Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T05:27:33.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stop me if you've heard this one before: The Chomskyan hammer and the Skinnerian nail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Alex Madva*
Affiliation:
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA. alexmadva@gmail.com https://alexmadva.com/

Abstract

The target article signal boosts important ongoing work across the cognitive sciences. However, its theoretical claims, generative value, and purported contributions are – where not simply restatements of arguments extensively explored elsewhere – imprecise, noncommittal, and underdeveloped to a degree that makes them difficult to evaluate. The article's apparent force results from engaging with straw rather than steel opponents.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownstein, M. (2018). The implicit mind: Cognitive architecture, the self, and ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012). The normativity of automaticity. Mind & Language, 27(4), 410434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01450.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, N. (2021). What we can (and can't) infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments. Synthese, 198(2), 14271455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02128-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Pinal, G., Madva, A., & Reuter, K. (2017). Stereotypes, conceptual centrality and gender bias: An empirical investigation. Ratio, 30(4), 384410. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Précis of the modularity of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001921XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Mann, T. C., Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(13), 58625871. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820240116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Morehouse, K. N., & Dunham, Y. (2023). How do explicit and implicit evaluations shift? A preregistered meta-analysis of the effects of co-occurrence and relational information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(6), 11741202. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Morris, A., & Cushman, F. A. (2022b). The role of causal structure in implicit evaluation. Cognition, 225, 105116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madva, A. (2016). Why implicit attitudes are (probably) not beliefs. Synthese, 193(8), 26592684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0874-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madva, A. (2019). Social psychology, phenomenology, and the indeterminate content of unreflective racial bias. In Lee, E. S. (Ed.), Race as phenomena: Between phenomenology and philosophy of race (pp. 87106). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Madva, A., & Brownstein, M. (2018). Stereotypes, prejudice, and the taxonomy of the implicit social mind. Noûs, 52(3), 611644. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, E. (2022). Associationist theories of thought. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/associationist-thought/Google Scholar
Nolan, C. (2008). The dark knight. Warner Bros.Google Scholar
Phills, C. E., Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2020). The bidirectional causal relation between implicit stereotypes and implicit prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 13181330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219899234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Roets, A., & Smith, C. T. (2020). On the effectiveness of approach-avoidance instructions and training for changing evaluations of social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, e1e14. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed