Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T20:48:04.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Ovarian Surgery, Menopause Hormone Therapy and Contraception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

Swati Jha
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
Eloise Power
Affiliation:
Sergeants’ Inn, London
Get access

Summary

The claimant made the case that it was substandard care and a breach of duty to start her on the combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill as she had a clear family history of vascular disease. Because of this breach, the claimant suffered a DVT with its consequent effects.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lessons from Medicolegal Cases in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Improving Clinical Practice
, pp. 264 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Management of ovarian masses in premenopausal women. Green-top Guideline No. 62. London: RCOG; 2011.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Management of ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women. Green-top Guideline No. 34. London: RCOG; 2016.Google Scholar
Tingulstad, S, Hagen, B, Skjeldestad, FE, Onsrud, M, Kiserud, T, Halvorsen, T, et al. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the preoperative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 826–31.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Menopause: diagnosis and management of menopause. NICE guideline [NG23]. London: NICE; 2015. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng23Google Scholar
Coney, P, Washenik, K, Langley, RG, Di Giovanna, J, Harrison, D. Weight change and adverse event incidence with a low dose oral contraceptive: two randomised placebo controlled trials. Contraception 2001: 63(6) 297302.Google Scholar
Endrikat, J, Muller, U, Dusterberg, B. A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low dose oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 4 micrograms ethinyl estradiol/75 micrograms gestodene with respect to efficacy, cycle control and tolerance. Contraception 1997; 55(3): 131–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, M, Lopez, L, Grime, D, Carayon, F, Schulz, K, Helmerhorst, F. Combination contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (1): CD 003987.Google Scholar
Trussell, J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011; 83(5): 397404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterberg, L, Blaschke, T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(5): 487–97.Google Scholar
Dinger, J, Bardenheuer, K, Heinemann, K. Cardiovascular and general safety of a 24-day regime of drospirenone containing oral contraceptive: final results from the international active surveillance study of women taking oral contraceptives. Contraception 2014; 89(4): 253–63.Google Scholar
Peregallo Urrutia, R, Coeytaux, R, McBroom, A, Gierisch, J, Haurilesky, L, Moorman, P, et al. Risk of acute thromboembolic events with oral contraceptive use: a systemic review and met analysis: Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 122(2 part 1): 380–9.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Medical eligibility criteria for contraception use. Geneva: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
Lalchandini, S, Phillips, K. Laparoscopy entry techniques. In: Complications in Gynaecological Surgery, edited by O’Donovan, Peter. London: Springer; 2008, 3, 20–33.Google Scholar
Ogah, J. Laparoscopic surgery. In: Complications in Gynaecological Surgery, edited by O’Donovan, Peter. London: Springer; 2008, 8, 67–74.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Obtaining valid consent. Clinical governance advice No. 6. London: RCOG; 2004.Google Scholar
Hammond, I, Kathigasu, K. Training assessment and competency in gynaecological surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 173–87.Google Scholar
Gray, T, Jha, S, Bolton, H. ‘Duty of candour’ – The obstetrics and gynaecology perspective. Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 21: 165–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×