Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:14:33.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Measurability: Borel Isomorphism and Analytic Sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

R. M. Dudley
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Borel Isomorphism

Two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ) are called isomorphic iff there is a one-to-one function f from X onto Y such that f and f−1 are measurable. Two metric spaces (X, d) and (Y, e) will be called Borel-isomorphic, written XY, iff they are isomorphic with their σ-algebras of Borel sets.

Clearly, Borel isomorphism comes somewhere between being homeomorphic topologically and being isomorphic as sets, which means having the same cardinality. The following main fact of this section shows that in many cases, surprisingly, Borel isomorphism is just equivalent to having the same cardinality:

Theorem If X and Y are two separable metric spaces which are Borel subsets of their completions, then XY if and only if X and Y have the same cardinality, which moreover is either finite, countable, or c (the cardinal of the continuum, that is, of [0, 1]).

Remarks In general, the continuum hypothesis, stating that no sets have cardinality uncountable but strictly less than c, is independent of the other axioms of set theory, including the axiom of choice (see the notes to Appendix A.3). For Borel sets in complete separable metric spaces, however, the continuum hypothesis follows from the axioms, by the theorem about to be proved. Examples of the isomorphism are ℝ ∼ ℝ2 and ℝ ∼ ℝ∖, the space of irrational numbers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandroff [Aleksandrov], P. (1916). Sur la puissance des ensembles mesurables B. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris 162: 323–325Google Scholar
Cohn, Donald Lee (1980). Measure Theory. Birkhäuser, Boston
Dellacherie, Claude (1978). Quelques exemples familiers, en probabilités, d'ensembles analytiques, non boréliens, Séminaire de Probabilités, Univ. Strasbourg (1976–1977); Lecture Notes in Math. (Springer) 649: 746–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausdorff, Felix (1916). Die Mächtigkeit der Borelschen Mengen. Math. Ann. 77: 430–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuratowski, Kazimierz [Casimir] (1933). Topologie I. Monografje Matematyczne, Warsaw and Lwow
Kuratowski, Kazimierz [Casimir] (1934). Sur une généralisation de la notion d'homéomorphie. Fund. Math. 22: 206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuratowski, Kazimierz [Casimir] (1966). Topology, vol. 1, transl. from 2d French ed. (1958) by J. Jaworowski. Academic Press, New York; PWN, Warsaw
Lebesgue, Henri (1905). Sur les fonctions représentables analytiquement. Journal de Mathématiques (Ser. 6) 1: 139–216Google Scholar
Lusin [Luzin], Nikolai Nikolaevich (1917). Sur la classification de M. Baire. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris 164: 91–94Google Scholar
Lusin [Luzin] Nikolai Nikolaevich (1930). Leçons sur les ensembles analytiques et leurs applications, with a Note by W. Sierpiński and a preface by H. Lebesgue. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Mauldin, R. Daniel, and Ulam, Stanislaw M. (1987). Mathematical problems and games. Adv. Appl. Math. 8: 281–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paplauscas [Paplauskas], A. B. (1973). Luzin, Nikolai Nikolaievich. Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 8: 557–559Google Scholar
Parthasarathy, K. R. [Kalyanapuram Rangachari] (1967). Probability Measures on Metric Spaces. Academic Press, New York
Sierpiński, Wacław (1950). Les ensembles projectifs et analytiques. In Mémorial des Sciences Mathématiques, fasc. 112. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Souslin [Suslin], Mikhail Yakovlevich (1917). Sur une définition des ensembles mesurables B sans nombres transfinis. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris 164: 88–91Google Scholar
Souslin [Suslin], Mikhail Yakovlevich (1920). [Problem]. Fund. Math. 1: 223Google Scholar
Yushkevich, A. P. (1968). Istoriya Matematiki v Rossii do 1917 goda [in Russian]. Nauka, Moscow

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×