Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:23:14.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Foundations; Set Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

R. M. Dudley
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

In constructing a building, the builders may well use different techniques and materials to lay the foundation than they use in the rest of the building. Likewise, almost every field of mathematics can be built on a foundation of axiomatic set theory. This foundation is accepted by most logicians and mathematicians concerned with foundations, but only a minority of mathematicians have the time or inclination to learn axiomatic set theory in detail.

To make another analogy, higher-level computer languages and programs written in them are built on a foundation of computer hardware and systems programs. How much the people who write high-level programs need to know about the hardware and operating systems will depend on the problem at hand.

In modern real analysis, set-theoretic questions are somewhat more to the fore than they are in most work in algebra, complex analysis, geometry, and applied mathematics. A relatively recent line of development in real analysis, “nonstandard analysis,” allows, for example, positive numbers that are infinitely small but not zero. Nonstandard analysis depends even more heavily on the specifics of set theory than earlier developments in real analysis did.

This chapter will give only enough of an introduction to set theory to define some notation and concepts used in the rest of the book. In other words, this chapter presents mainly “naive” (as opposed to axiomatic) set theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boorman, Kathleen E., Barbara E. Dodd, and Patrick J. Lincoln (1977). Blood Group Serology. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
*Borel, Émile (1898). LeÇons sur la théorie des fonctions. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Cantor, Georg (1874). Ueber eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen.Journal für die reine u. angew. Math. 77: 258-262Google Scholar
Cantor, Georg (1892). Über eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre.Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 1: 75-78Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Abraham A. (1976). Abstract Set Theory. Rev. by Azriel Levy. 4th ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Frewer, Magdalene (1978). Das wissenschaftliche Werk Felix Bernsteins. Diplomarbeit, Inst. f. Math. Statistik u. Wirtschaftsmath., Univ. Göttingen
Hausdorff, Felix (1914). Grundzüge der Mengenlehre. Von Veit, Leipzig. 1st ed. repr. Chelsea, New York (1949). 2d ed., 1927. 3d ed., 1937, published in English as Set Theory, transl. J. R. Aumann et al., Chelsea, New York (1957; 2d Engl. ed., 1962; 3d Engl. ed., 1978)
Jech, Thomas (1973). The Axiom of Choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Korselt, A. (1911). Über einen Beweis des Äquivalenzsatzes.Math. Annalen 70: 294-296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Henry (1970). Bernstein, Felix. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography 2: 58–59. Scribner's, New York
Rubin, Herman, and Jean E. Rubin (1963). Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 2d. ed. 1985
Russell, Bertrand (1906). On some difficulties in the theory of transfinite numbers and order types.Proc. London Math. Soc. (Ser. 2) 4: 29-53Google Scholar
Zermelo, Ernst (1904). Beweis, dass jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann.Math. Annalen 59: 514-516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, Ernst (1908a). Neuer Beweis für die Möglichkeit einer Wohlordnung.Math. Ann. 65: 107-128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, Ernst (1908b). Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre I.Math. Ann. 65: 261-281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Max (1935). A remark on method in transfinite algebra.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 41: 667-670CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Foundations; Set Theory
  • R. M. Dudley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Real Analysis and Probability
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755347.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Foundations; Set Theory
  • R. M. Dudley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Real Analysis and Probability
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755347.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Foundations; Set Theory
  • R. M. Dudley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Book: Real Analysis and Probability
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755347.002
Available formats
×