Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:36:10.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and Implementation of Prioritized Care in a Tertiary Hospital Intensive Care Unit During the Sars-Cov-2 Pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Filippo Boroli
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland Center for Humanitarian Medicine and Disaster Management - WHO Collaborating Center, Geneva, Switzerland
Didier Tassaux
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Annie-Claude Paubel
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Helene Lenoir
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Jerome Pugin
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Olivier Hagon
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland Center for Humanitarian Medicine and Disaster Management - WHO collaborating center, Geneva, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

In the event of a major event or disaster, the intensive care unit (ICU) should be able to offer an adapted and proportional response, within a limited time frame, to the influx of patients who can benefit from the technical facilities of the University Hospitals of Geneva. We developed an innovative approach to ICU care aimed to guarantee continuity by protecting healthcare staff from excessive fatigue and by tailoring the care provided from individualized care to the best care for the most people.

Method:

A modified organizational and systematic investigation method (MINOS, Paries - 2013) was used to elaborate an ICU security model; threats to activity shut down were identified and their prevention, recovery, and mitigation were planned. These actions were updated following the evolution of the crisis. Crew resources management (CRM) and bedside simulations were used in the implementation phase.

Results:

The ICU security model pillars were staff protection and patient management; the identified threats to activity continuity were lack of human resources, activity overload, medical errors, pressure sores and healthcare acquired infections; they were evaluated at intermediate or high risk to patients’ safety. The prioritized care plan was developed to control, recover, and mitigate these threats. It consisted in: adaptable level of ICU care, modular organization by cell, huddles, matrix for activities prioritization and controlled delegation method. Before implementation, 55 nurses and 46 doctors were trained by CRM courses and simulations. The pilot phase was deployed in one cell, from December 2021 to January 2022; 67 patients were admitted in the period; 13 adaptations to the original plan were introduced. No critical safety issues were reported.

Conclusion:

The prioritized care could be an adapted and proportional ICU response to a major event allowing the continuity of the activity while protecting staff from overload. Further tests are needed.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine