stoicism–Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C.. Leuven: 133–48.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1970) “Furor poeticus: poetic inspiration in Greek literature before Democritus and Plato,” Journal of the History of Ideas 31: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togni, P. (forthcoming) Conoscenza e virtù nella dialettica stoica. Naples.Google Scholar
Tuckey, T. G. (1951) Plato's Charmides. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1962) “Der Begriff der Mania in PlatonsPhaidros,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 44: 132–50.Google Scholar
Viansino, G. (1992–93) Lucio Anneo Seneca. I dialoghi, 2nd edn., 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994) Socratic Studies, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1999) “Happiness and virtue in Socrates' moral theory,” in Fine 1999b, vol. 2: 105–36.
Voelke, A.-J. (1973) L'Idée de volonté dans le stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2007) Law and Reason in Early Stoic Political Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vottero, D. (1998) Lucio Anneo Seneca. I frammenti. Bologna.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2003) “Practical reason,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Waterlow, S. (1972–73) “The good of others in Plato's Republic,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72: 19–36.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (2006) The Socratic Paradox and its Enemies. Chicago.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1959) Platon. Sein Leben und seine Werke, 2 vols., 5th edn., ed. Snell, B. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2006) Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt, 2 vols. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 84.1–2. Berlin and New York.
Williams, G. D. (2003) Seneca, De Otio, De Brevitate Vitae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2004) “Socrates' avowals of knowledge,” Phronesis 49: 75–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1992) “Plato's early theory of knowledge,” in Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates, ed. Benson, H.. New York: 86–106.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2000) “Callicles and Socrates,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 1–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Andrea Nightingale, Stanford University, California, David Sedley, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Ancient Models of Mind
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760389.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Andrea Nightingale, Stanford University, California, David Sedley, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Ancient Models of Mind
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760389.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Andrea Nightingale, Stanford University, California, David Sedley, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Ancient Models of Mind
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760389.015
Available formats
×