Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:24:41.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Basic Needs, Goals and Motivation

from Part V - Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access

Summary

A psychological need is a condition of an organism that must be attained or maintained in order to preserve wellbeing and adaptive psychological functioning. Psychological needs are proactive, in that they promote engagement with the environment to satisfy the needs (Reeve, 2015). Recently, Dweck (2017) proposed two criteria for a “basic” need: (1) The goals that serve to satisfy the needs are high in value and universal in scope; and (2) successful attainment of goals related to a need is important for both immediate and long-term wellbeing. In addition, she identified needs as “basic” only if they are irreducible to other needs, and if they are present at or very soon after birth. Derivative needs develop over the span of early childhood. One problem with this conception is that it is very difficult to clearly establish that a need is “irreducible,” or that it is present at the beginning of life, i.e., that it is not a product of development via person–environment transaction (Lazarus, 1991; Matthews, 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). Introduction to motivation (2nd ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L ., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 505516).Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 110.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). Cybernetic control processes and the self-regulation of behavior. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 2842). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158175.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119142.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227268.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627668.Google Scholar
Dember, W. N. (1974). Motivation and the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 29, 161168.Google Scholar
Di Domenico, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.Google Scholar
Dunning, D. (2016). Systems approaches to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, D., & Anderson, J. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect that expectation of reward. Journal of Personality Psychology, 107, 122141.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689719.Google Scholar
Hmel, B. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2002). The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 70, 277310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410422.Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., & Sutton, A. (2011). Understanding exercise behaviour: Examining the interaction of exercise motivation and personality in predicting exercise frequency. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 8297.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well–being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750764.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370396.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1997). An introduction to the cognitive science of personality and emotion. In Matthews, G. (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 330). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2001). Levels of transaction: A cognitive science framework for operator stress. In Hancock, P. A. & Desmond, P. A. (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 533). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2008). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 5679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mathews, G. (2009). Personality and performance: Cognitive processes and models. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 400426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology. American Psychologist, 60, 294307.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olesen, M. H., Thomsen, D. K., & O’Toole, M. S. (2015). Subjective well-being: Above neuroticism and extraversion, autonomy motivation matters. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 4549.Google Scholar
Phillips, P., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2003). Personality, cognition, and university students’ examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 435448.Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2016). A grand theory of motivation: Why not? Motivation and Emotion, 40, 3135.Google Scholar
Reeve, J., & Woogul, L. (2012). Neuroscience and human motivation. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 365380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, E., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Villar, P. (2012). Life aspirations, personality traits and subjective well-being in a Spanish sample. European Journal of Personality, 26, 4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749761.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 6678.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In John, L. A., Robins, O. P. & Pervin, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 654678). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two process model. Psychological Review, 118, 552--569.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475486.Google Scholar
Sulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning & Individual Differences, 42, 132138.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2008). Individual differences in stress reaction. In Hancock, P. A. & Szalma, J. L. (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 323357). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2009). Individual differences: incorporating human variation into human factors/ergonomics research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 381397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2014). On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human-technology interaction. Human Factors, 56, 14531471.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Veroff, J. (1957). Development and validation of a projective measure of power motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 18.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×