Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T20:22:04.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Approach–Avoidance Theories of Personality

from Part IV - Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Philip J. Corr  and
Dino Krupić
Edited by
Philip J. Corr  and
Gerald Matthews
Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access

Summary

Approach and avoidance theories of personality try to account for the systematic individual differences observed in reactions to classes of appetitive (“rewarding”) and aversive (“punishing”) stimuli. These individual differences reflect the operation of neuropsychological systems underpinning primary forms of motivation and emotion – accordingly, they are phylogenetically old, of evolutionary significance and of wide scale applicability (e.g., Krupić, Banai & Corr, 2018). The literature now has grown to include a family of approach and avoidance theories of personality. As detailed below, this literature is a culmination of research conducted over the last one hundred years, although its philosophical roots go back much further.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 259 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, A., & Blanch, A. (2011). Neuropsychological behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral approach system (BAS) assessment: A shortened sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire version (SPSRQ-20). Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 628–636.Google Scholar
Aluja, A., García, L. F., García, Ó., & Blanco, E. (2016). Testosterone and disinhibited personality in healthy males. Physiology and Behavior, 164, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416–431.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B. D., Murphy, D. L., & Hamer, D. H. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 81–84.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. London: Payne and sons.Google Scholar
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 507–513.Google Scholar
Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality–psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bizot, J. C., Le Bihan, C., Puech, A. J., Hamon, M., & Thiébot, M. H. (1999). Serotonin and tolerance to delay of reward in rats. Psychopharmacology, 146, 400–412.Google Scholar
Blum, K., Cull, J. G., Braverman, E. R., & Comings, D. E. (1996). Reward deficiency syndrome. American Scientist, 84, 132–145.Google Scholar
Carré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2015). Social neuroendocrinology of human aggression: Examining the role of competition-induced testosterone dynamics. Neuroscience, 286, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carré, J. M., Geniole, S. N., Ortiz, T. L., Bird, B. M., Videto, A., & Bonin, P. L. (2017). Exogenous testosterone rapidly increases aggressive behavior in dominant and impulsive men. Biological Psychiatry, 82, 249–256.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, F. (2009). Self-regulation and control in personality functioning. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 427–440). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
Casey, B. J., Somerville, L. H., Gotlib, I. H., Ayduk, O., Franklin, N. T., Askren, M. K., … Shoda, Y. (2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 14998–15003.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167–226.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., & Svrakic, D. M. (1991). The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: US normative data. Psychological Reports, 69, 1047–1057.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. J., Perkins, A., & Corr, P. J. (2007). A confirmatory factor analytic study of anxiety, fear and Behavioural Inhibition System measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, S. E., Goings, S. P., Kim, J. Y., & Wood, R. I. (2014). Testosterone enhances risk tolerance without altering motor impulsivity in male rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 40, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corr, P. J. (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray’s personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2002a). J. A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystem hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2002b). J. A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory and frustrative nonreward: A theoretical note on expectancies in reactions to rewarding stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1247–1253.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2010). Automatic and controlled processes in behavioral control: Implications for personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 24, 376–403.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2013). Approach and avoidance behaviour: Multiple systems and their interactions. Emotion Review, 5, 285–290.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2016a). Hans Eysenck: A contradictory psychology. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2016b). Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 60–64.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1427–1440.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & Krupić, D. (2017). Motivating personality: Approach, avoidance, and their conflict. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 4, pp. 39–90). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & Mobbs, D. (2018). From epiphenomenon to biologically important phenomena. Personality Neuroscience, 1, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corr, P. J., & Morsella, E. (2015). The conscious control of behaviour: Revisiting Gray’s Comparator model. In Corr, P. J., Fajkowska, M., Eysenck, M. & Wytykowska, A. (Eds.), Personality and control (pp. 15–42). New York: Eliot Werner Publications.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 155–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation–motivation) approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2339–2354.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2015). Neural mechanisms of low trait anxiety and risk for externalizing behaviour. In Beauchaine, T. & Hinshaw, S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of externalizing spectrum disorders: A developmental psychopathology perspective (pp. 220–238). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., McNaughton, N., Wilson, M. R., Hutchison, A., Burch, G., & Poropat, A. (2017). Putting the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) to work. In Kim, S., Reeve, J. M. & Bong, M. (Eds.), Recent developments in neuroscience research on human motivation: Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 65–92). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Corr, P., & Plagnol, A. (2018). Behavioral economics: The basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costa, V. D., Tran, V. L., Turchi, J., & Averbeck, B. B. (2014). Dopamine modulates novelty seeking behavior during decision making. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128, 556–566.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology: I. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 330–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, R. J., Shackman, A. J., & Maxwell, J. S. (2004). Asymmetries in face and brain related to emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 389–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, K. L., Panksepp, J., & Normansell, L. (2003). The Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Normative data and implications. Neuropsychoanalysis, 5, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depue, R. A. (2006). Interpersonal behavior and the structure of personality: Neurobehavioral foundation of agentic extraversion and affiliation. In Canli, T. (Ed.), Biology of personality and individual differences (pp. 60–92). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 491–517.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Gray, J. R., Eastman, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Sources of cognitive exploration: Genetic variation in the prefrontal dopamine system predicts Openness/Intellect. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 364–371.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.Google Scholar
Dissabandara, L. O., Loxton, N. J., Dias, S. R., Daglish, M., & Stadlin, A. (2012). Testing the fear and anxiety distinction in the BIS/BAS scales in community and heroin-dependent samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 888–892.Google Scholar
Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D., … Belmaker, R. H. (1996). Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 78–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Smith, M., & Maszk, P. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 195–209.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1963). Personality and drug effects. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments with drugs: Studies in the relation between personality, learning theory and drug action (pp. 1–24). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Kent, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. C., & Pflum, M. J. (2014). The assessment of interpersonal pleasure: Introduction of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS) and preliminary findings. Psychiatry Research, 215, 237–243.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1967). Strength of the nervous system, introversion-extraversion, conditionality and arousal. Behavior Research and Therapy, 5, 151–169.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1972a). The psychophysiological nature of introversion–extraversion: A modification of Eysenck’s theory. In Nebylitsyn, V. D. & Gray, J. A. (Eds.), The biological bases of individual behaviour (pp. 182–205). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1972b). Learning theory, the conceptual nervous system and personality. In Nebylitsyn, V. D. & Gray, J. A. (Eds.), The biological bases of individual behaviour (pp. 372–399). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1975). Elements of a two-process theory of learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1976). The behavioral inhibition system: A possible substrate for anxiety. In Feldman, M. P. & Broadhurst, A. M. (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental bases of behavior modification (pp. 3–41). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1977). Drug effects on fear and frustration: Possible limbic site of action of minor tranquillizers. In Iversen, L. L., Iversen, S. D. & Snyder, S. H. (Eds.), Handbook of psychopharmacology: Drugs, Neurotransmitters, and Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 433–529). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & Smith, P. T. (1969). An arousal decision model for partial reinforcement and discrimination learning. In Gilbert, R. M. & Sutherland, N. S. (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning (pp. 243–272). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. W., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., Rose, R. D., Waters, A. M., & Sutton, J. M. (2010). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological medicine, 40, 1125–1136.Google Scholar
Hansenne, M., Pinto, E., Pitchot, W., Reggers, J., Scantamburlo, G., Moor, M., & Ansseau, M. (2002). Further evidence on the relationship between dopamine and novelty seeking: A neuroendocrine study. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 967–977.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (Conceptual Nervous System). Psychological Review, 62, 243–254.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 503–525). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ikemoto, S., & Panksepp, J. (1999). The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: A unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 6–41.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Prescott, C. A., Myers, J., & Neale, M. C. (2003). The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 929–937.Google Scholar
Kennis, M., Rademaker, A. R., & Geuze, E. (2013). Neural correlates of personality: An integrative review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 73–95.Google Scholar
Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921–926.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psycholology, 2, 111–133.Google Scholar
Krupić, D., Banai, B., & Corr, P. J. (2018). Relations between the Behavioral Approach System (BAS) and self-reported life history traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 39, 115–122.Google Scholar
Krupić, D., & Corr, P. J. (2017). Moving forward with the BAS: Towards a neurobiology of multidimensional model of approach motivation. Psychological Topics, 26, 25–45.Google Scholar
Krupić, D., Corr, P. J., Ručević, S., Križanić, V., & Gračanin, A. (2016a). Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 19–24.Google Scholar
Krupić, D., Gračanin, A., & Corr, P. J. (2016b). The evolution of the Behavioural Approach System (BAS): Cooperative and competitive resource acquisition strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 223–227.Google Scholar
Krupić, D., Križanić, V., & Corr, P. J. (2016). Personality and defensive behaviour: A factor analytic approach to threat scenario choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 303–308.Google Scholar
Leyton, M., Boileau, I., Benkelfat, C., Diksic, M., Baker, G., & Dagher, A. (2002). Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: A PET/[11C]raclopride study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacology, 27, 1027–1035.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Guan, Y., Wang, F., Zhou, X., Guo, K., Jiang, P., … Fang, Z. (2015). Big-five personality and BIS/BAS traits as predictors of career exploration: The mediation role of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 39–45.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1971). Multiple factor analysis and personality research. Journal of Research in Personality, 5, 161–170.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. (1995). Evolution, the Five-Factor Model, and levels of personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 525–567.Google Scholar
MacHin, A. J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The brain opioid theory of social attachment: A review of the evidence. Behaviour, 140, 985–1025.Google Scholar
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305.Google Scholar
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2008). The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: A foundation for reinforcement sensitivity theory. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 44–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and their conflict: The problem of anchoring. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2016). Mechanisms of comorbidity, continuity, and discontinuity in anxiety-related disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 28, 1053–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2018a). Sensitivity to punishment and reward: Revisiting Gray (1970). In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), Classic studies in personality psychology (pp. 115–136). London: Sage.Google Scholar
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2018b). Survival circuits and risk assessment. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 24, 14–20.Google Scholar
McNaughton, N., DeYoung, C., & Corr, P. J. (2016). Approach and avoidance. In Absher, J. R. & Cloutier, J. (Eds.), Neuroimaging personality and character: Traits and mental states in the brain (pp. 25–49). London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In Hunt, J. M. (Ed.), Personality and the behavioral disorders (pp. 431–465). New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, K., Miyazaki, K. W., & Doya, K. (2011). Activation of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons underlies waiting for delayed rewards. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 469–479.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Zeichner, A., & Wilson, L. F. (2012). Personality correlates of aggression: Evidence from measures of the Five-Factor Model, UPPS model of impulsivity, and BIS/BAS. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2903–2919.Google Scholar
Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. N., & Gray, J. A. (1971). Peak shift, behavioral contrast and stimulus generalization as related to personality and development in children. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 47–62.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K., & Corr, P. J. (2018). The dimensional model of personality and psychopathology: Revisiting Eysenck (1944). In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), Classic studies in personality psychology (pp. 69–86) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ode, S., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). Agreeableness and the self-regulation of negative affect: Findings involving the neuroticism/somatic distress relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2137–2148.Google Scholar
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, K. R. (2004). Relations between Big Five traits and fundamental motives. Psychological Reports, 95, 795–802.Google Scholar
Pearson, R., McGeary, J. E., & Beevers, C. G. (2014). Association between serotonin Cumulative Genetic Score and the Behavioral Approach System (BAS): Moderation by early life environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 140–144.Google Scholar
Peciña, M., Azhar, H., Love, T. M., Lu, T., Fredrickson, B. L., Stohler, C. S., & Zubieta, J. K. (2013a). Personality trait predictors of placebo analgesia and neurobiological correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, 639–646.Google Scholar
Peciña, M., Mickey, B. J., Love, T., Wang, H., Langenecker, S. A., Hodgkinson, C., … Zubieta, J. K. (2013b). DRD2 polymorphisms modulate reward and emotion processing, dopamine neurotransmission and openness to experience. Cortex, 49, 877–890.Google Scholar
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.Google Scholar
Perkins, A. M., Ettinger, U., Weaver, K., Schmechtig, A., Schrantee, A., Morrison, P. D., … Corr, P. J. (2013). Advancing the defensive explanation for anxiety disorders: Lorazepam effects on human defense are systematically modulated by personality and threat-type. Translational Psychiatry, 3, e246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, A. M., Inchley-Mort, S. L., Pickering, A. D., Corr, P. J., & Burgess, A. P. (2012). A facial expression for anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 910–924.Google Scholar
Perkins, A., Kemp, S. E., & Corr, P. J. (2007). Fear and anxiety as separable emotions: An investigation of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Emotion, 7, 252–261.Google Scholar
Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature, 442, 1042–1045.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D. (2008). Formal and computational models of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 453–481). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D., Diaz, A., & Gray, J. A. (1995). Personality and reinforcement: An exploration using a maze-learning task. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 541–558.Google Scholar
Piotti, P., Satchell, L. P., & Lockhart, T. S. (2018). Impulsivity and behaviour problems in dogs: A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory perspective. Behavioural Processes, 151, 104–110.Google Scholar
Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., … Liu, J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.Google Scholar
Ranade, S., Pi, H. J., & Kepecs, A. (2014). Neuroscience: Waiting for serotonin. Current Biology, 24, R803–R805.Google Scholar
Randles, D., Flett, G. L., Nash, K. A., McGregor, I. D., & Hewitt, P. L. (2010). Dimensions of perfectionism, behavioral inhibition, and rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 83–87.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D., Lerner, J. S., Josephs, R. A., Renshon, J., & Gross, J. J. (2016). The interaction of testosterone and cortisol is associated with attained status in male executives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 921–929.Google Scholar
Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2006). The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): A dimensional measure of traits relevant to personality and personality athology. In Strack, S. (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 431–450). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behaviour. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smits, D. J. M., & Boeck, P. D. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 270, 255–270.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204–210.Google Scholar
Svrakic, D. M., Przybeck, T. R., & Cloninger, C. R. (1991). Further contribution to the conceptual validity of the unified biosocial model of personality: US and Yugoslav data. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 32, 195–209.Google Scholar
Sylvers, P., Lilienfeld, S. O., & LaPrairie, J. L. (2011). Differences between trait fear and trait anxiety: Implications for psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 122–137.Google Scholar
Tajima-Pozo, K., Bayón, C., Díaz-Marsá, M., & Carrasco, J. L. (2015). Correlation between personality traits and testosterone concentrations in healthy population. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37, 317–321.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Thornton, J. C., Dawe, S., Lee, C., Capstick, C., Corr, P. J., Cotter, P., … Gray, J. A. (1996). Effects of nicotine and amphetamine on latent inhibition in normal human subjects. Psychopharmacology, 127, 164–173.Google Scholar
Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., Wheeler, R. E., & Doss, R. C. (1992). Individual differences in anterior brain asymmetry and fundamental dimensions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 676–687.Google Scholar
Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Moltó, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862.Google Scholar
Tuominen, L., Salo, J., Hirvonen, J., Nagren, K., Laine, P., Melartin, T., … Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2012). Temperament, character and serotonin activity in the human brain: A positron emission tomography study based on a general population cohort. Psychological Medicine, 43, 881–894.Google Scholar
Turakulov, R., Jorm, A. F., Jacomb, P. A., Tan, X., & Easteal, S. (2004). Association of dopamine-β-hydroxylase and androgen receptor gene polymorphisms with Eysenck’s P and other personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanigasekera, V., Lee, M. C., Rogers, R., Kong, Y., Leknes, S., Andersson, J., & Tracey, I. (2012). Baseline reward circuitry activity and trait reward responsiveness predict expression of opioid analgesia in healthy subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17705–17710.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×