Book contents
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Geophysical Techniques
- Chapter 4 Rock Physics of CO2 Storage Monitoring in Porous Media
- Chapter 5 Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring
- Chapter 6 Monitoring the Deformation Associated with the Geological Storage of CO2
- Chapter 7 Gravity
- Chapter 8 Estimating Saturation and Density Changes Caused by CO2 Injection at Sleipner
- Chapter 9 Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods
- Chapter 10 Microseismic Imaging of CO2 Injection
- Chapter 11 Well Logging
- Part III Case Studies
- Part IV Summary
- Index
- References
Chapter 11 - Well Logging
from Part II - Geophysical Techniques
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2019
Book contents
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Geophysical Techniques
- Chapter 4 Rock Physics of CO2 Storage Monitoring in Porous Media
- Chapter 5 Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring
- Chapter 6 Monitoring the Deformation Associated with the Geological Storage of CO2
- Chapter 7 Gravity
- Chapter 8 Estimating Saturation and Density Changes Caused by CO2 Injection at Sleipner
- Chapter 9 Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods
- Chapter 10 Microseismic Imaging of CO2 Injection
- Chapter 11 Well Logging
- Part III Case Studies
- Part IV Summary
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Geophysics and Geosequestration , pp. 181 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Archie, G. E. (1942). Electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146: 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouni, Z. (1994). Theory, measurement, and interpretation of well logs. SPE Textbook Series, 4. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavier, C., Hoyle, W. R., and Meunier, D. (1971). Quantitative interpretation of TDT Logs. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 23: 743–763.Google Scholar
Dupree, J. H. (1989). Cased-hole nuclear logging interpretation, Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Log Analyst, 162–177.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, W. A. Jr., Roger, L. T., and Watson, J. T. (1983). Carbon/oxygen interpretation, a theoretical model. In SPWLA 24th Symposium, paper FF.Google Scholar
Gould, J., Wackler, J., Quiren, J., and Watson, J. (1991). CO2 monitor logging: East Mallet Unit, Slaughter Field, Hockley County, Texas. In SPWLA 32nd Annual Symposium, paper PP.Google Scholar
Harold, B. H., Benimeli, D., Leveques, C., Bebourg, I., and Cadenhead, J. (2004). Combinable through-tubing cased hole formation resistivity tool. SPE 90018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., Tokar, T., and Zyweck, M. (2009). Innovation to enhanced oil recovery from slim cased hole resistivity measurement in Gulf of Thailand. In SPWLA 50th Annual Symposium, paper YY.Google Scholar
McGhee, B. F., McGuire, J. A., and Vacca, H. I. (1974). Examples of dual spacing thermal neutron decay time login Texas coast oil & gas reservoirs. SPWLA 15th Annual Symposium, paper R.Google Scholar
Moore, J. S. (1986). Design, installation, and early operation of the Tambalier Bay Gravity–Stable Miscible CO2 Injection Project. SPE Production Engineering, 369–378, also SPE 14287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, R. J. (1987). Through-casing reservoir evaluation using gamma ray spectroscopy. SPE 16356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhovets, N., and Wyatt, D. F. (1995). Quantitative monitoring of gas flooding in oil-bearing reservoirs by use of a pulsed neutron tool. SPE 21411.Google Scholar
Sakurai, S., Ramakrishnan, T. S., Boyd, A., Mueller, N., and Hovorka, S. (2006). Monitoring saturation changes for CO2 CSS; petrophysical support of the Frio Brine pilot experiment. Petrophysics, 47(6): 483–496.Google Scholar
Smolen, J. J. (1996). Cased hole and production log evaluation. Tulsa, OK: PennWell, 108.Google Scholar