Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T19:11:07.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is core knowledge in the format of LOT?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Fei Xu Open the ORCID record for Fei Xu [Opens in a new window]
Fei Xu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA fei_xu@berkeley.edu https://www.babylab.berkeley.edu/feixu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Object individuation provides a test case for the claim that infants already have a prelinguistic language-of-thought (LOT). By 12 months, infants represent several sortal-kinds: Object, agent, animate, and perhaps artifact. Infants have also encountered many words for object kinds, animals, people, and artifacts, therefore it remains a viable hypothesis that language learning may play a causal role in the acquisition of sortal-kinds, contra Quilty-Dunn et al.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e291
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., & Mehler, J. (2002). The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44(4), 388–426. https://doi.org/10.1006/COGP.2002.0779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bródy, G., Oláh, K., Király, I., & Biro, S. (2022). Individuation of agents based on psychological properties in 10 month-old infants. Infancy, 27(4), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/INFA.12472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croteau, J., Cheries, E., & Xu, F. (forthcoming). The development of kind concepts: Insight from object individuation and beyond. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
Decarli, G., Franchin, L., Piazza, M., & Surian, L. (2020). Infants’ use of motion cues in object individuation processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 197, 104868. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECP.2020.104868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futó, J., Téglás, E., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2010). Communicative function demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants. Cognition, 117(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kibbe, M. M., & Leslie, A. M. (2019). Conceptually rich, perceptually sparse: Object representations in 6-month-old infants’ working memory. Psychological Science, 30, 362–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, Y., Li, J., Gertner, Y., Ng, W., Fisher, C. L., & Baillargeon, R. (2021). How do the objectfile and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels. Cognitive Psychology, 125, 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macnamara, J. (1986). A border dispute. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perszyk, D. R., & Waxman, S. R. (2018). Linking language and cognition in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What babies know. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavans, M., Lin, Y., Wu, D., & Baillargeon, R. (2019). Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions. Psychological Review, 126(2), 196–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/REV0000136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surian, L., & Caldi, S. (2010). Infants’ individuation of agents and inert objects. Developmental Science, 13(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-7687.2009.00873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborda-Osorio, H., & Cheries, E. W. (2018). Infants’ agent individuation: It's what's on the insides that counts. Cognition, 175, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.01.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborda-Osorio, H., Lyons, A. B., & Cheries, E. W. (2019). Examining infants’ individuation of others by sociomoral disposition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1271. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01271/BIBTEXCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, D. (1980). Sameness and substance. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, T., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Object individuation in infancy: The use of featural information in reasoning about occlusion events. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 97–155. https://doi.org/10.1006/COGP.1998.0690CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (1997). From Lot's wife to a pillar of salt: Evidence for physical object as a sortal concept. Mind and Language, 12, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85, 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00109-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (2007). Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2007.08.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (2019). Towards a rational constructivist theory of cognitive development. Psychological Review, 126, 841–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1006/COGP.1996.0005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F., Carey, S., & Quint, N. (2004). The emergence of kind-based object individuation in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2004.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed