Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lpd2x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:01:47.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Parties, Citizens, and the Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Timothy J. Colton
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Michael McFaul
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Kathryn Stoner-Weiss
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Scarcely anywhere has the semi-democratized political system of the new Russia appeared to stand in stiffer contrast to its predecessor, the prototypical communist dictatorship, than in the area of partisan activity. The Soviet regime banned overt opposition and insisted that all legitimate social interests find expression through one hierarchical pseudo-party. Having long since reduced elections, the hub of a traditional party's operations, to single-candidate charades, “the” party – the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) – functioned essentially as ideological policeman, personnel department, and master coordinator and fixer for a disjointed state bureaucracy. Perestroika unleashed a quantum change in the late 1980s. Mikhail Gorbachev's sudden inauguration of electoral competition telescoped the universalization of the franchise, the work of generations in the West, into a few frenzied months. The same emancipating impulse led him to cripple the CPSU administrative apparatus and to ease curbs on public association, assembly, and communication. Politicized groups of all manner and description rapidly formed and took the stage. Elimination of the CPSU's legal monopoly in 1990 enabled almost any faction with an articulate spokesman and a photocopying machine to pose as a political party or movement. Two years after the Russian Federation emerged from the wreckage of the USSR in 1991, the Yeltsin constitution of 1993 enshrined the rights to organize parties and to vote freely for them. Aided by low barriers to entry, proportional-representation (PR) voting rules, and budget-subsidized campaigns, parties and party-like entities proliferated in Russia.

Type
Chapter
Information
After the Collapse of Communism
Comparative Lessons of Transition
, pp. 173 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×