Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:50:21.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - What Kinds of Tools and Resources Are Made Available to Students through Effective Guidance in a Student-Scientist Partnership Program?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Jrène Rahm
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Faculté des Sciences de l'Êducation, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Wendy Naughton
Affiliation:
Instructor of Chemistry, Minneapolis Community and Technical College, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
John C. Moore
Affiliation:
Mathematics and Science Teaching Institute, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, United States
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

Partnerships between scientists and students have a long history (John-Steiner, 2000; Pycior, Slack, & Abir-Am, 1996; Tinker, 1997). Typically, through joint activity over prolonged periods of time, old and new ways of thinking are being developed. Given the recognition that “generative ideas emerge from joint thinking, from significant conversations, and from sustained, shared struggles to achieve new insights by partners in thought” (John-Steiner, 2000, p. 3), such models of education also figure prominently in current reform-oriented educational efforts (e.g., Barab & Duffy, 2000; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Collins, Brown, & Holum, 1991; Hennessy, 1993; Lave, 1996; Lave & Wenger, 1991; McGinn & Roth, 1999; Richmond & Kurth, 1999). Yet there is a paucity of research on how such ways of knowing and becoming are perceived by students and how they come to influence students' future endeavors.

A second area of concern centers on the low rates of participation of students from different ethnic, racial, cultural, and socioeconomic groups in science and mathematics disciplines, hereafter referred to collectively as underrepresented students. Much has been published on these disparities and the putative reasons behind them (Atwater, 2000; Mortensen, 1995; Oakes, Muir, & Joseph, 2000; Steele, 1997; Tobin, Seiler, & Walls, 1999). Against this backdrop are myriad programs that involve creative collaborations aimed at exposing underrepresented students to the cultures of science and mathematics in the hopes of encouraging these students to pursue careers in these disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 342 - 357
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atwater, M. M. (2000). Equity for black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84, 154–188.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Jonassen, D. H. & Land, S. M. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of scientists: Issues related to the scientist apprentice camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, C. A. (2001). Modeling science teaching on science practice? Painting a more accurate picture through an ethnographic lab study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Calabrese A. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15 (3), 38–46.Google Scholar
Crane, V. (1994). An introduction to informal science learning and research. In Crane, V., Nicholson, H., Bitgood, S., & Chen, M. (Eds.), Informal science learning (pp. 1–14). Dedham, MA: Research Communications.Google Scholar
Ebert-May, D., Hodder, J., Williams, K., & Luckie, D. (2004). Pathways to scientific teaching. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2 (6), 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, M. A., & Hollingsworth, S. (Eds.). (2000). What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (1999). Video recording as theory. In Kelly, A. & Lesh, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647–664). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (1993). Identity and inner-city youth. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1–41.Google Scholar
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, L. S. (1997). Opening doors with informal science: Exposure and access for our underserved students. Science Education, 81, 663–677.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4 (1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 3 (3), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28 (3), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. C., Tripp, B. B., Simpson, R. T., & Coleman, D. C. (2000). Springtails in the classroom: Collembola as model organisms for inquiry-based laboratories. American Biology Teacher, 62, 512–519.Google Scholar
Mortenson Research Letter. (1995). The Mortenson Research Letter on public policy analysis of opportunity for postsecondary education, 41. Iowa City, Iowa.
Oakes, J., Muir, K., & Joseph, R. (2000). Course taking and achievement: Inequalities that endure and change. A keynote presentation at the annual meeting of the National Institute for Science Education, Detroit.Google Scholar
Pycior, H. M., Slack, N. G., & Abir-Am, P. G. (Eds.). (1996). Creative couples in the sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rahm, J., Miller, H., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (8), 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students' use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (6), 677–697.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (7), 799–815.Google Scholar
Sosniak, L. A. (1995). Inviting adolescents into academic communities: An alternative perspective on systemic reform. Theory into Practice, 34 (1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, R. S. (1997). Student-scientist partnerships: Shrewd maneuvers. In Cohen, K. C. (Ed.), Internet links for science education: Student-scientist partnerships (pp. 5–15). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Walls, E. (1999). Reproduction of social class in the teaching and learning of science in urban high schools. Research in Science Education, 29, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×