Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Foundational Issues: History and Approaches to Personality
- Part II Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied
- Part III Development, Health and Change: Life Span and Health Outcomes
- Part IV Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality
- Part V Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality
- Part VI Social and Cultural Processes: Personality at the Intersection of Society
- Part VII Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action
- Addendum: Statistical Analyses and Computer Programming in Personality
- Index
- References
Part V - Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Foundational Issues: History and Approaches to Personality
- Part II Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied
- Part III Development, Health and Change: Life Span and Health Outcomes
- Part IV Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality
- Part V Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality
- Part VI Social and Cultural Processes: Personality at the Intersection of Society
- Part VII Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action
- Addendum: Statistical Analyses and Computer Programming in Personality
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 293 - 374Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 85–93.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2009). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Areh, I., & Umek, P. (2007). Predicting quality of memory recall by personality traits. Studia Psychologica, 49, 19–26.Google Scholar
Aue, T., & Okon-Singer, H. (2015). Expectancy biases in fear and anxiety and their link to biases in attention. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 83–95.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement. European Psychologist, 19, 227–236.Google Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar
Barron, L. G., Carretta, T. R., & Bonto-Kane, M. V. A. (2016). Relations of personality traits to military aviator performance: It depends on the criterion. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 6, 57–67.Google Scholar
Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Leue, A. (2006). Energetical bases of extraversion: Effort, arousal, EEG, and performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 212–223.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24.Google Scholar
Berggren, N., Blonievsky, T., & Derakshan, N. (2015). Enhanced visual detection in trait anxiety. Emotion, 15, 477–483.Google Scholar
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don’t. Biological Psychology, 92, 440–446.Google Scholar
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2014). Inhibitory deficits in trait anxiety: Increased stimulus-based or response-based interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1339–1345.Google Scholar
Berggren, N., Koster, E. H., & Derakshan, N. (2012). The effect of cognitive load in emotional attention and trait anxiety: An eye movement study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 79–91.Google Scholar
Beukeboom, C. J., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2013). The language of extraversion: Extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 191–201.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.Google Scholar
Carrigan, N., & Barkus, E. (2016). A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 63, 29–42.Google Scholar
Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–296.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Engagement, disengagement, coping, and catastrophe. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 527–547). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chapman, A., Devue, C., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2017). Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task. Psychological Research, 1 -13.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Milne, K., Dayman, J., & Kemps, E. (2019). Interpretation bias and social anxiety: Does interpretation bias mediate the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety responses? Cognition and Emotion, 33, 630–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Civai, C., Hawes, D. R., DeYoung, C. G., & Rustichini, A. (2016). Intelligence and extraversion in the neural evaluation of delayed rewards. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 99–108.Google Scholar
Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203–216.Google Scholar
Corcoran, D. J. W. (1972). Studies of individual differences at the Applied Psychology Unit. In Nebylitsin, V. D. & Gray, J. A. (Eds.), Biological bases of individual behavior (pp. 269–290). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 155–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coy, B., O’Brien, W. H., Tabaczynski, T., Northern, J., & Carels, R. (2011). Associations between evaluation anxiety, cognitive interference and performance on working memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 823–832.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Dietrich, E., & Chemero, A. (2009). Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 33, 739–742.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, K., De Houwer, J., Vansteelandt, K., Perugini, M., Pieters, G., Claes, L., & Hermans, D. (2017). Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self‐concept of personality: A systematic review and meta‐analyses. European Journal of Personality, 31, 8–41.Google Scholar
De Pascalis, V. (2004). On the psychophysiology of extraversion. In Stelmack, R. (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 295–327). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J. M. (2013). The link between foreign language classroom anxiety and psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism among adult bi‐and multilinguals. Modern Language Journal, 97, 670–684.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J., & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49, 509–544.Google Scholar
Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 783–788.Google Scholar
Dietrich, M., & Abbott, K. V. (2012). Vocal function in introverts and extraverts during a psychological stress reactivity protocol. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 973–987.Google Scholar
Dobbs, S., Furnham, A., & McClelland, A. (2011). The effect of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 307–313.Google Scholar
Doucet, C., & Stelmack, R.M. (2000). An event-related potential analysis of extraversion and individual differences in cognitive processing speed and response execution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 956–964.Google Scholar
Doughty, N., Paterson, H. M., MacCann, C., & Monds, L. A. (2017). Personality and memory conformity. Journal of Individual Differences, 38, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettinger, U., Corr, P. J., Mofidi, A., Williams, S. C., & Kumari, V. (2013). Dopaminergic basis of the psychosis-prone personality investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging of procedural learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 (Article 30), 1–11.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1957). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (1981). Learning, memory and personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 169–203). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 955–960.Google Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.Google Scholar
Finomore, V. S., Matthews, G., & Warm, J. S. (2009). Predicting vigilance: A fresh look at an old problem. Ergonomics, 52, 791–808.Google Scholar
Fournier, K. A., Couret, J., Ramsay, J. B., & Caulkins, J. L. (2017). Using collaborative two‐stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10, 409–422.Google Scholar
Fuentes-Claramonte, P., Ávila, C., Rodríguez-Pujadas, A., Costumero, V., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., … Barrós-Loscertales, A. (2016). Inferior frontal cortex activity is modulated by reward sensitivity and performance variability. Biological Psychology, 114, 127–137.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Boo, H. C., & McClelland, A. (2012). Individual differences and the susceptibility to the influence of anchoring cues. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 89–93.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Strbac, L. (2002). Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45, 203–217.Google Scholar
Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.Google Scholar
Grafton, B., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Enhanced probing of attentional bias: The independence of anxiety-linked selectivity in attentional engagement with and disengagement from negative information. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1287–1302.Google Scholar
Graham, E. K., Rutsohn, J. P., Turiano, N. A., Bendayan, R., Batterham, P. J., Gerstorf, D., … Bastarache, E. D. (2017). Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 174–186.Google Scholar
Gray, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Yarkoni, T., Larsen, R. J., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 601–619.Google Scholar
Gustavson, D. E., & Miyake, A. (2016). Trait worry is associated with difficulties in working memory updating. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1289–1303.Google Scholar
Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 188–201.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. A. (2011). Social, personality, and affective constructs in driving. In Porter, B. E. (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 149 – 163). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hockey, G. R. J. (1984). Varieties of attentional state: The effects of environment. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 449–483). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, C. J., Luciana, M., Wahlstrom, D., Conklin, H. M., & Yarger, R. S. (2008). Personality correlates of Iowa Gambling Task performance in healthy adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 598–609.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.Google Scholar
Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In Gruszka, A., Matthews, G. & Szymura, B. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 298–342.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179.Google Scholar
Kennis, M., Rademaker, A. R., & Geuze, E. (2013). Neural correlates of personality: An integrative review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 73–95.Google Scholar
Koch, J., & Exner, C. (2015). Selective attention deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder: The role of metacognitive processes. Psychiatry Research, 225, 550–555.Google Scholar
Koelega, H. S. (1992). Extraversion and vigilance performance: 30 years of inconsistencies. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 239–258.Google Scholar
Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 215–226.Google Scholar
Leleu, V., Douilliez, C., & Rusinek, S. (2014). Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: A new approach in terms of benefits. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 203–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Introversion and working memory: Central executive differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 479–486.Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E., & Kaplan, O. (2010). Psychopathology and individual differences in latent inhibition: Schizophrenia and schizotypality. In Gruszka, A., Matthews, G. & Szymura, B. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory and executive control (pp. 181–193). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C., & Clarke, P. J. (2015). The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 58–78.Google Scholar
Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1992). Extraversion. In Smith, A. P. & Jones, D. M. (Eds.), Handbook of human performance: State and trait (Vol. 3, pp. 95–126). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1997). Extraversion, emotion and performance: A cognitive-adaptive model. In Matthews, G. (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 339–442). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1999). Personality and skill: A cognitive-adaptive framework. In Ackerman, P. L., Kyllonen, P. C. & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), The future of learning and individual differences research: Processes, traits, and content (pp. 251–270). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2000). A cognitive science critique of biological theories of personality traits. History and Philosophy of Psychology, 2, 1–17.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 195–211.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2004). Neuroticism from the top down: Psychophysiology and negative emotionality. In Stelmack, R. (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 249–266). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2008a). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 56–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2008b). Reinforcement sensitivity theory: A critique from cognitive science. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 482–507). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2016). Traits, cognitive processes and adaptation: An elegy for Hans Eysenck’s personality theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 61–67.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2018). Cognitive‐adaptive trait theory: A shift in perspective on personality. Journal of Personality, 86, 69–82.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Amelang, M. (1993). Extraversion, arousal theory and performance: A study of individual differences in the EEG. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 347–364.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., & Lees, J. L. (1990). Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 150–168.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., & Stammers, R. B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Harley, T. A. (1993). Effects of extraversion and self-report arousal on semantic priming: A connectionist approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 735–756.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Harley, T. A. (1996). Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 561–600.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Lin, J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2017). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. In Pfeiffer, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., & Hudlicka, E. (2011). Anxiety and selective attention to threat in tactical decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 949–954.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., Wells, A., Wohleber, R. W., & Reinerman-Jones, L. E. (2019). Metacognition, hardiness and grit as resilience factors in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) operations: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 640.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Pérez-González, J.-C., Fellner, A. N., Funke, G. J., Emo, A. K., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). Individual differences in facial emotion processing: Trait emotional intelligence, cognitive ability or transient stress? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 68–82.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Reinerman-Jones, L. (2017). Workload assessment: How to diagnose workload issues and enhance performance. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Reinerman-Jones, L. E., Burke, C. S., Teo, G. W., & Scribner, D. R. (2018). Nationalism, personality, and decision-making: Evidence from an SJT for military multi-national teaming scenarios. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 89–100.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Warm, J. S., Shaw, T. H., & Finomore, V. S. (2014). Predicting battlefield vigilance: A multivariate approach to assessment of attentional resources. Ergonomics, 57, 856–875.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Wohleber, R., & Lin, J. (2020). Stress, skilled performance, and expertise: Overload and beyond. In Ward, P., Schraagen, J. M., Gore, J. & Roth, E. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of expertise. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2004). Traits, states and the trilogy of mind: An adaptive perspective on intellectual functioning. In Dai, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 143–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2012). Individual differences in attentional networks: Trait and state correlates of the ANT. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 574–579.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2006). Models of personality and affect for education: A review and synthesis. In Winne, P. & Alexander, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 163–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. M., & Graziano, W. G. (2016). Seeing people, seeing things: Individual differences in selective attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1258–1271.Google Scholar
McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382–392.Google Scholar
McNally, R. J. (2019). Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity? Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 4–13.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877.Google Scholar
Moore, A. M., McAuley, A. J., Allred, G. A., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2015). In Chinn, S. (Ed.), Mathematics anxiety, working memory, and mathematical performance. The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 326–336). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moran, T. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 831–864.Google Scholar
Munoz, E., Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Almeida, D. M., & King, H. A. (2013). Intrusive thoughts mediate the association between neuroticism and cognitive function. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 898–903.Google Scholar
Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Lavi, H., McKeachie, W. J., & Lin, Y. G. (1997). Individual differences in students’ retention of knowledge and conceptual structures learned in university and high school courses: The case of test anxiety. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 507–526.Google Scholar
Onie, S., & Most, S. B. (2017). Two roads diverged: Distinct mechanisms of attentional bias differentially predict negative affect and persistent negative thought. Emotion, 17, 884–894.Google Scholar
Ormel, J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Hankin, B., … Oldehinkel, A. J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 686–697.Google Scholar
Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 184–199.Google Scholar
Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. (2011). Extraverts have larger social network layers: But do not feel emotionally closer to individuals at any layer. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 161–169.Google Scholar
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). What’s in your mind? In Lepore, E. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 1–25). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rammsayer, T. H., Indermühle, R., & Troche, S. J. (2014). Psychological refractory period in introverts and extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 10–15.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2010). Personality traits and autobiographical memory: Openness is positively related to the experience and usage of recollections. Memory, 18, 774–786.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. D., Martin, J., & Olaru, G. (2015). A Rosetta Stone for noncognitive skills: Understanding, assessing, and enhancing noncognitive skills in primary and secondary education. New York: Asia Society and ProExam.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 254–273.Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F., & Tauriz, G. (2014). The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, L. C., & Fisk, J. E. (2009). How does the extraversion personality trait influence false recall with the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 972–977.Google Scholar
Sarason, I. G. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–403). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1995) Cognitive interference: At the intelligence-personality crossroads. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 285–296). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2005). A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100–107.Google Scholar
Servaas, M. N., van der Velde, J., Costafreda, S. G., Horton, P., Ormel, J., Riese, H., & Aleman, A. (2013). Neuroticism and the brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies investigating emotion processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 1518–1529.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1966) The effects of anxiety on complex learning and academic achievement. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 3–20). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 23–49). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Staugaard, S. R. (2010). Threatening faces and social anxiety: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 669–690.Google Scholar
Stelmack, R. M., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2008). Psychophysiological and biochemical perspectives on personality. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 33–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stoeber, J., Chesterman, D., & Tarn, T. A. (2010). Perfectionism and task performance: Time on task mediates the perfectionistic strivings–performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 458–462.Google Scholar
Stoeber, J., Haskew, A. E., & Scott, C. (2015). Perfectionism and exam performance: The mediating effect of task-approach goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 171–176.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 71–96.Google Scholar
Szymura, B., & Necka, E. (1998). Visual selective attention and personality: An experimental verification of three models of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 713–729.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.Google Scholar
van Rooijen, R., Ploeger, A., & Kret, M. E. (2017). The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1686–1717.Google Scholar
Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Stress in the zoo: Tracking the impact of stress on memory formation over time. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 71, 64–72.Google Scholar
Wacker, J., Chavanon, M. L., & Stemmler, G. (2006). Investigating the dopaminergic basis of extraversion in humans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 171–187.Google Scholar
Wacker, J., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). Trait extraversion and dopamine function. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 225–238.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Pan, Y., Zhang, K., Sui, Y., Lv, T., Xu, S., & Gao, L. (2017). Emotional experience and personality traits influence individual and joint risk-based decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 45, 881–892.Google Scholar
Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lukasik, K. M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2018). Working memory and the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 26–35.Google Scholar
Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.Google Scholar
Weinman, J. (1987) Non-cognitive determinants of perceptual problem-solving strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 53–58.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 186–201.Google Scholar
Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (2015) Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
White, L. K., Britton, J. C., Sequeira, S., Ronkin, E. G., Chen, G., Bar-Haim, Y., … Pine, D. S. (2016). Behavioral and neural stability of attention bias to threat in healthy adolescents. Neuroimage, 136, 84–93.Google Scholar
Wright, B. A., Peters, E. R., Ettinger, U., Kuipers, E., & Kumari, V. (2016). Moderators of noise-induced cognitive change in healthy adults. Noise & Health, 18, 117–132.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Evaluation anxiety. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 141–163). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ziemkiewicz, C., Ottley, A., Crouser, R. J., Yauilla, A. R., Su, S. L., Ribarsky, W., & Chang, R. (2013). How visualization layout relates to locus of control and other personality factors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 1109–1121.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Ahadi, S. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Temperament, development and the Big Five. In Halverson, C. F. Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 189–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ballard, T., Yeo, G., Vancouver, J. B., & Neal, A. (2017). The dynamics of avoidance goal regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 698–707.Google Scholar
Barratt, E. S. (1965). Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 16, 547–554.Google Scholar
Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173–215.Google Scholar
Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1129–1146.Google Scholar
Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81, 179–209.Google Scholar
Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins, W. A. (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations (Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 13, pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bocanegra, B. R., & Hommel, B. (2014). When cognitive control is not adaptive. Psychological Science, 25, 1249–1255.Google Scholar
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.Google Scholar
Buckholz, J. W. (2015). Social norms, self-control, and the value of antisocial behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 122–129.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241–261.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3–22.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2008). Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: What depression has in common with impulsive aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 912–943.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2013). Major depressive disorder and impulsive reactivity to emotion: Toward a dual process view of depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 285–299.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., Joormann, J., Kim, Y., & Nam, J. Y. (2011). Serotonin transporter polymorphism interacts with childhood adversity to predict aspects of impulsivity. Psychological Science, 22, 589–595.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Timpano, K. R. (2017). Toward a functional view of the p factor in psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 880–889.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 783–792.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: Understanding “response shift” phenomena. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1715–1722.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2003). Three human strengths. In Aspinwall, L. G. & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 87–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2017a). Perspectives on personality (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2017b). Self-regulatory functions supporting motivated action. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 4, pp. 1–37). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., … Moffitt, T. (2014). The P-factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137.Google Scholar
Castellanos-Ryan, N., Brière, F. N., O’Leary-Barrett, M., Banaschewski, T., Bokde, A., Bromberg, U., … IMAGEN CONSORTIUM (2016). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence and its common personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1039–1052.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505–521.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1999). Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 399–423). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cleare, A. J., & Bond, A. J. (1997). Does central serotonergic function correlate inversely with aggression? A study using D-fenfluramine in healthy subjects. Psychiatry Research, 69, 89–95.Google Scholar
Clore, G. C. (1994). Why emotions are felt. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 103–111). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coccaro, E. F., Kavoussi, R. J., Cooper, T. B., & Hauger, R. L. (1997). Central serotonin activity and aggression: Inverse relationship with prolactin response to d-fenfluramine, but not CSF 5-HIAA concentration, in human subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1430–1435.Google Scholar
Coccaro, E. F., Kavoussi, R. J., Hauger, R. L., Cooper, T. B., & Ferris, C. F. (1998). Cerebrospinal fluid vasopressin levels: Correlates with aggression and serotonin function in personality-disordered subjects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 708–714.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. L, Wood, P. K., Orcutt, H. K., & Albino, A. (2003). Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 390–410.Google Scholar
Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Delaney, L., Egan, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). Childhood self-control and unemployment throughout the life span: Evidence from two British cohort studies. Psychological Science, 26, 709–723.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J. (1992). Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 20, 125–151.Google Scholar
Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005). Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1704–1711.Google Scholar
Dayan, P. (2008). Simple substrates for complex cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 255–263.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 261–300.Google Scholar
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–517.Google Scholar
Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.Google Scholar
Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160–1171.Google Scholar
Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343–353.Google Scholar
Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Yang, Y., & Casey, B. J. (2002). The effect of preceding context on inhibition: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 16, 449–453.Google Scholar
Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Ulug, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9–F16.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2002). Emotion-related regulation and its relation to quality of social functioning. In Hartup, W. W. & Weinberg, R. A. (Eds.), Child psychology in retrospect and prospect: The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 133–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Self-regulation, effortful control, and their socioemotional correlates. In Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 157–172). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.Google Scholar
Finlay-Jones, R., & Brown, G. W. (1981). Types of stressful life event and the onset of anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine, 11, 803–815.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fulford, D., Johnson, S. L., Llabre, M. M., & Carver, C. S. (2010). Pushing and coasting in dynamic goal pursuit: Coasting is attenuated in bipolar disorder. Psychological Science, 21, 1021–1027.Google Scholar
Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2010). Effort mobilization when the self is involved: Some lessons from the cardiovascular system. Review of General Psychology, 14, 212–226.Google Scholar
George, D. T., Umhau, J. C., Phillips, M. J., Emmela, D., Ragan, P. W., Shoaf, S. E., … Rawlings, R. R. (2001). Serotonin, testosterone, and alcohol in the etiology of domestic violence. Psychiatry Research, 104, 27–37.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1994). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 329–331). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. B., & Breivik, G. (2001). Sensation seeking as a predictor of positive and negative risk behaviour among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 627–640.Google Scholar
Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3, 275–310.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus: Affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. In Gollwitzer, P. M. & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 91–114). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218–243.Google Scholar
Hull, J. G. (1981). A self-awareness model of the causes and effects of alcohol consumption. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 586–600.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. L., Carver, C. S., & Joormann, J. (2013). Impulsive responses to emotion as a transdiagnostic vulnerability to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150, 872–878.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. L., Carver, C. S., Mulé, S., & Joormann, J. (2013). Impulsivity and risk for mania: Toward greater specificity. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 86, 401–412.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A. (2006). A hyper-emotion theory of psychological illnesses. Psychological Review, 113, 822–841.Google Scholar
Kaiser, A., Bonsu, J. A., Charnigo, R. J., Milich, R. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2016). Impulsive personality and alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77, 475–482.Google Scholar
Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.Google Scholar
Kieras, J. E., Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Effortful control and children’s responses to undesirable gifts. Psychological Science, 16, 391–396.Google Scholar
Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82, 1–25.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., & Knaack, A. (2003). Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality, 71, 1087–1112.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111–133.Google Scholar
Laceulle, O. M., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Ormel, J. (2015). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence: Replication of a general psychopathology factor in the TRAILS Study. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 850–860.Google Scholar
Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., Hakes, J. K., Zald, D. H., Hariri, A. R., & Rathouz, P. J. (2012). Is there a general factor of prevalent psychopathology during adulthood? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 971–977.Google Scholar
Lahey, B. B., Rathouz, P. J., Keenan, K., Stepp, S. D., Loeber, R., & Hipwell, A. E. (2015). Criterion validity of the general factor of psychopathology in a prospective study of girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 56, 415–422.Google Scholar
Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identification of chronic offenders: Who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209–234.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved dispositions. Psychological Review, 115, 1012–1031.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. M. (1966). Cerebral organization and the conscious control of action. In Eccles, J. C. (Ed.), Brain and conscious experience (pp. 422–445). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Manuck, S. B., Kaplan, J. R., & Lotrich, F. E. (2006). Brain serotonin and aggressive disposition in humans and nonhuman primates. In Nelson, R. J. (Ed.), Biology of aggression (pp. 65–102). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. (1994). Human learned helplessness: A coping perspective. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S. (1991). Urgency, motivation, and group performance: The effect of prior success on current success among professional basketball teams. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 181–189.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2000). Is depression an adaptation? Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 14–20.Google Scholar
Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental pychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246.Google Scholar
Nigg, J. T. (2003). Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: Toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 170–182.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, D. M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379–385.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, A. R., Gershman, S. J., Markman, A. B., & Daw, N. D. (2013). The curse of planning: Dissecting multiple reinforcement learning systems by taxing the central executive. Psychological Science, 24, 751–761.Google Scholar
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.Google Scholar
Parker, J. D. A., Bagby, R. M., & Webster, C. D. (1993). Domains of the impulsivity construct: A factor analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 267–274.Google Scholar
Payton, D. W. (1990). Internalized plans: A representation for action resources. In Maes, P. (Ed.), Designing autonomous agents: Theory and practice from biology to engineering and back (pp. 89–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, C. M., Combs, J. L., Zapolski, T. C., & Smith, G. T. (2012). A longitudinal transactional risk model for early eating disorder onset. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 27, 320–331.Google Scholar
Pittman, T. S., & Pittman, N. L. (1980). Deprivation of control and the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 377–389.Google Scholar
Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 767–782.Google Scholar
Riley, E. N., Combs, J. L., Jordan, C. E., & Smith, G. T. (2015). Negative urgency and lack of perseverance: Identification of differential pathways of onset and maintenance risk in the longitudinal prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 46, 439–448.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72, 1394–1408.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E., & Heppen, J. B. (2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. (1999). Self-regulating interest: The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67, 701–733.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1978). The dominant action system: An information-processing approach to consciousness. In Pope, K. S. & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 117–157). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39.Google Scholar
Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., Cyders, M. A., Annus, A. M., Spillane, N. S., & McCarthy, D. M. (2007). On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment, 14, 155–170.Google Scholar
Smith, G. T., Guller, L., & Zapolski, T. C. (2013). A comparison of two models of urgency: Urgency predicts both rash action and depression in youth. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 266–275.Google Scholar
Snyder, H. R., Young, J. F., & Hankin, B. L. (2017). Strong homotypic continuity in common psychopathology-, internalizing- and externalizing-specific factors over time in adolescents. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 98–110.Google Scholar
Solanto, M. V., Abikoff, H., Sonuga-Barke, E., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Wigal, T., … Turkel, E. (2001). The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: A supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 215–228.Google Scholar
Sperry, S. H., Lynam, D. P., & Kwapil, T. R. (2018). The convergence and divergence of impulsivity facets in daily life. Journal of Personality, 86, 841–852.Google Scholar
Spoont, M. R. (1992). Modulatory role of serotonin in neural information processing: Implications for human psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 330–350.Google Scholar
Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1992). Impulsivity and the multi-impulsive personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 831–834.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.Google Scholar
Tackett, J. L., Lahey, B. B., van Hulle, C., Waldman, I., Krueger, R. F., & Rathouz, P. J. (2013). Common genetic influences on negative emotionality and a general psychopathology factor in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1142–1153.Google Scholar
Toates, F. (2006). A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 15, 75–118.Google Scholar
Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2010). Brain substrates of behavioral programs associated with self-regulation. Frontiers in Neurosciences, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Waldman, I. D., Poore, H. E., van Hulle, C., Rathouz, P. J., & Lahey, B. B. (2016). External validity of a hierarchical dimensional model of child and adolescent psychopathology: Tests using confirmatory factor analyses and multivariate behavior genetic analyses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1053–1066.Google Scholar
White, J. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Bartusch, D. J., Needles, D. J., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 192–205.Google Scholar
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five-Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.Google Scholar
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: Application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 210–217.Google Scholar
Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Reynolds, S. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 19, 559–574.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit–goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843–863.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314.Google Scholar
Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 277–336). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Schulz, R. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2, 1–20.Google Scholar
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal re-engagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494–1508.Google Scholar
Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791.Google Scholar
References
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). Introduction to motivation (2nd ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L ., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 505–516).Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 1–10.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). Cybernetic control processes and the self-regulation of behavior. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 28–42). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.Google Scholar
Dember, W. N. (1974). Motivation and the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 29, 161–168.Google Scholar
Di Domenico, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.Google Scholar
Dunning, D. (2016). Systems approaches to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 27–30.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., & Anderson, J. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect that expectation of reward. Journal of Personality Psychology, 107, 122–141.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719.Google Scholar
Hmel, B. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2002). The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 70, 277–310.Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., & Sutton, A. (2011). Understanding exercise behaviour: Examining the interaction of exercise motivation and personality in predicting exercise frequency. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 82–97.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well–being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750–764.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1997). An introduction to the cognitive science of personality and emotion. In Matthews, G. (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 3–30). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2001). Levels of transaction: A cognitive science framework for operator stress. In Hancock, P. A. & Desmond, P. A. (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 5–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2008). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 56–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mathews, G. (2009). Personality and performance: Cognitive processes and models. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 400–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology. American Psychologist, 60, 294–307.Google Scholar
Olesen, M. H., Thomsen, D. K., & O’Toole, M. S. (2015). Subjective well-being: Above neuroticism and extraversion, autonomy motivation matters. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 45–49.Google Scholar
Phillips, P., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2003). Personality, cognition, and university students’ examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 435–448.Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2016). A grand theory of motivation: Why not? Motivation and Emotion, 40, 31–35.Google Scholar
Reeve, J., & Woogul, L. (2012). Neuroscience and human motivation. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 365–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romero, E., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Villar, P. (2012). Life aspirations, personality traits and subjective well-being in a Spanish sample. European Journal of Personality, 26, 45–55.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 66–78.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In John, L. A., Robins, O. P. & Pervin, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 654–678). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two process model. Psychological Review, 118, 552--569.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486.Google Scholar
Sulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning & Individual Differences, 42, 132–138.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2008). Individual differences in stress reaction. In Hancock, P. A. & Szalma, J. L. (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 323–357). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2009). Individual differences: incorporating human variation into human factors/ergonomics research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 381–397.Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L. (2014). On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human-technology interaction. Human Factors, 56, 1453–1471.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Veroff, J. (1957). Development and validation of a projective measure of power motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 1–8.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
References
Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In Alicke, M. D., Dunning, D. A. & Krueger, J. I. (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85–106). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 766–781.Google Scholar
Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of the correlations among the Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955–966.Google Scholar
Ayduk, O., Gyurak, A., Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Consistency over flattery: Self-verification processes revealed in implicit and behavioral responses to feedback. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 538–545.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 555–578.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547–579.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.Google Scholar
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.Google Scholar
Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.Google Scholar
Bowling, N. A., & Burns, G. N. (2010). A comparison of work-specific and general personality measures as predictors of work and non-work criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 95–101.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & McGill, K. L. (1989). The costs of good fortune: When positive life events produce negative health consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1103–1110.Google Scholar
Brown, N. R. (1995). Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1539–1553.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156.Google Scholar
Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–339.Google Scholar
Clore, G. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Knowing our emotions: How do we know what we feel? In Vazire, S. & Wilson, T. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 194–209). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in somatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Meyer, R. D., Bradshaw, R. P., Green, J. P., Kelly, E. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 261–287.Google Scholar
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.Google Scholar
Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., & Boardman, A. F. (1995). Perceived accuracy of favorable and unfavorable psychological feedback. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 137–157.Google Scholar
Donahue, E. M., & Harary, K. (1998). The patterned inconsistency of traits: Mapping the differential effects of social roles on self-perceptions of the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 610–619.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1966). Relationship between probability of endorsement and social desirability scale value for a set of 2,824 personality statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 238–239.Google Scholar
Erdle, S., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2009). Does self-esteem account for the higher-order factors of the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 921–922.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638.Google Scholar
Gregg, A. P. (2009). Is identity per se irrelevant? A contrarian view of self-verification effects. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 49–59.Google Scholar
Hafdahl, A. R., Panter, A. T., Gramzow, R. H., Sedikides, C., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Free-response self-discrepancies across, among, and within FFM personality dimensions. Journal of Personality, 68, 111–151.Google Scholar
Heimpel, S. A., Wood, J. V., Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2002). Do people with low self-esteem really want to feel better? Self-esteem differences in motivation to repair negative moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 128–147.Google Scholar
Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Individual differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78, 781–814.Google Scholar
Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 455–477.Google Scholar
Houtveen, J. H., & Oei, N. Y. L. (2007). Recall bias in reporting medically unexplained symptoms comes from semantic memory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62, 277–282.Google Scholar
Hunthausen, J. M., Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Hammer, L. B. (2003). A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 545–551.Google Scholar
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521–551.Google Scholar
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Joiner, T. E., & Metalsky, G. I. (1995). A prospective test of an integrative interpersonal theory of depression: A naturalistic study of college roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 778–788.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from the controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.Google Scholar
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., & Costabile, K. A. (2003). Preserved knowledge of self in a case of Alzheimer’s dementia. Social Cognition, 21, 157–165.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., & Lax, M. L. (2010). The unanticipated resilience of trait self-knowledge in the face of neural damage. Memory, 18, 918–948.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1993). Behavioral experience and trait judgments about the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 740–745.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996b). Self-knowledge of an amnesic patient: Toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 250–260.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., Sherman, J. W., & Loftus, J. (1996a). The role of episodic and semantic memory in the development of trait self-knowledge. Social Cognition, 14, 277–291.Google Scholar
Klinger, E. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In Singer, J. A. & Salovey, P. (Eds.), At play in the fields of consciousness: Essays in honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 29–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Köber, C., & Habermas, T. (2017). How stable is the personal past? Stability of most important autobiographical memories and life narratives across eight years in a life span sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 608–626.Google Scholar
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.Google Scholar
Larsen, R. J. (1992). Neuroticism and selective encoding and recall of symptoms: Evidence from a combined concurrent-retrospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 480–488.Google Scholar
Leising, D., Scherbaum, S., Locke, K. D., & Zimmermann, J. (2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 61–71.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2001). Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 343–356.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. L. L., Liu, Y., Cai, H., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2016). Nostalgia and self-enhancement: Phenotypic and genetic approaches. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 857–866.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Personality, 38, 299–337.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1982). Self-concept and the stability of personality: Cross-sectional comparisons of self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1282–1292.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1994). The stability of personality: Observation and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 173–175.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 97–144.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421–448.Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029–1049.Google Scholar
Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 219–230.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. (2002). The experiencing and remembering of well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1398–1406.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.Google Scholar
Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–113.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 251–276). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. (2007). Contextualizing personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 75, 1071–1082.Google Scholar
Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002a). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002b). Belief and feeling: An accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Traits, states, and encoding speed: Support for a top-down view of neuroticism/stress relations. Journal of Personality, 75, 95–120.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Goetz, M. C., Wilkowski, B. M., & Hoffman, S. J. (2006). Driven to tears or to joy: Response dominance and trait-based predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 629–640.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1998). The gender heuristic and the database: Factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 206–219.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Oishi, S. (2006). Trait self-report as a “fill in” belief system: Categorization speed moderates the extraversion/life satisfaction relation. Self and Identity, 5, 15–34.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Traits and the self: Toward an integration. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 457–472). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Solberg, E. C., Vargas, P., & Tamir, M. (2003). Trait as default: Extraversion, subjective well-being, and the distinction between neutral and positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 517–527.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Wilkowski, B. M., Kirkeby, B. S., & Meier, B. P. (2006). Stuck in a rut: Perseverative response tendencies and the neuroticism/distress relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 78–91.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (1994). Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 141–154.Google Scholar
Schell, T. L., Klein, S. B., & Babey, S. H. (1996). Testing a hierarchical model of self-knowledge. Psychological Science, 7, 170–173.Google Scholar
Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Cai, H. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 185–241.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., Saunders, J., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. (2016). Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 1–62.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In Hogg, M. A. & Cooper, J. (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110–138). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Hoorens, V., & Dufner, M. (2015b). Self-enhancing self-presentation: Interpersonal, relational, and organizational implications. In Guay, F., McInerney, D. M., Craven, R. & Marsh, H. W. (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 29–55). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14, 407–428.Google Scholar
Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B. (1992). Seeking “truth,” finding despair: Some unhappy consequences of a negative self-concept. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 15–18.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B., & Ely, R. J. (1984). A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, W. B., Rentfrow, P. J., & Guinn, J. (2003). Self-verification: The search for coherence. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 367–383). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Tamir, M., Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). The epistemic benefits of trait-consistent mood states: An analysis of extraversion and mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 663–677.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.Google Scholar
Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 205–220.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Boys don’t cry: Cognitive load and priming increase stereotypic sex differences in emotion memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 303–309.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Suls, J., & Haig, J. (2002). Global self-esteem in relation to structural models of personality and affectivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 185–197.Google Scholar
Werner, P. D., & Pervin, L. A. (1986). The content of personality inventory items. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 622–628.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.Google Scholar
Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74, 779–809.Google Scholar
Wood, D., & Wortman, J. (2012). Trait means and desirabilities as artifactual and real sources of differential stability of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 665–701.Google Scholar
Wood, J. V., Hempel, S. A., Manwell, L. A., & Whittington, E. J. (2009). This mood is familiar and I don’t deserve to feel better anyway: Mechanisms underlying self-esteem differences in motivation to repair sad moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 363–380.Google Scholar
References
Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–352) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Back, M. D. (2018). Continued quality, openness, and curiosity at the European Journal of Personality. European Journal of Personality, 32, 3–5.Google Scholar
Baird, B., Le, K., & Lucas, R. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 512–527.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. London: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., & Borkenau, P., … Wrzus, C. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528.Google Scholar
Blackie, L. E., Roepke, A. M., Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Act well to be well: The promise of changing personality states to promote well‐being. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 462–474). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2009). Patterns and sources of adult personality development: Growth curve analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 142–155.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 366–379.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Genetic and environmental influences on personality profile stability: Unraveling the normativeness problem. Journal of Personality, 80, 1029–1060.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1993). Studying personality the long way. In Funder, D. C., Parke, R. D., Tomlinson-Keasy, C. & Widaman, K. (Eds.), Studying lives through time (pp. 9–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Borgatta, E. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9, 8–17.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.Google Scholar
Cattell, R., Cattell, A., & Rhymer, R. (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12, 267–288.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Concurrent validation after 20 years: Implications of personality stability for its assessment. In Butcher, J. N. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). The NEO Inventories as instruments of psychological theory. The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 11–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., van der Maas, H., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137–150.Google Scholar
de Raad, B., & Mlačić, B. (2017). The lexical foundation of the Big Five Factor Model. In Widiger, T., The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 191–216). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., & Krueger, R. F. (2018). A cybernetic theory of psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 117–138.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Fujita, F. (1992). Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. national probability sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 205–215.Google Scholar
Digman, J., & Takemoto-Chock, N. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole Trait Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Jolley, S. (2006). A proposed theory of the adult development of intraindividual variability in trait-manifesting behavior. In Mroczek, D. K. & Little, T. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 41–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., Malanos, A., & Achille, N. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? Journal of Personality, 78, 1353–1382.Google Scholar
Fridhandler, B. (1986). Conceptual note on state, trait, and the state-trait distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 169–174.Google Scholar
Friedman, H., Tucker, J., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Schwartz, J., Wingard, D., & Criqui, M. (1993). Does childhood personality predict longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerpott, F., Balliet, D., Columbus, S., Molho, C., & de Vries, R. (2017). How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 716–742.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment, 1, 203–234.Google Scholar
Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hampson, S. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin.” Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.Google Scholar
Horstmann, K. T., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Situational perception and affect: Barking up the wrong tree. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, N., & Fraley, R. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507.Google Scholar
Hudson, N., Roberts, B., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2012). Personality trait development and social investment in work. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 334–344.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Misconceptions of traits continue to persist: A response to Bandura. Journal of Management, 38, 745–752.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Conscientiousness. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. (2014). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–331.Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., Helzer, E., Furr, R., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Virtuous states and virtuous traits: How the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad traits saves virtue ethics from the situationist critique. Theory and Research in Education, 12, 283–308.Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2017). Does Whole Trait Theory work for the virtues? In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. and Miller, C. B. (Eds), Moral Psychology, Volume V: Virtue and Happiness (pp. 75–103). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., Zachry, C. E., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Whole Trait Theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11.Google Scholar
Jensen-Campbell, L., Adams, R., Perry, D., Workman, K., Furdella, J., & Egan, S. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261–271). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (p. 114–158). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Zimmermann, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243.Google Scholar
Kern, M., & Friedman, H. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27, 505–512.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 847–861.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.Google Scholar
McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 287–301.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McNiel, J., & Fleeson, W. (2006). The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 529–550.Google Scholar
McNiel, J., Lowman, J., & Fleeson, W. (2010). The effect of state extraversion on four types of affect. European Journal of Personality, 24, 18–35.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS). In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 208–241). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Noftle, E., & Fleeson, W. (2010). Age differences in Big Five behavior averages and variabilities across the adult life span: Moving beyond retrospective, global summary accounts of personality. Psychology and Aging, 25, 95–107.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar
Parrigon, S., Woo, S., Tay, L., & Wang, T. (2017). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 642–681.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E., Todd, E., Nave, C., & Sherman, R., … Todd, E. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J., & Sherman, R. (2018). The description of situations: Towards replicable domains of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, S., Monroe, B., Brownstein, A., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61–92.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. (2017). A revised Sociogenomic Model of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, B., & DelVecchio, W. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Hill, P. L., & Davis, J. P. (2017). How to change conscientiousness: The sociogenomic trait intervention model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 199–205.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Oppenheim, S., Elster, A., & Gal, A. (2014). Integrating content and structure aspects of the self: Traits, values, and self‐improvement. Journal of Personality, 82, 144–157.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, R., Rauthmann, J., Brown, N., Serfass, D., & Jones, A. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888.Google Scholar
Shoda, Y., LeeTiernan, S., & Mischel, W. (2002). Personality as a dynamical system: Emergence of stability and distinctiveness from intra- and interpersonal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 316–325.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. (2006). Building bridges between personality and social psychology: Understanding the ties that bind persons and situations: The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches. In Van Lange, P. A. M. (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 187–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, C., & John, O. P. (2016). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143.Google Scholar
Soto, C., John, O. P., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348.Google Scholar
Spielberg, J., Miller, G., Engels, A., Herrington, J., Sutton, B., Banich, M., & Heller, W. (2011). Trait approach and avoidance motivation: Lateralized neural activity associated with executive function. Neuroimage, 54, 661–670.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97, Lackland Airforce Base, TX: US Air Force.Google Scholar
Van Der Maas, H., Dolan, C., Grasman, R., Wicherts, J., Huizenga, H., & Raijmakers, M. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2017). A personality perspective on situations. In Funder, D., Rauthmann, J. & Sherman, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2019). The Big Five, everyday contexts and activities, and affective experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 140–147.Google Scholar
Wood, D., & Wortman, J. (2012). Trait means and desirabilities as artifactual and real sources of differential stability of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 665–701.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. (2017). Factor analytic support for the five-factor model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 217–242). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, A., & Hopwood, C. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23, 399–403.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. (2016). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelenski, J., Whelan, D., Nealis, L., Besner, C., Santoro, M., & Wynn, J. (2013). Personality and affective forecasting: Trait introverts underpredict the hedonic benefits of acting extraverted. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1092–1108.Google Scholar
Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions!: Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction [Editorial]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 239–242.Google Scholar
Zillig, L., Hemenover, S., & Dienstbier, R. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847–858.Google Scholar
References
Andrews, P. W., & Thomson, J. A. (2009). The bright side of being blue: Depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems. Psychological Review, 116, 620–654.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 704–723.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2011). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between post-traumatic stress symptoms and attentional threat bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 1008–1018.Google Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., & Duzois, D. J. A. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Medicine, 62, 397–409.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Steer, R. A., Eidelson, J. L., & Riskid, J. H. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: A test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., Maclarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2012a). Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: Husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques. Animal Welfare – The UFAW Journal, 21, 185–195.Google Scholar
Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., MacLarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2012b). Evidence that emotion mediates social attention in rhesus macaques. PLOS One, 7, e44387.Google Scholar
Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., MacLarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2016). Emotion evaluation and response slowing in a non-human primate: New directions for cognitive bias measures of animal emotion? Behavioral Sciences, 6, article 2.Google Scholar
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595.Google Scholar
Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229–246.Google Scholar
Booth, R. W., Mackintosh, B., Mobini, S., Oztop, P., & Nunn, S. (2014). Cognitive bias modification of attention is less effective under working memory load. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 634–639.Google Scholar
Booth, R. W., Mackintosh, B., & Sharma, D. (2017). Working memory regulates trait anxiety-related threat processing biases. Emotion, 17, 616–627.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.Google Scholar
Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206, 7–16.Google Scholar
Del Guidice, M., & Ellis, B. J. (2915). Evolutionary foundations of developmental psychopathology. In Ciccetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Developmental neuroscience (Vol. 2, 3rd. ed., pp. 1–58). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Disner, S. G., Beevers, C. G., Haigh, E. A., & Beck, A. T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 467–477.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Lam, D., & Mathews, A. (2007). Rumination and attention in major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2664–2678.Google Scholar
Durisko, Z., Mulsant, B. H., & Andrews, P. W. (2015). An adaptationist perspective on the aetiology of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 172, 315–323.Google Scholar
Everaert, J., Grahek, I., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017a). Individual differences in cognitive control over emotional material modules cognitive biases linked to depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 736–746.Google Scholar
Everaert, J., Podina, I. R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017b). A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation bias in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 33–48.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (1997). Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (2016). Hans Eysenck: A research evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 209–219.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Fajkowska, M. (2018). Anxiety and depression: Toward overlapping and distinctive features. Cognition and Emotion, 32, 1391–1400.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (7th ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research, 49, 189–195.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Payne, S., & Santos, R. (2006). Anxiety and depression: Past, present, and future events. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 274–294.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Van Berkum, J. (1992). Trait anxiety, defensiveness, and the structure of worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1285–1290.Google Scholar
Foland-Ross, L. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (2012). Cognitive and neural aspects of information processing in major depressive disorder: An integrative perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, article 489.Google Scholar
Gaddy, M. A., & Ingram, R. E. (2014). A meta-analytic review of mood-congruent implicit memory in depressed mood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 402–416.Google Scholar
Gotlib, I., & Cane, D. B. (1987). Construct accessibility and clinical depression: A Longitudinal investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 199–204.Google Scholar
Gotlib, I., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Construct accessibility and depression: An examination of cognitive and affective factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 427–439.Google Scholar
Grafton, B., MacLeod, C., Rudaizky, D., Holmes, E. A., Salemink, E., Fox, E., & Notebaert, L. (2017). Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 211, 266–271.Google Scholar
Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.Google Scholar
Harding, E. J., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2004). Animal behavior: Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature, 427, 312.Google Scholar
Heeren, A., De Raedt, R., Koster, E. H. W., & Philpott, P. (2013). The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: Proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, article 119.Google Scholar
Herrera, S., Montorio, I., Cabrera, I., & Botella, J. (2017). Memory bias for threatening information related to anxiety: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 832–854.Google Scholar
Hertel, P. T., & El-Messidi, L. (2006). Am I blue? Depressed mood and the consequences of self-focus for the interpretation and recall of ambiguous words. Behavior Therapy, 37, 259–268.Google Scholar
Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Emotion and autobiographical memory. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 88–131.Google Scholar
Huppert, J. D. (2008). Anxiety disorders and depression comorbidity. In Antony, M. M. & Stein, M. B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of anxiety and related disorders (pp. 572–587). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joormann, J., Yoon, K. L., & Zestche, U. (2007). Cognitive inhibition in depression. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 12, 128–139.Google Scholar
Joormann, J., & Tanovic, E. (2015). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: Examining Cognitive control and emotion regulation. Current Opinions in Psychology, 4, 86–92.Google Scholar
Judah, M. R., Grant, D. M., Lechner, W. V., & Mills, A. C. (2013). Working memory load moderates late attentional bias in social anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 502–511.Google Scholar
Kaiser, R. H., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Spielberg, J. M., Warren, S. L., Sutton, B. P., Miller, G. A., … Banich, M. T. (2015). Distracted and down: Neural mechanisms of affective interference in subclinical depression. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 654–663.Google Scholar
Khazanov, G. K., & Ruscio, A. M. (2016). Is low positive emotionality a specific risk factor For depression? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 991–1015.Google Scholar
Koster, E. H. W., Hoorelbeke, K., Onraedt, T., Owens, M., & Derakshan, N. (2017). Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 53, 79–92.Google Scholar
Lau, J. Y. F. (2015). Commentary: A glass half full or half empty? Cognitive bias Modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents – Reflections on the meta-analysis by Cristea et al. (2015). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 735–737.Google Scholar
Lemogne, C., Delaveau, P., Freton, M., Guionnet, S., & Fossati, P. (2012). Medial prefrontal cortex and the self in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, e1–e11.Google Scholar
MacLeod, A. K. (2016). Prospection, well-being and memory. Memory Studies, 9, 266–274.Google Scholar
Mitte, K. (2008). Memory bias for threatening information in anxiety and anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 886–911.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Williams, R. (1995). Attentional bias in anxiety and depression: The role of awareness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 17–36.Google Scholar
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Williams, R., & Mathews, A. (1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 304–311.Google Scholar
Mogg, K., Waters, A. M., & Bradley, B. (2017). Attention bias modification (ABM): Review of effects of multi-session ABM on anxiety and threat-related attention in high-anxious individuals. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 698–717.Google Scholar
Murphy, F. C., Michael, A., & Sahakian, B. J. (2012). Emotion modulates cognitive flexibility in patients with major depression. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1373–1382.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.Google Scholar
Olatunji, B. O., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Sawchuk, C. N., & Ciesielski, B. G. (2010). Worry and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic synthesis of specificity to GAD. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14, 1–24.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. J., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2010). Implicit cognition and depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 691–709.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. M., & Rose, P. (2014). Is depression the past tense of anxiety? An empirical study of the temporal distinction. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 446–452.Google Scholar
Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., Beyers, W., Eelen, P., & Brunfaut, E. (2006). Reduced autobiographical memory specificity and rumination in predicting the course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, A., Blanchette, I., & Munjiza, J. (2007). Contextual influences in the resolution of ambiguity in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 879–890.Google Scholar
Richards, A., Holmes, A., Pell, P. J., & Bethell, E. J. (2013). Adapting effects of emotional expression in anxiety: Evidence for an enhanced late positive potential. Social Neuroscience, 8, 650–664.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Locati, F., Parolin, L., & Girelli, L. (2017). Distancing the present self from the past and the future: Psychological distance in anxiety and depression. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1106–1113.Google Scholar
Sari, D. A., Koster, E. H. W., Pourtois, G., & Derakshan, N. (2016). Training working memory to improve attentional control in anxiety: A proof-of-principle study using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 121, 203–212.Google Scholar
Saunders, B., & Jentzsch, I. (2014). Reactive and proactive control adjustments under increased depressive symptoms: Insights from the classic and emotional-face Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 684–698.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: Remembering, imaging, and the brain. Neuron, 76, 677–694.Google Scholar
Starr, L. R., & Davila, J. (2012). Temporal patterns of anxious and depressed mood in generalized anxiety disorder: A daily diary study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 131–141.Google Scholar
Sumner, J. A., Griffith, J. W., & Mineka, S. (2010). Overgeneral autobiographical memory as a predictor of the course of depression: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 614–625.Google Scholar
Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 18414–18421.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. T., Cross, K., & Amir, N. (2016). Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety symptoms and attentional disengagement from threatening information. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 68–76.Google Scholar
Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769–785.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J., McNally, M. A., Skariah, A., Butt, A. A., & Eysenck, M. W. (2015). Interpretive bias, repressive coping, and trait anxiety. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 28, 617–633.Google Scholar
Watson, D. (2009). Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: A quadpartite model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 221–247.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative Affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Winer, E. S., & Salem, T. (2016). Reward devaluation: Dot-probe meta-analytic evidence of avoidance of positive information in depressed persons. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 18–78.Google Scholar
Wisco, B. E., & Nolen-Hoeksma, S. (2010). Interpretation bias and depression symptoms: The role of self-relevance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1113–1122.Google Scholar
Wittchen, H.-U., Kessler, R. C., Pfister, H., & Lieb, M. (2000). Why do people with anxiety disorders become depressed? A prospective-longitudinal community study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 14–23.Google Scholar