Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- The Core International Human Rights Instruments and Their Monitoring Bodies
- Universal Human Rights Instruments
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Glossary of United Nations and Psychology Acronyms in the Handbook
- Introduction
- Part I History of Human Rights
- Part II The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights
- 5 The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights in Addressing Racism, Discrimination, and Xenophobia
- 6 Poverty and the Human Rights of Children and Youth through the Lenses of Psychology and Sociology
- 7 Labor Rights as Human Rights
- 8 Whose Culture? Challenging the Idea of an Opposition between Women’s Human Rights and the Right to Culture
- 9 Human Rights
- 10 Child Rights
- 11 Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities
- Part III Contemporary Issues in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part IV Teaching, Research, and Training in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part V Future Directions
- Index
- References
9 - Human Rights
A Psychologist’s Path to “Do No Harm”
from Part II - The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- The Core International Human Rights Instruments and Their Monitoring Bodies
- Universal Human Rights Instruments
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Glossary of United Nations and Psychology Acronyms in the Handbook
- Introduction
- Part I History of Human Rights
- Part II The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights
- 5 The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights in Addressing Racism, Discrimination, and Xenophobia
- 6 Poverty and the Human Rights of Children and Youth through the Lenses of Psychology and Sociology
- 7 Labor Rights as Human Rights
- 8 Whose Culture? Challenging the Idea of an Opposition between Women’s Human Rights and the Right to Culture
- 9 Human Rights
- 10 Child Rights
- 11 Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities
- Part III Contemporary Issues in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part IV Teaching, Research, and Training in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part V Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
Embedded in psychological ethics is the principle of nonmaleficence – psychologists should endeavor to “do no harm.” Consistent with fundamental human rights, psychologists aim to protect integrity and dignity; secure development and fulfillment of lives; and ensure the well-being of individuals, groups, and communities. Psychological science and practice contains knowledge and insights that can be used to promote these aims. Unfortunately, this knowledge too often has been used to obstruct human integrity, destroy mental capacity and psychological health, and diminish the well-being and security of both persons and peoples. This chapter focuses on ways in which psychologists and psychological knowledge in different ways and at different levels may become part of an abusive culture that both violates human rights and fosters social injustice. In this chapter, we discuss psychologists’ involvement in torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment across a range of settings. Through a case example, we highlight the interplay between direct and structural forms of violence and the path to harm created by ethical decision making devoid of human rights analyses. The need for a clear ethical and human rights–based approach in psychology is argued, including ways of dealing with violations and claiming accountability for crimes against humanity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights , pp. 135 - 149Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Afkhami, M. (n.d.). Mahnaz Afkhani reflects on working toward peace. https://legacy.scu.edu/ethics/architects-of-peace/Afkhami/essay.html (accessed June 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (1983). Uruguay: An Amnesty briefing. www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR520341983ENGLISH.PDFGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. (2002). Doctors and torture. www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/112000/act750012002en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York, NY: Worth.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., Boye, D., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1968). Retaliation as a means of restoring equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 370–376.Google Scholar
Bloch, S., & Reddaway, P. (1985). Psychiatrists and dissenters in the Soviet Union. In Stover, E. & Nightingale, E. (Eds.), The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse, and the health professions (pp. 132–164). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigham, C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. https://archive.org/stream/studyofamericani00briguoft/studyofamericani00briguoft_djvu.txtGoogle Scholar
Bruner, F. (1908). The hearing of primitive peoples. Archives of Psychology, 11, 1–113.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. (2013). South Africa’s shameful past and hopeful future: Interview with Saths Cooper. Monitor on Psychology, 44(4), 32.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galton, D., & Galton, C. (1998). Francis Galton: And eugenics today. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 99–105.Google Scholar
Haritos-Fatouros, M. (1988) The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1107–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kordon, D., & Edelman, L. (1988). Psychological effects of political repression. In Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos, D., Nicoletti, E., & Bozollo, R. (Eds.), Psychological effects of political repression. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana/Planeta.Google Scholar
Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos, D., Nicoletti, E., Kersner, D., & Groshaus, M. (1992). Torture in Argentina. In Basoglu, M. (Ed.), Torture and its consequences (pp. 432–455). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landis, D., & Boucher, J. (1987). Themes and models of conflict. In Boucher, J., Landis, D., & Clark, K. A. (Eds.), Ethnic conflict: International perspectives (pp. 18–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Leonard, K., & Taylor, S. (1981). Effects of racial prejudice and race of target on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 7, 205–214.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (2004, November 30). Red Cross finds detainee abuse at Guantánamo. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2004/11/30/politics/red-cross-finds-detainee-abuse-in-guantanamo.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lindner, E. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. New York, NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lira, E., & Castillo, M. (1991). Psicología de la amenaza politíca y del miedo [The psychology of political threat and fear]. Santiago: ILAS.Google Scholar
Maercker, A., & Guski-Leinwand, S. (2018). Psychologists’ involvement in repressive “Stasi” secret police activities in former East Germany. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 7(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, A. (2007). Science in Dachau’s shadow: Hebb, Beecher and the development of CIA psychological torture and modern medical ethics. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 43, 401–417.Google Scholar
Military Commissions Act of 2006. (2006). Public Law 109–366—Oct. 17, 2006. www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Belmont report. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Newman, L., & Erber, R. (2002). Understanding genocide: The social psychology of the Holocaust. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, L. (1992). The contribution of the double-bind theory to the understanding of oppression. In Nicholas, L. J. (Ed.), Psychology and oppression: Critiques and proposals (pp. 190–196). Johannesburg: Skotaville.Google Scholar
Nicholas, L. (2014). Psychological sequelae of political imprisonment during apartheid. South African Journal of Psychology, 44, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M., & McArthur, E. (2006). The distinction between torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Torture, 16(3), 147–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Nuremberg Code. (1949). Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Olson, B., & Soldz, S. (2007). Positive illusions and the necessity of a bright line forbidding psychologist involvement in detainee interrogations. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 145–154.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (Ed.) (1990). Moral exclusion [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2001). Social injustice. In Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (Eds.), Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 102–109). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall. http://u.osu.edu/christie/files/2014/10/Chapter-8-Social-Injustice-Opotow-1jaya7m.pdfGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (2002). The psychology of impunity and injustice: Implications for social reconciliation. In Bassiouni, M. C. (Ed.), Post conflict justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Press.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2018). Social justice theory and practice: Fostering inclusion in exclusionary contexts. In Hammack, P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rojas, P. (2000). Impunity: An impossible reparation. Nordic Journal of International Law, 69, 27–34.Google Scholar
Senate Intelligence Committee. (2012). Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. https://fas.org/irp/congress/2014_rpt/ssci-rdi.pdfGoogle Scholar
Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stover, E., & Nightingale, E. (1985). Introduction. In Stover, E. and Nightingale, E. (Eds.), The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse, and the health professions (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (1990). Psychologists as victims, administrators, and designers of torture. In Suedfeld, P. (Ed.), Psychology and torture (pp. 101–115). New York, NY: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2007). Torture: A crime against humanity. In Lothe, E. A., Daniel, M., Snipstad, M. B., & Sveaass, N. (Eds.), Strength in broken places (pp. 179–196). Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2009). Destroying minds: Psychological pain and the crime of torture. New York City Law Review, 11, 303–332.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2013). Gross human rights violations and reparation under international law: Approaching rehabilitation as a form of reparation. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, 17191.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2017). The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: The absolute prohibition and the obligation to prevent. In Bas¸og˘lu, M. (Ed.), Torture and its definition in international law: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 247–271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1966a). The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspxGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1966b). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspxGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1984). Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT). www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspxGoogle Scholar
UN Committee Against Torture. (2008). General comment No. 2 on article 2 of the UNCAT. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT%2fC%2fGC%2f2&Lang=enGoogle Scholar
UN Committee Against Torture. (2009). Concluding observations of the Committee Against Torture. Azerbaijan. CAT/C/AZE/CO/. Retrieved from www.atlas-of-torture.org/en/document/s1zm912lpvlcj1z3epyl23xr?page=1.Google Scholar
Vesti, P., & Lavik, N. J. (1991). Torture and the medical profession: A review. Journal of Medical Ethics, suppl., 4–8.Google Scholar
Wessells, M., Sveaass, N., Foster, D., & Dawes, A. (2017). Do no harm? How psychologists have supported torture and what to do about it. In Seedat, M., Suffla, S., & Christie, D. (Eds.), Enlarging the scope of peace psychology: African and world-regional contributions (pp. 269–294). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Woolf, L. M. (2019). Peace and Social Justice. In Njoku, M. G., Jason, L. A., & Johnson, R. B. (Eds.), Psychology of peace promotion: Global perspectives on personal peace, children and adolescents, and social justice (pp. 219–235). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Woolf, L., & Hulsizer, M. (2002/2003). Intra- and inter-religious hate and violence: A psychosocial model. Journal of Hate Studies, 2, 5–26.Google Scholar
Woolf, L., & Hulsizer, M. (2005). Psychosocial roots of genocide: Risk, prevention, and intervention. Journal of Genocide Research, 7, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar