The Institute for Emergency Medical Assistance of Canton Sarajevo covers 1,777 square kilometers. All teams are physician staffed and are organized in ten geographic points. Patients are transported to a tertiary care level facility–University Clinical Center Sarajevo. Our objective was to determine the association between total prehospital time and severe trauma patient outcomes in a physician staffed emergency medical system with the hypothesis that the length of prehospital time is insignificant to patient outcome if physician treatment begins on scene.

This was a descriptive, retrospective, analytical study conducted from June to December 2020. The data of 153 patients with an ISS score of ≥ 16 was selected from patient registries of both facilities. According to transport duration, patients were assigned to one of four groups: <15 minutes (group 1); 16 to 30 minutes (group 2); 31-45 minutes (group 3) and > 45 minutes (group 4). Both groups according to the TRISS score were equal in mortality with an expected survival rate margin taken at 70% due to this being the approximate intrahospital survival rate of our patients. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and 30-day survival rate.

We found no statistically significant difference to in-hospital mortality in relation to the length of pre-hospital transport when physician treatment begins on scene (p = 0,186). We ruled out any significant difference in length of stay and ICU stay (p = 0,179 and p = 0,173, respectively) among the preselected groups in relation to the length of prehospital time. Also, the 30 day survival rate was unaffected by the length of transport in physician led teams (p = 0,156).

With strategically placed physician staffed EMS teams and physician treatment beginning on scene, patient outcome is unaffected by the length of transport.

In Germany, emergency care is provided by ambulances and rescue helicopters. Emergency physicians are part of prehospital care. The rescue helicopter in Dresden covers the city with 540.000 inhabitants and surrounding areas. The goal of the study was to evaluate cases of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) and to describe factors that affect the primary success of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in trauma.

Data of all emergencies from the German Air Rescue (DRF-Luftrettung®) Helicopter Base Dresden were recorded on a standardized protocol and transferred to a central database (MEDAT®, HEMSDER®). Data from all patients with severe injuries, classified as polytrauma between January 2006 and December 2015 were analyzed.

There were a total number of 14,126 emergency cases involving the rescue Helicopter. The Helicopter was on the scene within 10.9 minutes [4-34]. Polytraumatized patients were identified in 673 cases (4.76%), the mean age was 43.73 years [2-98], and 498 patients were male (73.99%). In 444 cases, traffic accidents were responsible, in 188 cases falls from high. In 46 cases a suicide was documented. Mean ISS was 34,04 [16-75]. The main injury regions were head, extremities and chest. In 115 patients (17.08%) a TCA was observed. 43 pat. were pronounced dead initially and no treatment was initiated. 72 pat. (62.6%) received CPR. 39 of these pat. (54,17%) were also pronounced dead after treatment. 14 pat. (19.44%) were transported to hospital with ongoing CPR. 19 pat. (27.38%) reached the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Male pat. reached more often ROSC.

According to present guidelines for TCA, it is important that reversible causes of cardiac arrest in trauma pat. are to be treated. If we ensure the treatment of hypoxia, hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade consequently, there will be a survival chance. Regular training for manual skills and simulation can be a key factor.

Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) have formed an integral component of the Irish healthcare system for the past decade, yet the factors leading its commencement, its evolutions over this time, the current model of service delivery have not been widely published.

Aeromedical service provision may vary significantly from country to country and may also vary regionally within countries. Health systems necessities, capacity and maturity, the level of state, corporate, private or community investment and capacity of the contracted service provider are all factors that influence the service provision.

This research provides a descriptive analysis of the historic factors leading to the implementation of HEMS during an era of healthcare reform, its key evolutions and current model of service delivery.

Health system reform in a time of global financial recession led to a unique collaboration between the Irish Defense Forces and civilian Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) to provide a sustainable foundation of primary scene landing Helicopter Emergency Medical Services for the Irish state. This sharing of professional knowledge, logistics and operational experience lead to many further system reforms and will inform future aeromedical service provision.

Over the past decade the Irish health system has undergone significant reconfiguration and centralization of services, leading to increased demands on emergency medical ground and aeromedical services. Future advancements in aeromedical service provision require an innate understanding of the current model.

This research will add to the knowledge base and inform policy makers and support decision making surrounding Helicopter Emergency Medical Services reform and enhanced service provision in the Irish state.

After officer-involved shootings, rapid delivery of emergency medical care is critical but may be delayed due to scene safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to describe medical care rendered by law enforcement officers (LEO) after lethal force incidents.

Retrospective analysis of open-source video footage of officer-involved shootings (OIS) occurring between 2/15/2013 and 12/31/2020. Frequency and nature of care provided, time until LEO and emergency medical services (EMS) care, and mortality outcomes were evaluated. The study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.

342 videos were included in the final analysis. LEOs rendered care in 172 (50.3%) incidents. The average elapsed time from the time of injury to LEO-provided care was 155.8 + 198.8 seconds. Hemorrhage control was the most common intervention performed. An average of 214.2 seconds elapsed between LEO care and EMS arrival. No mortality difference was identified between LEO vs EMS care (p = 0.1631). Subjects with truncal wounds were more likely to die than those with extremity wounds (p < 0.00001).

LEO rendered medical care in half of all OIS incidents, initiating care on average 3.5 minutes prior to EMS arrival. Although no significant mortality difference was noted for LEO versus EMS care, this finding must be interpreted cautiously, as specific interventions, such as extremity hemorrhage control, may have impacted select patients. Future studies are needed to determine optimal LEO care for these patients.

Disaster planning and preparedness for a burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) must consider the needs of those who will be directly involved and support the response to such an event. An aspect of developing a more comprehensive statewide burn disaster program included meeting (regionally) with healthcare coalitions (HCC) to identify gaps in care and deficiencies.

Regularly scheduled (quarterly) HCC meetings are held around the state linking stakeholders representing local hospitals, health departments, emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, and other interested parties. We were able to use the HCCs regional meetings to serve as a platform for conducting focus group research to identify gaps specific to a BMCI and to inform strategy development for a statewide approach. Additionally, we held engagement meetings with state emergency response network (a state agency that coordinates the movement of ambulances to appropriate destinations) and the Burn Medical Directors findings were vetted from the focus groups.

One of the deficiencies identified, included a lack of burn-specific wound care dressings that could support the initial response. Relying on this same process, a consensus was attained for equipment types and quantities, including a kit for storage. Furthermore, a maintenance, supply replacement, and delivery to the scene processes were developed for these kits of supplies that could augment a BMCI response.

Focus group feedback reminded us that outside of the world of burn care, many report an infrequent opportunity to provide care for patients with burn injuries. Several types of burn-specific dressings can be expensive, and with the occurrence being infrequent. EMS agencies and rural hospitals alike reported that it was unlikely their agency/hospital would have more than a minimal stock of burn injury supplies. Developing supply caches that can be quickly mobilized and deployed to the impacted area was one of the deficiencies we addressed.

The initial medical certificate (CMI) is a medico-legal document of great importance. Writing CMIs is a frequent act in emergency medicine. In 2011, the Haute Authority of Medicine (HAS) published good practice recommendations concerning the writing and content of these certificates. Nevertheless, this practice faces a difficult reality in the emergency services. The aim of this study was to analyze the writing quality of CMIs in terms of compliance of all the criteria collected with respect to HAS recommendations.

This was a retrospective study, evaluating professional practices over a period of two years in Ben Arous ED. We analyzed CMIs written by EPs. The certificates were subjected to a critical reading to begin a comparative study of the quality of writing of these certificates with the HAS recommendations using a criteria grid relating to the theoretical content of the certificates.

207 CMIs were analyzed (Acts of violence 88%, work accidents 12% and AVP less than 1%). The medical writers were mainly represented by general practitioners (98%). Not all of the CMIs complied with writing recommendations. The identity of the physician, the identity of the patient, the date of the examination and of the facts, the nature of the lesions, the handwritten signature of the doctor and the stamp were mentioned in more than 95% of the CMIs. The presence of CNOM registration number, the profession, the address and the number of the national identity of the patient, the place of the facts, the medical history and the previous condition of the patient were absent in more than 95% of the CMIs. The duration of the ITT was written in full in 36% of the cases.

The study revealed insufficiencies in the quality of CMI drafting written by EP. Specific training is underway to improve certificate redactions.

Japan is geographically prone to natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis, economically advanced, and socially characterized as a super-aged society. The SDGs are a concrete strategy to achieve a society where no one is left behind. So what exactly can we do to protect the vulnerable populace? This presentation will introduce the system of cooperation and implementation of medical, health, and welfare disaster relief in Japan.

Government documents were received on developing national policies regarding the strategy for the unification of medical, health, and welfare. For implementation, the status of support teams specializing in disaster welfare and training status was reviewed.

National policy level achievements: The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) issued a "Notification on Enhancing and Strengthening the Medical System in Times of Disaster" in 2012 and conducted a critical review of the initial response to the Kumamoto earthquake in 2016 in the "Initial Response Verification Report." This process reaffirmed the need to support vulnerable populations such as the disabled, children, and the elderly. In 2021, the Disaster Welfare Assistance Team was added to the Basic Plan for Disaster Management and the MHLW Disaster Management Work Plan.

Implementation level Achievement: As of 2022, 24 of the 47 prefectures have a DWAT in place. Gunma, Kyoto, and Miyazaki prefectures were the most advanced, with 1) ongoing meetings to strengthen cooperation with medical and health care teams, 2) participation in joint drills, and 3) DWAT awareness-raising activities through training for municipal administrative staff.

While this review revealed that the national government had made progress in developing policies, the implementation revealed that some prefectures have not yet established DWATs.

Reusing PPE is not recommended but was common during COVID-19 pandemic. Limited guidance on proper PPE use and its reuse heightened the hazards to health care worker (HCW) safety. Emerging data on PPE use suggests that most HCWs were contaminated by donning and doffing of PPE while adhering to standards of care.

A prospective observational study was conducted to understand HCW behaviors in donning, doffing, and reusing PPE. Emergency Department physicians and nurses were video-recorded donning, doffing, and reusing PPE within a simulated acute care environment. Participants performed five donning and doffing PPE procedures. PPE kit included gown, face shields, and N95 respirator masks. Participants had access to disposable gloves and hand sanitizer. Recordings were reviewed and coded independently by two trained coders based on checklist of key behaviors. Agreement between coders was high (81.9%). All participants reported completing PPE training.

28 videos of participants capturing 278 procedures were reviewed. None of the participants followed the CDC’s order for donning across five scenarios. Majority of participants failed to perform hand hygiene before donning or re-donning PPE or when doffing PPE. For contaminant spread risk, 92.85% (n=26) touched patient-facing side of PPE during re-donning and/or doffing PPE (M= 3.75, SD= 2.37, Median = 4; 0-9 times). The most common area of self-contamination was hands (n= 111 across all participants in 5 donning/doffing sequences). Touching patient-facing side of PPE was more likely to occur during donning than doffing (70.5% vs. 20.1% of sequences).

The study found wide variation in PPE donning/doffing practices among HCW in violation of CDC guidance. This first study to review PPE reuse through a human factors lens, identifyied deviant behaviors that contribute to HCW self-contamination. Efforts are needed to redesign PPE and develop effective ways to train staff using PPE equipment safely.

Emergency patients have to stay in the Emergency Department (ED) for hours to days to get ward admission for definite care in Nepal. Access block is a major issue in the ED of University Level Teaching Hospitals (ULTH) in Nepal. This study aimed to analyze the impact of access blocks in the EDs of Nepal.

Meta-analysis of different publications on ‘duration of ED Boarding’ and ‘mortality outcome of ED’ of ULTHs of Nepal till November 15, 2022

9.7% of ED patients were admitted to the ward. The time period from ED arrival to respective ward team consultation is 5.7 hours, consultation to ward admission is 5.6 hours, and admission to ward transfer is 8 hours. The average ED boarding time is 18.1 hours. 38% of patients arrived in ED via Ambulances. The time period from ED arrival to ward team consultation for those who need transfer to another center are 6.9 hours, consultation to admission is 5.7 hours, and admission to transfer is 8.7 hours (ED Boarding time 21.3 hours). Meta-analysis of three major ULTH’s showed mortality with respect to ED boarding time to be 17% in < 1 hour, 40.4% in 1 - 6 hours, 27.4% in 6-12 hours, 9.1% in 12-24 hours, 4% in 24-28 hours and 2.1% in >48 hours. Among them, higher age, greater mortality rate. The immediate causes of mortality comparing 2018 vs 2010 are Sepsis & Septic shock 32.2% vs 18%, Cardiac Causes 21.8% vs 14.8%, Aspiration Pneumonia 19.5% vs 14.8%, Severe Lung Diseases 12.7% vs 16.4%, Hypovolumic & Haemorrhagic Shock 9.2% vs 34.4% and Poisoning 4.6% vs 1.6%.

Prolonged ED boarding due to Access Block is triggering increased mortality in the ED.

The health system faces many challenges including the lack of personnel or resources and the overcrowding of emergency rooms. In this context, Real Time Locating Systems (RTLS) offer the possibility of improving the efficiency, safety and quality of care management. Clinical trajectories are currently very dependent on manual processes. We believe that real-time management systems that use geolocation can optimize time-dependent clinical trajectories, improve critical care and transform the health network for patients, caregivers and managers. Typically, RTLS tools require a significant investment in terms of installation, configuration, and integration.

The Nano Data Center (NDC) system developed by Humanitas Solutions is equipped with an advanced and low-cost IT infrastructure. It is self-deploying, self-configurable and allows geolocation and autonomous telecommunication with multiple interfaces (WIFI, Bluetooth, electrical). It requires a power source and operates without requiring access to technological infrastructures, which is the major difference with similar products based mainly on cloud computing and dependent on internet connectivity. We tested, as a pilot project, the deployment of the NDC system in a complex hospital environment (Centre intégré de la santé et des services sociaux de la Montérégie-Centre, Quebec, Canada) in order to demonstrate its potential use.

Using the NDC system, we were successful in establishing an autonomous communication network over several hospital floors. This innovation made it possible to support the real-time geolocalization of fictive patients and the creation of a real-time dashboard for monitoring clinical trajectories, analyzing data, and evaluating performance.

The next development phases of the CHRONOS project include real-time notification and transformation of clinical trajectories into smart trajectories. The independence of the NDC system in terms of infrastructures would allow its deployment in low-resource environments, such as temporary installations or remote areas. Thus, its potential benefit in creating connected environments in disaster situations.

Emergencies provide opportunities for deep systemic intra-action and after-action reviews, followed by changes and adaptations that are aimed at enhancing resilience against future health emergencies. One of the most prevalent lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic is the need to intensify the investment in the health workforce. Diverse groups of health workers have brought their expertise from the benches to patients’ beds, and the desks of the decision-makers.

Match skill mix of health staff with the needed level of care: those with mild diseases can be cared for by basic nursing staff. Critical patients require advanced skilled nursing that is familiarized with advanced technologies such as ECMO, and use “out-of-the-box” thinking.

Developing the capabilities of the communities and civil society organizations to respond to emergencies. Cooperation agreements with partners that are not involved in medical care during “regular days” should be set before emergencies strike.

Formulate civil-military-police cooperation as well as the Good Samaritan Law is an important legal instrument to allow for humanitarian aid from within and outside the country.

Matching the skill mix of the health staff with the needed level of care for basic nursing for minor patients as well as advanced nursing for critical patients, while using “out of the box “ thinking to develop a high level of knowledge is important to maintain quality care during emergencies.

The COVID-19 pandemic and other emergencies provide us with the opportunity to switch from bouncing back to bouncing forward, and from just coping to anticipating and transforming. Investing in the health workforce would enhance preparedness and readiness so that emergencies will not turn into disasters and crises. The presentation will highlight some of the new approaches and methods applied during the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as those applied in countries that are faced with wars and military conflicts.

Disaster and emergency management planning has an essential role to ensure that hospitals can continue to function in disaster response situations. However, there are several gaps for safe hospital policies and implementations between national and provincial/district level. The Special Region of Yogyakarta, as one of the provinces with high disaster risk in Indonesia, initiated a study to identify local policies needed for safe hospitals.

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) series were conducted with several hospitals representing private, public, academic, and military hospitals located in the first ring of Mount Merapi, an active volcano located on the border between Yogyakarta and Central Java Province. The FGD participants consisted of the Hospital Disaster Plan team, hospital task force of COVID-19, emergency department and hospital management team. Three FGD were carried out with different topics of discussion in each session. The topics were hospital experiences in implementing Hospital Disaster Plans during COVID-19, hospital incident command, coordination and networking. In addition, they also conducted advocacy and public consultation

The study that involved 12 hospitals and 40 persons, resulting in 11 specific additional policies for Yogyakarta safe hospital which include; six additional Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in terms of donation management, volunteers’ recruitment and cost claim; one initiated Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for surge capacity; conducting functional exercise rather than full scale ritual simulation with management scenario, as well as develop two plans for cyber-attack and business continuity plan.

The pocketbook of Yogyakarta’s safe hospital will be useful for more than 70 hospitals in implementing and developing their hospital disaster plan, improving coordination among hospitals in the disaster phase, as well as a lesson-learned process for other regions to develop their local-based safe hospital policies.

In Japan, victims of large-scale disasters are usually identified by non-objective means. In the case of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, ~90% of the bodies were identified based on nonobjective means such as facial features or belongings, which resulted in misidentification. At present, the situation remains the same. However, according to global standards, a method referred to as “disaster victim identification” (DVI; individual identification of disaster victims) is recommended by the International Criminal Police Organization; in this method, a multidisciplinary investigation team integrates objective information such as dental charts and DNA. Furthermore, recently, there has been a movement to employ postmortem computed tomography (CT) for personal identification, and radiologists are expected to be included in the DVI team.

In the Department of Legal Medicine of Chiba University in Japan, individual identification via CT or magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in forensic autopsy cases of unknown identities when there was an assumed person for the body and the antemortem image of the person could be acquired. Two certified radiologists interpreted and compared the antemortem CT with the postmortem CT taken prior to autopsy and assessed whether the two images were compatible to indicate the same person.

A total of 20 cases were judged. In all cases, two images were compatible, indicating the same person. Image-based identification was particularly useful when dental findings or fingerprints were unavailable for comparison and there were no family members available for DNA testing.

In the future, this method will be applied to large-scale disasters.

In the event of a major event or disaster, the intensive care unit (ICU) should be able to offer an adapted and proportional response, within a limited time frame, to the influx of patients who can benefit from the technical facilities of the University Hospitals of Geneva. We developed an innovative approach to ICU care aimed to guarantee continuity by protecting healthcare staff from excessive fatigue and by tailoring the care provided from individualized care to the best care for the most people.

A modified organizational and systematic investigation method (MINOS, Paries - 2013) was used to elaborate an ICU security model; threats to activity shut down were identified and their prevention, recovery, and mitigation were planned. These actions were updated following the evolution of the crisis. Crew resources management (CRM) and bedside simulations were used in the implementation phase.

The ICU security model pillars were staff protection and patient management; the identified threats to activity continuity were lack of human resources, activity overload, medical errors, pressure sores and healthcare acquired infections; they were evaluated at intermediate or high risk to patients’ safety. The prioritized care plan was developed to control, recover, and mitigate these threats. It consisted in: adaptable level of ICU care, modular organization by cell, huddles, matrix for activities prioritization and controlled delegation method. Before implementation, 55 nurses and 46 doctors were trained by CRM courses and simulations. The pilot phase was deployed in one cell, from December 2021 to January 2022; 67 patients were admitted in the period; 13 adaptations to the original plan were introduced. No critical safety issues were reported.

The prioritized care could be an adapted and proportional ICU response to a major event allowing the continuity of the activity while protecting staff from overload. Further tests are needed.

Utilization of the Emergency Department (ED) for non-urgent care increases demand for services, therefore reducing avoidable attendance is an important area for intervention in the prevention of ED crowding. This study aims to develop a consensus among clinicians across care settings about the “appropriateness” of attendance at the ED in Ireland.

The Better Data, Better Planning study was a multi-center, cross-sectional study investigating factors influencing ED utilization in Ireland. Following ethical approval, data was compiled in patient summary files which were assessed for measures of appropriateness by an academic General Practitioner (GP) and academic Emergency Medicine Consultant (EMC) National Panel. In cases where consensus was not reached charts were assessed by an Independent Review Panel (IRP). At each site all files were autonomously assessed by local GP-EMC panels.

The National Panel determined that 11% (GP) to 38% (EMC) of n=306 lower acuity presentations could be treated by a GP within 24-48h (k=0.259; p<0.001) and that 18% (GP) to 35% (EMC) of attendances could be considered “inappropriate” (k=0.341; p<0.001). For attendances deemed “appropriate” the admission rate was 47% compared to 0% for “inappropriate” attendees. There was no consensus on 45% of charts (n=136). Subset analysis by the IRP determined that consensus for appropriate attendances ranged from 0-59% and for inappropriate attendances ranged from 0-29%. For the Local Panel review (n=306) consensus on appropriateness ranged from 40-76% across sites.

Multidisciplinary clinicians agree that “inappropriate” use of Irish EDs is an issue. However, obtaining consensus on appropriateness of attendance is challenging and there was a significant cohort of complex heterogeneous presentations where agreement could not be reached by clinicians in this study. This research again demonstrates the complexity of ED crowding, the introduction of evidence-based care pathways targeting avoidable presentations may serve to alleviate the problem in our EDs.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a devastating impact on long-term care in Canada, exacerbating an existing crisis of staff shortages, inadequate infrastructure and funding, into a disaster. In response, the province of Ontario enacted emergency legislation and requested federal government support, resulting in the deployment of personnel from the Canadian Armed Forces and acute care hospitals into long-term care homes across the province. This exploratory study aims to develop a rich description of the long-term care context during the pandemic, deployed personnel's perspectives on providing care in the context, and identification of lessons learned while working during the pandemic.

Descriptive exploratory design with demographic questionnaire and semi-structured interviews will be used to understand the background and perspective of deployed personnel and managers on working in long-term care during the pandemic. Thematic analysis will be used to analyze the transcripts, organize codes, and identify and describe major themes. Findings will also be compared with disaster literature to understand how the perspectives of deployed personnel compare with existing disaster research.

21 interviews were initially conducted. Analysis of these interviews identified key challenges experienced by those deployed, including human resources, leadership and accountability, and policies and regulations. Perspectives and strategies for overcoming these challenges were also shared.

The scale, duration, and context of the redeployment of personnel into long-term is unprecedented and has seen little research. This exploratory study shares the experiences of personnel who deployed into long-term care and helps identify lessons learned from overcoming challenges in the disaster context. These findings will be able to inform future disaster research and how to better prepare responders in the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic hit Kentucky in March of 2020. While around the world the pandemic had already reared its head and strained international hospital systems at their core, Kentucky hospitals remained wholly underprepared. University of Kentucky Hospital is a relatively resource rich hospital. However, utilization of these resources was severely misplaced and inefficiently distributed. This led to unnecessarily large upfront costs in an attempt to prepare for large volumes of patients that never actually came, as well as risk stratifying patients in a costly and unproductive way.

We reviewed the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic from the University of Kentucky as well as specifically within the emergency department. This included all system-wide preparations as well as emergency medicine-specific COVID-19 protocols regarding risk stratification of patients, testing, and delivering results.

Initially the number of patients that would need to be hospitalized with COVID-19 as well as how to risk stratify or treat them was completely unknown. This led to multiple large issues within University of Kentucky's response to the pandemic. A 400-bed field hospital was constructed out of University of Kentucky’s football field and subsequently deconstructed two months later before ever being used, costing the hospital $6.7 million dollars. Lack of tests and knowledge about the disease in combination with over ordering labs and CT scans in an attempt to risk stratify. There was no reliable way to obtain COVID-19 testing or deliver the results and this led to increased non-sick patients presenting to the ED just for information.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted many shortcomings of our hospital system and its preparedness for a pandemic or mass disaster. The silver lining of these failures was the implementation of system wide improvements in throughput and preparation within our emergency department.

It is widely recognized that there is an increasing demand for healthcare in emergency departments (ED) around the world as well as a global shortage of healthcare workers (HCWs). This has led to ED overcrowding, which increases risks of avoidable complications and suboptimal care provision. Since ED overcrowding impacts patients, staff and quality of care, new strategies are needed for optimizing patient throughput and reducing waiting times. One such strategy is to reconsider the specific roles and professional duties of different cadres of HCWs. Empowering nurses to take on some of the tasks historically performed by physicians is a promising solution for improving ED healthcare provision. However, nurses’ professional responsibilities and competencies differ significantly from country to country. There are few studies about best practices and how to effectively implement such task-shifting strategies. The aim of this study is to map the evidence published in the scholarly literature on nurses’ advanced roles in ED as a strategy for reducing overcrowding, facilitating ED throughput, and, ultimately, improving quality of care.

A mapping review was performed by searching the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science.

A total of 168 studies were analyzed and the data were grouped according to the countries where advanced tasks were implemented. The type of tasks that were carried out were: autonomous management of patients with minor injuries, triage-based ordering of exams and administration of therapy and management of patient flow.

In some high-income countries having nurses take on advanced roles is well-established, and it contributes to reducing overcrowding in ED. Further evidence is needed to assess the barriers and facilitating factors to implementing this strategy in other contexts.

A resilient health care system is expected to withstand disruptive events and consistently deliver high quality care by continually adapting, learning, and improving. To achieve these expectations, medical command and control teams are responsible for making relevant strategic decisions, reallocating resources, and initiating cooperation. Early during Covid-19, medical command and control teams were faced with an unforeseen increase in number of patients, as well as unknown disease mechanisms and treatment regimes. Timely and adequate decision-making to become a resilient healthcare system and maintain high quality care was necessary. The aim of the present study was to describe the challenges and strategies in a medical command and control team during the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic.

A semi-structured retrospective in-depth interview study with phenomenological approach and inductive design was used. Thirteen experienced decision makers serving in a regional medical command and control team were interviewed using the Critical Decision Method. The interviews were analyzed using manifest conventional content analyses.

The respondents described twelve separate episodes during the Covid-19 management. The analysis resulted in five themes: organization, adaptation, common operational picture, assumptions, and analysis. Organization described how organizational challenges affected the decision-making process. Adaptation described the strategies to overcome the obstructive organizational factors. Common operational picture described how challenges in lack of available information affected decision-making and strategies used in creating situational awareness. Assumptions offered descriptions of strategies used to make decisions. Analysis emphasized descriptions and strategies affecting the decision-making process.

This study enables a better understanding of how medical command and control teams can be organized and structured, while also highlighting challenges in maintaining high-quality care during unexpected events. The findings obtained in the present study provide further knowledge about disaster resilience and can be utilized in educational and training settings for medical command and control.

Across the United States (US), there are approximately 2,000 burn beds in 133 burn centers, only 72 of which are verified by the American Burn Association (ABA). As such, many areas in the US are hundreds of miles from the closest burn center. Eight states do not have a burn center, and another 11 do not have an ABA-verified center. Further, the average center has 15 beds, and, on average, there are 90 available beds across the US. Therefore, in addition to patient care complexities, the broader infrastructure for burn patients is severely limited. These constraints suggest the burn healthcare system is particularly vulnerable to disasters, where the needs will exceed the resources available.

A literature review was conducted of available burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) plans from stakeholders in each level of a response. These response partners included prehospital agencies, hospitals (those with and without trauma center designations), emergency management agencies (local, state, and federal), healthcare coalitions, public health (district, state, and federal), regional coordinating burn centers, and the ABA.

The amalgamation of the BMCI plans yields a tripartite infrastructure not unfamiliar to emergency management professionals. The burn care agencies integrate into a response, similar to the way in which public health integrates into the emergency management infrastructure. The local to state to federal escalation of assets is reflected by an escalation from the local burn center to the regional coordinating burn center to the ABA. However, gaps remain in the communication between response partners. Few plans, particularly at the local level, reflect the integration of the burn system response.

The burn healthcare infrastructure in the US is constrained and therefore is particularly vulnerable to a BMCI. Emergency responders should preemptively examine their plans and systems to specifically integrate the burn care and response infrastructure.