Bibliography and Further Reading

Martin J. Eppler; Sebastian Kernbach

doi:10.1017/9781108903059.012

Mankins, M., Brahm, C., & Caimi, G. (2014). Your Scarcest Resource, https://hbr.org/2014/05/your-scarcest-resource (Last accessed: 07.09.2020).Google Scholar

Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2010). Das Flow-Erlebnis: Jenseits von Angst und Langeweile: Im Tun aufgehen. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.Google Scholar

Eppler, M. J., et al. (2016). Zusammen denken: Ein Manifest für bessere Besprechungen. OrganisationsEntwicklung, No. 4.Google Scholar

Burmester, H. (2016). Stupser für die innovative Organisation. Wie Nudging die Organisationsentwicklung bereichern kann. OrganisationsEntwicklung, 1, 59–65.Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 304–13.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Wie man kluge Entscheidungen anstößt. Berlin: Econ.Google Scholar

Allen, J. A., et al. (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Language, 336–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andrade, J. (2010). What does doodling do? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 100–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (2015). Konzentriert Euch!: Eine Anleitung zum modernen Leben. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar

Meetings-Imagine. (2017). https://meetingsimagined.com/tips-trends/value-scent-how-aromatherapy-canchange-your-meeting-better (Last accessed: 20.11.2017).Google Scholar

Mirivel, J. C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 1–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spradley, J. P. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Volkema, R. J., & Neiderman, F. (1995). Organizational meetings: Formats and informational requirements. Small Group Research, 26, 3–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zoladz, P. R., & Raudenbush, B. (2005). Cognitive enhancement through stimulation of the chemical senses. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(1), 125–40.Google Scholar

Allen, J. A., Beck, T., Scott, C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2014). Understanding workplace meetings: A qualitative taxonomy of meeting purposes. Management Research Review, 37(9), 791–814.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R., & Axelrod, E. (2014). Let’s Stop Meeting Like This: Tools to Save Time and Get More Done. Oakland: Berrett- Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar

Boden, D. (1995). Agendas and arrangements: Everyday negotiations in meetings. In Firth, A (ed.), The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the workplace, 83–100. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Harkins, P. (1999). Powerful Conversations: How High Impact Leaders Communicate. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Kauffeld, S., & Güntner, A. V. (2016). Teilnehmer-Typologie. OrganisationsEntwicklung, 4, 29–35.Google Scholar

Schindler, M., & Eppler, M. J. (2002). Vom Debriefing zum kontinuierlichen Erfahrungslernen. OrganisationsEntwicklung, 21(1), 58–71.Google Scholar

Schindler, M., & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 219–28.Google Scholar

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Azlina, N. N. (2010). CETLs: Supporting collaborative activities among students and teachers through the use of think-pair-share techniques. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7(5), 18–29.Google Scholar

Colzato, L. S., Szapora, A., Lippelt, D., & Hommel, B. (2017). Prior meditation practice modulates performance and strategy use in convergent- and divergent-thinking problems. Mindfulness, 8(1), 10–16.Google Scholar

Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Group, sub-group, and nominal group idea generation: New rules for a new media? Journal of Management, 20(4), 723–36.Google Scholar

Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2011). Make Space: How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Eppler, M. J., Hoffmann, F., & Pfister, R. A. (2014). Creability: Gemeinsam kreativ. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar

Eppler, M. J., & Pfister, R. A. (2010). Drawing conclusions: Supporting decision making through collaborative graphic annotations. Information Visualisation (IV), 14th International Conference, 369–74.Google Scholar

Havas, David A., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21(7), 895–900.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kangasharju, H. & Nikko, T. (2009).Emotions in organizations: Joint laughter in workplace meetings. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 46(1), 100–19.Google Scholar

Kernbach, S., Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2015). Slip-sliding-away: A review of the literature on the constraining qualities of PowerPoint. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 292–313.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. K., & Allen, J. A. (2014). How fun are your meetings?: Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1278–87.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., Calic, A., McGrory, C. M., Murrell, R. L., & Schutte, N. S. (2012). Evidence for a needs-based model of organizational-meeting leadership. Current Psychology, 31(1), 35–48.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.Google Scholar

National Health Service. (2017). www.nhs.uk/news/lifestyle-and-exercise/office-workers-of-englandstand-up-for-your-health/ (Last accessed: 20.11.2017).Google Scholar

Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152.Google Scholar

Public Health Ontario, Health Nexus Canada. (2010). Priority Setting: Four Methods for Getting to What’s Important. Ottawa, ON: Ontario Health Promotion E-Bulletin.Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 47–68.Google Scholar

Schulz-Hardt, S., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2012). Group Performance and Leadership. WOP Working Paper, No. 2012/4.Google Scholar

Shimojima, A. (1999). Derivative meaning in graphical representations. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 212–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Steiner, V. (2011). Energiekompetenz. Munich: Pendo Verlag.Google Scholar

Valentine, E. R., & Sweet, P. L. (1999). Meditation and attention: A comparison of the effects of concentrative and mindfulness meditation on sustained attention. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2(1), 59–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Gundy, A. B. (1984). Brain writing for new product ideas: an alternative to brainstorming. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1(2), 67–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ariely, D. (2016). Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes Our Motivations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 29–41.Google Scholar

Dutton, J., & Spreitzer, G. (2014). How to Be a Positive Leader. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar

Gray, D., Brown, S., & Macanufo, J. (2010). Gamestorming: A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers, and Changemakers. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. (2005). Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 137–62.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D. (2017). Gödel, Escher, Bach. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.Google Scholar

Jacka, J. M., & Keller, P. J. (2009). Business Process Mapping: Improving Customer Satisfaction. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263–91.Google Scholar

Mirsch, T., Lehrer, C., & Jung, R. (2017). Digital nudging: Altering user behavior in digital environments. In Leimeister, J. M. & Brenner, W (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), St. Gallen, 634–48.Google Scholar

Parker, P., Hall, D. T., & Kram, K. E. (2008). Peer coaching: A relational process for accelerating career learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education 7(4), 487–503.Google Scholar

Pries-Heje, L., & Pries-Heje, J. (2011). Why Scrum works: A case study from an agile distributed project in Denmark and India. In Agile Conference (AGILE), IEEE, 20–8.Google Scholar

SwissQ (2017). Agile Priority Poker, https://swissq.it/en/agile/priority-poker/ (Adapted – last accessed: 20.11.2017).Google Scholar

Washington, M. C., Okoro, E. A., & Cardon, P. W. (2014). Perceptions of civility for mobile phone use in formal and informal meetings. Business Communication Quarterly, 77, 52–64.Google Scholar

Kwon, W., Clarke, I., & Wodak, R. (2014). Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 265–90.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. (2012). Flourish – Wie Menschen aufblühen. Die Positive Psychologie des gelingenden Lebens. Munich: Kösel-Verlag.Google Scholar

McGrath, L., Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2016). We Walk the Line: provisional icon appearance on virtual whiteboards triggers elaborative dialogue and creativity. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 717–26.Google Scholar

Mengis, J., & Eppler, M. J. (2006). Seeing versus arguing: The moderating role of collaborative visualization in team knowledge integration, Journal of Universal Knowledge Management, 1(3), 151–62.Google Scholar

Alexander, E., Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2015). Understanding the Impact of Visual Representation Restrictiveness on Experience Sharing: an Experimental Assessment. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 31, 30–46.Google Scholar

Eppler, M. J., Hoffmann, M., & Kernbach, S. (2015). Navicons for Collaboration: Navigating and augmenting discussions through visual annotations. In Proceedings of IV2015, the 19th International Information Visualization Conference. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar

Alexander, E., Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2015). Knowledge scaffolding visualizations: a guiding framework. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 7(2).Google Scholar

Kernbach, S., Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2015). Slip-sliding-away: A Review of the Literature on the Constraining Qualities of PowerPoint. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 292–313.Google Scholar

Eppler, M. J., & Kernbach, S. (2016). Dynagrams: Enhancing design thinking through dynamic diagrams. Design Studies, 47, 91–117.Google Scholar

Kernbach, S., Eppler, M. J., & Bresciani, S. (2015). The use of visualization in the communication of business strategies: An experimental evaluation. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(2), 164–187.Google Scholar