Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:07:50.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Pretend Play and Preschoolers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Ricardo Ottoni Vaz Japiassu
Affiliation:
State University of Bahia (UNEB), Brazil
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

THE EDUCATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF PRETEND PLAY

Although the belief that play is educationally important could already be found in the works of Plato and Aristotle, it was only in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that Rousseau and Fröbel, with their pedagogical theories, laid the basis for the construction of educational practices that systematically incorporate playfulness into school education (Brougère, 1998). The discoveries resulting from research in the field of developmental psychology enriched the belief in the educational value of play. This belief corresponds to the liberal progressivist pedagogical concept of Active Education (the New School movement), which, since the early 1900s, has spread throughout the world. Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Usova, and Elkonin are among the most important investigators of the educational dimensions of play, and their research contributed to the elaboration of the idea of an active pedagogy of play (França, 1990). Today, the study of the interrelationships between play and education has awakened the interest of researchers such as Gilles Brougère, Artin Göncü, Suzanne Gaskins, Barbara Rogoff, Jaan Valsiner, James Wertsch, Keith Sawyer, Tia Tulviste, Bert van Oers, Tizuko Kishimoto, Gisela Wajskop, Ingrid Koudela, Maria Cecília R. de Góes, and Zilma Oliveira.

The investigation of the educational dimensions of play in a historical and cultural perspective seeks to associate pretend play with the historical, material, economic, and political development of the relationships between production and the division of labor in human societies.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 380 - 398
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. (1993). Questões de literatura e estética. São Paulo: Hucitec.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1995). Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1997). Estética da criação verbal. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Brougère, G. (1995). Brinquedo e cultura. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Brougère, G. (1998). Jogo e educação. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Davidov, V. (1988). La enseñanza escolar y el desarrollo psiquico. Moscow: Progresso.Google Scholar
Elkonin, D. B. (1998). Psicologia do jogo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
França, G. W. (1990). “Tia, me deixa brincar!” O espaço do jogo na Educação pré-escolar. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica-PUC. (Dissertação de Mestrado).
Japiassu, R. O. V. (1999). Ensino do teatro nas séries iniciais da educação básica: a formação de conceitos sociais no jogo teatral. São Paulo: ECA-USP. (Dissertação de mestrado).
Japiassu, R. O. V. (2001a). Metodologia do ensino de teatro. Campinas: Papirus.Google Scholar
Japiassu, R. O. V. (2001b). Criatividade, criação e apreciação artísticas: a atividade criadora segundo Vygotsky. In Vasconcelos, M. (Ed.), Criatividade – Psicologia, Educação e conhecimento do novo (pp. 43–58). São Paulo: Moderna.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, T. M. (1994). O jogo e a educação infantil. São Paulo: Pioneira.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, T. M. (1996). Jogo, brinquedo, brincadeira e a educação. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Lima, E. S. (1995a). Culture revisited: Vygotsky's ideas in Brazil. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26 (4), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, E. S. (1995b). Vygotsky in the international scene: A brief overview. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26 (4), 490–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Estudos sobre a história do comportamento: o macaco, o primitivo e a criança. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L. (1974). Psicodrama. Buenos Aires: Hormé.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M. B. de (1999). Natureza e dinâmica dos conceitos. In Oliveira, M. K. & Oliveira, M. B. (Eds.), Investigações cognitivas: conceitos, linguagem e cultura (pp. 35–53). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Z. M. R. de. (1988). Jogos de papéis: uma perspectiva para análise do desenvolvimento humano. São Paulo: IP-USP (Tese de doutoramento).
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Child Development Publications (Vol. 58, no. 8). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Slade, P. (1971). An introduction to child drama (8th ed.). London: University of London Press. (Originally published 1958).Google Scholar
Toomela, A. (1996). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization. Culture and Psychology, 2 (3), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). El arte e la imaginación en la infancia: ensayo psicológico. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). História del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. Ciudad de La Habana: Científico Técnica.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Wajskop, G. A. (1996). Representação do brincar entre professores da educação infantil: Implicações para a prática pedagógica. São Paulo: FEUSP (Tese de doutoramento).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×