Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:50:52.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The roles of large herbivores in ecosystem nutrient cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

By
John Pastor ,
Yosef Cohen  and
N. Thompson Hobbs
Edited by
Kjell Danell ,
Roger Bergström ,
Patrick Duncan  and
John Pastor
John Pastor
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Yosef Cohen
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
N. Thompson Hobbs
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Kjell Danell
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Roger Bergström
Affiliation:
The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden
Patrick Duncan
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
John Pastor
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The question of how herbivores control various ecosystem processes has had a long history in modern ecology. In a now much‐cited paper, Hairston et al. (1960) proposed that in the absence of predators, herbivore populations increase to the limit set by their food supply and thus control net or actual productivity and energy flow. With the addition of predators, herbivore populations become controlled from above; plant productivity is then released from direct control by herbivores and instead is limited by abiotic processes such as climate. These ideas have been developed further by Oksanen and colleagues (Oksanen et al. 1981, Oksanen 1983, 1988). In order to simplify the concepts and models, these studies have ignored the way that the cycling of nutrients between decomposers and higher trophic levels limits net primary productivity in most ecosystems, and the many mechanisms by which herbivores alter nutrient flows through decomposers and soils.

Early recognition of the roles of herbivores in regulating nutrient cycles focused on phytophagous insects (Mattson & Addy 1975) or phytoplanktivorous zooplankton (Kitchell et al. 1979). Perhaps this was because of their ubiquity, rapid population growth rates, high turnover rates and because (at least in the case of zooplankton) they consume most of the primary production (Macfadyen 1964). With the exception of large herds in grasslands (Sinclair & Norton‐Griffiths 1979) and microtine populations in tundra (Schultz 1964), the possibility that mammals could also regulate nutrient cycles was generally ignored for quite some time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation , pp. 289 - 325
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. B., Raff, D. A. & Laurenroth, W. K. (2001). The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia, 128, 465–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belovsky, G. E. (1978). Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 105–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. H. V. (1971). A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti. Scientific American, 225, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. H. V. (1982). The effect of soil nutrient availability on community structure in African ecosystems. In Ecology of Tropical Savannas, ed. Huntly, B. J. & Walker, B. H.. Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag, pp. 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, R. (1984). Rebrowsing on birch Betula pendula and B. pubescens stems by moose. Alces, 12, 870–96.Google Scholar
Bergström, R. & Danell, K. (1987). Effects of simulated winter browsing by moose on morphology and biomass of two birch species. Journal of Ecology, 75, 533–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biondini, M. E., Patten, B. D. & Nyren, P. E. (1998). Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed‐grass prairie, USA. Ecological Applications, 8, 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandner, T. A., Peterson, R. O. & Risenhoover, K. (1990). Balsam fir on Isle Royale: effects of moose herbivory and population density. Ecology, 7, 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S., III (1986). Browsing – woody plant interactions during boreal forest plant succession. In Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga, ed. Cleve, K., Chapin, F. S. III, Flanagan, P. W., Viereck, L. A. & Dyrness, C. T.. New York, Springer‐Verlag, pp. 213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. P. & Kuropat, P. J. (1980). Selection of winter forage by subarctic browsing vertebrates: the role of plant chemistry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. P., Tahvanainen, J., Sulkinoja, M.et al. (1989). Biogeographic evidence for the evolution of chemical defense by boreal birch and willow against mammalian browsing. American Naturalist, 134, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. P., Provenza, F. D., Pastor, J., Reichardt, P. B., Clausen, T. P. & Toit, du J. T. (1991). Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 431–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. P., Reichardt, P. B. & Clausen, T. P. (1992). Chemically mediated interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals. Journal of Range Management, 45, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bråthen, K. A. & Oksanen, J. (2001). Reindeer reduce biomass of preferred species. Journal of Vegetation Science, 12, 473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1975). The elephant problem, an alternative hypothesis. East African Wildlife Journal, 14, 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1976). Plant‐herbivore systems. In Theoretical Ecology, ed. May, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar
Cohen, Y., Pastor, J. & Vincent, T. (2000). Nutrient cycling in evolutionary stable ecosystems. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 719–43.Google Scholar
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S. III (1985). Resource availability and plant herbivore defense. Science, 230, 895–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1991). Biomass and nitrogen responses to grazing of upland steppe on Yellowstone's northern winter range. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, K. & Huss‐Danell, K. (1985). Feeding by insects and hares on birches earlier affected by moose browsing. Oikos, 44, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, K., Huss‐Danell, K. & Bergström, R. (1985). Fractions between browsing moose and two species of birch in Sweden. Ecology, 66, 1867–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, K., Berteaux, D. & Bråthen, K. A. (2002). Effects of muskox carcasses on nitrogen concentration in tundra vegetation. Arctic, 55, 389–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, K., Bergström, R., Edenius, L. & Ericsson, G. (2003). Ungulates as drivers of tree population dynamics at module and genet levels. Forest Ecology and Management, 181, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelis, D. L. (1992). Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazancourt, C., Loreau, M. & Abbadie, L. (1998). Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology, 79, 2242–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detling, J. K. & Painter, E. L. (1983). Defoliation responses of western wheatgrass population with diverse histories of prairie dog grazing. Oecologia, 57, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doak, B. W. (1952). Some chemical changes in the nitrogenous constituents of urine when voided on pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, 42, 162–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Toit, J. T. (1991). Introduction of artificial waterpoints: potential impacts on nutrient cycling. In Management of the Hwange Ecosystem, ed. Jones, M. & Martin, R.. Harare, Zimbabwe: USAID/Zimbabwe Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management.Google Scholar
Edenius, L., Danell, K. & Nyquist, H. (1995). Effects of simulated moose browsing on growth, mortality, and fecundity in Scots pine: relations to plant productivity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, P. W. & Cleve, K. (1983). Nutrient cycling in relation to decomposition and organic‐matter quality in taiga ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, M. J. S. (1970). Mineralization of N and P from organic material of plant origin and animal origin and its significance in the nutrient cycle in grazed upland hill soils. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 25, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A. & Evans, R. D. (1997). Effects of native grazers on N cycling in a north temperate grassland ecosystem: Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 78, 2238–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A., Groffman, P. M., Evans, R. D. & Tracy, B. F. (2000). Ungulate stimulation of nitrogen cycling and retention in Yellowstone Park grasslands. Oecologia, 123, 116–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiadis, N. J., Ruess, R. W., McNaughton, S. J. & Western, D. (1989). Ecological conditions that determine when grazing stimulates grass production. Oecologia, 81, 316–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grellmann, D. (2002). Plant responses to fertilization and exclusion of grazers on an arctic tundra heath. Oikos, 98, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Thompson, K. & Hodgson, J. G. (1996). Evidence of a causal connection between anti‐herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves. Oikos, 77, 489–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. E., Shipley, L. A., Hobbs, N. T., Spalinger, D. E. & Wunder, B. A. (1993). Functional response of herbivores in food‐concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology, 74, 778–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist, 879, 421–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, J. T. & Sharik, T. L. (1990). The influence of mammalian browsing on tree growth and mortality in the Pigeon River State Forest, Michigan. American Midland Naturalist, 123, 202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjältén, J., Danell, K. & Ericson, L. (1993). Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches. Ecology, 74, 1136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbie, S. E. (1996). Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecological Monographs, 66, 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, N. T. (1996). Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, N. T., Schimel, D. S., Owensby, C. E. & Ojima, D. J. (1991). Fire and grazing in the tallgrass prairie, contingent effects on nitrogen budgets. Ecology, 72, 1374–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, E. A., Parton, W. J., Detling, J. K. & Coppock, D. L. (1992). Physiological responses of plant populations to herbivory and their consequences for ecosystem nutrient flow. American Naturalist, 140, 685–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntly, N. (1991). Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, J. G., Bryant, J. P.III & Oswood, M. W. (1991). Effects of moose browsing on decomposition rates of birch leaf litter in a subarctic stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 442–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, R. L., Klein, D. R. & Shaver, G. R. (1994). Vertebrate herbivores and northern plant communities: reciprocal influences and responses. Oikos, 71, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, W. B. (1937). Natural selection within plant species as exemplified in a permanent pasture. Journal of Heredity, 28, 329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielland, K. & Bryant, J. P. (1998). Moose herbivory in taiga: effects on biogeochemistry and vegetation dynamics in primary succession. Oikos, 82, 377–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1982). East African Mammals. An Atlas of Evolution in Africa. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. F., O'Neill, R. V., Webb, D.et al. (1979). Consumer regulation of nutrient cycling. BioScience, 29, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krefting, L. W. (1974). The Ecology of the Isle Royale Moose with Special Reference to the Habitat. Technical Bulletin 297‐1974, Forestry Series 15. St. Paul, MN, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Larcher, W. (1995). Physiological Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. New York: Springer‐Verlag.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. A. (1980). The Boreal Ecosystem. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laws, R. M., Parker, I. C. S. & Johnstone, R. C. B. (1975). Elephants and their Habitats. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Loreau, M. (1995). Consumers as maximizers of energy and material flow in ecosystems. American Naturalist, 145, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfadyen, A. (1964). Energy flow in ecosystems and its exploitation by grazing. In Grazing in Terrestrial and Marine Environments, ed. Crisp, D. J.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Mattson, W. J. & Addy, N. D. (1975). Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science, 190, 515–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Smith J. & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.Google Scholar
McInnes, P. F., Naiman, R. J., Pastor, J. & Cohen, Y. (1992). Effects of moose browsing on vegetation and litterfall of the boreal forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA. Ecology, 73, 2059–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, J. D., Batzli, G. O., Everett, K. R. & Swanson, J. C. (1980). Some effects of mammalian herbivores and fertilization on tundra soils and vegetation. Arctic and Alpine Research, 12, 565–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1979). Grazing as an optimization process: grass‐ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. American Naturalist, 113, 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1983). Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos, 40, 329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1984). Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. American Naturalist, 124, 863–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1985). Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecological Monographs, 55, 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. & Georgiadis, N. J. (1986). Ecology of African grazing and browsing mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J., Banyikwa, F. F. & McNaughton, M. M. (1997). Promotion of diet‐enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science, 278, 1798–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D. & Muratore, R. F. (1983). Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter dynamics. Ecology, 63, 621–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, R., Cohen, Y. & Pastor, J. (1998). Evaluating foraging strategies with a moose energetics model. Ecosystems, 1, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, E. D. & Robbins, C. T. (1981). Nitrogen metabolism in elk. Journal of Wildlife Management, 45, 323–34.Google Scholar
Oksanen, L. (1983). Trophic exploitation and arctic phytomass patterns. American Naturalist, 122, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L. (1988). Ecosystem organization: mutualism and cybernetics or plain Darwinian struggle for existence? American Naturalist, 131, 424–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L.,Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J. & Niemelä, P. (1981). Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist, 118, 240–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, J. & Oksanen, L. (2002). Role of litter decomposition for the increased primary production in areas of heavy grazing by reindeer: a litterbag experiment. Oikos, 96, 507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, J., Kitti, H., Rautainen, P., Stark, S. & Oksanen, L. (2001). Effects of summer grazing by reindeer on composition of vegetation, productivity and nitrogen cycling. Ecography, 24, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J. & Cohen, Y. (1997). Herbivores, the functional diversity of plants species, and the cycling of nutrients in ecosystems. Theoretical Population Biology, 51, 165–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pastor, J. & Danell, K. (2003). Moose‐vegetation‐soils: a dynamic system. Alces, 39, 177–92.Google Scholar
Pastor, J. & Naiman, R. J. (1992). Selective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forests. American Naturalist, 139, 690–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Naiman, R. J., McInnes, P. F. & Cohen, Y. (1993). Moose browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle Royale National Park. Ecology, 74, 467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Dewey, B. & Christian, D. (1996). Carbon and nutrient mineralization and fungal spore composition of vole fecal pellets in Minnesota. Ecography, 19, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Moen, R. & Cohen, Y. (1997). Spatial heterogeneities, carrying capacity, and feedbacks in animal‐landscape interactions. Journal of Mammalogy, 78, 1040–52.Google Scholar
Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Moen, R.et al. (1998). Spatial patterns in the moose‐forest‐soil ecosystem on Isle Royale, Michigan, USA. Ecological Applications, 8, 411–24.Google Scholar
Pastor, J., Cohen, Y. & Moen, R. (1999a). The generation of spatial patterns in boreal landscapes. Ecosystems, 2, 439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Standke, K., Farnsworth, K., Moen, R. & Cohen, Y. (1999b). Further development of the Spalinger‐Hobbs mechanistic foraging model for free‐ranging moose. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 1505–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renecker, L. A. & Schwartz, C. C. (1998). Food habits and feeding behavior. In Ecology and Management of the North American Moose, ed. Franzmann, A. W. & Schwarz, C. C.. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 403–40.Google Scholar
Risenhoover, K. L. (1987). Winter foraging strategies of moose in subarctic and boreal forest habitats. Ph.D. dissertation, Houghton, MI, Michigan Technological University.
Risenhoover, K. L. & Maass, S. A. (1987). The influence of moose on the composition and structure of Isle Royale forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, M. E., Tilman, D. & Knops, J. M. H. (1998). Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology, 79, 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, C. T. (1983). Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, C. T., Moen, A. N. & Reid, J. T. (1974). Body composition of white‐tailed deer. Journal of Animal Science, 38, 871–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruess, R. W. & McNaughton, S. J. (1987). Grazing and the dynamics of nutrient and energy regulated microbial processes in the Serengeti grasslands. Oikos, 49, 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruess, R. W. & Seagle, S. W. (1994). Landscape patterns in soil microbial processes in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Ecology, 75, 892–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimel, D. S., Parton, W. J., Adamsen, , F. J.et al. (1986). The role of cattle in the volatile loss of nitrogen from a shortgrass steppe. Biogeochemistry, 2, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, A. M. (1964). The nutrient recovery hypothesis for arctic microtine cycles. II. Ecosystem variables in relation to arctic microtine cycles. In Grazing in Terrestrial and Marine Environments, ed. Crisp, D. J.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Seagle, S. W., McNaughton, S. J. & Ruess, R. W. (1992). Simulated effects of grazing on soil nitrogen and mineralization in contrasting Serengeti grasslands. Ecology, 73, 1105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senn, J. & Haukioja, E. (1994). Reactions of the mountain birch to bud removal: effects of severity and timing, and implications for herbivores. Ecology, 75, 494–501.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. R., Biondini, M. E. & Grygiel, C. E. (1994). Grazing intensity effects on litter decomposition and soil nitrogen mineralization. Journal of Range Management, 47, 444–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, L. A., Blomquist, S. & Danell, K. (1998). Diet choices made by free‐ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 1722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. & Norton‐Griffiths, M. (1979). Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J. & Schoenecker, K. A. (2003). Do ungulates accelerate or decelerate nitrogen cycling? Forest Ecology and Management, 181, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirotnak, J. M. & Huntly, N. J. (2000). Direct and indirect effects of herbivores on nitrogen dynamics: voles in riparian areas. Ecology, 81, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J. D. & Janke, R. A. (1976). Impact of moose browsing on boreal‐type forests of Isle Royale National Park. American Midland Naturalist, 95, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalinger, D. E. & Hobbs, N. T. (1992). Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. American Naturalist, 140, 325–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamp, N. (2003). Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 23–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, S., Wardle, D. A., Ohtonen, R., Helle, T. & Yeates, G. W. (2000). The effect of reindeer grazing on decomposition, mineralization, and soil biota in a dry oligotrophic Scots pine forest. Oikos, 90, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, S. & Grellmann, D. (2002). Soil microbial responses to herbivory in an arctic tundra heath at two levels of nutrient availability. Ecology, 83, 2736–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, S., Tuomi, J., Strömmer, R. & Helle, T. (2003). Non‐parallel changes in soil microbial carbon and nitrogen dynamics due to reindeer grazing in northern boreal forests. Ecography, 26, 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. D. & Curran, W. J. (1993). A reexamination of moose damage to balsam fir – white birch forests in central Newfoundland: 27 years later. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 1388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, I. D., Curran, W. J., Hancock, J. A. & Butler, C. E. (1992). Influence of moose browsing on successional forest growth on black spruce sites in Newfoundland. Forest Ecology and Management, 47, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trottier, G. C. (1981). Beaked hazelnut – a key browse species for moose in the boreal forest region of western Canada. Alces, 17, 257–81.Google Scholar
Uriarte, M. (2000). Interactions between goldenrod (Solidago altissima L.) and its insect herbivore (Trirhabda virgata) over the course of succession. Oecologia, 122, 521–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Väre, H., Ohtonen, R. & Mikkola, K. (1996). The effect and extent of heavy grazing by reindeer in oligotrophic pine heaths in northeastern Fennoscandia. Ecography, 19, 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivås, H. J. & Saether, B.‐E. (1987). Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose (Alces alces) and its food resources: An experimental study of winter foraging behavior in relation to browse availability. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. H., Ludwig, D., Holling, C. S. & Peterman, R. M. (1981). Stability of semi‐arid savanna grazing systems. Journal of Ecology, 69, 473–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A. & Bardgett, R. D. (2004). Human‐induced changes in large herbivorous mammal density: the consequences for decomposers. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Barker, G. M., Yeates, G. W., Bonner, K. I. & Ghani, A. (2001). Introduced browsing mammals in natural New Zealand forests: aboveground and belowground consequences. Ecological Monographs, 71, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I. & Barker, G. M. (2002). Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores. Functional Ecology, 16, 585–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, D. A. & Tilman, D. (1990). Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia, 84, 433–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedin, D. A. & Pastor, J. (1993). Nitrogen mineralization dynamics in grass monocultures. Oecologia, 96, 186–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, J. S. (1971). The effect of creating additional water supplies in a Central African National Park. In The Scientific Management of Animal and Plant Communities for Conservation, ed. Duffey, E. & Watt, A. S.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 367–85.Google Scholar
White, T. C. R. (1993). The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals, New York: Springer‐Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J. G. (1975). Nutrient cycles, nutrient limitation and vertebrate populations. The Biologist, 57, 104–24.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×