Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:25:12.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Case Histories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2022

Frank R. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Since the discovery of carbon fibres in the 1960s, the applications have grown. Because of the high specific strength and stiffness, aerospace applications have dominated, especially initially in military aircraft. The intent here is to demonstrate how the choice of material has been identified. Most critical demonstrators have come from the field of aerospace because of the benefits of carbon fibres and the development of confidence in their use in safety-critical designs. The latter has involved much testing and durability studies. Middleton has provided several case histories detailing the development of composite applications in aircraft structures [1]. The use of composite components has increased with improved confidence in the durability and reliability of these materials and structures. The Airbus A380 was introduced in 2006 using a carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) centre wing box, while the fuselage employed an aluminium–glass fibre composite laminate (GLARE). The centre wing box is a critical carbon-fibre composite structure that joins the wings to the fuselage. Together with several other composite components, such as the horizontal and vertical stabilizers, keel beam, and pressure bulkhead, the total composite usage is 22% w/w. In 2011 the Boeing 787 Dreamliner employed carbon-fibre materials for the fuselage and wings. In total, the latter used 80–90% by volume or 50% by weight of composite materials. The Airbus A350, introduced in 2015, also uses CFRP for the fuselage and wings, and in total composite usage is 53% w/w.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Middleton, D. H., Case histories. In Composite materials in aircraft structures, ed. Middleton, D. H. (Harlow: Longman, 1990), pp. 228390.Google Scholar
Mason, K., CFRP module saves weight on rocket design. Composites World 5 (2019), 4447.Google Scholar
Friedrich, K. and Almajid, A. A., Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20 (2013), 107128.Google Scholar
Lukaszewicz, D. H.-J. A., Automotive composite structures for crashworthiness. In Advanced composite materials for automotive applications: structural integrity and crashworthiness, ed. Elmarakbi, A.. (Chichester: Wiley, 2013), pp. 99127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, D., Wang, Y., Dang, L., and Pan, Q., Energy absorption characteristics of composite tubes with different fibres and matrix under axial quasi-static and impact crushing conditions. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 20 (2018), 25872599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D., A unified approach to progressive crushing of fibre-reinforced composite tubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 40 (1991), 377421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, D. Y., Luo, M., and Yang, J. L., Experimental study on crushing characteristics of brittle fibre/epoxy hybrid composite tubes. Int. J. Crashworthiness 15 (2010), 401412.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. M., A critical analysis of the Aberfeldy footbridge, Scotland. In Proceedings of bridge engineering 2 conference, 2009 (Bath: University of Bath, 2009).Google Scholar
Mottram, J. T. and Henderson, J., ed., Fibre-reinforced polymer bridges: guidance for designers (London: CIRIA and Composites UK, 2018).Google Scholar
Harvey, W. J., A reinforced plastic footbridge, Aberfeldy, UK. Struct. Eng. Int. 4 (1993), 229232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratford, T., The condition of the Aberfeldy footbridge after 20 years in service. Paper presented at Structural Faults and Repair 2012, Edinburgh (2012).Google Scholar
Cadei, J. and Stratford, T., The design, construction and in-service performance of the all-composite Aberfeldy footbridge. In Advanced polymer composites for structural applications in construction, ed. Shenoi, R., Moy, S., and Holloway, L. (London: Thomas Telford, 2002), pp. 445455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffard, T.A., Malvar, L. J., Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in bridges: a state-of-the-art report, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NAVFAC) Technical Memorandum TM-2384-SHR (2005).Google Scholar
Meier, U., The development of composites and their utilisation in Switzerland. In Advanced composites in bridge construction and repair, ed. Kim, Y. (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2014), pp 2331.Google Scholar
Meier, U., Carbon fiber reinforced polymer cables: why? Why not? What if? Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37 (2012), 399411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, U., Carbon fiber reinforced polymers: modern materials in bridge engineering. Struct. Eng. Int. 2 (1992), 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, U., Proposal for a carbon fibre reinforced composite bridge across the Strait of Gibraltar at its narrowest site. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. B2 201 (1987), 7378.Google Scholar
Meier, U., Composite materials in bridge repair. Appl. Compos. Mater. 7 (2000), 7594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. F. M., Wu, Z., and Wu, G., Post-earthquake recoverability of existing RC bridge piers retrofitted with FRP composites. Construct. Building Mater. 24 (2010) 980998.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y.-K. and Mo, Y. L., Shear retrofit of hollow bridge piers with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets. J. Compos. Construct. 9 (2005), 327336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivaraja, S. S., Thandavamoorthy, T. S., Vijayakumar, S., Aranganathan, S. M., and Dasarathy, A. K., Preservation of historical monumental structures using fibre reinforced polymer (FRP): case studies. Procedia Engineering 54 (2013) 472479.Google Scholar
Asteris, P. G. and Plevris, V., Handbook of research on seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historic structures (Hershey, PA: Engineering Science Reference, 2015).Google Scholar
Chang, K. C., Chung, L. L., Lee, B. J., et al. Seismic retrofit study of RC bridge columns. Technical Report, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan (2000).Google Scholar
Sarker, P., Begum, M., and Nasrin, S., Fiber reinforced polymers for structural retrofitting: a review. J. Civil Eng. 39 (2011), 4957.Google Scholar
Mishnaevsky Jr., L., Composite materials in wind energy technology. In Thermal to mechanical energy conversion: engines and requirements, ed. Favorsky, O. N. (Paris: UNESCO-EOLSS).Google Scholar
Richardson, R., New design tool improves manufacture of composite wind turbine blades. Power 154 (2010), 6265.Google Scholar
Mishnaevsky Jr, L.., Branner, K., Petersen, H. N., et al., Materials for wind turbine blades: an overview. Materials 10 (2017), 12851309.Google Scholar
Hogg, P., Wind turbine blade materials, SUPERGEN wind phase 1 final assembly. Presentation at University of Loughborough (2010).Google Scholar
Szabó, R. and Szabó, L. Composite materials for wind power turbine blades. In Proceedings of EXPRES 2017 (2017), pp. 4450.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Case Histories
  • Frank R. Jones, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Composites Science, Technology, and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139565943.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Case Histories
  • Frank R. Jones, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Composites Science, Technology, and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139565943.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Case Histories
  • Frank R. Jones, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Composites Science, Technology, and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139565943.011
Available formats
×