Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T20:57:49.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Whose Culture? Challenging the Idea of an Opposition between Women’s Human Rights and the Right to Culture

from Part II - The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Neal S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Adler University
Roseanne L. Flores
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

We challenge the idea that the human rights of women and the right to culture are in opposition. First, the ideas that all human beings have the same rights and that these rights cannot be selectively abridged are fundamental to a diversity of cultures – though they often co-exist with discriminatory ideas and practices. Second, the idea of opposition between women’s rights and cultural rights is grounded in the myth that cultures are homogenous, bounded, and static. All cultures include a diversity of values; cultures also constantly mix and evolve. Third, the idea of opposition between women’s rights and cultural rights overlooks the power dynamics that make it difficult for women to influence their culture. Fourth, contraposing women’s rights and cultural rights splits experiences of oppression and privilege by gender and culture, instead of recognizing their intersectionality. Finally, the selective use of arguments against the universality of human rights in women’s case reveals bias. The universality of human rights is not questioned when men’s rights are at stake. In conclusion, it is critical to recognize and resist oppressive interests and practices disguised under the cloak of culture. The universality-of-human-rights principle demands essential protections and freedoms for all human beings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African Union. (2003). Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa. https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/37077-treaty-0027_-_protocol_to_the_african_charter_on_human_and_peoples_rights_on_the_rights_of_women_in_africa_e.pdf.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002; amended June 1, 2010, and January 2017). www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspxGoogle Scholar
Arat, Z. F. K. (2008). Women’s rights as human rights. UN Chronicle. https://unchronicle.un.org/article/womens-rights-human-rightsGoogle Scholar
Arat, Z. F. K. (2015). Feminisms, women’s rights, and the UN: Would achieving gender equality empower women? American Political Science Review, 109, 674–689.Google Scholar
Asomah, J. Y. (2015). Cultural rights versus human rights: A critical analysis of the trokosi practice in Ghana and the role of civil society. African Human Rights Law Journal, 15, 129–149.Google Scholar
Ayton-Shenker, D. (1995). The challenge of human rights and cultural diversity. UN Department of Public Information DPI/1627/HR. http://khoaanh.hcmup.edu.vn/projects/tilt2011/3B08/Unit.2.Kim.Duyen_Tran.Thi.Hien/Resources/Materials/The%20challenge%20of%20Huma%20rights%20and%20cultural%20diversity.docGoogle Scholar
Beckett, C., & Macey, M. (2001). Race, gender and sexuality: The oppression of multiculturalism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 309–319.Google Scholar
Bunch, C., & Frost, S. (2000). Women’s human rights: An introduction. www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/globalcenter/whr.htmlGoogle Scholar
Burn, S. M. (2019). Women across cultures: A global perspective (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Canetto, S. S. (2018). Women and human rights: Concepts, debates, progress and implications. In Travis, C. & White, J. (Eds.), APA handbook on the psychology of women (vol. II, pp. 521–543). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Canetto, S. S. (2019). Teaching about women and gender from a transnational and intersectional feminist perspective. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 8, 144–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. (2014). A call to action: Women, religion, violence, and power. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (2015). Patriarchy and violence against women and girls. Lancet, 385, e40–e41.Google Scholar
Cusack, S., & Pusey, L. (2012). Women’s human rights and culture: From deadlock to dialogue [review]. Human Rights Quarterly, 34, 657–667.Google Scholar
Ebadi, S. (2016). Until we are free: My fight for human rights in Iran. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Elias, J. (2015). Realising women’s human rights in Malaysia: The EMPOWER report. Asian Studies Review, 39, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltahawy, M. (2015). Headscarves and hymens: Why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Ertürk, Y. (2006, January). Integration of the human rights of women and a gender perspective: Violence against women. Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences. www.iranhrdc.org/english/human-rights-documents/aadel-collection/10028-integration-of-the-human-rights-of-women-and-a-gender-perspective-violence-against-women.htmlGoogle Scholar
European Federation of Psychologists’ Association. (2005). Meta-code of ethics. http://ethics.efpa.eu/meta-code/Google Scholar
Falcón, S. M., & Nash, J. C. (2017). Shifting analytics and linking theories: A conversation about the “meaning-making” of intersectionality and transnational feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 50, 1–10.Google Scholar
Frick, M. L. (2014). The cultural defense and women’s human rights: An inquiry into the rationales for unveiling Justitia’s eyes to “Culture.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40, 555–576.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. S. (2014). Human rights. In Stimpson, C. S. & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Critical terms for the study of gender (pp. 139–155). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gross, R. A. (1996). Feminism and religion: An introduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hirsi Ali, A. (2015). Heretic: Why Islam needs a reformation now. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Holtmaat, R., & Naber, J. (2011). Women’s human rights and culture: From deadlock to dialogue. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
International Union of Psychological Science. (2008). Universal declaration of ethical principles for psychologists. www.iupsys.net/about/governance/universal-declaration-of-ethical-principles-for-psychologists.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kuokkanen, R. (2015). Gendered violence and politics in indigenous communities. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(2), 271–288.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (2007). (Women’s) human rights: Paradoxes and possibilities. Review of International Studies, 33, 91–103.Google Scholar
Maalouf, A. (2001). In the name of identity: Violence and the need to belong. New York, NY: Arcade.Google Scholar
Manji, I. (2003). The trouble with Islam: A Muslim’s call for reform in her faith. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. E. (1995). Cultural particularism as a bar to women’s rights: Reflections on the Middle Eastern experience. In Peters, J. & Wolper, A. (Eds.), Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspectives (pp. 176–188). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mirhosseini, A. (1995). After the revolution: Violations of women’s human rights in Iran. In Peters, J. & Wolper, A. (Eds.), Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspectives (pp. 72–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mutua, M. (2007). Standard setting in human rights: Critique and prognosis. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 547–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naher, A. (2010). “Defending Islam and women’s honour against NGOs” in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 316–324.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? In Cohen, J. C., Howard, M., & Nussbaum, M. (Eds.), Is multiculturalism bad for women? (pp. 9–24). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ormiston, S., & Hogan, S. (2019, January 14). Saudi teen who fled her family and risked her life says she had nothing to lose. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saudi-teen-fled-thailand-canada-1.4977664Google Scholar
Peters, J., & Wolper, A. (Eds.). (1995). Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, K. (1999). Whose culture? In Cohen, J. C., Howard, M., & Nussbaum, M. (Eds.), Is multiculturalism bad for women? (pp. 27–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rajan, H. (2018). The ethics of transnational feminist research and activism: An argument for a more comprehensive view. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(2), 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramcharan, B. G. (n.d.). How universal are human rights? A debate about power rather than rights. www.academia.edu/12108500/DEBATTE_DEBATE_How_Universal_Are_Human_Rights_B.G._RAMCHARAN_A_Debate_About_Power_Rather_Than_RightsGoogle Scholar
Rao, A. (1995). The politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. In Peters, J. & Wolper, A. (Eds.), Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspectives (pp. 167–175). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steans, J. (2007). Debating women’s human rights as a universal feminist project: Defending women’s human rights as a political tool. Review of International Studies, 33, 11–27.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. (2017, March 16). On betrayal by the left: Talking with ex-Muslim Sarah Haider. https://quillette.com/2017/03/16/on-betrayal-by-the-left-talking-with-ex-muslim-sarah-haider/Google Scholar
Tobin, T. W. (2009). Using rights to counter “gender-specific” wrongs. Human Rights Review, 10, 521–530.Google Scholar
Trott, C. D., & Canetto, S. S. (2014). The abuse of women’s rights: Perspectives from psychology and gender studies. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies, 7(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1948). The universal declaration of human rights. www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/Google Scholar
United Nations. (1979). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CEDAW.aspxGoogle Scholar
UN. (1993, June 25). Vienna declaration and programme of action. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspxGoogle Scholar
UN. (1993, December 20). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. www.un-documents.net/a48r104.htmGoogle Scholar
UN. (1995). The United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women: Platform for Action. www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/plat1.htmGoogle Scholar
UN. (2007, January 17). Special rapporteur on violence against women: Intersections between culture and violence against women. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G07/103/04/PDF/G0710304.pdf?OpenElementGoogle Scholar
UN. (2014). Women’s rights are human rights. www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR-PUB-14-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
UN. (2015, October 21). 70/1. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1Google Scholar
UN. (n.d., b). Human Rights Day 10 December. Women who shaped the Universal Declaration. www.un.org/en/events/humanrightsday/women-who-shaped-the-universal-declaration.shtmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (n.d.). UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.htmlGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. (2006). Religion, culture and women’s human rights: Some general political and theoretical considerations. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 381–393.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.) Millennium Development Goals. www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en/Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×